GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 20 Mar 2019, 00:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the si

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 13 Jun 2009
Posts: 82
Location: Tu
Schools: Chicago b.
There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the si  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2009, 03:02
1
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

86% (00:45) correct 14% (01:00) wrong based on 13 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Hi everyone.
here is the question that brings doubt into my soul, can you help?
Attachment:

22.09.png [ 30.49 KiB | Viewed 2395 times ]

while the test I eliminated all answers with the plural pronoun (a,b and e), because the MONKFISH as a sort of fish should demand ITS depletion. So why the of.ans. is A? using THEIR. There is no hint on the fishes who are in the monkfish family.

OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: https://gmatclub.com/forum/there-are-no ... 37187.html
_________________

The greatest pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do...

Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 374
Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the si  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2009, 04:09
1
Can't the monkfish be used as a plural in this context? There aren't plural forms for many types of fish such as tuna and I think it's the same for monkfish. The collective noun would be 'school' for fish and that would be singular but I think in the above context monkfish is plural.

So if you eliminated singular pronouns you're left with A, B and E.
A Correct
B Ambiguous use of pronouns.
E doesn't really make sense what is "depleting"
Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 141
Re: There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the si  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2009, 11:39
1
FIRST OF ALL: FISH IS BOTH SINGULAR AND PLURAL SO THE USAGE OF "ITS"/"THEIR" BOTH ARE CORRECT
LETS LOOK AT THE OPTIONS NOW:

B) "UNLIKE THOSE OF COD AND HADDOCK" IS CORRECT BUT "UNLIKE COD AND HADDOCK" IS NOT
"CONTRIBUTES TO" EXPECTS A NOUN OR PRONOUN BUT NEVER A PARTICIPLE CLAUSE "DEPLETING"
"THEY ARE BEING OVERFISHED" IS A ERRORNEOUS FORMATION IN THIS CONTEXT

C) THERE ARE "LEGAL LIMITS" FOR C BUT NOT ("LEGAL LIMITS") FOR Y..IS INCORRECT
SHOULD BE: THERE ARE LEGAL LIMITS OFR X BUT NONE FOR Y
"WHICH" HAS NO ACTECENDENT
"ITS" IS CORRECT

D) "UNLIKE THOSE OF COD AND HADDOCK" IS CORRECT FORM AND NOT "UNLIKE COD AND HADDOCK"
"WHICH" HAS NO ACTECEDENT
"ITS" IS CORRECT
"BEING OVERFISHED" SHOULD BE "OVERFISHING" A NOUN FORM

E) "SIZE LIMITS ON CATCHING" IS INCORRECT FORMAT...."CATHCING" SHOULD HAVE BEEN
"THE NUMBER OF FISH THAT CAN BE CAUGHT"
"CONTRIBUTING" IS A PARTICIPLE CLAUSE WITHOUT ANY SUBJECT.THE BELOW IS CORRECT
THERE ARE SIZE LIMITS FIXED ON THE NO OF MONKFISH THAT CAN BE CAUGHT,CONTRIBUTING TO...
Manager
Joined: 13 Jun 2009
Posts: 82
Location: Tu
Schools: Chicago b.
Re: There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the si  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2009, 23:26
Hi everyone.
Now I agree with Yangsta8

here what I've found in the collins dict.

monkfish
noun, plural -fish or -fishes
1) Also called: goosefish any of various anglers of the genus Lophius
2) another name for the: angel shark

tuna I
noun, plural -na or -nas
1) Also called: tunny any of various large marine spiny-finned fishes of the genus Thunnus, esp T. thynnus, chiefly of warm waters: family Scombridae. They have a spindle-shaped body and widely forked tail, and are important food fishes 2) any of various similar and related fishes

Thanx sasen, very useful expl.
_________________

The greatest pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do...

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 53716
Re: There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the si  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2019, 07:30
Ayrish wrote:
Hi everyone.
here is the question that brings doubt into my soul, can you help?
Attachment:
22.09.png

while the test I eliminated all answers with the plural pronoun (a,b and e), because the MONKFISH as a sort of fish should demand ITS depletion. So why the of.ans. is A? using THEIR. There is no hint on the fishes who are in the monkfish family.

OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: https://gmatclub.com/forum/there-are-no ... 37187.html

OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: https://gmatclub.com/forum/there-are-no ... 37187.html
_________________
Re: There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the si   [#permalink] 15 Jan 2019, 07:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by