Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 01:51 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 01:51

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1010
Own Kudos [?]: 6341 [33]
Given Kudos: 178
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1010
Own Kudos [?]: 6341 [12]
Given Kudos: 178
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
Send PM
General Discussion
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [4]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2013
Posts: 246
Own Kudos [?]: 945 [0]
Given Kudos: 410
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V39
WE:General Management (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Proponents of the school of thought positing that the Americas were [#permalink]
daagh wrote:
This question hinges on one major point and one fine point.

1. Major point --- Whether we use ‘have to’ or ‘have had’ to as the verb for those who oppose the thesis?
2. fine point ---Which is the appropriate transitional conjunction we have to use, yet or whereas?]

First thing is that ‘have to’ is inappropriate unless it is a daily chore or a universal point.

For a debate that started sometime ago and that which still continues, ‘have had to’ is the apt verb; so, B C and E can be dumped instantly.

Between A and D, I would reckon there is no forthright contrast implied in the passage by the author. He seems to express that while this is A’s point, this is B’s point. This is more indicative. So, A using ‘yet’ is a shade more preferable to choice D using ‘whereas’. But this is my personal proposition; I am keen to know the official version;
Magoosh’s questions in the forum seem to be getting finer and finer



Appreciate your analysis but I think the use of THAT after those is incorrect in D ;So A is anytime better.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Apr 2015
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 21
Concentration: General Management
Send PM
Re: Proponents of the school of thought positing that the Americas were [#permalink]
Harley1980 wrote:
Proponents of the school of thought positing that the Americas were peopled more than 15,000 years ago by a group forced to traverse thousands of miles of ice fields have themselves had to overcome obstacles in trying to account for such an improbable journey, yet those who argue that such a trek was indeed impossible and thus the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have had to account for the presence of artifacts in southern Chile that indicate that the New World was inhabited over 15,000 years ago.

A) in trying to account for such an improbable journey, yet those who argue that such a trek was indeed impossible and thus the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have had to
B) by trying to account for such an improbable journey, yet those who argue such a trek was indeed impossible and thus the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have to
C) in trying to account for such an improbable journey, whereas those arguing that such a trek was indeed impossible and that the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have themselves to
D) in trying to account for such an improbable journey, whereas those that argue that such a trek was indeed impossible and the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have had to
E) by trying to account for such an improbable journey, yet those arguing that such a trek was indeed impossible and thus that the first peopling of the Americas happened much later, they have to


Can someone please explain why is C wrong?

1) Eliminated B and E as it should be "in trying to account"

2) Eliminated D as there should be parallelism in argue THAT..... and THAT the first peopling

3) Between A and C why is A better?

Appreciate an explanation. Thanks!
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1030
Own Kudos [?]: 1779 [1]
Given Kudos: 2562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Send PM
Re: Proponents of the school of thought positing that the Americas were [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
this question is indeed interesting. The first time I read the original question, it took me around 45 second to comprehend and map out the position of main subjects and main verbs.

Next, I notice the tense "have had", so only A and D are left; other option choices do not parallel with the tense.
D changes the meaning b/c of "whereas" vs "yet", and "and" vs "and thus"
"and" vs "and thus" -> the original sentence has causal relaitonship
"whereas" indicates a contrast while "yet" just introduces another clause.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 450
Own Kudos [?]: 393 [1]
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Proponents of the school of thought positing that the Americas were [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Proponents ..Have had to.. should be parallel to Opponents have had to...

A and D are left.
2nd split.
Those who is right Not Those that..
So A is left out.
I think Answer is A.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 31 Mar 2022
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 37
Send PM
Re: Proponents of the school of thought positing that the Americas were [#permalink]
palelemon wrote:
Harley1980 wrote:
Proponents of the school of thought positing that the Americas were peopled more than 15,000 years ago by a group forced to traverse thousands of miles of ice fields have themselves had to overcome obstacles in trying to account for such an improbable journey, yet those who argue that such a trek was indeed impossible and thus the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have had to account for the presence of artifacts in southern Chile that indicate that the New World was inhabited over 15,000 years ago.

A) in trying to account for such an improbable journey, yet those who argue that such a trek was indeed impossible and thus the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have had to
B) by trying to account for such an improbable journey, yet those who argue such a trek was indeed impossible and thus the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have to
C) in trying to account for such an improbable journey, whereas those arguing that such a trek was indeed impossible and that the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have themselves to
D) in trying to account for such an improbable journey, whereas those that argue that such a trek was indeed impossible and the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have had to
E) by trying to account for such an improbable journey, yet those arguing that such a trek was indeed impossible and thus that the first peopling of the Americas happened much later, they have to


Can someone please explain why is C wrong?

1) Eliminated B and E as it should be "in trying to account"

2) Eliminated D as there should be parallelism in argue THAT..... and THAT the first peopling

3) Between A and C why is A better?

Appreciate an explanation. Thanks!


I'm happy to help.

In my understanding, C is incorrect because it joins the two cause and effect phrases with the "and" conjunction:
such a trek was indeed impossible and that the first peopling of the Americas happened much later

The correct formation will be the one that joins these two phrases with a "thus", instead.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Nov 2022
Posts: 42
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 553
Location: Italy
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 720 Q47 V42 (Online)
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: Proponents of the school of thought positing that the Americas were [#permalink]
Hello.

Shouldn't choice A) have an additional "THAT" after "thus"?

A) yet those who argue that such a trek was indeed impossible and thus THAT the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have had to account for

I mistakenly discarded A for this sole reason.
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: Proponents of the school of thought positing that the Americas were [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
juri01m wrote:
Hello.

Shouldn't choice A) have an additional "THAT" after "thus"?

A) yet those who argue that such a trek was indeed impossible and thus THAT the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have had to account for

I mistakenly discarded A for this sole reason.


Hello juri01m,

We hope this finds you well.

To clarify, the usage of the second "that" is not incorrect, but it is not needed either; the first "that" is common to both of the following clauses.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Nov 2022
Posts: 42
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 553
Location: Italy
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 720 Q47 V42 (Online)
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: Proponents of the school of thought positing that the Americas were [#permalink]
ExpertsGlobal5 wrote:
juri01m wrote:
Hello.

Shouldn't choice A) have an additional "THAT" after "thus"?

A) yet those who argue that such a trek was indeed impossible and thus THAT the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have had to account for

I mistakenly discarded A for this sole reason.


Hello juri01m,

We hope this finds you well.

To clarify, the usage of the second "that" is not incorrect, but it is not needed either; the first "that" is common to both of the following clauses.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team


Thank you so much! I had this doubt and your explanation really clarified it for me :)
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2014
Posts: 206
Own Kudos [?]: 69 [0]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: United States (MI)
Send PM
Re: Proponents of the school of thought positing that the Americas were [#permalink]
Harley1980 wrote:
Harley1980 wrote:
Proponents of the school of thought positing that the Americas were peopled more than 15,000 years ago by a group forced to traverse thousands of miles of ice fields have themselves had to overcome obstacles in trying to account for such an improbable journey, yet those who argue that such a trek was indeed impossible and thus the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have had to account for the presence of artifacts in southern Chile that indicate that the New World was inhabited over 15,000 years ago.

A) in trying to account for such an improbable journey, yet those who argue that such a trek was indeed impossible and thus the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have had to
B) by trying to account for such an improbable journey, yet those who argue such a trek was indeed impossible and thus the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have to
C) in trying to account for such an improbable journey, whereas those arguing that such a trek was indeed impossible and that the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have themselves to
D) in trying to account for such an improbable journey, whereas those that argue that such a trek was indeed impossible and the first peopling of the Americas happened much later have had to
E) by trying to account for such an improbable journey, yet those arguing that such a trek was indeed impossible and thus that the first peopling of the Americas happened much later, they have to


OE from Magoosh

This question has many words, but eliminating the wrong answers shouldn’t be as difficult as in other questions. First off, we have the 3:2 split of “by trying to account” and “in trying to account”.

“By trying” implies that the proponents started to overcome the obstacles by trying to account for such an improbable journey. But that’s the very obstacle these scholar face: trying to account for this improbable journey. Eliminate (B) and (E).

Next, (C) creates a funky meaning by saying “have themselves to account for”. They are not accounting for themselves in any respect. Rather, they themselves have had “to account for the presence of artifacts.”

(D) uses the “those that”. It should be those who”, since we are talking about people.

Answer is A


D also does not have "thus" (in addition to the flaws you pointed out). "Thus" or "therefore" or similar conjunction is important in this scenario, because it explains - such a trek was indeed impossible which is why (= thus) peopling of the Americas happened late.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Proponents of the school of thought positing that the Americas were [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne