Map the passage so that it becomes easier to answer the questions -
Para 1 - gives context about dark matter; says there are various hypotheses
Para 2 - talks about 1 such hypothesis - Neutralino hypothesis
Para 3 - Interest in the hypothesis-> AMS -> results not conclusive
You have to read the first 2 sentences and last sentence of each paragraph carefully to get a grasp of the main idea.
Clearly, from the map we can see that the passage has something to do with the neutralino hypothesis.
Q1.
A - Higgs boson is mentioned in only one sentence in the 2nd paragraph. Incorrect.
B - note the word "hypotheses". The passage talks only about one hypothesis.
C - No mention of the neutralino hypothesis. Note the word "prove" - no where does the author go to prove anything. The author does not give his opinion on the hypothesis. All he/she does is to detail it. Also, this option seems to suggest that positrons are only created by dark matter annihilation. We know that they are emitted from pulsars too.
Another red flag is that the option does mention electrons at all.
D - correct answer.
E - Nowhere does the author explain the results of the study. He/she just says that scientists are stoic on the issue. Another thing - this option is talked about only in the penultimate sentence of the passage.
Q2.
A - When you see the word "AMS" immediately go the 3rd paragraph and read it. the paragraph says - "positron fraction should peak when there is dark matter annihilation." Nowhere does it say positron fraction should be the highest from dark matter annihilation. Note the extreme word
"highest". The passage does not talk, for example, as to how positron fractions from pulsars compare to those from dark matter annihilation.
B - "Electrons and positrons" - go the 2nd paragraph. DO NOT bring in outside knowledge. The paragraph clearly states "
in such a reaction, electrons and positrons carry approximately the same amount of energy". Incorrect.
C - correct answer. 3rd paragraph - "research indeed indicates ..."
D - "pulsars" - go to the 3rd paragraph. "research continues to better delineate ...". Incorrect
E - Only the author says "most promising theory". We DO NOT know the view point of others. Again, "the plausibility of this theory has galvanized ..." does not mean that it is the MOST plausible theory.
Q3.
We need something that talks about neutralinos. Only option D does that.