Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 08:30 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 08:30
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
NickHalden
Joined: 15 Feb 2012
Last visit: 19 Jun 2016
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
450
 [29]
Given Kudos: 216
Status:Perspiring
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GPA: 3.6
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Kudos
Add Kudos
28
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,262
Own Kudos:
42,465
 [6]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,262
Kudos: 42,465
 [6]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
bdawg2057
Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Last visit: 02 Jun 2016
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
43
 [2]
Given Kudos: 41
Posts: 7
Kudos: 43
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
NickHalden
Joined: 15 Feb 2012
Last visit: 19 Jun 2016
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
450
 [1]
Given Kudos: 216
Status:Perspiring
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GPA: 3.6
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How do you justify the use of 'people who are seeking employment who' ???
avatar
amitgupta7587
Joined: 20 Aug 2014
Last visit: 26 Apr 2018
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 14
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can anybody justify the use of " WHO ARE " in the answer choice B... and among people who are seeking employment who
avatar
mayursurya
Joined: 16 Aug 2014
Last visit: 16 Mar 2025
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
52
 [3]
Given Kudos: 209
Posts: 34
Kudos: 52
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official explanation Kaplan

Read the Original Sentence Carefully, Looking for Errors:

On initial reading, this sentence appears to contain a series of results of the variables: "will influence the tempo ..., reduce inequalities ...." However, the series is not completed. In fact, the intent of the sentence is that influencing the tempo of economic growth will have the further effect of reducing inequalities among two groups of people. "Reduce" should be replaced with "reducing" to make the part of the sentence after the comma into a modifying phrase.

This sentence also tests knowledge of the use of who verus that. In general, use who (as well as whom) to refer to people and use that (and which) to refer to things.

Scan and Group the Answer Choices:

Each answer choice provides an alternative form of reduce. There is, however, a 3-2 split at the end of the choices between "that" in (C) and (E) and "who" in (A), (B), and (D). In this sentence, the antecedent is “people” (not “employment”), clearly requiring the use of “who.”

Eliminate Wrong Answer Choices:

(A) uses the incorrect "reduce," implying a series of actions beginning with "influence."

(C) and (E) are wrong because they use "that." (E) may also be eliminated because it begins with the awkward phrase "for the reduction of." (C) may also be eliminated because the use of "to reduce" after the comma suggests that a list is in progress: "to control . . ., to reduce . . . ." However, there is no third "to" item to complete the list. The use of the infinitive also subtly changes the meaning of the sentence, implying that the reason for the control of the variables is the reduction of inequalities.

(D) includes the awkward and unnecessary "for" before "reducing." There's no need to use both a conjunction and a participle verb.

(B) correctly uses "reducing" and "who" and does not introduce any other errors. Note that the repetition at the end of the underlined portion of "who" is a little grating stylistically, but it is not wrong. Since all other choices have errors, (B) is the winner.

TAKEAWAY: Longer sentences can have multiple errors. Choose any one error to start eliminating choices instead of reading for all possible errors at once.
User avatar
bobo16
Joined: 12 Jul 2018
Last visit: 15 Jul 2020
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Location: Israel
GMAT 1: 710 Q45 V41
GMAT 1: 710 Q45 V41
Posts: 22
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mayursurya
Official explanation Kaplan

Read the Original Sentence Carefully, Looking for Errors:

On initial reading, this sentence appears to contain a series of results of the variables: "will influence the tempo ..., reduce inequalities ...." However, the series is not completed. In fact, the intent of the sentence is that influencing the tempo of economic growth will have the further effect of reducing inequalities among two groups of people. "Reduce" should be replaced with "reducing" to make the part of the sentence after the comma into a modifying phrase.

This sentence also tests knowledge of the use of who verus that. In general, use who (as well as whom) to refer to people and use that (and which) to refer to things.

Scan and Group the Answer Choices:

Each answer choice provides an alternative form of reduce. There is, however, a 3-2 split at the end of the choices between "that" in (C) and (E) and "who" in (A), (B), and (D). In this sentence, the antecedent is “people” (not “employment”), clearly requiring the use of “who.”



Eliminate Wrong Answer Choices:

(A) uses the incorrect "reduce," implying a series of actions beginning with "influence."

(C) and (E) are wrong because they use "that." (E) may also be eliminated because it begins with the awkward phrase "for the reduction of." (C) may also be eliminated because the use of "to reduce" after the comma suggests that a list is in progress: "to control . . ., to reduce . . . ." However, there is no third "to" item to complete the list. The use of the infinitive also subtly changes the meaning of the sentence, implying that the reason for the control of the variables is the reduction of inequalities.

(D) includes the awkward and unnecessary "for" before "reducing." There's no need to use both a conjunction and a participle verb.

(B) correctly uses "reducing" and "who" and does not introduce any other errors. Note that the repetition at the end of the underlined portion of "who" is a little grating stylistically, but it is not wrong. Since all other choices have errors, (B) is the winner.

TAKEAWAY: Longer sentences can have multiple errors. Choose any one error to start eliminating choices instead of reading for all possible errors at once.

Sorry but I don't understand: In b reducing (present participle after comma) should refer to the subject of the preceding clause "variables" but the ownership is reducing and not the variables. Please explain!.

Thank you
avatar
Mpuneet
Joined: 16 Sep 2018
Last visit: 06 Aug 2019
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
Posts: 62
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D can be eliminated right away because ‘for reducing’ is awkward. C and E are wrong because they use ‘that’. The use of ‘reduce’ in A is also incorrect. This means that B is the right choice.
avatar
Wishmeluckz
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 30 Jun 2021
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bobo16
mayursurya
Official explanation Kaplan

Read the Original Sentence Carefully, Looking for Errors:

On initial reading, this sentence appears to contain a series of results of the variables: "will influence the tempo ..., reduce inequalities ...." However, the series is not completed. In fact, the intent of the sentence is that influencing the tempo of economic growth will have the further effect of reducing inequalities among two groups of people. "Reduce" should be replaced with "reducing" to make the part of the sentence after the comma into a modifying phrase.

This sentence also tests knowledge of the use of who verus that. In general, use who (as well as whom) to refer to people and use that (and which) to refer to things.

Scan and Group the Answer Choices:

Each answer choice provides an alternative form of reduce. There is, however, a 3-2 split at the end of the choices between "that" in (C) and (E) and "who" in (A), (B), and (D). In this sentence, the antecedent is “people” (not “employment”), clearly requiring the use of “who.”



Eliminate Wrong Answer Choices:

(A) uses the incorrect "reduce," implying a series of actions beginning with "influence."

(C) and (E) are wrong because they use "that." (E) may also be eliminated because it begins with the awkward phrase "for the reduction of." (C) may also be eliminated because the use of "to reduce" after the comma suggests that a list is in progress: "to control . . ., to reduce . . . ." However, there is no third "to" item to complete the list. The use of the infinitive also subtly changes the meaning of the sentence, implying that the reason for the control of the variables is the reduction of inequalities.

(D) includes the awkward and unnecessary "for" before "reducing." There's no need to use both a conjunction and a participle verb.

(B) correctly uses "reducing" and "who" and does not introduce any other errors. Note that the repetition at the end of the underlined portion of "who" is a little grating stylistically, but it is not wrong. Since all other choices have errors, (B) is the winner.

TAKEAWAY: Longer sentences can have multiple errors. Choose any one error to start eliminating choices instead of reading for all possible errors at once.

Sorry but I don't understand: In b reducing (present participle after comma) should refer to the subject of the preceding clause "variables" but the ownership is reducing and not the variables. Please explain!.

Thank you



A dependent clause preceded by a comma and starting with a VERB+ing, in this case "reducing", can be used to show the result of an independent clause. Another example "I ate a large meal, making my stomach blow up"
User avatar
sayan640
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,119
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 789
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Products:
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Posts: 1,119
Kudos: 861
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma GMATNinja
Should we avoid practising this question since all the options are flawed ?

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
pradeepgontla
Joined: 11 Sep 2018
Last visit: 06 May 2021
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
Posts: 28
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
What does the modifier, ‘who might otherwise wind up in need of state assistance’ modify? Is it modifying those who are seeking employment or those less able to compete in the marketplace or both of the categories? If it modifying the job-seekers as a whole, it is a fallacy to assume that just because somebody seeks a job, he might wind up seeking state assistance on the contrary if it is modifying the less able people, why is it not placed next to them?
Or if it is modifying both the categories, the proximity rule that a pronoun modifies a noun that is in front of it or close to it is fouled. The only salvation is either to shift the less able people to the second part before the relative clause the clause or to shift the relative clause next to the 'less able people'.
All the choices carry through this error. This is a stylistically flawed question basically. If this point is clarified, it will be useful to analyze each of the choices, and conclude why all of them are either syntactically or semantically erroneous.

Your are absolutely right, this question is a flaw.
avatar
user8275
Joined: 07 Jul 2020
Last visit: 27 Aug 2021
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
no doubt that B is the only possible answer
but "WHO are seeking employment WHO" ????
really?
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,423
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,423
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts