In Egypt in the late Paleolithic period, the climate changed, pastures

Question

In Egypt in the late Paleolithic period, the climate changed, pastures became deserts, and the  inhabitants were forced to withdraw to the land bordering the Nile from their hunting grounds.

(A) inhabitants were forced to withdraw to the land bordering the Nile from their hunting grounds
(B) inhabitants had been forced to withdraw from their hunting grounds to the land that bordered the Nile
(C) inhabitants were forced to withdraw from their hunting grounds to the land bordering the Nile
(D) inhabitants having been forced to, withdrew from their hunting grounds to the land that bordered the Nile
(E) inhabitants withdrew, because they were forced to, from their hunting grounds to the land bordering the Nile

msk0657 · Answer

Meaning  : In Egypt, climate changed and pastures became desserts, and thus the inhabitants were forced to withdraw from X to Y.

Mistake analysis:  Correct idiom is  Some result/change from X to Y  and in the sentence it is from to X and from.

Due to the climate change the inhabitants were from forced to leave the hunting grounds to Nile.

Only Option C fits the bill.

B) After climate and then something happened, but not something had happened and climate change --> Incorrect. When we use had + participle there must be some sequence related to it.
D) Having been forced incorrect as per the sequence flow.
E) Because of withdraw the inhibitants are forced but it is climate that made them to leave.

Divyadisha · Answer

(C) inhabitants were forced to withdraw from   their hunting grounds   to   the land bordering    the Nile

Only option 'C' mentions the idiom- form X to Y- correctly.

Nightfury14 · Answer

In Egypt in the late Paleolithic period, the climate changed, pastures became deserts, and the  inhabitants were forced to withdraw to the land bordering the Nile from their hunting grounds.

(A) inhabitants were forced to withdraw  to  the land bordering the Nile  from  their hunting grounds -  Incorrect Idiom 
(B) inhabitants  had been  forced to withdraw from their hunting grounds to the land that bordered the Nile. -  Incorrect, had been is Past Perfect Continuous (Past continuous action), whereas in statement B) the action ended. 
(C) inhabitants  were  forced to withdraw  from  their hunting grounds  to  the land bordering the Nile.  Correct Idiom usage and Tense (were). 
(D) inhabitants  having been  forced to, withdrew from their hunting grounds to the land that bordered the Nile. Incorrect -Having been would mean the action is still going.
(E) inhabitants withdrew,  because they were forced to , from their hunting grounds to the land bordering the Nile.  Awkward Wording

AbhishekDhanraJ72 · Answer

in C "and the inhabitants were forced" because of "were" in C, i thoght this is not parallel with "climate changed, pastures became deserts" and i crossed out C and went for E. what's wrong with m reasoning???

CrackverbalGMAT · Answer

In Egypt in the late Paleolithic period, the climate changed, pastures became deserts, and the  inhabitants were forced to withdraw to the land bordering the Nile from their hunting grounds .

(A) inhabitants were forced to withdraw to the land bordering the Nile from their hunting grounds  The correct idiomatic usage would be "withdraw from .... to .....". As such, we can hold on to this option for the time being till we examine all the other options, since this is not a very serious error.

(B) inhabitants had been forced to withdraw from their hunting grounds to the land that bordered the Nile  "inhabitants  had been ", past perfect tense, breaks parallelism with "climate changed" and "pastures became deserts", both in the simple past. Eliminate.

(C) inhabitants were forced to withdraw from their hunting grounds to the land bordering the Nile  Correct answer. We can eliminate option (A) based on this option having the correct idiomatic usage and no new errors being introduced.

(D) inhabitants having been forced to, withdrew from their hunting grounds to the land that bordered the Nile  "having been" is quite unnecessary and breaks parallelism with "climate changed" and "pastures became deserts" which are in the simple past. Eliminate.

(E) inhabitants withdrew, because they were forced to, from their hunting grounds to the land bordering the Nile  While there is no obvious grammatical error in this option, it is more wordy than option (C), which too does not have any errors. Hence, based on conciseness, we can eliminate this option.

Hope this helps.

GMATNinja · Answer

In choice (C), we have a parallel list of clauses. The verbs in the first two clauses are active, and the verb in the third clause is passive. But there's no rule saying that active and passive verbs -- or clauses with active and passive verbs -- can't be parallel. For example:

"The workers are overwhelmed by the job and complain constantly."

The first verb ("are overwhelmed") is passive and the second verb ("complain") is active. This is not a problem.

Similarly, the mix of active and passive verbs does not affect the parallelism in (C). Another example of this can be found  here .

I hope that helps!

thangvietnam · Answer

why choice A is wrong? is this from gmatprep?

GMATNinja · Answer

Take another look at (A):

The placement of the modifier "from their hunting grounds" is problematic. At first glance, it seems to be describing "The Nile," as though there might be one Nile from their hunting grounds and some other Nile from a different location. If you read it again, sure, you can figure out that "from their hunting grounds" is actually giving information about the verb "withdraw," but the construction is confusing, at best. That said, I might hang on to it until I've had a chance to examine the other options.

Now take a look at (C):

In this case, it's crystal clear that "from their hunting grounds" is actually modifying the verb "withdraw." Because the meaning in (C) is clearer and more logical, it's a better option than (A).

I hope that helps!

ChiranjeevSingh · Answer

Here's the   official explanation   provided by the GMAC for this question:

The sentence mentions a group of people who left one area and moved to another. The original version says that they  were forced to withdraw to  one area from the other. In the absence of any overriding reason to mention the destination first, it is more standard and direct to mention the people’s earlier location before their later location: they went from point A to point B. In this sentence there is no plausible reason to mention the environmental changes except to indicate that they caused the relocation, so the verb forms and sentence structure should make this causal connection clear.

Option A:  Saying that the people were forced to  withdraw to  one location  from  another location is less clear, direct, and idiomatically standard than mentioning the  from  location before the  to  location.

Option B:  The verb form  had been forced  seems to indicate that when the environmental changes took place, the people had already relocated and that the cause of their relocation was some unspecified earlier event. That makes the author’s purpose in mentioning the environmental changes unclear and their relationship to the relocation puzzling.

Option C:  Correct. This wording is clear, concise, and direct, and the verb forms clearly express a coherent causal sequence of events.

Option D:  This is awkward and indirect. The verb form  having been forced  and the comma before  withdrew  suggest that the people had already been forced before the environmental changes took place. They also make it unclear whether the people were forced by the environmental changes or by some unmentioned factor. With no comma after  inhabitants  to bracket the phrase  having been forced to , there is no grammatical subject for  withdrew.

Option E:  This is awkward, verbose, and indirect. Setting off the phrase  because they were forced to  parenthetically between commas makes it unclear whether the people were forced to withdraw by the environmental changes by or some unmentioned factor.

The correct answer is C.

Please note that I'm not the author of this explanation. I'm just posting it here since I believe it can help the community.

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

In Egypt in the late Paleolithic period, the climate changed, pastures

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

In Egypt in the late Paleolithic period, the climate changed, pastures

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards