A view fast gaining popularity is that international coaches emphasizing on technique and relying on a strict training regimen are overdoing their job. After all, at the highest level, the professional sportsmen lack neither the skill nor the expertise to perform; therefore,
the role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator. A crucial aspect such proponents miss is that no sportsperson, however skilled, is flawless in technique and letting such lacuna aggravate is bound to have serious repercussions; furthermore, given the highly dynamic and competitive nature of the modern day sport,
lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson today. Clearly, those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink.
Let's decipher this argument and try to find the role of each entity:A view fast gaining popularity is that international coaches emphasizing on technique and relying on a strict training regimen are overdoing their job.Premise - gives general information about coaching and training using strict techniques is not good.
After all, at the highest level, the professional sportsmen lack neither the skill nor the expertise to perform;Premise supports the intermediate conclusion - states that in general professional sportsmen doesn't have the skill and the expertise to perform well.
therefore, the role of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator.Intermediate conclusion in role counter premise - 'therefore' - above premis gives us a reason why the role of of a coach must be more of a people manager and a facilitator.
A crucial aspect such proponents miss is that no sportsperson, however skilled, is flawless in technique and letting such lacuna aggravate is bound to have serious repercussions;Premise - descriptive information that supports the conclusion.
furthermore, given the highly dynamic and competitive nature of the modern day sportPremise - supporting information for main conclusion
lack of technical advancements may outmode tomorrow, a competitive sportsperson todayPremise supporting for main conclusion
Clearly, those arguing for softer coaching at the highest level must rethink.Main conclusion of the argument that author is advocating.
In the argument above, the portions in boldface play which of the following roles?A. The first is the main conclusion of the passage; the second opposes that conclusion.B. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.C. The first is a conclusion that the argument seeks to oppose; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
D. The first is a consideration that has been used to oppose the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.
E. The first has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a consideration presented to support the main conclusion of the argument.B is the answer.