Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 00:40 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 00:40
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
venkateshraviraj
Joined: 27 Mar 2019
Last visit: 18 Oct 2020
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
21
 [11]
Given Kudos: 35
Posts: 13
Kudos: 21
 [11]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Same Good Kid
Joined: 27 Feb 2017
Last visit: 11 Jan 2020
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V38
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V38
Posts: 39
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
venkateshraviraj
Joined: 27 Mar 2019
Last visit: 18 Oct 2020
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
21
 [1]
Given Kudos: 35
Posts: 13
Kudos: 21
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
blowice27
Joined: 16 Apr 2019
Last visit: 29 Jun 2021
Posts: 200
Own Kudos:
347
 [1]
Given Kudos: 48
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Sustainability
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'm not convinced with A. Argument says the well funded special groups already are able to influence to the voters. How does it matter that their opponents have funding or not. Even if they did interest groups could still influence

D on the other hand states that media is biased in favor of special interests group. Even though it is a general statements, it still applies.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
ngochuyen1904
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 05 Aug 2019
Last visit: 16 Jun 2024
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
Posts: 14
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
blowice27
I'm not convinced with A. Argument says the well funded special groups already are able to influence to the voters. How does it matter that their opponents have funding or not. Even if they did interest groups could still influence

D on the other hand states that media is biased in favor of special interests group. Even though it is a general statements, it still applies.

Posted from my mobile device

I chose D at first but then I think whether media is influenced by well-funded special interest groups unintentionally or intentionally

The conclusion stated that well-funded special interest groups actively influence these large open referenda
while in (D) does not mean well-funded special interest groups intentionally influence media

So with this subtle difference, (D) is out

The correct answer is (A) because it indicated that the opposed groups are not able to the same with well-funded special interest groups in order to influence media.
What happen when both groups could influence media, the conclusion would be weaken, so (A) eliminate one possibility that can weaken conclusion
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,419
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,419
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts