Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
30 Jun 2025, 11:05
Kudos
Bookmarks
Trade Stagnated. Few reliable methods for transport goods.
Top spur economic growth - Build freeway system that that passes no more than five miles away from each city.
Conclusion -> Freeway (no more than five miles away) A-> Improve Trade - B> Spur economic growth C
Question type Weaken
A. Freeway (as much as ten miles from each city) X -> sufficient to Greatly increase trade B (weaken) lets keep it
B. There More important other causes of lack of trade. But it doesn't say whether something else can cause B or C. ELIMINATE
C. Budget doesn't matter. Conclusion still stands. Out of scope. ELIMINATE
D. Growth of commercial traffic associated with Closeness of transportation between cities. (Strengthen) ELIMINATE
E. Reliability of transport can be improved to some extent without freeway. Doesnt clearly indicate that it will be sufficient to improve trade to level which spur economic growth.
A is the answer
Top spur economic growth - Build freeway system that that passes no more than five miles away from each city.
Conclusion -> Freeway (no more than five miles away) A-> Improve Trade - B> Spur economic growth C
Question type Weaken
A. Freeway (as much as ten miles from each city) X -> sufficient to Greatly increase trade B (weaken) lets keep it
B. There More important other causes of lack of trade. But it doesn't say whether something else can cause B or C. ELIMINATE
C. Budget doesn't matter. Conclusion still stands. Out of scope. ELIMINATE
D. Growth of commercial traffic associated with Closeness of transportation between cities. (Strengthen) ELIMINATE
E. Reliability of transport can be improved to some extent without freeway. Doesnt clearly indicate that it will be sufficient to improve trade to level which spur economic growth.
A is the answer
Bunuel
30 Jun 2025, 11:37
Kudos
Bookmarks
Civil Engineer: Trade between the northern and southern cities of our state has stagnated greatly. There are few reliable methods of transporting goods between these two groups of cities, so in order to spur economic growth in this state, we must build a freeway system, connecting the two groups of cities, that passes no more than five miles away from each city.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the civil engineer’s reasoning?
A. Building a freeway system that passes as much as ten miles from each city would be sufficient to greatly increase trade between the northern and southern cities of the state.: Correct: Since the civil engineer insist that it should be five miles away, the statement if true weakens the claim of 5 miles
B. There are other, more important causes for the lack of trade between the northern and southern cities of the state in addition to a lack of reliable methods of transporting goods between these two groups of cities. Incorrect: It doesnt weaken the argument since freeway system is must be for economic growth. there could be other causes too.
C. The state’s infrastructure budget is not currently large enough to finance the construction of a freeway system.: Out of Scope
D. Growth in the commercial traffic between two groups of cities is most often associated with the closeness of the transportation system with the cities.: Strenghthen the argument rather than weakening
E. The reliability of existing methods of transporting goods between the northern and southern cities of the state can be improved to some extent without building a freeway system: Out of Scope
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the civil engineer’s reasoning?
A. Building a freeway system that passes as much as ten miles from each city would be sufficient to greatly increase trade between the northern and southern cities of the state.: Correct: Since the civil engineer insist that it should be five miles away, the statement if true weakens the claim of 5 miles
B. There are other, more important causes for the lack of trade between the northern and southern cities of the state in addition to a lack of reliable methods of transporting goods between these two groups of cities. Incorrect: It doesnt weaken the argument since freeway system is must be for economic growth. there could be other causes too.
C. The state’s infrastructure budget is not currently large enough to finance the construction of a freeway system.: Out of Scope
D. Growth in the commercial traffic between two groups of cities is most often associated with the closeness of the transportation system with the cities.: Strenghthen the argument rather than weakening
E. The reliability of existing methods of transporting goods between the northern and southern cities of the state can be improved to some extent without building a freeway system: Out of Scope
30 Jun 2025, 11:43
Kudos
Bookmarks
Ans: A (IMHO)
Civil Engineer: Trade between the northern and southern cities of our state has stagnated greatly. There are few reliable methods of transporting goods between these two groups of cities, so in order to spur economic growth in this state, we must build a freeway system, connecting the two groups of cities, that passes no more than five miles away from each city.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the civil engineer’s reasoning?
A. Building a freeway system that passes as much as ten miles from each city would be sufficient to greatly increase trade between the northern and southern cities of the state.
If 10 miles would be sufficient than "no more than 5 miles" of the reasoning is weakened. (Answer)
B. There are other, more important causes for the lack of trade between the northern and southern cities of the state in addition to a lack of reliable methods of transporting goods between these two groups of cities.
The argument is only concerned with the method of transportation as a reason.
C. The state’s infrastructure budget is not currently large enough to finance the construction of a freeway system.The
The budget is not part of the discussion in this argument.
D. Growth in the commercial traffic between two groups of cities is most often associated with the closeness of the transportation system to the cities.
this doesn't weaken the argument, if anything, it shows some support for the argument of building passes close to 5 miles.
E. The reliability of existing methods of transporting goods between the northern and southern cities of the state can be improved to some extent without building a freeway system
the reliability of the existing method is not the point of the argument, its the creating more mode of tranportation (passes in close proximity of the cities)
Civil Engineer: Trade between the northern and southern cities of our state has stagnated greatly. There are few reliable methods of transporting goods between these two groups of cities, so in order to spur economic growth in this state, we must build a freeway system, connecting the two groups of cities, that passes no more than five miles away from each city.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the civil engineer’s reasoning?
A. Building a freeway system that passes as much as ten miles from each city would be sufficient to greatly increase trade between the northern and southern cities of the state.
If 10 miles would be sufficient than "no more than 5 miles" of the reasoning is weakened. (Answer)
B. There are other, more important causes for the lack of trade between the northern and southern cities of the state in addition to a lack of reliable methods of transporting goods between these two groups of cities.
The argument is only concerned with the method of transportation as a reason.
C. The state’s infrastructure budget is not currently large enough to finance the construction of a freeway system.The
The budget is not part of the discussion in this argument.
D. Growth in the commercial traffic between two groups of cities is most often associated with the closeness of the transportation system to the cities.
this doesn't weaken the argument, if anything, it shows some support for the argument of building passes close to 5 miles.
E. The reliability of existing methods of transporting goods between the northern and southern cities of the state can be improved to some extent without building a freeway system
the reliability of the existing method is not the point of the argument, its the creating more mode of tranportation (passes in close proximity of the cities)
