Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 07:50 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 07:50
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
778,257
 [8]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,257
 [8]
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
778,257
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,257
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
MaxFabianKirchner
Joined: 02 Jun 2025
Last visit: 12 Jul 2025
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 122
Status:26' Applicant
Location: Denmark
Concentration: Finance, International Business
GPA: 4.0
WE:Other (Student)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
cabii
Joined: 30 Jul 2024
Last visit: 21 Sep 2025
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 29
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ans is E

this question i have seen somewhere is GMAT Club but not in exact format looks like paraphrased by Author
User avatar
Dipan0506
Joined: 24 May 2021
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 72
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Products:
Posts: 72
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The first boldface states that increasing the frequency may be inactive, it doesn’t come to a conclusion why it is inactive . The second boldface supports the cause to be ineffective and concludes that why increasing frequency of anti smoking messages may be ineffective .
User avatar
Emkicheru
Joined: 12 Sep 2023
Last visit: 12 Sep 2025
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Location: Kenya
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V48
GRE 1: Q167 V164
GPA: 3.7
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V48
GRE 1: Q167 V164
Posts: 119
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Health official: Increasing the frequency of anti-smoking warnings may be ineffective. Aside from annoying the majority who do not smoke, it may weaken all anti-smoking messaging by leading people to believe that such warnings are needlessly stringent. Moreover, there is nothing to suggest that those who typically disregard anti-smoking messages will pay heed when the messages occur more frequently.

The two sections in boldface play which of the following roles in the public health official’s argument?

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, but it is not the main conclusion of the argument; the second is an unsupported premise that supports the main conclusion of the argument.
(B) The first is a premise that supports the argument’s only explicit conclusion; so is the second.
(C) The first is the only explicit conclusion of the argument; the second is a premise that supports that conclusion.
(D) The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second lends support to that conclusion and is itself a conclusion for which support is provided. ✓
(E) The first is a premise that supports the only conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

. The first statement clearly illustrate the argument and the second statement lends more support and evidence and hence we go for option D
User avatar
Heix
Joined: 21 Feb 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 362
Own Kudos:
153
 [1]
Given Kudos: 63
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Focus 1: 485 Q76 V74 DI77
GPA: 3.4
WE:Accounting (Finance)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 485 Q76 V74 DI77
Posts: 362
Kudos: 153
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option A: The first boldface is a sub-conclusion (not the main point) that las support in the argument, the second boldface is an unsupported claim that helps prove the main conclusion.
Option B: Both boldface sections are premises (supporting evidence) for the argument's only conclusion (which isn't in boldface).
Option C: The first boldface is the argument's only conclusion (main point); the second boldface is evidence supporting this conclusion.
Option D: The first boldface is the main conclusion; the second boldface both supports the main conclusion AND is itself a conclusion that has its own supporting evidence.
Option E: The first boldface is evidence supporting the argument's conclusion; the second boldface is that conclusion.
The correct answer is C because the first boldface ("Increasing the frequency of anti-smoking warnings may be ineffective") is indeed the health official's main conclusion, and the second boldface ("there is nothing to suggest that those who typically disregard anti-smoking messages will pay heed when the messages occur more frequently) is one piece of evidence supporting why increasing warning frequency would be ineffective.
User avatar
RiyaSingh3
Joined: 30 Oct 2024
Last visit: 19 Aug 2025
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Posts: 3
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The first boldface is a statement by the author which he tries to justify in the following sentences. Hence, it’s the main conclusion of the argument. This eliminates option B & E. The option 'A' states that there it is not the main conclusion and so we can discard this option as well. Option 'C' uses extreme wording 'only' which seems incorrect - the first part of the second boldface 'it may weaken all anti- smoking messages' also seems as a secondary which in is justified in the same sentence. Thus ‘option D' is the only option remaining and it covers everything so it must be the correct option.
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 8,422
Own Kudos:
4,981
 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,422
Kudos: 4,981
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BF1 :Increasing the frequency of anti-smoking warnings may be ineffective.
BF2 : it may weaken all anti-smoking messaging by leading people to believe that such warnings are needlessly stringent

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, but it is not the main conclusion of the argument; the second is an unsupported premise that supports the main conclusion of the argument. irrelevant
(B) The first is a premise that supports the argument’s only explicit conclusion; so is the second. not what the argument states
(C) The first is the only explicit conclusion of the argument; the second is a premise that supports that conclusion. correct option as the BF2 is a premise supporting the conclusion of BF1

(D) The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second lends support to that conclusion and is itself a conclusion for which support is provided. [color=#ff5f54]irrelevant

(E) The first is a premise that supports the only conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion. irrelevant[/color]


OPTION C is correct

Bunuel
Health official: Increasing the frequency of anti-smoking warnings may be ineffective. Aside from annoying the majority who do not smoke, it may weaken all anti-smoking messaging by leading people to believe that such warnings are needlessly stringent. Moreover, there is nothing to suggest that those who typically disregard anti-smoking messages will pay heed when the messages occur more frequently.

The two sections in boldface play which of the following roles in the public health official’s argument?

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, but it is not the main conclusion of the argument; the second is an unsupported premise that supports the main conclusion of the argument.
(B) The first is a premise that supports the argument’s only explicit conclusion; so is the second.
(C) The first is the only explicit conclusion of the argument; the second is a premise that supports that conclusion.
(D) The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second lends support to that conclusion and is itself a conclusion for which support is provided.
(E) The first is a premise that supports the only conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

User avatar
Harika2024
Joined: 27 Jul 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Location: India
Posts: 80
Kudos: 65
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
let's check the options

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, but it is not the main conclusion of the argument; the second is an unsupported premise that supports the main conclusion of the argument.

The first boldface is not a conclusion; it's a reason. The second boldface is a premise, but it's not "unsupported" in the sense that the official asserts it as a fact, not something needing further proof within this argument.

(B) The first is a premise that supports the argument’s only explicit conclusion; so is the second.

This aligns with our analysis. Both boldface statements provide reasons (premises) to support the main point that increasing frequency may be ineffective. The phrase "only explicit conclusion" fits because the entire argument builds to that one central claim.

(C) The first is the only explicit conclusion of the argument; the second is a premise that supports that conclusion.

The first boldface is not the main conclusion. The main conclusion is "Increasing the frequency of anti-smoking warnings may be ineffective."

(D) The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second lends support to that conclusion and is itself a conclusion for which support is provided.

The first is not the main conclusion. Neither boldface is a conclusion that is further supported within this argument.

(E) The first is a premise that supports the only conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.

The second boldface is not the main conclusion. It's a supporting reason.

Therefore, B accurately describes the roles of the boldface sections.
User avatar
vnandan2001
Joined: 22 Apr 2025
Last visit: 05 Nov 2025
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 25
Kudos: 20
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) The first is a conclusion... but not the main one -> No, it is the main conclusion.
(B) Both are premises -> The first is not a premise; it's the conclusion.
(C) The first is the only explicit conclusion; the second is a premise -> Fits perfectly.
(D) The second is a conclusion? No, it’s a premise, not a conclusion.
(E) The second is the conclusion? Again, wrong direction.

(C)
Bunuel
Health official: Increasing the frequency of anti-smoking warnings may be ineffective. Aside from annoying the majority who do not smoke, it may weaken all anti-smoking messaging by leading people to believe that such warnings are needlessly stringent. Moreover, there is nothing to suggest that those who typically disregard anti-smoking messages will pay heed when the messages occur more frequently.

The two sections in boldface play which of the following roles in the public health official’s argument?

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, but it is not the main conclusion of the argument; the second is an unsupported premise that supports the main conclusion of the argument.
(B) The first is a premise that supports the argument’s only explicit conclusion; so is the second.
(C) The first is the only explicit conclusion of the argument; the second is a premise that supports that conclusion.
(D) The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second lends support to that conclusion and is itself a conclusion for which support is provided.
(E) The first is a premise that supports the only conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

User avatar
BeachStudy
Joined: 30 Jun 2025
Last visit: 18 Aug 2025
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 61
Kudos: 37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The first: Increasing the frequency of anti-smoking warnings may be ineffective

The Second: it may weaken all anti-smoking messaging by leading people to believe that such warnings are needlessly stringent.

A) The first is the main conclusion
B) The first is not a premise to support a conclusion
C) This could work. First is only conclusion in it. Second supports it. - Likely this one
D) First is main conclusion. Second does lend support, and it does add more support to itself.
E) Not correct.

I believe the answer is D.

Bunuel
Health official: Increasing the frequency of anti-smoking warnings may be ineffective. Aside from annoying the majority who do not smoke, it may weaken all anti-smoking messaging by leading people to believe that such warnings are needlessly stringent. Moreover, there is nothing to suggest that those who typically disregard anti-smoking messages will pay heed when the messages occur more frequently.

The two sections in boldface play which of the following roles in the public health official’s argument?

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, but it is not the main conclusion of the argument; the second is an unsupported premise that supports the main conclusion of the argument.
(B) The first is a premise that supports the argument’s only explicit conclusion; so is the second.
(C) The first is the only explicit conclusion of the argument; the second is a premise that supports that conclusion.
(D) The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second lends support to that conclusion and is itself a conclusion for which support is provided.
(E) The first is a premise that supports the only conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

User avatar
FruAdey
Joined: 10 Jul 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
16
 [1]
Given Kudos: 30
Posts: 25
Kudos: 16
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Increasing the frequency of anti-smoking warnings may be ineffective. --- clearly a conclusion

it may weaken all anti-smoking messaging by leading people to believe that such warnings are needlessly stringent -- a premise supporting conclusion

there is nothing to suggest that those who typically disregard anti-smoking messages will pay heed when the messages occur more frequently -- Another premise

C
User avatar
iamchinu97
Joined: 14 Dec 2020
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 133
Own Kudos:
139
 [1]
Given Kudos: 34
Products:
Posts: 133
Kudos: 139
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Health official: Increasing the frequency of anti-smoking warnings may be ineffective. Aside from annoying the majority who do not smoke, it may weaken all anti-smoking messaging by leading people to believe that such warnings are needlessly stringent. Moreover, there is nothing to suggest that those who typically disregard anti-smoking messages will pay heed when the messages occur more frequently.

The two sections in boldface play which of the following roles in the public health official’s argument?

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, but it is not the main conclusion of the argument; the second is an unsupported premise that supports the main conclusion of the argument. => This is wrong as First is the main conclusion of argument for which second is providing support

(B) The first is a premise that supports the argument’s only explicit conclusion; so is the second. => First is not the premise so this is wrong

(C) The first is the only explicit conclusion of the argument; the second is a premise that supports that conclusion. => Yes First is the only Conclusion and second is premise for it. this is Answer

(D) The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second lends support to that conclusion and is itself a conclusion for which support is provided. => The first is main conclusion and second is supporting it but there is no support for second so not the ans

(E) The first is a premise that supports the only conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion. => The first is not the premise so not the ans

Hence Ans C
User avatar
Aashimabhatia
Joined: 29 Aug 2024
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
25
 [1]
Given Kudos: 655
Posts: 46
Kudos: 25
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The first boldface is the author’s main point- that increasing the frequency of anti-smoking warnings may be ineffective which the rest of the paragraph is written to support.
The second boldface is one of the reasons the author gives to back up this point: they claim there’s no evidence that people who usually ignore such warnings will respond to hearing them more often. Since this second statement is used to support the main conclusion and is not itself supported by anything else in the passage, it functions as a premise.

Therefore, the first is the only explicit conclusion, and the second is a premise that supports it- just as answer choice C states.

Ans- C
User avatar
D3N0
Joined: 21 Jan 2015
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 587
Own Kudos:
572
 [1]
Given Kudos: 132
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V28
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V35
WE:Operations (Retail: E-commerce)
Products:
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V35
Posts: 587
Kudos: 572
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ans: C (IMHO)

Health official: Increasing the frequency of anti-smoking warnings may be ineffective [C].
Now, HO gives the reason why they think so
(first reason) Aside from annoying the majority who do not smoke, (use of phrase "Aside from" means they are going to give another reason in this sentence)
(This is another reason - Premise continues) it may weaken all anti-smoking messaging by leading people to believe that such warnings are needlessly stringent.[P]
Moreover, (Use of Moreover suggests that they are going to provide another reasoning for the same conclusion)
(Another reason - Premise continuous) There is nothing to suggest that those who typically disregard anti-smoking messages will pay heed when the messages occur more frequently.

The two sections in boldface play which of the following roles in the public health official’s argument?

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, but it is not the main conclusion of the argument; the second is an unsupported premise that supports the main conclusion of the argument.
First is the main conclusion of the argument

(B) The first is a premise that supports the argument’s only explicit conclusion; so is the second.
First is the conclusion

(C) The first is the only explicit conclusion of the argument; the second is a premise that supports that conclusion.
Correct for the reasons given above

(D) The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second lends support to that conclusion and is itself a conclusion for which support is provided.
Second, it is not a conclusion but the extension of premise only

(E) The first is a premise that supports the only conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
Same reason as above
User avatar
Mohak01
Joined: 05 Sep 2020
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q83 V87 DI83
GPA: 8
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q83 V87 DI83
Posts: 104
Kudos: 64
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Will present a simple approach-

BF 1 - Authors Opinion - Main conclusion
BF 2 - Authors Opion - Intermediate conclusion put forward in support of BF 1

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, but it is not the main conclusion of the argument; the second is an unsupported premise that supports the main conclusion of the argument. BF 2 is not a premise - Incorrect
(B) The first is a premise that supports the argument’s only explicit conclusion; so is the second.
BF 1 is not a premise - Incorrect
(C) The first is the only explicit conclusion of the argument; the second is a premise that supports that conclusion.BF 2 is not a premise - Incorrect
(D) The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second lends support to that conclusion and is itself a conclusion for which support is provided. - Correct, inline with pre-thinking
(E) The first is a premise that supports the only conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.BF 1 is not a premise - incorrect
User avatar
iCheetaah
Joined: 13 Nov 2021
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
72
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Posts: 81
Kudos: 72
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For boldface question, while reading the argument, always segregate the boldface statements into one of three categories: Premise, interim-conclusion, conclusion

This helps in seeking out the answer choices faster, as we know what we are looking for.

BF1 - Increasing the frequency of anti-smoking warnings may be ineffective (This is the conclusion of the argument)
BF2 - it may weaken all anti-smoking messaging by leading people to believe that such warnings are needlessly stringent (This is a premise that supports the argument)

So, the overall story looks like this:

Anti-smoking warnings may be ineffective -- it may make smokers believe that these warnings are too strict

Please be wary, that the last statement of the argument is given as an additional premise to make the case that since there is no evidence that smokers who usually ignore such messaging will pay attention to if the frequency of this messagiing is inccreased, this, suggesting that increasing the frequency may be ineffective (supporting our conclusion)

Let's look at the answer choices now:

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, but it is not the main conclusion of the argument; the second is an unsupported premise that supports the main conclusion of the argument.

  • "but is not the main conclusion of the argument", since it is the only conclusion, it is the main conclusion. Eliminate
(B) The first is a premise that supports the argument’s only explicit conclusion; so is the second.
  • The first is a conclusion not a premise. Eliminate
(C) The first is the only explicit conclusion of the argument; the second is a premise that supports that conclusion.
  • This works. It tells us that the first is the only conclusion that we have and the second is the premise that supports it. Keep
(D) The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second lends support to that conclusion and is itself a conclusion for which support is provided.
  • The second is not a conclusion in itself. Eliminate
(E) The first is a premise that supports the only conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
  • Similar issue as B, the first is a conclusion not a premise. Eliminate

C seems to be the best choice.
User avatar
AVMachine
Joined: 03 May 2024
Last visit: 26 Aug 2025
Posts: 190
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
Posts: 190
Kudos: 154
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Health official: Increasing the frequency of anti-smoking warnings may be ineffective (Conclusion). Aside from annoying the majority who do not smoke, it may weaken all anti-smoking messaging by leading people to believe that such warnings are needlessly stringent (Conclusion and Support for first). Moreover, there is nothing to suggest that those who typically disregard anti-smoking messages will pay heed when the messages occur more frequently (Conclusion).
The two sections in boldface play which of the following roles in the public health official’s argument?

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, but it is not the main conclusion of the argument; the second is an unsupported premise that supports the main conclusion of the argument.

The Second is not a premise.

(B) The first is a premise that supports the argument’s only explicit conclusion; so is the second.

The First is not a premise.

(C) The first is the only explicit conclusion of the argument; the second is a premise that supports that conclusion.

The Second is not a premise.

(D) The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second lends support to that conclusion and is itself a conclusion for which support is provided.

Best Answer:

(E) The first is a premise that supports the only conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.

The First is not a premise.
User avatar
Cana1766
Joined: 26 May 2024
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 85
Kudos: 79
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Was confused by C and D.

The first bold face is the main conclusion.
The second bold face supports the main conclusion,but it also acts as a conclusion,and support for it is given by (Moreover, there is nothing to suggest) line.
In C it says the only explicit conclusion is the first bold face which is wrong

So D is the answer.
Bunuel
Health official: Increasing the frequency of anti-smoking warnings may be ineffective. Aside from annoying the majority who do not smoke, it may weaken all anti-smoking messaging by leading people to believe that such warnings are needlessly stringent. Moreover, there is nothing to suggest that those who typically disregard anti-smoking messages will pay heed when the messages occur more frequently.

The two sections in boldface play which of the following roles in the public health official’s argument?

(A) The first is a conclusion for which support is provided, but it is not the main conclusion of the argument; the second is an unsupported premise that supports the main conclusion of the argument.
(B) The first is a premise that supports the argument’s only explicit conclusion; so is the second.
(C) The first is the only explicit conclusion of the argument; the second is a premise that supports that conclusion.
(D) The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second lends support to that conclusion and is itself a conclusion for which support is provided.
(E) The first is a premise that supports the only conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

 1   2   3   4   5   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts