Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 07:50 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 07:50
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
605-655 Level|   Weaken|         
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,257
 [11]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,257
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Cana1766
Joined: 26 May 2024
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
79
 [1]
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 85
Kudos: 79
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Abhi310
Joined: 10 May 2025
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Products:
Posts: 19
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C.

Question asks about weaking the conclusion. These if C is true it will shaken the conclusion that crest will be capable of producing high volume sound.
User avatar
Emkicheru
Joined: 12 Sep 2023
Last visit: 12 Sep 2025
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Location: Kenya
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V48
GRE 1: Q167 V164
GPA: 3.7
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V48
GRE 1: Q167 V164
Posts: 119
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

The Idea is long distance communication , therefore if Option A is True it will weakened the statement because what's the need of long distance communication when they move on large herds
avatar
ManifestDreamMBA
Joined: 17 Sep 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,282
Own Kudos:
785
 [1]
Given Kudos: 236
Products:
Posts: 1,282
Kudos: 785
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Prethinking:
May be the call is amplified some other way?
Or something else was there but was not preserved/found?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness. We don't care if it was useful or not
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species. [color=#e82a1f]Irrelevant, we don't care if it was found in other species[/color]
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone. We are not concerned about the strength but the ability to produce loud, resonant calls
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation. [color=#e82a1f]Irrelevant, we don't care about the different functions. We care about producing the loud, resonant calls[/color]
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus. This makes sense, Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have supported the crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication and only crest was fossilized

Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
Heix
Joined: 21 Feb 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 362
Own Kudos:
153
 [1]
Given Kudos: 63
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Focus 1: 485 Q76 V74 DI77
GPA: 3.4
WE:Accounting (Finance)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 485 Q76 V74 DI77
Posts: 362
Kudos: 153
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premise: The crest of Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to nasal passages.
Researcher's hypothesis: The dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication.
Paleontologist's objection: This hypothesis is implausible because: 1. Long distance calls would need to exceed 100 decibels 2. The crest structure doesn't appear capable of producing such loud sounds
To rebut (weaken) the paleontologist's objection, we need to find something that challenges their reasoning about the crest's inability to produce loud enough sounds.
Let's evaluate each option:
(A) This actually supports the paleontologist's objection by suggesting long distance calls wouldn't have been useful ầnyway.
(B) The presence of similar structures in other species doesn't address whether Parasaurolophus's crest could produce loud enough sounds.
(C) This suggests the crest was slightly more rigid than bone alone, but doesn't clearly establish that this would enable louder sound production.
(D) The possibility of multiple functions doesn't address whether the crest could produce sufficiently loud sounds.
(E) Correct. This directly weakens the paleontologist's objection. The paleontologist assumes that what we can observe in fossils (the bone structure) represents the complete sound-producing apparatus. If soft tissues that don't fossilize were also involved in vocalization, then the paleontologist's assessment of sound producing capability based solely on the crest's structure would be incomplete. These missing soft tissues could have enabled the dinosaur to produce sounds exceeding 100 decibels, directly challenging the paleontologist's objection.
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 8,422
Own Kudos:
4,981
 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,422
Kudos: 4,981
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premise of argument :
Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages
that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication.
Conclusion : this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.


Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness. ; not related to argument to weaken the conclusion
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species. irrelevant option as the argument is discussing about Parasaurolophus
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone. does not weaken the claim made by paleontologist..
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation. does not weaken the conclusion ..
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus. we have a strong reason why the paleontologist are not able to get convinced that call exceeded 100 db of Parasaurolophus

Correct option E

Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
Dipan0506
Joined: 24 May 2021
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 72
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Products:
Posts: 72
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The paragraph suggests that dinosaurs used the crest to produce loud calls over long distance above 100 decibels, but the crest was not supportive enough to produce that call

Now , coming to the question,
Point A due to travelling in herds, long distance calls have limited usefulness supporting the objection.

Point B similar crest structures are found in others species of the dinosaurs which doesn’t contribute to the objection.

Point C crest is more rigid than the bone alone, which is not supportive of loud sounds at long distances which strengthens the objection.

Point D produce multiple functions like thermoregulation and sound production which supports the argument that it can’t produce long sounds.

Point E suggest soft tissue structure will weaken the structure if the crest to produce such long sounds.
Hence Point B is the answer.
User avatar
simondahlfors
Joined: 24 Jun 2025
Last visit: 23 Sep 2025
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
46
 [1]
Posts: 48
Kudos: 46
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Information given:
- Fossil evidence shows Parasaurolophus had a hollow crest connected to its nasal passages
- One researcher thinks this crest was used to make loud, long-distance calls
- Objection: the crest's structure looks incapable of producing the needed 100+ decibels to travel that far

Question:
- Which option, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist's objection that the crest couldn't make such loud sounds?

Solution:
- A: Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
- Means long-distance calls might not be useful anyway
- Does not prove that crest could make them
- Does not rebut structural objection, invalid

- B: Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
- Shows the crest structures are not unique, does not prove that crest could produce sound, invalid

- C: Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
- Makes it more rigid, but does not prove that crest could produce sound, invalid

- D: The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
- Suggests other uses, doesn't show it could make loud sounds, invalid

- E: Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.
- Explains how the crest might have had missing parts needed for loud calls, directly rebuts objection, valid

Answer: E, Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.
Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
AVMachine
Joined: 03 May 2024
Last visit: 26 Aug 2025
Posts: 190
Own Kudos:
154
 [1]
Given Kudos: 40
Posts: 190
Kudos: 154
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.
Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

Here, the claim is "structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound."

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.

This removes the need for long-distance communication, but doesn't rebut the objection.

(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.

But doesn't rebut the objection.

(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.

There is a comparison, but it is part of the structure, and the passage explicitly says that the structure was not capable.

(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.

But doesn't rebut the objection.

(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.

If it is true, then the crest can produce such a loud sound, which rebuts their objection.
User avatar
Harika2024
Joined: 27 Jul 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
65
 [1]
Given Kudos: 31
Location: India
Posts: 80
Kudos: 65
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
From given options,

(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.

This directly rebuts the paleontologist's objection. The paleontologist's claim of implausibility is based on the fossilized crest's appearance. If soft tissues (like vocal cords, membranes, or resonating chambers) that do not preserve as fossils were part of the sound-producing mechanism, they could easily account for the ability to produce high-volume sounds, even if the bony crest alone doesn't suggest it. This directly undermines the premise that the fossil's appearance is a complete indicator of its sound-producing capabilities.

Therefore, the answer is E
User avatar
harshnaicker
Joined: 13 May 2024
Last visit: 25 Sep 2025
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
60
 [1]
Given Kudos: 35
Posts: 84
Kudos: 60
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
An effective rebuttal to the paleontologist's objection would be a statement that supports the hypothesis of the researcher by introducing another evidence or bringing in a conjecture that sheds doubt on the paleontologist's reasoning.

Option A: This option helps the paleontologist's argument.
Option B: This option is irrelevant.
Option C: This option does not strengthen nor weaken.
Option D: It does not help prove the researcher's point regarding the use for long-distance communication.
Option E: This is the correct option. It reasonably introduces a possibility that the crest in combination with the soft-tissue structures could have may be produced sounds loud enough for long distance communication.

Option E is the correct answer.
Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
Rishika2805
Joined: 13 Dec 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
24
 [1]
Given Kudos: 27
Posts: 31
Kudos: 24
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In the question, it says rebut the paleontologist’s objection means refute the objection. So that means we have to find something that suggests that the crest could have produced high-volume sound, despite what its fossilized structure suggests.

My best bet is on answer E because it suggests that something that is not fossilized could be responsible for the sound, and the crest is not responsible. If the crest is not responsible, then its structure should be in question for the capabilities of making the sound. This perfectly refutes the objection made paleontologist.


Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
vnandan2001
Joined: 22 Apr 2025
Last visit: 05 Nov 2025
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 25
Kudos: 20
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A)Herd behavior = less need for long-distance calls
=> Weakens the original hypothesis, not the objection
Eliminate
(B)Other dinos had similar crests
=> Interesting, but doesn’t address whether the Parasaurolophus could produce >100 dB sound
Eliminate
(C)Cartilage reinforcement makes it slightly more rigid
=> "Slightly" stronger doesn’t necessarily mean it could produce much louder sounds
Eliminate
(D)The crest had multiple functions
=> This doesn’t help the loud call hypothesis; it's a distraction, not a rebuttal
Eliminate
(E) Soft-tissue structures that don’t fossilize could have helped with vocalization - Correct
=> This directly rebuts the objection that the bony crest alone couldn't produce enough sound, by suggesting there were additional parts (now missing) that could have made it possible.

Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
shashank17gupta
Joined: 19 Jun 2025
Last visit: 29 Oct 2025
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
12
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 19
Kudos: 12
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Objection: Such calls would have to exceed 100 decibels, but the crest’s structure does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.
Option A: This option suggests that long-distance calls might not have been necessary. However, it does not address
whether the crest could produce loud sounds or not.
Option B: This points out that other dinosaurs had similar crests, but it doesn’t address whether the Parasaurolophus
crest could produce the required sound volume.
Option C: This suggests the crest might have been a bit stronger or more rigid, possibly affecting its acoustic properties.
However, “slightly more rigid” does not necessarily mean it could produce sounds over 100 decibels.
Option D: This suggests the crest had more than one function, but it does not address the issue of sound volume at all.
Option E: If soft tissues (which do not fossilize) played a role in sound production, then the actual sound-producing
ability could have been much greater than what the fossilized bone suggests. This means the dinosaur could
have produced much louder calls, thus rebutting the objection.
So, Option E
User avatar
Dav2000
Joined: 21 Sep 2023
Last visit: 14 Sep 2025
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
44
 [1]
Given Kudos: 69
Posts: 75
Kudos: 44
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

A. Strength the argument. Not rebut
B. Irrelevant since conclusion is not concerned about other animals.
C. bone strength is not discussed in passsage.
D. So discussion in conclusion about other uses of crest.
E. CORRECT, weakens the argument by proposing that there was more to the structure in question which is not visible(fossilized). Hence this correctly weakens the argument.
User avatar
APram
Joined: 23 Jun 2024
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 673
Own Kudos:
263
 [1]
Given Kudos: 240
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q86 V78 DI76
GPA: 3.608
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q86 V78 DI76
Posts: 673
Kudos: 263
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premise: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages.
Premise: One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication.
Conclusion: This hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

We are being told that the crest is incapable of producing the high volume sound that exceed 100 decibels

We are asked to weaken this argument so we need to show somehow that the crest is actually capable of producing the high volume sound that exceed 100 decibels

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
This is actually strengthening the argument by saying that Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds and long distance calls were not that useful suggesting us that crest is incapable and had limited use.

(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
This does nothing to argument. Just because similar hollow crest structures were found it does not say anything that the present crest were capable or incapable

(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
This do somehow weaken by saying that cartilage make it more rigid. Keep this option

(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
This is irrelevant option. What functions crest can perform apart from loud sound is irrelevant.

(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.
This directly weakens the argument by saying that there were soft tissues that have not fossilized and they could have involved in vocalization (loud sounds)

E is correct
Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
Abhiswarup
Joined: 07 Apr 2024
Last visit: 08 Sep 2025
Posts: 178
Own Kudos:
154
 [1]
Given Kudos: 42
Location: India
Posts: 178
Kudos: 154
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The researcher claim that the Dinosaur used crest to loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, paleontologist disagrees with the claim saying such sound need high decibel for longer distance and more robust structure of crust.

We have to find statement which rebuts the Paleontologist's objection. Lets analyze options:

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
Factual information and irrelevant. Eliminate
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
Again factual information and irrelevant. Eliminate
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
In a way explains for more strength to crest but doesn't explain whether it will support in long distance sound generation. Eliminate
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
Factual information and irrelevant. Eliminate
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.
This explains that Soft-tissue structures have decayed and hasn't fossilized due to which long distance and high decibel sound couldn't be explained. This rebuts paleontologist objection.

Correct answer is E.
User avatar
iamchinu97
Joined: 14 Dec 2020
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 133
Own Kudos:
139
 [1]
Given Kudos: 34
Products:
Posts: 133
Kudos: 139
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

=> Author's analysis completely depend on Crest on that analysis he has based objection. if any option choice try to show that this analysis is incomplete and there maybe some additional factors which can aid the resonant calls for distance then we can rebut the objection. so lets see

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness. =>
So usefulness long-distance calls is not at the center of argument. we need to find whether long distance calls itself were possible or not. so this is not the ans

(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species. => This says similar crest structures were found but it does not give any info whether it helped in resonant calls or not so not the ans

(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone. => Again here we have info that reinforced with cartilage was there but was it aiding in long distance calls or not that is not clear. it just gives info nothing more so not the ans

(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation. =>
Multiple functions are not relevant. we need to find if crest was capable of the long distance resonant calls what were other functions we are not concerned so not the ans

(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus. => This clearly says that there were soft-tissue structures which fossil does not have but could have involved or helped the vocalization so this is our ans

Hence Ans E
 1   2   3   4   5   6   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts