Information given:- Fossil evidence shows Parasaurolophus had a hollow crest connected to its nasal passages
- One researcher thinks this crest was used to make loud, long-distance calls
- Objection: the crest's structure looks incapable of producing the needed 100+ decibels to travel that far
Question:- Which option, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist's objection that the crest couldn't make such loud sounds?
Solution:- A:
Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
- Means long-distance calls might not be useful anyway
- Does not prove that crest could make them
- Does not rebut structural objection, invalid
- B: Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
- Shows the crest structures are not unique, does not prove that crest could produce sound, invalid
- C: Fossil reconstructions of the
Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
- Makes it more rigid, but does not prove that crest could produce sound, invalid
- D: The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
- Suggests other uses, doesn't show it could make loud sounds, invalid
- E: Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in
Parasaurolophus.
- Explains how the crest might have had missing parts needed for loud calls, directly rebuts objection, valid
Answer: E, Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur
Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.
Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?
(A)
Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the
Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in
Parasaurolophus.