Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur
Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.
Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?
(A)
Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the
Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in
Parasaurolophus.
Given that:
Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur
Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages.
The researcher proposed:
Crest was used to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication.
Paleontologist's objection:
The researcher's hypothesis is implausible.
Any such call would have to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed.
Crest not capable of producing such high volume sound.
We have to weaken the Paleontologist's objection.
Let's analyse each option:
(A)
Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
Doesn't refute the Paleontologist's objection. Even if the long-distance calls may have limited use, they might still be useful in some cases. But this option is Irrelevant to the question.
Incorrect. (B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
The argument is focused on
Parasaurolophus and the use of its crest. Irrelevant.
Incorrect. (C) Fossil reconstructions of the
Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
Doesn't provide any information regarding whether the crest was capable of producing sounds or its use. Cannot be used to weaken.
Incorrect. (D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
This option just states what functions the crest might have. Doesn't weaken the paleontologist's objection.
Incorrect. (E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in
Parasaurolophus.
If these tissues that didn't fossilize were involved in vocalization, then the crest and these tissues together can produce sounds greater than 100 decibels. This means that the crest was used for long-distance calls over the proposed distances. This weakens the paleontologist's objection.
Correct.