Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 08:22 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 08:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
605-655 Level|   Weaken|         
User avatar
WrickR
Joined: 22 Dec 2024
Last visit: 02 Aug 2025
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
26
 [1]
Given Kudos: 51
Location: India
GPA: 3.7
Posts: 37
Kudos: 26
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
SaanjK26
Joined: 08 Oct 2022
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
63
 [1]
Given Kudos: 69
Location: India
Posts: 77
Kudos: 63
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
cyang8
Joined: 04 Jun 2022
Last visit: 02 Nov 2025
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111
Posts: 12
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Elite097
Joined: 20 Apr 2022
Last visit: 08 Oct 2025
Posts: 771
Own Kudos:
553
 [1]
Given Kudos: 346
Location: India
GPA: 3.64
Posts: 771
Kudos: 553
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization...
This directly rebuts the paleontologist’s objection by pointing out that the visible crest may not represent the entire sound system missing soft tissue could have helped produce louder ca lls. This other features have helped generate these sounds

Ans E
User avatar
Manu1995
Joined: 30 Aug 2021
Last visit: 11 Nov 2025
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
55
 [1]
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 81
Kudos: 55
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Goal: Find an option that most effectively rebuts the paleontologist's objection.

Evaluating Options:

(A)"Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness"
This option supports the paleontologist's objection

(B)"Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species."
Irrelevant to the objection about sound volume and crest capability

(C)"Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone"
The objection is about producing very high volume, and "slightly more rigid" doesn’t really resolve that. Doesn’t fully counter the argument about insufficient structure for loud sounds.

(D)"The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation"
It doesn’t address the objection that the crest can’t produce very loud sound

(E)"Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus."
Strongest rebuttal.Directly challenges the assumption that the crest alone had to produce the sound.
It introduces non-fossilized soft tissues as part of the system, which explains how Parasaurolophus might have created loud calls despite fossil limitations.


Correct answer Option E
User avatar
shaliny
Joined: 30 Oct 2023
Last visit: 24 Oct 2025
Posts: 99
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 712
Products:
Posts: 99
Kudos: 26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
we have to weaken the Paleontologist's objection, so we need an answer that shows that crest is capable of producing high volume sound.

A- conclusion is not about usefulness of long distance calls so this option is not providing anything relevant.
B- If this is true still we have no idea about the capability of crest so irrelevant.
C-here this option is talking about crest structure which becomes more rigid after fossil reconstruction, which make the crest capable to produce high volume sound
(According to me it is not the direct answer to weaken but by eliminating other options i selected this options which can weaken the argument in a way)- correct answer

D-this option is talking about other functions of crest other than sound production but not telling us about high volume sound is producing by crest.-not correct
E-the argument is based on fossil evidence so not fossilzed structures are of no use- not correct

i request to experts to correct my explanation if something is wrong here. thanku

Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
crimson_king
Joined: 21 Dec 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
131
 [1]
Given Kudos: 103
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 127
Kudos: 131
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option Analysis
(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness - This challenges the usefulness of long-distance calls, not the ability to produce them. Eliminate

(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species - This shows the structure is not unique, but doesn't address sound production capability. Eliminate

(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone - If the crest was more rigid, it might produce louder sounds than bone alone. Eliminate

(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation - This suggests alternative uses, but doesn't address the objection about sound volume. Eliminate

(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus. - This suggests that the fossil record is incomplete and that additional sound-producing structures may have existed, making it possible for the dinosaur to produce louder sounds than the fossilized crest alone would allow. Keep


Best Answer
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.
User avatar
Gladiator59
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 841
Own Kudos:
2,613
 [1]
Given Kudos: 260
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Products:
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Posts: 841
Kudos: 2,613
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The paleontologist says: The crest can't make 100+ decibel calls because its structure isn't capable of such high volume.
To rebut this, we need to show the crest COULD make loud calls.

(E) Soft tissues that don't fossilize could have been involved in vocalization.
This directly attacks the objection! The paleontologist is judging sound capability based only on fossilized bone structure. But if there were soft tissues (like vocal cords, air sacs, etc.) that rotted away, the complete sound-making system could have been much more powerful than just the bony crest suggests.

Answer: E
User avatar
quynhanhtran
Joined: 25 Jan 2018
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
28
 [1]
Given Kudos: 61
Posts: 38
Kudos: 28
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
  • Hypothesis: Parasaurolophus used its hollow crest to make loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication.
  • Conclusion: This hypothesis is implausible because these sounds would need to exceed 100 decibels, but the structure doesn’t seem capable of producing that volume.

Need to rebut the paleontologist's objection:

(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.
=> WEAKENS. It stated many the crest alone doesn't account for the volume, but other parts which do not fossilize might have helped.

Answer: E
User avatar
Aishna1034
Joined: 21 Feb 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 219
Own Kudos:
64
 [1]
Given Kudos: 150
Products:
Posts: 219
Kudos: 64
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E, we need to weaken the paleontologist's objection, and pick an answer choice which somehow strengthens the fact that the crest of the dinosaur is capable of producing the high-volume sound. Scanning the answer choices, E fits in to this idea really well, indicating that maybe the whole set that we are taking to draw a conclusion isnt complete, the un fossilized crest, can produce the high volume sound, and it can be the case that the reseacher made the statement observing that soft tissue structure only. Rest every other answer can be eliminated right away.
Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
sanya511
Joined: 25 Oct 2024
Last visit: 10 Nov 2025
Posts: 100
Own Kudos:
52
 [1]
Given Kudos: 101
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 100
Kudos: 52
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A) This supports the paleontologist's objection, because it says that the Parasaurolophus didn't really need long distance calls. Eliminate.
B) Out of context of the question, Eliminate.
C) Okay, but how does it show that the crest was capable of producing high volume sound? Eliminate.
D) We are concerned with if the dinosaur used the crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication, the statement talks about sound production and thermoregulation. Eliminate.
E) The soft tissue structures add the most doubt to the paleontologist's objection, as there might be more to the story than fossils show, that might have made such long distance communication possible.
Option E.
Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
Aarushi100
Joined: 17 Jul 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
44
 [1]
Given Kudos: 88
Products:
Posts: 56
Kudos: 44
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


Given that:
Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages.

The researcher proposed:
Crest was used to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication.

Paleontologist's objection:
The researcher's hypothesis is implausible.
Any such call would have to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed.
Crest not capable of producing such high volume sound.

We have to weaken the Paleontologist's objection.

Let's analyse each option:
(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
Doesn't refute the Paleontologist's objection. Even if the long-distance calls may have limited use, they might still be useful in some cases. But this option is Irrelevant to the question.
Incorrect.

(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
The argument is focused on Parasaurolophus and the use of its crest. Irrelevant.
Incorrect.

(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
Doesn't provide any information regarding whether the crest was capable of producing sounds or its use. Cannot be used to weaken. Incorrect.

(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
This option just states what functions the crest might have. Doesn't weaken the paleontologist's objection.
Incorrect.

(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.
If these tissues that didn't fossilize were involved in vocalization, then the crest and these tissues together can produce sounds greater than 100 decibels. This means that the crest was used for long-distance calls over the proposed distances. This weakens the paleontologist's objection.
Correct.
User avatar
SumnerSCB
Joined: 27 Apr 2025
Last visit: 08 Sep 2025
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
22
 [1]
Posts: 36
Kudos: 22
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

First it is important to clarify the question. The paleontologist's objection was that the tubes were used for long distance communication based on its structure. ABD. does nothing to rebut that. C does have some potential as maybe that extra cartilage reinforcements mean the paleontologist was wrong, but compared to E it's clear. We are looking at an incomplete structure. So E
User avatar
missionmba2025
Joined: 07 May 2023
Last visit: 07 Sep 2025
Posts: 341
Own Kudos:
427
 [1]
Given Kudos: 52
Location: India
Posts: 341
Kudos: 427
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 



The question requires us to weaken the reasoning.

Reasoning provided :The structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing sounds over 100 decibels .

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.

We are not evaluating the usefulness of the calls but the capability. Hence, we can eliminate A.

(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.

The question and the conclusion is only related to this particular type of dinosaur. Hence, the information doesn't weaken authors reasoning. Eliminate B

(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.

We are referring to the capability to produce the sound. Not evaluating rigidness. Eliminate C.

(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.

Irrelevant to the argument. Eliminate D.

(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.

The authors conclusion is merely based on the fossils that have been discovered. This information provides us with information that tells that the dinosaurs had tissues which were not considered. Hence weakens the reasoning that was employed to conclude.

Option E
User avatar
adityaprateek15
Joined: 26 May 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 268
Own Kudos:
104
 [1]
Given Kudos: 309
Location: India
GPA: 2.7
Products:
Posts: 268
Kudos: 104
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The core of the paleontologist's objection is that the crest's structure is insufficient to produce the required volume. To rebut this objection, we need to find an alternative explanation or a supporting factor that strengthens our belief that crest could have produced the high-volume sound.

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness. Paleontologist’s objection is about the crest’s structure being insufficient to produce the required volume. How limited was it usefulness doesn’t concern our conclusion. Incorrect.

(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species. We’re not concerned about whether the crest was unique. This choice doesn't provide information about the sound-producing capabilities of these structures nor does it address the volume issue. Incorrect.

(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone. This option tells us that the crest was more robust, but we don’t know the effect of this rigid structure. Was it helpful in producing the sound could exceed 100 decibels? Not mentioned. Incorrect.

(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation. This tells us about the additional functions for the crest but it doesn't address the paleontologist's objection. Incorrect.

(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus. This choice is interesting. It tells us there might have been soft, squishy parts present around the crest that aided in making the loud sounds, and those squishy parts wouldn't turn into fossils so we wouldn't see them now. This directly undermines the paleontologist's objection. Correct.

Answer E.

Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
ritishasingh
Joined: 21 Aug 2021
Last visit: 04 Nov 2025
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
8
 [1]
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
Posts: 6
Kudos: 8
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


The paleontologist argues that the structure of crest doesn't appear capable of producing high-volume sound.
Our goal is to rebut this argument, hence supporting the capability of the crest to make such sounds.

Statement 1 - Talks about the usefulness of its sound, doesn't seem to support the crest's capability
Statement 2 - Compares this crest to that of other species, again doesn't support the crest's capability
Statement 3 - Talks about the rigidity of the crest, once again not the sound producing capability of it
Statement 4 - Tells us about other functions it might have served, still not the ability of the crest to produce high volume sound
Statement 5 - Presents an additional feature, the soft-tissue structure, that might have been involved in vocalization. Now if that was proven to be true, this feature would enhance the sound producing ability on top of the of the existing crest. This could help rebut the paleontologist's opinion,

Hence statement 5 is the answer.
User avatar
IIIJOHNNYSIII
Joined: 10 Aug 2023
Last visit: 13 Nov 2025
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
53
 [1]
Given Kudos: 15
Location: India
Posts: 85
Kudos: 53
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Type : Weaken/Rebut
The correct option should be the one that rebuts " this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound"

Checking the options,
(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness. - This is not relevant as we are not discussing if long distance call was needed. It does not rebut the statement.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species. - This does not rebut the statement and is irrelevant to the question.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone. - While this slightly weakens the statement, it does not rebut the statement. It does not necessarily mean the animal was Parasaurolophus crest was capable of producing sounds that are over 100 decibels.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation. - This does not weaken the statement regarding as it does not necessarily mean that the crest would be able to produce sounds over 100 decibels
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus. - This directly rebuts the statement by providing further insights about structure that may have been lost in time like the soft-tissue, which when coupled with the crest helped the Parasaurolophus produce such loud sounds.

Therefore the correct option is Option E
User avatar
Mardee
Joined: 22 Nov 2022
Last visit: 16 Oct 2025
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
110
 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
Products:
Posts: 127
Kudos: 110
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
Incorrect, since this attacks the usefulness of long-distance calls, not whether the dinosaur could physically produce them.

(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
Incorrect since it looks like its relevant but isnt. It doesnt address whether the crest could produce sounds louder than 100 decibels.

(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
It is a rebutal but a weak one since the rigidity might support louder sound production but given the "slightly rigid" wording, we could say it may not be enough to overcome the 100 decibel threshold. It could be considered as one of the possible rebutals but not the most effective one

(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
This suggests dual purpose, but it doesnt exactly challenge the volume limitation issue. The loud enough sound issue raised by the paleontologist isnt resolved with this.

(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.
This directly rebuts the objection. The paleontologist is basing the conclusion on fossilized crest structures. But if there were soft tissues like air sacs, vocal cords, that didn't fossilize, then our understanding of the sound producing capacity is incomplete. This is the most effective rebuttal to the paleontologist's objection


(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.
User avatar
Rahul_Sharma23
Joined: 05 Aug 2023
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
82
 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V83 DI83
GPA: 2.5
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V83 DI83
Posts: 114
Kudos: 82
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A) if this is true it refutes the conclusion
B) Additional information
C) it seems like that it may helpin producing high volume sound because of cartilage reinforcement, but not written explicitly
D) we are not concerned with other functions
E) soft-tissues could change the game of sound production, hence refuting the objection
Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
jkkamau
Joined: 25 May 2020
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
107
 [1]
Given Kudos: 122
Location: Kenya
Schools: Haas '25
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V46
GPA: 3.5
Products:
Schools: Haas '25
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V46
Posts: 132
Kudos: 107
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness. Incorrect since it does not refute the actual claim related to crest capability
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species. Irrelevant additional information
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone. Does not directly refute the claim presented
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation. While this could be true it does not provide a rebuttal
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus. Correct if this is true then it provides a good explanation that refutes the researchers claim

Bunuel
Paleontologist: Fossil evidence suggests that the crest of the dinosaur Parasaurolophus contained hollow tubes connected to its nasal passages. One researcher has proposed that the dinosaur used this crest to produce loud, resonant calls for long-distance communication. However, this hypothesis is implausible, since any such call would have had to exceed 100 decibels to travel the distances proposed, and the structure of the crest does not appear capable of producing such high-volume sound.

Which of the following, if true, would most effectively rebut the paleontologist’s objection?

(A) Parasaurolophus likely traveled in herds, where long-distance calls may have had limited usefulness.
(B) Similar hollow-crest structures are found in many other herbivorous dinosaur species.
(C) Fossil reconstructions of the Parasaurolophus crest suggest it was reinforced with cartilage, making it slightly more rigid than bone alone.
(D) The crest may have served multiple functions, including both sound production and thermoregulation.
(E) Soft-tissue structures that do not fossilize could have been involved in vocalization in Parasaurolophus.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

   1   2   3   4   5   6   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts