Statement (1) Analysis
The first statement provides that the total charge for the trip was 3.3p dollars.
Set up the cost formula: Let x be the number of additional miles (or fractions of a mile) after the first 5 miles. The total cost is p + (0.1p * x).
Cost = p * (1 + 0.1x)
Solve for x: We can set the cost formula equal to the given charge.
3.3p = p * (1 + 0.1x)
Since p > 30, we can divide both sides by p.
3.3 = 1 + 0.1x
2.3 = 0.1x
x = 23
Find the total distance: The variable x represents the number of additional miles charged after the first 5. The total distance, m, is defined by x = ceiling(m - 5).
23 = ceiling(m - 5)
This means that m - 5 must be greater than 22 and less than or equal to 23.
22 < m - 5 ≤ 23
27 < m ≤ 28
The total distance of the trip was between 27 and 28 miles. Therefore, the trip was not more than 30 miles long. This provides a definitive "No" to the question.
This statement is sufficient.
Statement (2) Analysis
The second statement provides that the total charge for the trip was $132.
Set up the equation:
132 = p * (1 + 0.1x)
Test scenarios: This equation has two unknown variables, p and x. We only know that p > 30. We must check if different valid scenarios lead to different answers.
Scenario A (Trip is NOT > 30 miles): Let's assume the trip was 28 miles. As calculated above, this means x = 23.
132 = p * (1 + 0.1 * 23)
132 = p * (3.3)
p = 132 / 3.3 = 40
This is a valid scenario because p = 40 satisfies the condition p > 30. So, it's possible the trip was not more than 30 miles.
Scenario B (Trip IS > 30 miles): Let's assume the trip was 35 miles. This would mean x = ceil(35 - 5) = 30.
132 = p * (1 + 0.1 * 30)
132 = p * (4)
p = 33
This is also a valid scenario because p = 33 satisfies the condition p > 30. So, it's possible the trip was more than 30 miles.
Since this statement allows for both a "Yes" and a "No" answer to the question, it is not sufficient to determine the answer.
This statement is not sufficient. Hence the answer is A