Hi RogueVole,Good instinct to slow down on that word, because the whole choice turns on it. Let me read the exact phrasing with you.
Choice (C) says owners use their laptops
"in different locations around their own homes." The key words are
"around their own homes." That means
inside the house - moving the laptop from room to room (kitchen, bedroom, couch, patio) -
not taking it out into the world. If it meant outside, it would say something like "away from home" or "outside the home," which is the exact language the stimulus already used for the
22% figure.
So you're not being too specific - you're being appropriately careful. The trap here is reading "around the home" as "outside the home," which would flip the whole meaning of the choice.
Why the inside reading is what makes (C) the answer: The argument's hidden assumption is that "using portability" only counts when the laptop leaves the house. (C) breaks that assumption. Even if only
22% carry it outside, owners are
still using the portability - just within their homes. That's a benefit the survey never measured, so the conclusion ("not used enough to justify the cost") no longer follows cleanly. That's a classic weakener: it doesn't disprove the conclusion, it just shows the evidence doesn't fully support it.
If (C) really had meant "outside the home," it would just restate the survey - no new information, no weakening at all.
Quick way to lock the reading: whenever a choice uses a location word, ask
"does this add a new place, or repeat one the stimulus already covered?" Here, "around their own homes" adds a brand-new arena of use (inside), which is exactly why it matters.
Answer: CRogueVole
Doesn't 'around' the house mean 'outside' the house or am I being far too specific?