The argument assumes that because
lower % of inkjet printers required servicing, inkjet printers will
cause far fewer work flow disruptions.
The
key GAP in the argument here is that the
higher frequency of servicing for laser printers has nothing to do with the
frequency of usage or that
higher frequency of usage was
NOT a
contributing factor to the more laser printers requiring servicing.
*** A simpler parellel example to illustrate: if I use my car
more often, there is higher chances that it would require
MORE maintainence repairs than if I keep my car in the garage.
A
Quality of print is out of scope the conclusion is about fewer workflow distruptions by using laser printers
B
Correct: This says that laser printers were
NOT being used more. Higher usage was
not driving the higher servicing. Negation: if higher usage
not was driving the higher servicing---> then the conclusion that ink jet printers would cause lower work flow disruptions would perish. What if inkjet printers were used at a higher frequency and then they would require even more servicing ?
C This is not a required assumption. if you negate i.e there were fewer offices that accquired laser printers. This doesnt impact the conclusion because the argument is based on a
% and
not on the absolute numbers of laser and ink jet printers accquired.
D Out of scope: Negation --> Laser printers
do not require more periods of down time ? So what ? The question is about the
frequency of servicing and not on the period of down time.
E Out of scope: Again the conclusion is drawn based on the % of laser printers requiring servicing. The higher probabilty of offices accquiring laser printers is irrelavant.
Bunuel
A survey of office managers who had acquired new printing equipment over the previous five years found that twelve percent of laser printers in use had needed servicing on more than one occasion, compared with just three percent of inkjet printers that had ever required any servicing at all. Offices that depend on uninterrupted access to printing should therefore expect far fewer workflow disruptions by choosing inkjet over laser printers.
Which of the following is an assumption the argument relies on?
(A) Inkjet printers do not produce noticeably lower print quality than laser printers for standard office documents.
(B) Offices that use laser printers are not far more likely to operate them at substantially higher print volumes over time than offices that use inkjet printers.
(C) At least as many offices in the survey had acquired laser printers as had acquired inkjet printers.
(D) Laser printers do not generally require longer periods of downtime for each service visit than inkjet printers do.
(E) Offices that acquired printing equipment within the past year are not far more likely to have chosen laser printers than offices that acquired equipment five years ago.
⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.