Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

 It is currently 16 Jul 2019, 14:11

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravit

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 21 Jun 2018
Posts: 5
Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Jun 2018, 12:39
4
18
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

91% (01:07) correct 9% (01:26) wrong based on 1410 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoiding large doses of radiation, plus contending with the chemically reactive Martian soil, and perhaps even ward off contamination by Martian life-forms.

A. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoiding large doses of radiation, plus contending

B. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend

C. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, would also have to avoid large doses of radiation, plus contending

D. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, plus contend

E. Mars, who would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend with

OG2019 SC03083
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 497
Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

Updated on: 07 May 2019, 12:34
4
2
Hello Everyone!

This looks like a great example of a question that focuses on parallelism! Whenever we see a question with a long list, parallelism is a great place to start narrowing down wrong answers.

Let's break down each answer to rule out answers that don't use parallel structure. We know that every item in the list has to be parallel to the one item on the list that isn't underlined: "ward off." Since we cannot change that part, we need to match all other items in the list to that!

A. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoiding large doses of radiation, plus contending --> NOT PARALLEL
B. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend --> PARALLEL
C. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, would also have to avoid large doses of radiation, plus contending --> NOT PARALLEL
D. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, plus contend --> PARALLEL
E. Mars, who would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend with --> PARALLEL

We can rule out answers A and C for lacking parallel structure!

Okay, so this narrows things down a bit! Let's break down any other problems with answer B, D, and E:

B. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend
This is CORRECT! It uses parallel structure and includes a verb to make this a complete sentence.

D. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, plus contend
This is INCORRECT because by adding the comma and changing the verb to the gerund "having," this is now just one long run-on sentence. It is missing a verb!

E. Mars, who would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend with
This is also INCORRECT because the comma turns this into a long run-on sentence that is missing a verb.

Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
_________________

Originally posted by EMPOWERgmatVerbal on 25 Jun 2018, 12:59.
Last edited by EMPOWERgmatVerbal on 07 May 2019, 12:34, edited 1 time in total.
General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2017
Posts: 182
Re: Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Jun 2018, 12:48
1
IMO B
Parallelism - endure, avoid, contend with
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2012
Posts: 372
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
GPA: 3.5
Re: Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Jul 2018, 00:54
Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoiding large doses of radiation, plus contending with the chemically reactive Martian soil, and perhaps even ward off contamination by Martian life-forms.

A. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoiding large doses of radiation, plus contending (Items in red are not parallel)
B. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend (correct)
C. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, would also have to avoid large doses of radiation, plus contending (Items in red are not parallel)
D. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, plus contend (Lack of main verb)
E. Mars, who would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend with (Travelers would have endure low levels of gravity not mars)
_________________
Kindly hit kudos if my post helps!
Director
Joined: 14 Dec 2017
Posts: 517
Location: India
Re: Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Jul 2018, 20:51
Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoiding large doses of radiation, plus contending with the chemically reactive Martian soil, and perhaps even ward off contamination by Martian life-forms.

A. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoiding large doses of radiation, plus contending
B. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend
C. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, would also have to avoid large doses of radiation, plus contending
D. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, plus contend
E. Mars, who would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend with

The sentence explains a Hypothetical situation, hence a "would" is appropriate. C & D are out

In the non-underlined portion, we see "and" & "ward off", signalling a parallel structure, going by the meaning of the sentence, we require the three actions

i) to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time
ii) to avoid large doses of radiation
iii) to contend with the chemically reactive Martian soil

parallel to "ward off contamination by Martian life-forms"

A does not maintain parallelism

Between B & E.

E is redundant, no need of "who".

B is more concise & hence correct.

Thanks,
GyM
_________________
SC Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1746
Re: Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Jul 2018, 06:53
1
BFR wrote:
Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoiding large doses of radiation, plus contending with the chemically reactive Martian soil, and perhaps even ward off contamination by Martian life-forms.

A. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoiding large doses of radiation, plus contending
B. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend
C. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, would also have to avoid large doses of radiation, plus contending
D. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, plus contend
E. Mars, who would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend with

OG2019 SC03083

Only B can be answer. avoiding can't modify previous part. A out. rest choices does not make any sense at all.
_________________
Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2 | How to Improve GMAT Quant from Q49 to a Perfect Q51 | Time management

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases | Subjunctive Mood
Manager
Joined: 11 May 2018
Posts: 91
Location: India
GMAT 1: 460 Q42 V14
Re: Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Sep 2018, 01:03
BFR wrote:
Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoiding large doses of radiation, plus contending with the chemically reactive Martian soil, and perhaps even ward off contamination by Martian life-forms.

A. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoiding large doses of radiation, plus contending
B. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend
C. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, would also have to avoid large doses of radiation, plus contending
D. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, plus contend
E. Mars, who would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend with

OG2019 SC03083

Travelers must experience these things when they travel from earth to mars;
Travelers would have to , List 1, List2 ,List 3 and perhaps even List 4.
Quote:
A. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoiding large doses of radiation, plus contending

A lacks parallelism.endure.......... avoiding......... contending.........NOT parallel so eliminate it.
Quote:
B. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend

I have no problem with it because parallelism is correct in this option.so Keep it.
Quote:
C. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, would also have to avoid large doses of radiation, plus contending

Here we have two problems .
1.having to is wrong and even changes the meaning.B is far better than this option.
2.parallelism exists.so you can eliminate it without doubt.

Quote:
D. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, plus contend

same problem as c.so eliminate it.
Quote:
E. Mars, who would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend with

Here who is wordy because we don't need it as B is clearly giving the meaning without who.So eliminate.
Left out is [b]B[/b]. So its the winner.
_________________
If you want to Thank me Give me a KUDOS
"I’ve spent months preparing for the day I’d face you. I’ve come a long way, GMAT"- SonGoku
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2018
Posts: 69
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
GPA: 4
Re: Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Sep 2018, 08:48
1
EMPOWERgmatVerbal wrote:
Hello Everyone!

This looks like a great example of a question that focuses on parallel structure! Whenever we see a question with a long list, parallelism is a great place to start narrowing down wrong answers.

Let's break down each answer to rule out answers that don't use parallel structure. We know that every item in the list has to be parallel to the one item on the list that isn't underlined: "ward off." Since we cannot change that part, we need to match all other items in the list to that!

A. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoiding large doses of radiation, plus contending --> NOT PARALLEL
B. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend --> PARALLEL
C. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, would also have to avoid large doses of radiation, plus contending --> NOT PARALLEL
D. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, plus contend --> PARALLEL
E. Mars, who would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend with --> PARALLEL

We can rule out answers A and C for lacking parallel structure!

Okay, so this narrows things down a bit! Let's break down any other problems with answer B, D, and E:

B. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend

This is CORRECT! It uses parallel structure and includes a verb to make this a complete sentence.

D. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, plus contend

This is INCORRECT because by adding the comma and changing the verb to the gerund "having," this is now just one long run-on sentence. It is missing a verb!

E. Mars, who would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend with

This is also INCORRECT because the comma turns this into a long run-on sentence that is missing a verb.

Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.

Is "Endure" not a verb?..... having to endure sounds right to me .... to endure - verb in the infinitive form?
SC Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1746
Re: Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low  [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Sep 2018, 15:52
1
sriramsundaram91

Here is a post for usage of 'having'. usually problem is with the meaning of the sentence. In most of the Gmat question use of having is only in wrong option, though not all.
https://gmatclub.com/forum/use-of-havin ... 53479.html
_________________
Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2 | How to Improve GMAT Quant from Q49 to a Perfect Q51 | Time management

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases | Subjunctive Mood
Intern
Joined: 18 Sep 2016
Posts: 37
Re: Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Dec 2018, 02:31
EMPOWERgmatVerbal wrote:
Hello Everyone!

This looks like a great example of a question that focuses on parallel structure! Whenever we see a question with a long list, parallelism is a great place to start narrowing down wrong answers.

Let's break down each answer to rule out answers that don't use parallel structure. We know that every item in the list has to be parallel to the one item on the list that isn't underlined: "ward off." Since we cannot change that part, we need to match all other items in the list to that!

A. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoiding large doses of radiation, plus contending --> NOT PARALLEL
B. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend --> PARALLEL
C. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, would also have to avoid large doses of radiation, plus contending --> NOT PARALLEL
D. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, plus contend --> PARALLEL
E. Mars, who would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend with --> PARALLEL

We can rule out answers A and C for lacking parallel structure!

Okay, so this narrows things down a bit! Let's break down any other problems with answer B, D, and E:

B. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend

This is CORRECT! It uses parallel structure and includes a verb to make this a complete sentence.

D. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, plus contend

This is INCORRECT because by adding the comma and changing the verb to the gerund "having," this is now just one long run-on sentence. It is missing a verb!

E. Mars, who would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend with

This is also INCORRECT because the comma turns this into a long run-on sentence that is missing a verb.

Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.

In D, yes having to introduces a run on sentence, But if we see that as a modifier, then it wont be a run on.

Travelers from earth to mars, modifier, avoid(verb), contend and ward off. How is it a run on sentence then?
Director
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 766
Re: Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Feb 2019, 02:49
[quote="BFR"]Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoiding large doses of radiation, plus contending with the chemically reactive Martian soil, and perhaps even ward off contamination by Martian life-forms.

A. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoiding large doses of radiation, plus contending

B. Mars would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend

C. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, would also have to avoid large doses of radiation, plus contending

D. Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, plus contend

E. Mars, who would have to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, contend with

look at choice E. if you think choice E is correct, then there is tense problem with choice E
the travellers to the Mars avoid, contend and ward off.

this simple tense is used wrongly . present simple is about a condition which, we think, exists indefintely. so, choice E mean that indefintely, the traveller avoid, contend and ward off. this is wrong.

the use of present tense is not hard but not easy. what condition exist indefintely? it is scientific rules. it is what , we think , exist indefintely." she is beautiful" is correct if we think at the moment of speaking, the beauty exist indefintely . though beauty dose not exist forever, but at the moment of speaking, we think the beauty exist indefintely.
Intern
Joined: 20 Aug 2017
Posts: 9
Re: Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 May 2019, 21:06
Hello egmat

Could you please explain how come there is no verb in option D as pointed out by earlier explanations.

Travelers from Earth to Mars, having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time, avoid large doses of radiation, plus contend with the chemically reactive Martian soil, and perhaps even ward off contamination by Martian life-forms.

Can't the above highlighted act as verb for Travelers? if having to endure low levels of gravity for long periods of time act as modifier.
I mean I know that in this way sentence will have different meaning than the original one and will be wrong.
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 3063
Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 May 2019, 21:24
1
nitinaroraaa wrote:
I mean I know that in this way sentence will have different meaning than the original one and will be wrong.

Hi nitinaroraaa , you tagged egmat about the verb issue, but this part needs addressing.

The highlighted sentence keeps appearing in one form or another.

I do not know from what source this belief comes, but the belief is pervasive and causes too many people to avoid correct answers.

Option A does not determine the original meaning.
Use all five options to determine meaning.

Many problems in the official guides contain a choice (A) that could not be and is not the intended meaning of the sentence.

I will give you four examples that I found quickly (read: there may be better examples, but these will suffice).

The questions I mention below can be found from this directory page.
Click on the title that I reference.
On the new page, find the question number.

In OG 2018, look at SC #741 (in which A's meaning is nonsensical and opposite from that intended)
and at SC #781 (in which option A's logic is both incredibly confusing and not the intended meaning)
HERE is yet another example.

If you have access to the Official Guide Verbal Review 2019, look at SC #273, in which the author of the OE writes,
"It is difficult to tell which parts of this sentence go together because of errors and confusion in [Option A]."

About the correct answer, which is NOT A, the author writes, "In this sentence, the meaning is clearer . . ."
Part of that OE is here.

In short, we use context, grammar, comparison of options, logic, and other things to discern the intended meaning.
Sure, if option A is garbled and illogical, we can try to infer the meaning from the errors.

On the other hand, we could read the other options and find one that is not garbled and illogical.

I would hate for anyone to eliminate a correct answer because its meaning was different from that in A.
It's okay if the correct answer does not match the meaning in option A.
_________________
SC Butler has resumed!
Get two SC questions to practice, whose links you can find by date, here.

Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life? -- Mary Oliver
Travelers from Earth to Mars would have to endure low levels of gravit   [#permalink] 20 May 2019, 21:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by