It is currently 28 Jun 2017, 09:37

Live Now:

Open Admission Chat with MBA Expert, Donna Bauman. (Kellogg MBA Graduate and Former UNC Adcom)


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 195
Schools: ABCD
Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2012, 14:52
3
This post received
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (03:50) correct 45% (01:51) wrong based on 409 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found on public property cannot legally be privately owned. But according to centuries-old maritime law, people who risk their lives attempting to rescue a ship in peril are permitted to keep whatever cargo they can salvage. Under this rule treasure hunters clearly are entitled to keep the cargo from ancient shipwrecks that they risk their lives to save from oblivion in public waters.

Archaeologist: Not so. These shipwrecks have stabilized over the centuries they have lain underwater. The only danger they are in is from greedy treasure hunters who destroy archaeological evidence in their hurry to loot salable artifacts.


On the evidence of their statements, it can be concluded that the treasure hunter and the archaeologist disagree on which one of the following?

(A) what constitutes an archaeological artifact
(B) in what sense, if any, an ancient shipwreck can be said to be in peril
(C) whether treasure hunters risk their lives when they retrieve artifacts from ancient shipwrecks
(D) whether maritime law can ever be applied to a ship that has already sunk
(E) whether antique shipwrecks in public waters can properly be said to be on public property

Why not C?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2011
Posts: 60
Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2012, 19:25
Treasure Hunters - ..attempting to rescue a ship in peril are permitted to keep whatever cargo they can salvage.
Under this rule treasure hunters clearly are entitled to keep the cargo from ancient shipwrecks that they risk their lives to save from oblivion in public waters.
While Archaeologist: Not so. These shipwrecks have stabilized over the centuries they have lain underwater.
They disagree over "what is scope of Maritime law ?" According to Archaeologist - These shipwrecks have stabilized and can't be defined in scope of peril
Hence -
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B


Why not (C)- whether treasure hunters risk their lives when they retrieve artifacts from ancient shipwrecks ? I think ,its not about scavenging things that are not in peril .They seem to disagree with definition of things - one(Archaeologist) says Law should be same with Artifacts in peril ,other thinks in general.
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 513
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2012, 02:23
1
This post received
KUDOS
+1 B

voodoochild wrote:
Why not C?


Good Question

Maritime Law is dependent on two things
1) risk their lives
2) ship in peril

For the law to function properly, these two things should be properly defined.

Look at what Archaeologist says
“Not so. These shipwrecks have stabilized over the centuries they have lain underwater. The only danger they are in is from greedy treasure hunters who destroy archaeological evidence in their hurry to loot salable artifacts.”
The Archaeologist only discussed about the “ship in peril” and not about the “risk their lives” i.e. the risk entailed by the treasure hunter


:-D
_________________

First Attempt 710 - http://gmatclub.com/forum/first-attempt-141273.html

Expert Post
3 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4132
Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2012, 12:57
3
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
voodoochild wrote:
Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found on public property cannot legally be privately owned. But according to centuries-old maritime law, people who risk their lives attempting to rescue a ship in peril are permitted to keep whatever cargo they can salvage. Under this rule treasure hunters clearly are entitled to keep the cargo from ancient shipwrecks that they risk their lives to save from oblivion in public waters.
Archaeologist: Not so. These shipwrecks have stabilized over the centuries they have lain underwater. The only danger they are in is from greedy treasure hunters who destroy archaeological evidence in their hurry to loot salable artifacts.

On the evidence of their statements, it can be concluded that the treasure hunter and the archaeologist disagree on which one of the following?
(A) what constitutes an archaeological artifact
(B) in what sense, if any, an ancient shipwreck can be said to be in peril
(C) whether treasure hunters risk their lives when they retrieve artifacts from ancient shipwrecks
(D) whether maritime law can ever be applied to a ship that has already sunk
(E) whether antique shipwrecks in public waters can properly be said to be on public property

Why not C?

I am answering a p.m. from voodoochild

Voodoo:
It seems to me that vishu1414 and getgyan have already done a good job of explaining why it's not C, but since you sent me a p.m., I will explain this. I will only discuss (B) & (C) since those are the answers in contention.
(B) in what sense, if any, an ancient shipwreck can be said to be in peril
(C) whether treasure hunters risk their lives when they retrieve artifacts from ancient shipwrecks


Well, the treasure hunter explicitly states that treasure hunters "risk their lives", so he states that the treasure hunters are at risk. He also explicitly states that the sunken ships are headed to "oblivion", which implies that they are decaying and vanishing, and will take the treasure with them. Thus, he also implies the sunken ships are at risk. So far, from the treasure hunter's side, both claims are stated.
Now, from the archaeologist's side. The archaeologist states, "These shipwrecks have stabilized over the centuries they have lain underwater. The only danger they are in is from greedy treasure hunters..." In other words, if the treasure hunters simply stayed away, the ship would be fine, not at all in danger. So, without any pesky treasure hunters swimming around it, the sunken ships are at no risk.

The treasure hunter and the archaeologist clearly and explicitly disagree on whether the sunken ships are at risk, whether they are in any peril. That's clear. That's why (B) is correct.
The treasure hunter also clearly feels treasure hunters put themselves at risk. By contrast, the archaeologist says nothing about the relative risk to which the treasure hunters are exposed. Does the archaeologist feel the treasure hunters are at risk? We don't know. Maybe the archaeologist thinks they are not at risk. Maybe the archaeologist thinks they are at risk and because they are doing something criminal, they deserve whatever bad things happens to them in the process. We don't know. The archaeologist's reply characterizes the treasure hunters as "greedy", as "looting", as "in [a] hurry" --- it makes clear that the archaeologist thinks the treasure hunters are causing destruction, posing a threat to the sunken ship, but this reply does not explicitly address in any way the issue of whether the treasure hunters themselves are at risk. That's why (C) is not correct.

Does all this make sense?

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 195
Schools: ABCD
Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2012, 13:10
thanks Mike for your wonderful explanation. I was confused by "not so." I thought that by saying "not so" the Archaeologist is specifically denying the fact that treasure hunters risk their lives....Thoughts?
Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4132
Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2012, 13:53
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
voodoochild wrote:
thanks Mike for your wonderful explanation. I was confused by "not so." I thought that by saying "not so" the Archaeologist is specifically denying the fact that treasure hunters risk their lives....Thoughts?

The archaeologist's first words simply connote some kind of disagreement. It would be inconsistent (and therefore misleading) only if there were no disagreement at all in what she said. (The GMAT wouldn't do that to us!) To find out what the disagreement is, we need to read the archaeologist's response carefully. It is absolutely invalid to make your own assumptions from the isolated "not so" that go into regions that the archaeologist doesn't explicitly address at all. Yes, the "not so" connotes disagreement, but you don't get to decide what that disagreement is --- you still have to read carefully and precisely.

In fact, I would argue --- those opening words, "not so", are an extremely clever trap set by the test-writer, and unwittingly, you fell into that trap. Agreement or disagreement itself can be expressed in just a word or two, but you have to read carefully to see exactly which aspects of the argument were part of the agreement or disagreement and which were not part of it. You do not get to assume you know what the agreement or disagreement is without reading carefully. That is precisely the mistake the words "not so" tempt test-takers to make.

Does that make sense?

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1997
Concentration: Finance
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 May 2014, 11:47
Dude you might want to use a spoiler so that not all members of GMAT Club realize that the answer is not C

Thanks!
Cheers
J :)
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 291
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V34
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 May 2014, 23:22
voodoochild wrote:
Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found on public property cannot legally be privately owned. But according to centuries-old maritime law, people who risk their lives attempting to rescue a ship in peril are permitted to keep whatever cargo they can salvage. Under this rule treasure hunters clearly are entitled to keep the cargo from ancient shipwrecks that they risk their lives to save from oblivion in public waters.

Archaeologist: Not so. These shipwrecks have stabilized over the centuries they have lain underwater. The only danger they are in is from greedy treasure hunters who destroy archaeological evidence in their hurry to loot salable artifacts.


On the evidence of their statements, it can be concluded that the treasure hunter and the archaeologist disagree on which one of the following?

(A) what constitutes an archaeological artifact
(B) in what sense, if any, an ancient shipwreck can be said to be in peril
(C) whether treasure hunters risk their lives when they retrieve artifacts from ancient shipwrecks
(D) whether maritime law can ever be applied to a ship that has already sunk
(E) whether antique shipwrecks in public waters can properly be said to be on public property

Why not C?


How would you feel if I gave you and interesting question and revealed an answer?
Please use spoilers. You just need to press the spoiler button above the text box [spoiler^=^]write anything between these (after removing ^) and it will be hidden[/spoiler]
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 May 2014
Posts: 39
GMAT Date: 08-20-2014
GMAT ToolKit User
Treasure Hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jul 2014, 08:55
Treasure Hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found on public property cannot legally be privately owned. But according to centuries-old maritime law, people who risk their lives attempting to rescue a ship in peril are permitted to keep whatever cargo they can salvage. Under this rule treasure hunters clearly are entitled to keep the cargo from ancient shipwrecks that they risk their lives to save from oblivion in public waters.

Archaeologist: Not so. These shipwrecks have stabilized over the centuries they have lain underwater. The only danger they are in is from greedy treasure hunters who destroy archaeological evidence in their hurry to loot salable artifacts.

On the evidence of their statements, it can be concluded that the treasure hunter and the archaeologist disagree on which of the following?

(A) What constitutes an archaeological artifact

(B) In what sense, if any, an ancient shipwreck can be said to be in peril

(C) Whether treasure hunters risk their lives when they retrieve artifacts from ancient shipwrecks

(D) Whether maritime law can ever be applied to a ship that has already sunk

(E) Whether antique shipwrecks in public waters can properly be said to be on public property

Last edited by carcass on 21 Jul 2014, 13:19, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the title and formatted the question
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3219
Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jul 2014, 13:24
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10145
Premium Member
Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2015, 12:56
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
VP
VP
User avatar
S
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1205
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2015, 07:49
I got stuck between B and C.
Chose C as I missed an important point that Archaeologist did not speak or say anything about the risk that treasure hunters face in their lives when they retrieve artifacts from ancient shipwrecks.

:(
_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.


My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773
https://gmatclub.com/forum/improve-reading-habit-233410.html#p1802265

Expert Post
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4132
Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2015, 10:56
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Mechmeera wrote:
I got stuck between B and C.
Chose C as I missed an important point that Archaeologist did not speak or say anything about the risk that treasure hunters face in their lives when they retrieve artifacts from ancient shipwrecks.

:(

Dear Mechmeera,
I'm happy to respond. :-) This is a tough question: some other websites suggest that it is, in fact, an LSAT question. I cannot determine whether this is true. The LSAT questions tend to be a notch harder than the GMAT CR, so they make excellent practice.

Yes, on the GMAT CR, it's very important to understand that you should not draw a conclusion from silence or omission. This is tricky, because this is something we often do in everyday life, especially in emotional contexts (e.g. "Have you forgiven me for that incident last week?", "Let's not talk about that!") In logical arguments, such as we see on the GMAT CR, we should not infer anything from silence omission.

The treasure hunter says that the divers risk their lives. The archaeologist responds to other points, but is completely silence about this particular point. We can infer nothing. Maybe he agrees and thinks it's so obvious that it doesn't need acknowledging. Maybe he thinks it's dangerous and that the naughty underwater treasure hunters deserve to get hurt because they are doing something bad. Maybe he thinks diving for treasure is perfectly safe, but he is not particularly interested in arguing about the technical aspects of diving, because he has more important points to make. We simply don't know.

Silence or omission is not a basis for drawing a conclusion.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 979
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Apr 2017, 16:44
voodoochild wrote:
Treasure Hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found on public property cannot legally be privately owned. But according to centuries-old maritime law, people who risk their lives attempting to rescue a ship in peril are permitted to keep whatever cargo they can salvage. Under this rule treasure hunters clearly are entitled to keep the cargo from ancient shipwrecks that they risk their lives to save from oblivion in public waters.

Archaeologist: Not so. These shipwrecks have stabilized over the centuries they have lain underwater. The only danger they are in is from greedy treasure hunters who destroy archaeological evidence in their hurry to loot salable artifacts.

On the evidence of their statements, it can be concluded that the treasure hunter and the archaeologist disagree on which one of the following?

(A) what constitutes an archaeological artifact
(B) in what sense, if any, an ancient shipwreck can be said to be in peril
(C) whether treasure hunters risk their lives when they retrieve artifacts from ancient shipwrecks
(D) whether maritime law can ever be applied to a ship that has already sunk
(E) whether antique shipwrecks in public waters can properly be said to be on public property


General Description: This question asks you to identify an issue over which the treasure hunter and the archaeologist disagree. The task, then, is a matter of determining which of the choices is a claim supported by one speaker but rejected by the other.

A. Incorrect. Whether or not shipwrecks (or anything else, for that matter) count as archaeological artifacts does not arise in the passage.

B. Correct. The treasure hunter presents a rule applying to "a ship in peril" and claims that this rule applies also to the case of treasure hunters taking cargo from ancient shipwrecks. Thus the treasure hunter is saying that ancient shipwrecks count as "ships in peril" in the sense used in "centuries-old maritime law." The archaeologist, on the other hand, disagrees with this claim. By saying "these shipwrecks have stabilized over the centuries," the archaeologist shows disagreement with the claim that ancient shipwrecks are "ships in peril." By saying "The only danger they are in is from greedy treasure hunters," the archaeologist suggests a different sense in which ancient shipwrecks may be said to be in peril. Thus the treasure hunter and the archaeologist disagree over "in what sense, if any, an ancient shipwreck can be said to be- in peril."

C. Incorrect. The treasure hunter clearly believes that treasure hunters risk their lives in retrieving such artifacts, as shown by the reference in the last sentence to "cargo from ancient shipwrecks that they [i.e., treasure hunters] risk their lives to save." However, nothing the archaeologist says indicates disagreement with this claim. The archaeologist does make a claim about danger to the shipwrecks, but not about possible dangers to those who would retrieve their cargo. This was by far the most popular incorrect response.

D. Incorrect. The treasure hunter does bring maritime law into the discussion, but the archaeologist does not even address this issue in responding to the treasure hunter.

E. Incorrect. The treasure hunter brings into the discussion the general issue of the ownership of archaeological artifacts found on public property, but nothing the archaeologist says indicates any disagreement with the implication that antique shipwrecks can be said to be on public property.

Tips and Pitfalls: In a "point of disagreement" question, a choice that presents a claim that is supported or denied by one speaker, but about which the other speaker has made no commitment either way, cannot be correct. In other words, for a response to be the correct response, it is not sufficient that the speakers might disagree about it. Limit your analysis to what is actually said; avoid the temptation to speculate about what (else) either speaker might believe.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found   [#permalink] 10 Apr 2017, 16:44
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities tuanquang269 3 20 Jan 2017, 08:26
2 An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities bschool83 16 04 Nov 2013, 09:27
13 An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities hemanthp 24 13 Jan 2017, 19:43
25 Experts publish their posts in the topic Hunter: Many people blame hunters alone for the decline in perfectstranger 19 08 May 2017, 13:17
8 Hunter: Hunters alone are blamed for the decline in tenaman10 21 19 Aug 2016, 09:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.