Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 04:04 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 04:04
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
aidyn
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 19 Apr 2019
Last visit: 14 Sep 2024
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Products:
Posts: 35
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,783
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,783
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
avinash1105
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 02 Jul 2020
Last visit: 12 Nov 2022
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
15
 [1]
Given Kudos: 40
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
Posts: 87
Kudos: 15
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
saman283
Joined: 31 Mar 2020
Last visit: 20 Feb 2022
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GPA: 3.55
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Posts: 22
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja, VeritasKarishma, how can we eliminate the option B here?

B - the efficiency of solar-power generators in converting energy from the Sun into electric power is not improving as fast as it once did

B says that the efficiency is not improving. Hence we don't need to lower the production levels in order to match the demand. If the efficiency had been increasing then we could have gotten away with the lower production levels to match the demand.
User avatar
Basshead
Joined: 09 Jan 2020
Last visit: 07 Feb 2024
Posts: 925
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 432
Location: United States
Posts: 925
Kudos: 302
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It's between C and E.

C explains why American manufacturers want to maintain significant production levels -- they're competitive.

E tells us that the current market for solar generators is low in USA. We know that demand will increase, but will it increase enough to maintain the 'significant production levels'? We can't make that assumption here. Maybe USA previously exported 1,000 solar generators to Europe. Can we say that USA demand has increased enough to account for those 1,000 solar generators? No.

C wins.
User avatar
ChiranjeevSingh
Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 411
Own Kudos:
3,058
 [4]
Given Kudos: 154
Status:Private GMAT Tutor
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT Focus 2: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT Focus 3: 735 Q88 V87 DI84
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GRE 1: Q170 V168
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT Focus 3: 735 Q88 V87 DI84
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GRE 1: Q170 V168
Posts: 411
Kudos: 3,058
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dipeshsalvi
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

United States manufacturers currently produce most of the world's solar-power generators—most of which are exported to Europe. However, European manufacturers are emerging and probably will ultimately capture much of the European market. The United States government is funding initiatives intended to encourage use of solar power within the United States. If these initiatives succeed in increasing the demand for solar-power generators in the United States, United States manufacturers will probably maintain significant production levels, since __________.

(E) the current market for solar-power generators in the United States is very limited


Let me explain why E is wrong.

Let me first start with a changed passage and a changed option E. Let's remove the "If part" of the last sentence of the passage and change option E as follows:

United States manufacturers currently produce most of the world's solar-power generators—most of which are exported to Europe. However, European manufacturers are emerging and probably will ultimately capture much of the European market. The United States government is funding initiatives intended to encourage use of solar power within the United States. United States manufacturers will probably maintain significant production levels, since __________.

E'. The current market for solar-power generators in the United States doesn't have much potential to grow.

What is the impact of the above option E'?

E' actually weakens the argument rather than strengthen it. If the current market doesn't have much potential to grow, the initiatives to encourage the use of solar power within the US may not succeed. As a result, US manufacturers may not be able to maintain significant production levels.

*************************
Now, let me reintroduce a modified "if" part in the last statement of the passage:

United States manufacturers currently produce most of the world's solar-power generators—most of which are exported to Europe. However, European manufacturers are emerging and probably will ultimately capture much of the European market. The United States government is funding initiatives intended to encourage use of solar power within the United States. If these initiatives succeed in significantly increasing the demand for solar-power generators in the United States, United States manufacturers will probably maintain significant production levels, since __________.

Now, what is the impact of option E' ?

Now, E' has no impact on the argument. Why? Because now, option E' just indicates that the "if" part is very unlikely to happen; E' doesn't impact the "if then" statement. Let me explain.

Let's say there is a statement "If you score 760 on the GMAT, you'll get into HBS."

Can you weaken this statement by saying that you're unlikely to score 760 on the GMAT?

No. Saying so will have no impact on the statement. The statement says that if X happens, Y will happen. What if X doesn't happen? That has no impact on the statement. The statement is weakened only if we say that even if X happens, Y may not happen.

Thus, E' will have no impact on this modified conclusion.

***********

Now, let's talk about the original passage:

United States manufacturers currently produce most of the world's solar-power generators—most of which are exported to Europe. However, European manufacturers are emerging and probably will ultimately capture much of the European market. The United States government is funding initiatives intended to encourage use of solar power within the United States. If these initiatives succeed in increasing the demand for solar-power generators in the United States, United States manufacturers will probably maintain significant production levels, since __________.

E'. The current market for solar-power generators in the United States doesn't have much potential to grow.

In this case, we can argue that E' is a slight weakener since it limits the upside of the increase in demand for solar power generators in the US. We can argue that even if the initiatives succeed in increasing the demand for solar-power generators in the United States, the increase may not be substantial, and thus, US manufacturers may not be able to maintain significant production levels.

********

Now, let's talk about the original passage and the original option E.

United States manufacturers currently produce most of the world's solar-power generators—most of which are exported to Europe. However, European manufacturers are emerging and probably will ultimately capture much of the European market. The United States government is funding initiatives intended to encourage use of solar power within the United States. If these initiatives succeed in increasing the demand for solar-power generators in the United States, United States manufacturers will probably maintain significant production levels, since __________.

(E) the current market for solar-power generators in the United States is very limited

As we have discussed above, whether the current market for solar-power generators has the potential to grow substantially has an impact on the argument. However, option E says that the current market is very limited. The problem is that whether a market is very limited or not very limited, it may or may not have the potential to grow. Even if a market is not very limited, it may still have significant potential to grow. Thus, option E has no impact on the argument.

Rather, one may also think that this option has a slight negative impact since if the current market is very limited, growing it may also not be able to compensate for the loss of the European market.
User avatar
Raman109
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Jul 2025
Posts: 805
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 805
Kudos: 170
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Understanding the argument -
US manufacturers currently produce most of the world's solar-powered generators—most of which are exported to Europe.
But now, European manufacturers are emerging and capturing the European market.
The United States government is funding initiatives intended to encourage the use of solar power within the United States.
The argument predicts that If these initiatives succeed in increasing the demand for solar-power generators in the United States, United States manufacturers will probably maintain significant production levels since.....

There is a paradox in the conclusion. If the EU supplier can capture the EU market, they can capture the US market as well, so how will the US supplier probably maintain significant production levels? Where are they supplying? Not to EU much. So, it means they supply to the US market. But how come EU suppliers can't come? That's what option C states.

Option elimination -

(A) some United States manufacturers have been substantially increasing their output over the last several years - This worsens the paradox in the conclusion but doesn't strengthen the conclusion. Distortion

(B) the efficiency of solar-power generators in converting energy from the Sun into electric power is not improving as fast as it once did - It doesn't matter. Out of scope.

(C) just as European manufacturers enjoy certain competitive advantages in Europe, so do United States manufacturers in the United States - ok.

(D) European governments are currently undertaking initiatives to stimulate the use of solar power within Europe - but that doesn't explain for US suppliers as the EU market will mostly be taken by EU suppliers.

(E) the current market for solar-power generators in the United States is very limited - weakener.
User avatar
GMAT745owner
Joined: 16 Oct 2024
Last visit: 21 Jul 2025
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 769
Posts: 18
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E is just a mother way of saying ‘ If these initiatives succeed in increasing the demand for ’. It doesn’t help explaining.
User avatar
einstein801
Joined: 23 Jan 2024
Last visit: 18 Feb 2025
Posts: 168
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 138
Posts: 168
Kudos: 179
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Ninja, I disagree. The funding initiatives can be naught if the current demand is already at max capacity.
GMATNinja
aidyn
Awesome explanation! Now everything makes sense. Thanks, GMATNinja!
Thank you for the kind words, aidyn! Glad we could help.

Quote:
(E) the current market for solar-power generators in the United States is very limited
DiyaDutta
Can someone help me eliminate E. Is it because even though there is a limited US market for solar power and the demand might help the US manufacturers, but European manufacturers might come and take that market from the US manufacturers in which case just having a limited market and increasing that is not helpful?
I think you are on the right track here. The current market for solar-powered generators in the US isn't that important. The US government is funding initiatives intended to encourage use of solar power within the United States. So regardless of the current demand, we expect US demand to increase.

Check out this explanation of the OA, if you haven't already.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,783
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,783
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
einstein801
Hi Ninja, I disagree. The funding initiatives can be naught if the current demand is already at max capacity.

DiyaDutta
Can someone help me eliminate E. Is it because even though there is a limited US market for solar power and the demand might help the US manufacturers, but European manufacturers might come and take that market from the US manufacturers in which case just having a limited market and increasing that is not helpful?

I think you are on the right track here. The current market for solar-powered generators in the US isn't that important. The US government is funding initiatives intended to encourage use of solar power within the United States. So regardless of the current demand, we expect US demand to increase.

Check out this explanation of the OA, if you haven't already.
If (E) said something like, "the current market for solar-power generators in the United States is NOT at max capacity" you might have a point.

But as written, choice (E) is irrelevant because the argument is based on a hypothetical situation: "IF these initiatives succeed in increasing the demand for solar-power generators in the United States...". We don't need to worry about WHETHER the funding initiatives will or will not succeed because, for this argument, we are assuming that they DO succeed.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
HarshZsssh
Joined: 20 Aug 2024
Last visit: 12 Apr 2025
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 42
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
can u explain bit more why ans is not d this option seems vermy tempting to me
carcass
I'll try to help you dissecting your reasoning, maybe is useful to you and other students

you say

My Analysis:

Info – 1: United States manufacturers currently produce most of the world's solar-power generators--most of which are exported to Europe.

OK

Info – 2: However, European manufacturers are emerging and probably will ultimately capture much of the European market. (Assumption – It will reduce the US exports to Europe)

OK

Info – 3: The United States government is funding initiatives intended to encourage use of solar power within the United States. If these initiatives succeed in increasing the demand for solar-power generators in the United States, United States manufacturers will probably maintain significant production levels, since __________.

After since we need an answer that strenghten the argument in this case.

Analysis: Blank space is preceded by since which is the premise indicator, hence we should identify the premise that support the argument conclusion that “United States manufacturers will probably maintain significant production levels”.

Pre-think of answer: There is scope for increase in sales in US market.

Not properly true, because if you have a competitive advantage you can still maintain your market share and still have your sales constant respect your competitors

Hence I selected answer choice E as it says the current market is limited and with US govt. initiatives it will increase.

But the correct answer choice is C and I am not able to identify the reason for the same.

Please explain what I am missing in my approach.


Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

(A) some United States manufacturers have been substantially increasing their output over the last several years

what is happened until now is not our concern

(B) the efficiency of solar-power generators in converting energy from the Sun into electric power is not improving as fast as it once did

the efficiency is not our concern

(C) just as European manufacturers enjoy certain competitive advantages in Europe, so do United States manufacturers in the United States

US manufcturers want the european market but now maybe is not the same scenario as before. the US M will maintain significant production levels only and only if they have a consistent market share to sell solar power aka competitive advantage

(D) European governments are currently undertaking initiatives to stimulate the use of solar power within Europe

we already know this from the statement


(E) the current market for solar-power generators in the United States is very limited

we have NOT enough information to say this. where did you see this or infer from the stimulus ?? nowhere. moreover, we are talking about the current market BUT we are concerned about the FUTURE market share


Regards
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,783
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
HarshZsssh
can u explain bit more why ans is not d this option seems vermy tempting to me

Check out this post and let us know if you still have questions: https://gmatclub.com/forum/united-state ... l#p1999208.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts