Last visit was: 12 Jul 2024, 21:12 It is currently 12 Jul 2024, 21:12
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# Unlike human runners, who broke the four-minute mile in 1954

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 111
Own Kudos [?]: 589 [30]
Given Kudos: 0
Intern
Joined: 16 Apr 2013
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [3]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: China
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.04
SVP
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2261
Own Kudos [?]: 3700 [4]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: New York, NY
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Posts: 2093
Own Kudos [?]: 8977 [3]
Given Kudos: 171
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Unlike human runners, who broke the four-minute mile in 1954 [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Unlike human runners, who broke the four-minute mile in 1954 and they consistently recorded faster times ever since, horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have had winning times with little improvement: Secretariat’s world-record-breaking Derby tine of 1:59 2/5, for example, was set in 1973 and remained unsurpassed more than a quarter of a century later.
A. they consistently recorded faster times ever since, horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have had winning times with little improvement - parallelism issue -- and is followed by a clause but no clause before
B. they have consistently recorded faster times ever since, those of horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have shown little improvement in winning times - Illogical comparison - "human runners" to "those of horses"
C. have consistently recorded faster times ever since, horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have shown little improvement in winning times - Correct
D. have consistently recorded faster times ever since, in those of classic races such as the Kentucky Derby, horses have had winning times with little improvement - illogically compares human runner to "those of classic races", where it's not even clear what the pronoun "those" refers to, but definitely not horses, which is the only noun that can logically compare to a human runner in the context of this sentence.
E. consistently recorded faster times ever since, those of horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have shown little improvement in winning times - Illogical comparison - "human runners" to "those of horses"

Intern
Joined: 12 Jan 2019
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 17 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: Unlike human runners, who broke the four-minute mile in 1954 [#permalink]
The use of pronoun “they” is redundant and wrong as we have already introduced the subject “human runners” with “who” in the same sentence. So, eliminate A and B.
Choice D and E comparison of “human runners” with “horses” is not clear. Hence, D and E are out. Choice C has the clear comparison and the right use of pronoun. Hence, C is the answer.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4918
Own Kudos [?]: 7797 [0]
Given Kudos: 220
Location: India
Re: Unlike human runners, who broke the four-minute mile in 1954 [#permalink]
Top Contributor
johnycute wrote:
Unlike human runners, who broke the four-minute mile in 1954 and they consistently recorded faster times ever since, horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have had winning times with little improvement: Secretariat’s world-record-breaking Derby tine of 1:59 2/5, for example, was set in 1973 and remained unsurpassed more than a quarter of a century later.

(A) they consistently recorded faster times ever since, horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have had winning times with little improvement

(B) they have consistently recorded faster times ever since, those of horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have shown little improvement in winning times

(C) have consistently recorded faster times ever since, horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have shown little improvement in winning times

(D) have consistently recorded faster times ever since, in those of classic races such as the Kentucky Derby, horses have had winning times with little improvement

(E) consistently recorded faster times ever since, those of horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have shown little improvement in winning times

This question is based on Comparison and Structure.

The noun placed immediately after the conjunction ‘unlike’ provides the basis of comparison. In this sentence, the noun is ‘human runners’. In Option A, the comparison is between ‘human runners’ and ‘horses in classic races’. This comparison is logical but the sentence also requires parallelism in the modifier that describes ‘human runners’. The modifier “who broke the four-minute mile in 1954 and they consistently recorded faster times ever since” lacks parallelism as “who broke” cannot be parallel to “they consistently recorded”. So, Option A can be eliminated.

The same error of parallelism is present in Option B also. Option B also has an error comparison. In this option, ‘human runners’ is compared to the phrase “those of horses”. So, Option B can also be ruled out.

In Option C, the comparison is appropriate because ‘human runners’ are compared to ‘horses in classic races”. The error of parallelism in Option A has been rectified in this option. The modifier “who broke the four-minute mile in 1954 and have consistently recorded faster times ever since” maintains parallelism because the verb ‘broke’ is parallel to ‘have recorded’. The two verbs signify two actions done by human runners and convey the actions in the appropriate tenses. So, Option C is the best of all the options.

In Option D, the comparison seems to be between ‘human runners’ and the phrase ‘in those of classic races’. This comparison is completely illogical. So, Option D can be eliminated.

In Option E, the comparison is between ‘human runners’ and the phrase ‘those of horses’. Option E also contains a tense error. The simple past tense cannot be used with the conjunction ‘since’. The verb ‘recorded’ should instead have been in the present perfect tense ‘have recorded’. So, Option E can also be eliminated.

Therefore, C is the most appropriate option.

Jayanthi Kumar.
Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2019
Posts: 59
Own Kudos [?]: 139 [0]
Given Kudos: 130
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
Re: Unlike human runners, who broke the four-minute mile in 1954 [#permalink]
who broke the four-minute mile in 1954 and they consistently recorded faster times ever since remove this modifier to see what values are compared.

Unlike Human runners…. Horses [Correct]
Unlike Human Runner..., those of horses; runner [referred by plural those] of horses or human of horses [Incorrect]

Between A & C.
"ever since" indicates that present perfect is needed "have shown,
"have recorded" is parallel to " have shown", Also C conveys clear meaning.

Correct: C
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Posts: 6049
Own Kudos [?]: 4763 [0]
Given Kudos: 463
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Re: Unlike human runners, who broke the four-minute mile in 1954 [#permalink]
johnycute wrote:
Unlike human runners, who broke the four-minute mile in 1954 and they consistently recorded faster times ever since, horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have had winning times with little improvement: Secretariat’s world-record-breaking Derby tine of 1:59 2/5, for example, was set in 1973 and remained unsurpassed more than a quarter of a century later.

(A) they consistently recorded faster times ever since, horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have had winning times with little improvement

(B) they have consistently recorded faster times ever since, those of horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have shown little improvement in winning times

(C) have consistently recorded faster times ever since, horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have shown little improvement in winning times

(D) have consistently recorded faster times ever since, in those of classic races such as the Kentucky Derby, horses have had winning times with little improvement

(E) consistently recorded faster times ever since, those of horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have shown little improvement in winning times

Must be (C)-

Unlike human runners, who broke the four-minute mile in 1954 and have consistently recorded faster times ever since, horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have shown little improvement in winning times : Secretariat’s world-record-breaking Derby tine of 1:59 2/5, for example, was set in 1973 and remained unsurpassed more than a quarter of a century later.
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17494
Own Kudos [?]: 867 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: Unlike human runners, who broke the four-minute mile in 1954 [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Unlike human runners, who broke the four-minute mile in 1954 [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6979 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts