Last visit was: 02 May 2026, 23:43 It is currently 02 May 2026, 23:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 May 2026
Posts: 110,019
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,993
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,019
Kudos: 812,553
 [24]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
22
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 May 2026
Posts: 110,019
Own Kudos:
812,553
 [3]
Given Kudos: 105,993
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,019
Kudos: 812,553
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 May 2026
Posts: 110,019
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,993
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,019
Kudos: 812,553
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Krishnak13
Joined: 03 Dec 2021
Last visit: 16 Aug 2023
Posts: 116
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 52
Location: India
GMAT 1: 590 Q48 V23
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.6
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation. In this question, we can also say that cause - produce is mentioned in verb-ing, which must represent the effect part. Hence incorrect grammatically
avatar
shubhammah24
Joined: 12 Mar 2021
Last visit: 09 Nov 2022
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
28
 [6]
Given Kudos: 44
Location: India
GPA: 3
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel I understand the following structure---
"The basic structure of the correct option is as follows:

The largest energy producer in the Nordic region was Starkraft, which produced 22.7 kWH of energy and which had 2100 employees."

But----- The use of which in "and, including the subsidiaries Skagerak Energi and Trondheim Energi, which had 2100 employees." seems to refer to Trondheim Energi or atleast is ambiguous. Why is the use of which different here?

Thanks
User avatar
TargetKellogg2024
User avatar
MBA Section Director
Joined: 25 Apr 2018
Last visit: 06 Apr 2026
Posts: 441
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: Germany
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V36
GMAT 2: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V37
GRE 1: Q170 V163
Products:
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V37
GRE 1: Q170 V163
Posts: 441
Kudos: 741
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In 2007, the third largest energy producer in the Nordic region was Statkraft, a Norwegian state-owned electricity company, which produced 22.7 kWH of energy of which majority was Hydroelectric produced in 133 plants in Norway, 12 in Sweden and 4 in Finland and, including the subsidiaries Skagerak Energi and Trondheim Energi, which had 2100 employees.


Are you sure the text in pink makes sense?

Let's split the correct sentence in two parts:
1. In 2007, the third largest energy producer in the Nordic region was Statkraft, a Norwegian state-owned electricity company, which produced 22.7 kWH of energy -Makes sense

2. In 2007, the third largest energy producer in the Nordic region was Statkraft, a Norwegian state-owned electricity company, including the subsidiaries Skagerak Energi and Trondheim Energi, which had 2100 employees. - Issue is quite evident. Did Statkraft, including the subsidiaries, had 2100 employees? OR,
Did Statkraft, including the employees of the subsidiaries, had 2100 employees?
User avatar
sayan640
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Last visit: 02 May 2026
Posts: 1,116
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 790
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Products:
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Posts: 1,116
Kudos: 866
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TargetKellogg2024
In 2007, the third largest energy producer in the Nordic region was Statkraft, a Norwegian state-owned electricity company, which produced 22.7 kWH of energy of which majority was Hydroelectric produced in 133 plants in Norway, 12 in Sweden and 4 in Finland and, including the subsidiaries Skagerak Energi and Trondheim Energi, which had 2100 employees.


Are you sure the text in pink makes sense?

Let's split the correct sentence in two parts:
1. In 2007, the third largest energy producer in the Nordic region was Statkraft, a Norwegian state-owned electricity company, which produced 22.7 kWH of energy -Makes sense

2. In 2007, the third largest energy producer in the Nordic region was Statkraft, a Norwegian state-owned electricity company, including the subsidiaries Skagerak Energi and Trondheim Energi, which had 2100 employees. - Issue is quite evident. Did Statkraft, including the subsidiaries, had 2100 employees? OR,
Did Statkraft, including the employees of the subsidiaries, had 2100 employees?

I also dont think the text in pink makes sense... Bunuel GMATNinja
Moderators:
Math Expert
110019 posts
Founder
43197 posts