OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Day 241 Sentence Correction (SC1)
THE PROMPTQuote:
If Levi-Strauss is right, myths are constructed by a universal logic
that is, like language itself, as characteristic of human beings as nest-building by birds.
• Meaning and structure?
Building nests is characteristic of birds. Similarly, constructing myths is characteristic of human beings.We have a comparison: Myth-constructing based on universal logic is AS characteristic of human beings AS nest-building is characteristic of birds.
Finally, remember the basics.
-- we say characteristic OF
-- Another idiom is
AS X AS Y, in which the X and Y elements must be parallel.
• StrategyThis question is a siren song because it tempts us to get bogged down in the difficult AS/LIKE distinction.
I would advise that you avoid that distinction for as long as you can and look for other errors.
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A) If Levi-Strauss is right, myths are constructed by a universal logic
that is, like language itself, as characteristic of human beings as nest-building [is] [characteristic] by OF birds.
• nonsensical. The sentence says that
nest building by birds is
as characteristic of human beings
as constructing myths is [characteristic of human beings]
• the prepositions that follow the explicit and the implicit
characteristic should match and do not
-- characteristic OF and the preposition BY do not match
ELIMINATE A
Quote:
B) If Levi-Strauss is right, myths are constructed by a universal logic
that, like language itself, is as characteristic of human beings as nest-building is of birds.
• THis option looks clean:
- universal logic is AS characteristic OF human beings AS nest-building is characteristic OF birds
KEEP
Quote:
C) If Levi-Strauss is right, myths are constructed by a universal logic
that, as language itself, is [AS] characteristic for human beings as nest-building is for birds.
• in a comparison structure, if one AS is used, another must be, too:
AS X AS Y-- in this option, the comparative AS before
characteristic is missing
• finally, we cannot use
as language itself this way. See explanation under option D, below.
Quote:
D) If Levi-Strauss is right, myths are constructed by a universal logic
D) which is, as language itself, characteristic for human beings as nest-building [is] for birds.
• characteristic FOR is not idiomatic
•
which must be preceded by a comma and is not interchangeable with
that•
which gets a preceding comma and sets off nonessential material
-- I have seen exactly one official question in which, in the non-underlined portion, the word
which was used without a preceding comma.
That question is very old.
-- in British English,
which and
that are interchangeable
-- in U.S. English,
which is accompanied by commas and sets off nonessential material whereas
that is not accompanied by commas and signals essential material
-- for a long time, people have predicted the demise of the distinction between
which and
that on the GMAT
I don't think so. (I hope not. I'm a stickler about this distinction.)
SC#824 in OG 2020 explicitly tests that very rule.
•
as language itself is wrong
--
as means in the way that [language itself] -- then what?
As language itself IS or DOES what?
-- when
as is followed by a noun or noun phrase, it cannot mean "similar to."
-- AS connotes:
→ ROLE.
The uncle will act as guardian of his nieces and nephews. [in the role of guardian]
→ EQUALS.
I think of him as my brother. (He's not my brother, but I think of him in that way. I equate him with my brother.)
→ STAGE: As a teenager, she was shy.
Quote:
E) If Levi-Strauss is right, myths are constructed by a universal logic
which, like language itself, is as characteristic for human beings as nest-building [is (characteristic)]by birds.
[/quote]
•
which should be preceded by a comma
• neither characteristic
FOR nor characteristic
by is idiomatic
•
for and
by are not parallel
• We need an "is characteristic of" right after
nest-buildingThe best answer is B.COMMENTSGautam12121991 ,
sauravvirat1986 , and
ayushgarg32 , welcome to SC Butler.
I like the different approaches to the question and the different styles of explanation. Nice work. Kudos to all.