Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 07:27 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 07:27
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
catfreak
Joined: 20 Nov 2010
Last visit: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
120
 [19]
Given Kudos: 38
Posts: 87
Kudos: 120
 [19]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
17
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,778
Own Kudos:
810,786
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,778
Kudos: 810,786
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Amit0507
Joined: 26 May 2013
Last visit: 15 Aug 2016
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
78
 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Posts: 41
Kudos: 78
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ssriva2
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2015
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 94
Kudos: 37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
catfreak
Economist: The economy of the Republic of Nantau has experienced lower than expected growth in the past year, and the value of its currency has dropped against the Yen. As a result, purchases of imported goods, such as usually luxury items or high-end electronics, will likely decrease as people turn to cheaper domestic equivalents. However, this will likely help reverse the negative economic trends by creating a trade surplus as export goods become cheaper.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(A) The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.
(B) The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome.
(C) The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction.
(D) The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction.
(E) The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.


Please explain your solution.


I think it should be A.
In question,statement 2 is negative effect and statement 3 is positive effect.As per the analysis,statement 3 is main conclusion.
PLease help!
User avatar
Ashishmathew01081987
Joined: 20 Jan 2013
Last visit: 07 Jun 2020
Posts: 92
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 71
Status:I am not a product of my circumstances. I am a product of my decisions
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GPA: 3.92
WE:Operations (Energy)
Posts: 92
Kudos: 313
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ssriva2
catfreak
Economist: The economy of the Republic of Nantau has experienced lower than expected growth in the past year, and the value of its currency has dropped against the Yen. As a result, purchases of imported goods, such as usually luxury items or high-end electronics, will likely decrease as people turn to cheaper domestic equivalents. However, this will likely help reverse the negative economic trends by creating a trade surplus as export goods become cheaper.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(A) The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.
(B) The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome.
(C) The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction.
(D) The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction.
(E) The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.


Please explain your solution.


I think it should be A.
In question,statement 2 is negative effect and statement 3 is positive effect.As per the analysis,statement 3 is main conclusion.
PLease help!


The answer is c


1) The value of its currency has dropped against the Yen - FACT

2) As a result, purchases of imported goods, such as usually luxury items or high-end electronics, will likely decrease - Prediction of an Outcome based on above fact.

3) ]However, this will likely help reverse the negative economic trends by creating a trade surplus as export goodsbecome cheaper - Providing conceding contrast i.e. author unwillingly agrees to statement 3 because it provides a counter reasoning to the authors main conclusion i.e. purchases of imported goods will likely decrease.

Hope this helps
User avatar
AkshdeepS
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,423
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,002
Status:It's near - I can see.
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
GPA: 3.01
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Products:
Posts: 1,423
Kudos: 1,937
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
catfreak
Economist: The economy of the Republic of Nantau has experienced lower than expected growth in the past year, and the value of its currency has dropped against the Yen. As a result, purchases of imported goods, such as usually luxury items or high-end electronics, will likely decrease as people turn to cheaper domestic equivalents. However, this will likely help reverse the negative economic trends by creating a trade surplus as export goods become cheaper.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

BF 1 is a fact statement. This statement affects some prediction/result mentioned in the next line.

BF 2 is the main point of the passage.

It is easier to eliminate statements as per BF 2.

Eliminate D: BF 2 is not a prediction.

Eliminate E : BF 2 itself is the main conclusion and not the evidence to support the main point.

Now use BF 1.

A : Not that much to eliminate. Keep it.

B : BF 2 does not support the certain outcome. Actually BF 2 is against the outcome.

C. CORRECT : BF 1 is just showing a development. BF 2 is against the outcome.

(A) The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.

(B) The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome.

(C) The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction.

(D) The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction.

(E) The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.


Please explain your solution.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think C is more detailed but I don't find any wrong with option A
User avatar
Crytiocanalyst
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 27 May 2023
Posts: 943
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 309
Posts: 943
Kudos: 214
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
catfreak
Economist: The economy of the Republic of Nantau has experienced lower than expected growth in the past year, and the value of its currency has dropped against the Yen. As a result, purchases of imported goods, such as usually luxury items or high-end electronics, will likely decrease as people turn to cheaper domestic equivalents. However, this will likely help reverse the negative economic trends by creating a trade surplus as export goods become cheaper.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


(A) The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.
The context was established earlier that the economy is in negative progress and second one isn't the main conclusion

(B) The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome.
The second half predicits it will be part of the outcome and not the other way around and the first half is absolutely correct though but rest is not in sink

(C) The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction.
This is exactly the meaning and the roles played by the 2 bold face therefore let us hang on to it

(D) The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction.
This is entirely out of the reasoning circle and doesn't even touch the slightest role played by the boldfaces therefore out

(E) The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.
These are not the main conclusion of the argument

Therefore IMO C
avatar
Ozzy11100
Joined: 04 Jul 2021
Last visit: 14 Dec 2021
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 32
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is a poor quality question, in my humble opinion.

Answer choice C states: "The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction."

The first portion is absolutely correct; the second is not accurate. BF2 does not "weigh against" the prediction, it furthers the prediction. For BF2 to weigh against the prediction, it would have to in some way contradict the prediction that "purchases...will decrease." It does not do that. It simply states that there is a positive side effect of the stated prediction - it does not weigh against that prediction.

Cheers.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,423
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,423
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts