Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 07:15 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 07:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
ab2014
Joined: 16 May 2014
Last visit: 27 Oct 2017
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
75
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 11
Kudos: 75
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
b2bt
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Last visit: 14 Apr 2024
Posts: 192
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 242
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V34
Products:
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V34
Posts: 192
Kudos: 651
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KyleWiddison
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Last visit: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 779
Own Kudos:
2,695
 [2]
Given Kudos: 5
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 779
Kudos: 2,695
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rajthakkar
Joined: 08 Sep 2014
Last visit: 21 Dec 2018
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Concentration: Economics, Entrepreneurship
Schools: NUS '18
GMAT Date: 03-17-2015
Schools: NUS '18
Posts: 37
Kudos: 268
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KyleWiddison
Not a bad self-made question. I agree, though, that both B and D have merits. In fact, I believe that B would be more valuable to know because it's closer to the premise that the government wants to decrease pollution. If X pollutes at a higher level, but is needed at a lower level, the pollution created from the same trip could be lower for X and the government would be motivated to push for fuel X.

KW

Hey KyleWiddison ,

IMO if we want to evaluate B we will also have to assume overall pollution caused by equivalent amount of fuels X is lesser than is caused by Y.

We are not given any info If X pollutes at a higher level, but is needed at a lower level, then it will yield lower pollution than higher amount of Y.

Correct me if I am wrong.
User avatar
KyleWiddison
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Last visit: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 779
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 779
Kudos: 2,695
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rajthakkar
KyleWiddison
Not a bad self-made question. I agree, though, that both B and D have merits. In fact, I believe that B would be more valuable to know because it's closer to the premise that the government wants to decrease pollution. If X pollutes at a higher level, but is needed at a lower level, the pollution created from the same trip could be lower for X and the government would be motivated to push for fuel X.

KW

Hey KyleWiddison ,

IMO if we want to evaluate B we will also have to assume overall pollution caused by equivalent amount of fuels X is lesser than is caused by Y.

We are not given any info If X pollutes at a higher level, but is needed at a lower level, then it will yield lower pollution than higher amount of Y.

Correct me if I am wrong.

I'm having a hard time following your reasoning above. Maybe you can clarify.

The argument states that X pollutes at a higher level. If less X is needed, however, the pollution per mile (instead of per quantity of consumed liquid) could be lower for X. That would be very important to know in evaluating the conclusion.

KW
User avatar
TeamGMATIFY
Joined: 20 Aug 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2016
Posts: 339
Own Kudos:
1,527
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Posts: 339
Kudos: 1,527
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ab2014
Hi

Posting a self made question for practice purpose.

Natural fuels X and Y are commonly used by vehicles around the country. Recent tests indicate that complete combustion of X releases more pollutants in the air than complete combustion of an equal volume of Y. Since the government is inclined to bring down pollution levels in the long run, it can be expected that around 30 years from now, the manufacturing of cars that use the natural fuel Y will be significantly higher in proportion than that of cars that use fuel X.

Which of the following would be most useful to evaluate the argument’s conclusion?

A. Whether same vehicles that use fuel X can also use fuel Y?
B. Whether current cars that run on fuel X consume less fuel than cars that run on fuel Y to cover the same distance?
C. Whether the profit margin for cars that use fuel Y will be significantly higher 30 years from now?
D. Whether the natural resources of fuel Y are sufficient to comfortably cater to the demand of Y throughout the entire period of 30 years and beyond?
E. Whether the price of cars that run on fuel Y shall increase in the coming years?

Conclusion: 30 years from now, the manufacturing of cars that use the natural fuel Y will be significantly higher in proportion than that of cars that use fuel X.
As discussed above, looking at the options, only B and D come close.

Between B and D, B is talking about a flaw that is present currently, whereas D talks about a situation that can affect in the long term.
Therefore if everything goes well and there are indeed enough resources 30 years down the line, then the conclusion will hold true.

Correct Option: D
User avatar
warriorguy
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Last visit: 08 Feb 2023
Posts: 377
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 144
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Telecommunications)
Posts: 377
Kudos: 364
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I would go with B - if lesser volume of X is required then concl is hurt
User avatar
goforgmat
Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Last visit: 02 Nov 2019
Posts: 235
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 232
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 2.8
Products:
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
Posts: 235
Kudos: 108
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Even i would go with B as it is in sync with the premises . The goal is to reduce the pollution levels hence we need to know what is stated in B. option D only caters to the conclusion . B would be more appropriate to me.
User avatar
Its_me_aka_ak
Joined: 16 Jul 2023
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
21
 [1]
Given Kudos: 310
Location: India
GPA: 3.46
Posts: 111
Kudos: 21
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ab2014
Hi

Posting a self made question for practice purpose.

Natural fuels X and Y are commonly used by vehicles around the country. Recent tests indicate that complete combustion of X releases more pollutants in the air than complete combustion of an equal volume of Y. Since the government is inclined to bring down pollution levels in the long run, it can be expected that around 30 years from now, the manufacturing of cars that use the natural fuel Y will be significantly higher in proportion than that of cars that use fuel X.
Which of the following would be most useful to evaluate the argument’s conclusion?
A. Whether same vehicles that use fuel X can also use fuel Y?
B. Whether current cars that run on fuel X consume less fuel than cars that run on fuel Y to cover the same distance?
C. Whether the profit margin for cars that use fuel Y will be significantly higher 30 years from now?
D. Whether the natural resources of fuel Y are sufficient to comfortably cater to the demand of Y throughout the entire period of 30 years and beyond?
E. Whether the price of cars that run on fuel Y shall increase in the coming years?

Right answer HAS to be B
Conclusion is that manufacturing of y cars will be significantly more

D says Y may or may not be available in 30 years but says nothin About X. If Y and X both wont be available then manufacturing of both will either stop or remain similar. May be cycles will take over lmao
B on the other hand makes the comparison clear and is at least a better choice if not perfect

Posted from my mobile device
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts