Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 23:53 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 23:53
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
abhimahna
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 3,481
Own Kudos:
5,779
 [14]
Given Kudos: 346
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,481
Kudos: 5,779
 [14]
Kudos
Add Kudos
14
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
saicharan1191
Joined: 21 Jun 2014
Last visit: 18 Nov 2023
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 54
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
saicharan1191
Joined: 21 Jun 2014
Last visit: 18 Nov 2023
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 54
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Utkarsh KOhli
I would go with B. E seems too generic and B is to the point.
B says that Michelangelo's original intended work has been separated from others' additions, but if that is the case then it must reflect his original work right? But option E goes one step ahead says, due to multiple reworks by the artist himself, it is not possible to separate out his original intended work, even after stripping out other people's additions. So in the first place Stephen's argument is saying that the method suggested by the first argument may not be possible to implement.
I am still skeptical.

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
zflodeen
Joined: 04 Sep 2017
Last visit: 17 Dec 2017
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 610 Q36 V36
GMAT 2: 680 Q40 V36
GPA: 3.3
WE:Consulting (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
GMAT 2: 680 Q40 V36
Posts: 19
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Since the question asks "Stephen’s response to Zachary, if true, most strongly supports which one of the following?" and Stephen is pointing out how Michelangelo added painted details to their own fresco work after the original fresco has dried. Since the question assumes Stephen's statement to be true, I believe B is most supported by Stephen's specific statement. If you strip everything away except the original fresco, you will have removed the painting which Michelangelo did after the original, and therefore, it would still not be as he intended. I believe that E is too general and not related to Stephen's statement.
avatar
dumbodingo
Joined: 19 Apr 2017
Last visit: 11 Apr 2019
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
15
 [1]
Given Kudos: 357
Location: India
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Posts: 22
Kudos: 15
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can somebody explain why A is not correct?
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,133
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,133
Kudos: 7,377
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dumbodingo
Can somebody explain why A is not correct?

Hi,

Stephen said that painters of Michelangelo’s era often added painted details to their own fresco work after the frescos had dried.

Choice A indicated that the original and the modified are really similar. Thus this choice slightly weakens the Stephen's argument since Stephen implied that those paintings are different.
avatar
dumbodingo
Joined: 19 Apr 2017
Last visit: 11 Apr 2019
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 357
Location: India
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Posts: 22
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
broall
dumbodingo
Can somebody explain why A is not correct?

Hi,

Stephen said that painters of Michelangelo’s era often added painted details to their own fresco work after the frescos had dried.

Choice A indicated that the original and the modified are really similar. Thus this choice slightly weakens the Stephen's argument since Stephen implied that those paintings are different.

Thank you so much for explaining. I see what you mean now, and the difference seems really subtle. I get stuck the close calls...then think, think, think, and pick the wrong one :sad: Any advice, word of caution?
User avatar
abhimahna
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 3,481
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 346
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,481
Kudos: 5,779
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dumbodingo

Thank you so much for explaining. I see what you mean now, and the difference seems really subtle. I get stuck the close calls...then think, think, think, and pick the wrong one :sad: Any advice, word of caution?

Hey dumbodingo ,

Here is the catch: When you get stuck at 2 options, it means you have done the easier part of the job.

You need to slow down further, be very careful and reread everything again. Good Luck :)
User avatar
Jayant9090
Joined: 19 Feb 2018
Last visit: 21 Feb 2026
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98
Posts: 37
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have one doubt here in argument, i might have misunderstood something!
Zach: Unfortunately, additions known to have been made by LATER PAINTERS have obscured the original fresco work done by Michelangelo in the Sistine Chapel.
Steph: it was extremely common for painters of Michelangelo’s era to add painted details to their own fresco work after the frescos had dried.
so my confusion is Steph's logic will work if Michelangelo did the later addition to painting as well, not if some later painters did that.
hence, i eliminated 'B'.
What am i missing here?
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,329
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Zachary: The term “fresco” refers to paint that has been applied to wet plaster. Once dried, a fresco indelibly preserves the paint that a painter has applied in this way. Unfortunately, additions known to have been made by later painters have obscured the original fresco work done by Michelangelo in the Sistine Chapel. Therefore, in order to restore Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel paintings to the appearance that Michelangelo intended them to have, everything except the original fresco work must be stripped away.

Stephen: But it was extremely common for painters of Michelangelo’s era to add painted details to their own fresco work after the frescos had dried.

Stephen’s response to Zachary, if true, most strongly supports which one of the following?

(A) It is impossible to distinguish the later painted additions made to Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel paintings from the original fresco work. - WRONG. Not that Stephen suggests that it can be possible.

(B) Stripping away everything except Michelangelo’s original fresco work from the Sistine Chapel paintings would be unlikely to restore them to the appearance Michelangelo intended them to have. - CORRECT. The blue text in Z's claim and S's counter offer an opposing pov. While Z says the fresco is applied to wet plaster S says that the common practice in that era was that painters used to add details to their work after frescos had dried. One dried and one wet, seems trouble if two works are tried to be separated.

(C) The painted details that painters of Michelangelo’s era added to their own fresco work were not an integral part of the completed paintings’ overall design. - WRONG. Not a sure thing to go for.

(D) None of the painters of Michelangelo’s era who made additions to the Sistine Chapel paintings was important artist in his or her own right. - WRONG. Irrelevant altogether.

(E) Michelangelo was rarely satisfied with the appearance of his finished works. - WRONG. Like D again this too is irrelevant.

Answer B.
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,021
Own Kudos:
11,355
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,021
Kudos: 11,355
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Zachary: The term “fresco” refers to paint that has been applied to wet plaster. Once dried, a fresco indelibly preserves the paint that a painter has applied in this way. Unfortunately, additions known to have been made by later painters have obscured the original fresco work done by Michelangelo in the Sistine Chapel. Therefore, in order to restore Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel paintings to the appearance that Michelangelo intended them to have, everything except the original fresco work must be stripped away.

Stephen’s response to Zachary, if true, most strongly supports which one of the following?


Zachary assumes that everything except the original fresco layer should be removed in order to recover the appearance Michelangelo intended. Stephen’s point weakens that idea by saying that painters in Michelangelo’s time often added details after the fresco had dried, even to their own work. So the key idea is that some non-fresco paint might still have been part of Michelangelo’s intended final appearance.

(A) It is impossible to distinguish the later painted additions made to Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel paintings from the original fresco work.

Stephen does not say this. He says dried-on additions were common, not that they are impossible to identify.

(B) Stripping away everything except Michelangelo’s original fresco work from the Sistine Chapel paintings would be unlikely to restore them to the appearance Michelangelo intended them to have.

This is correct. If Michelangelo may himself have added painted details after the fresco dried, then removing everything except the original fresco layer could also remove details he intended to remain.

(C) The painted details that painters of Michelangelo’s era added to their own fresco work were not an integral part of the completed paintings’ overall design.

This goes the wrong way. Stephen’s point suggests those added details may well have been part of the intended final design.

(D) None of the painters of Michelangelo’s era who made additions to the Sistine Chapel paintings was important artist in his or her own right.

Stephen says nothing about the artistic importance of later painters.

(E) Michelangelo was rarely satisfied with the appearance of his finished works.

Stephen gives no information about Michelangelo’s level of satisfaction.

Answer: (B)
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,021
Own Kudos:
11,355
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,021
Kudos: 11,355
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
harshitasinghal
why is A incorrect
This was explained couple of times above but let me try again:

A is incorrect because Stephen’s point is not about identification. It is about whether all non-fresco paint is necessarily unwanted later addition.

He says painters of Michelangelo’s era often added painted details to their own work after the fresco dried. So some paint that is not part of the original wet-plaster fresco could still be part of Michelangelo’s intended final result.

That does not imply it is impossible to distinguish later additions from original work. It only shows that Zachary’s rule “remove everything except the original fresco work” is too extreme.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
504 posts
358 posts