Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 10:52 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 10:52
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
nightblade354
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,769
Own Kudos:
7,114
 [54]
Given Kudos: 3,305
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,769
Kudos: 7,114
 [54]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
49
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
US09
Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Last visit: 06 Apr 2021
Posts: 242
Own Kudos:
313
 [10]
Given Kudos: 338
GMAT 1: 560 Q42 V25
GMAT 2: 570 Q43 V27
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V39
Products:
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V39
Posts: 242
Kudos: 313
 [10]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Arro44
Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Last visit: 14 Aug 2022
Posts: 658
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 362
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q47 V44
GPA: 3.4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q47 V44
Posts: 658
Kudos: 752
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
amresh09
Joined: 16 Jun 2018
Last visit: 19 May 2019
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
14
 [1]
Given Kudos: 8
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V29
GPA: 4
WE:Supply Chain Management (Energy)
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V29
Posts: 22
Kudos: 14
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premise - Students evaluate professor on last day of the semester. This evaluation is not okay as some professors do not submit evaluation paper or they give it to selected students. In addition many students do not attend last day of the class. Now, Computer based evaluation is available throughout the semester.
Conclusion - With this new change evaluation will be accurate.
Assumptions - 1. All the professors evaluation forms will be available.
2. Students evaluating professors performance during the semester is good enough as that of evaluation done on the last day.
3. Students won't be selective in computer based evaluation.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?

(A) Professors who distribute the paper evaluation forms selectively distribute them only to students they personally like - Same as Premise. It's not an assumption.
(B) Student can wisely and insightfully asses a professor’s performance before the end of the semester - Correct. Students don't need to wait for the last day. They can evaluate on any day during the semester. Negate: Students cannot wisely and insightfully asses a professor's performance before the end of the semester. This means evaluation won't be good enough as many students cannot attend the last day of the class.
(C) The traditional system for evaluating teaching performance should not be used at any university - Irrelevant. we are not concerned with any other university.
(D) Nearly all professors who fail to distribute the paper evaluation forms do so because they believe the students will evaluate them unfavorably - But it is not supporting the cause why computer based evaluation will be accurate.
(E) Dissatisfied students are in general not more likely than satisfied student to submit a computerized evaluation - Negate: Dissatisfied students are in general more likely than satisfied students to submit a computerized evaluation which means results may or may not be accurate.
User avatar
GmatDaddy
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 11 Aug 2016
Last visit: 29 Jan 2022
Posts: 328
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 97
Products:
Posts: 328
Kudos: 412
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Traditionally, students at Kelly University have evaluated professors on the last day of class. But some professors at Kelly either do not distribute the paper evaluation forms or do so selectively, and many students cannot attend the last of day of class. Soon, students will be able to use school computers to evaluate their professors at any time during the semester. Therefore evaluations under the new system will accurately reflect the distribution of student opinion about teaching performance.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?

(A) Professors who distribute the paper evaluation forms selectively distribute them only to students they personally like
Does not affect our conclusion. Drop it.

(B) Student can wisely and insight-fully asses a professor’s performance before the end of the semester
while the students can fill up the forms anytime, the author hopes that they are able to assess the performance correctly by the end of semester. Negating this will destroy the conclusion that they will [b]accurately be able to assess. Keep it.[/b]

(C) The traditional system for evaluating teaching performance should not be used at any university
Irrelevant. Drop it.

(D) Nearly all professors who fail to distribute the paper evaluation forms do so because they believe the students will evaluate them unfavorably
Irrelevant Drop it.

(E) Dissatisfied students are in general not more likely than satisfied student to submit a computerized evaluation
Negating this will give that the Dissatisfied students are in general as or less likely than satisfied student to submit a computerized evaluation. but this will not affect the accurate [b]distribution of student opinion. Dissatisfied will still be. only the satisfied will be less. None the less. the distribution will be tiletled towards dissatisfaction but accurate. Drop it.[/b]

Answer: B
User avatar
redskull1
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Last visit: 25 Sep 2022
Posts: 287
Own Kudos:
215
 [2]
Given Kudos: 115
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Close between B & E.

Not B because of the reasons urvashis09 mentioned.Spot on explanation
avatar
Ashank07
Joined: 19 Jul 2017
Last visit: 03 Sep 2019
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
13
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 13
Kudos: 13
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is a difficult Assumption question that requires you to pay particular attention to the wording of the conclusion. The argument here is that the computerized evaluations will “accurately reflect the distribution of student opinion.” For this statement to be true, it is necessary that the students who do fill out the evaluations are representative of all other students (so that an accurate reflection of all students gets presented). That is, if none of the very disappointed or very pleased students respond, then the evaluations will not accurately reflect everyone. So all types of students need to respond, and they need to respond honestly.

Answer choice (A): The conclusion is about the computerized evaluations, not the paper evaluations, so this answer choice cannot be correct.

Answer choice (B): This is a tempting wrong answer choice, but keep in mind that the conclusion is not about whether the evaluations will be correct in their assessment, but merely that they will accurately reflect how all of the students truly feel.

Answer choice (C): Whether or not the paper evaluation system should ever be used is not necessary to the argument about the representativeness of the new computerized system.

Answer choice (D): The motivation of professors who do not distribute the paper evaluations is unrelated to the argument about computerized evaluation representativeness.

Answer choice (E): This is the correct answer choice. As mentioned above, this shows that there is no a tendency for a certain type of student to submit evaluations more frequently than other students. Negated, this answer choice would strongly attack the conclusion by showing that dissatisfied students will submit evaluations more often, and thus the overall reflection of student opinion will seem more negative than it actually is (and therefore not accurately reflect student opinion).
User avatar
CounterSniper
Joined: 20 Feb 2015
Last visit: 14 Apr 2023
Posts: 611
Own Kudos:
859
 [1]
Given Kudos: 74
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Posts: 611
Kudos: 859
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nightblade354
Traditionally, students at Kelly University have evaluated professors on the last day of class. But some professors at Kelly either do not distribute the paper evaluation forms or do so selectively, and many students cannot attend the last of day of class. Soon, students will be able to use school computers to evaluate their professors at any time during the semester. Therefore evaluations under the new system will accurately reflect the distribution of student opinion about teaching performance.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?

(A) Professors who distribute the paper evaluation forms selectively distribute them only to students they personally like
(B) Student can wisely and insightfully asses a professor’s performance before the end of the semester
(C) The traditional system for evaluating teaching performance should not be used at any university
(D) Nearly all professors who fail to distribute the paper evaluation forms do so because they believe the students will evaluate them unfavorably
(E) Dissatisfied students are in general not more likely than satisfied student to submit a computerized evaluation

Source: LSAT

Kudos will be given to the BEST solution posted BEFORE the OA is revealed!

Conclusion
evaluations under the new system will accurately reflect the distribution of student opinion about teaching performance

There should not be any skew in the distribution of student opinion.
E tells us that Dissatisfied students are at most as likely as the satisfied students to submit evaluation.

E for me as well.
User avatar
nightblade354
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,769
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3,305
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,769
Kudos: 7,114
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Good job, urvashis09! You have earned the Kudos for this one with your great explanation! OA is (E)!
User avatar
US09
Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Last visit: 06 Apr 2021
Posts: 242
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 338
GMAT 1: 560 Q42 V25
GMAT 2: 570 Q43 V27
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V39
Products:
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V39
Posts: 242
Kudos: 313
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nightblade354
Good job urvashis09! You have earned the Kudos for this one with your great explanation! OA is (E)!

Thank you for sharing good questions! :)
User avatar
Mizar18
Joined: 28 Jan 2019
Last visit: 23 Oct 2025
Posts: 173
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Location: Peru
Posts: 173
Kudos: 268
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Evidence: Soon, students will be able to use school computers to evaluate their professors at any time during the semester.

Conclusion: Evaluations under the new system will accurately reflect the distribution of student opinion about teaching performance.

As you can see the conclusion jumps from the fact that the students will be able to evaluate professors at any time to the fact that the new system will accurately reflect the distribution of student opinion.


(B) Student can wisely and insightfully asses a professor’s performance before the end of the semester

That students are "able" to asses performance before the end of the semester does not help assuring that the system will accurately reflect the distribution of student opinion.

(E) Dissatisfied students are in general not more likely than satisfied student to submit a computerized evaluation

To assure that the new system will accurately reflect the distribution of student opinion you need to assume that there will be no "bias" recollecting the evaluations, so by saying that dissatisfied students are no more likely to submit an evaluation, you eliminate that bias.

Best,
avatar
ChuHoaiNam2505
Joined: 17 Apr 2020
Last visit: 18 Apr 2021
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 15
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nightblade354
Good job, urvashis09! You have earned the Kudos for this one with your great explanation! OA is (E)!
Hi Nightblade,

I have a concern relating to answer E.

The conclusion is Therefore evaluations under the new system will accurately reflect the distribution of student opinion about teaching performance.


(E) Dissatisfied students are in general not more likely than satisfied student to submit a computerized evaluation.

In my understanding, E means that Satisfied student are more likely to submit a computerized evaluation. If satisfied students are more likely to do so, whether the new system accurately reflect the distribution of student opinion or it will be bias toward the satisfied students?
User avatar
lakshya14
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Jul 2022
Posts: 348
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 529
Posts: 348
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If dissatisfied students are less likely to give the assessment on the computer than satisfied students, then it would create a false positive report of the teacher. Which is not an accurate report for which we are trying to locate? Whereas, in (B), it is giving in telling us that students are wise enough to give an accurate assessment.
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,162
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,162
Kudos: 289
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
US09
IMO E.

The conclusion states that the computerised system will be able to capture "accurate distribution of student opinion" now that the professors cannot choose their students or do away with the process completely.

A. It is tempting but gives no information whether the students they like also represent accurate distribution of student opinion or not. For example, in a class of 100, 90% rate the teacher favourably and 10% unfavourably and of the 10 students selected by the teacher, 9 rate her favourably and 1 rates her unfavourably then the students selected give the accurate distribution, otherwise not. No such information provided. Incorrect.

B. The conclusion is about the "distribution of student opinion" and not about "the accuracy of student opinion". Even if they accurately evaluate or not has got nothing to do with our conclusion. Incorrect.

C. Irrelevant. Incorrect.

D. Tempting. But again no information provided about how such students actually end up rating the professors in the term of "distribution of opinion". This just states a reason why professors do not distribute. Not what actually happens. Does not hit the conclusion. Incorrect.

E. If those who are rate the professors negatively are more likely to submit the feedback, then the distribution of opinion will be skewed and not accurate. Negation breaks down the conclusion. Correct.

Am I missing something here? The distribution DIRECTLY depends on the accuracy of assessments. Take the extreme. Suppose everyone gave the prof a 1...then your distribution is heavily right skewed. So we can see that if students CANNOT wisely assess the performance, then the conclusion that evaluations under the new system will ACCURATELY reflect the distribution gets thrown out the window.

E is also acceptable as others have mentioned, but I don't see clearly why B is wrong.
User avatar
MBAB123
Joined: 05 Jul 2020
Last visit: 30 Jul 2023
Posts: 529
Own Kudos:
319
 [1]
Given Kudos: 150
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Products:
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
Posts: 529
Kudos: 319
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CEdward
US09
IMO E.

The conclusion states that the computerised system will be able to capture "accurate distribution of student opinion" now that the professors cannot choose their students or do away with the process completely.

A. It is tempting but gives no information whether the students they like also represent accurate distribution of student opinion or not. For example, in a class of 100, 90% rate the teacher favourably and 10% unfavourably and of the 10 students selected by the teacher, 9 rate her favourably and 1 rates her unfavourably then the students selected give the accurate distribution, otherwise not. No such information provided. Incorrect.

B. The conclusion is about the "distribution of student opinion" and not about "the accuracy of student opinion". Even if they accurately evaluate or not has got nothing to do with our conclusion. Incorrect.

C. Irrelevant. Incorrect.

D. Tempting. But again no information provided about how such students actually end up rating the professors in the term of "distribution of opinion". This just states a reason why professors do not distribute. Not what actually happens. Does not hit the conclusion. Incorrect.

E. If those who are rate the professors negatively are more likely to submit the feedback, then the distribution of opinion will be skewed and not accurate. Negation breaks down the conclusion. Correct.

Am I missing something here? The distribution DIRECTLY depends on the accuracy of assessments. Take the extreme. Suppose everyone gave the prof a 1...then your distribution is heavily right skewed. So we can see that if students CANNOT wisely assess the performance, then the conclusion that evaluations under the new system will ACCURATELY reflect the distribution gets thrown out the window.

E is also acceptable as others have mentioned, but I don't see clearly why B is wrong.

Hey CEdward, here is why I think B is wrong - The new system doesn't say that student's need to submit the evaluation before the end of the semester. They can do so at the last day.

I would also like to highlight the problems solved by the new system -
1. Selective or no distribution of forms - No such distribution would happen now.
2. Not attending the last day of class? No worries, just go to the computer and fill out the form or do it before hand.

Hope this helps! :)
User avatar
Fdambro294
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Last visit: 20 Aug 2025
Posts: 1,331
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,656
Posts: 1,331
Kudos: 771
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To piggy back on Brian123 great post,

It’s a really subtle shift between answer choice B and the actual conclusion given.

The conclusion is concerned with the opinions’ “accuracy” - it is not really necessary for the students to be able to make wise and insightful opinions. The author is focused on whether these submitted opinions accurately represent the students’ opinions (even if what is said is wise and insightful or rude and incomplete).

If only dissatisfied students are sending in evaluations, we end up with a skewed perception of what the opinions really are. We are missing out on all the other opinions that may be positive. Under this scenario, the author’s argument that the new system accurately reflects the student opinions is weakened.




CEdward
US09
IMO E.

The conclusion states that the computerised system will be able to capture "accurate distribution of student opinion" now that the professors cannot choose their students or do away with the process completely.

A. It is tempting but gives no information whether the students they like also represent accurate distribution of student opinion or not. For example, in a class of 100, 90% rate the teacher favourably and 10% unfavourably and of the 10 students selected by the teacher, 9 rate her favourably and 1 rates her unfavourably then the students selected give the accurate distribution, otherwise not. No such information provided. Incorrect.

B. The conclusion is about the "distribution of student opinion" and not about "the accuracy of student opinion". Even if they accurately evaluate or not has got nothing to do with our conclusion. Incorrect.

C. Irrelevant. Incorrect.

D. Tempting. But again no information provided about how such students actually end up rating the professors in the term of "distribution of opinion". This just states a reason why professors do not distribute. Not what actually happens. Does not hit the conclusion. Incorrect.

E. If those who are rate the professors negatively are more likely to submit the feedback, then the distribution of opinion will be skewed and not accurate. Negation breaks down the conclusion. Correct.

Am I missing something here? The distribution DIRECTLY depends on the accuracy of assessments. Take the extreme. Suppose everyone gave the prof a 1...then your distribution is heavily right skewed. So we can see that if students CANNOT wisely assess the performance, then the conclusion that evaluations under the new system will ACCURATELY reflect the distribution gets thrown out the window.

E is also acceptable as others have mentioned, but I don't see clearly why B is wrong.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,423
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,423
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts