Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 07:55 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 07:55
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
MartinTao
Joined: 29 Dec 2018
Last visit: 29 Mar 2020
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
229
 [71]
Given Kudos: 116
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V35
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V35
Posts: 19
Kudos: 229
 [71]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
64
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
DClifelonglearner
Joined: 28 Aug 2018
Last visit: 24 Oct 2019
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
29
 [13]
Given Kudos: 68
Posts: 10
Kudos: 29
 [13]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
DClifelonglearner
Joined: 28 Aug 2018
Last visit: 24 Oct 2019
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
29
 [6]
Given Kudos: 68
Posts: 10
Kudos: 29
 [6]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
neha283
Joined: 05 Oct 2017
Last visit: 05 Nov 2021
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 103
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 87
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone explain the last 2 lines of this passage clearly? i faltered in assessing the answer choices because of this.
TIA!
User avatar
Sanjeetgujrall
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 26 Apr 2024
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Germany
GPA: 3
Posts: 50
Kudos: 62
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja, GMATNinjaTwo - Can you help explain how does C weaken the argument?

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
neha283
Joined: 05 Oct 2017
Last visit: 05 Nov 2021
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
45
 [1]
Given Kudos: 103
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 87
Kudos: 45
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DClifelonglearner
neha283
Can someone explain the last 2 lines of this passage clearly? i faltered in assessing the answer choices because of this.
TIA!

Hi,

"A recently completed study has revealed that, on the annual cognitive tests given to Amaretti's first-graders in each of last ten years, nearly 25% of the students scoring in the top fifth of the class, but only about 2% of those scoring in the bottom fifth, were born in November."

-- It says that:
1. Every year for the last 10 years, a cognitive test has been held.
2. The test takers were 1st grade students.
3. Based on the performance of the test takers, a study has been done.
4. The study revealed that --> (Nearly 25% OF the students scoring in the TOP 1/5th of the class) AND (About 2% OF the students scoring in the BOTTOM 1/5th of the class) were born in November.

Because pregnancy lasts nine months, only the mothers of children born in November would not have fasted during the entire pregnancies; therefore, the ritual fasting must have detrimental effects on developing babies.

-- This mentions that:
1. Pregnancy lasts for 9 months.
2. Only the mothers of children born in November would not have fasted during the entire pregnancies. Why is it so? Consider this -> The fasting ritual is practiced in December and January. Pregnancy lasts 9 months and the baby is born after the completion of 9 months. And if the months of December and January should not fall DURING the pregnancy, the only way this can happen is if it (pregnancy) starts in February. Pregnancy would last till the end of October, or November. The baby would then be born in November.
Hence ONLY the mothers of children born in November didn't fast during the entire pregnancy.

The conclusion is that fasting causes a detrimental effect in the cognitive abilities of the children whose mothers fasted during pregnancy.

We can eliminate some of the options:

A --> can be eliminated since it says about data before 10 years.
B --> It doesn't mention the number of students being absent during the tests - it can be 1 student, or more. B is eliminated.
D --> Talks about physical deformities of children. Eliminated.

Hi,

Thank you for the detailed explanation, the passage is more clear now. However, option (C) tells us about the birth duration of its students which is year round, how does it weaken the claim that most students must be born in november since fasting causes a detrimental effect in the cognitive abilities of the children whose mothers fasted during pregnancy. ?

Thanks again!
avatar
lupitavf
Joined: 16 Aug 2018
Last visit: 18 Oct 2022
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 7
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It is because kids born in november are always the oldest in the class.
avatar
arorni
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Last visit: 08 Oct 2020
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 69
Posts: 55
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am still stuck between C and E. Not so sure, why and how we can reject E. Can someone please explain in detail, how we can reject E?
User avatar
redskull1
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Last visit: 25 Sep 2022
Posts: 287
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 115
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi arorni

DClifelonglearner explains it well.Ron Purewal also more or less says the same thing said by DClifelonglearner

This question is tackled very well by Ron purewal. My answer is very heavily borrowed from Ron's analysis of this problem(The first time I solved this problem I marked E)

Ron Purewal says, and rightly so, that weaken, strengthen or assumption answer choices have to, in a way , explain the question.Lets see the options now.

E - Incorrect.
This option doesn't explain the fact that 2% of students in the bottom fifth were born in November.Though 25% of the top fifth goes with the option.If 1/5th of babies were born in November then normally 1/5th of both the top performing and bottom performing students will comprise of those born in November.

C - Correct.
This option hits the nail on the head.This basically says the reason November kids do well is because they are the oldest in the class and not because their mothers fasted. Gives an alternate reason.

Hope it's clear...
avatar
arorni
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Last visit: 08 Oct 2020
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 69
Posts: 55
Kudos: 20
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
redskull1
Hi arorni

DClifelonglearner explains it well.Ron Purewal also more or less says the same thing said by DClifelonglearner

This question is tackled very well by Ron purewal. My answer is very heavily borrowed from Ron's analysis of this problem(The first time I solved this problem I marked E)

Ron Purewal says, and rightly so, that weaken, strengthen or assumption answer choices have to, in a way , explain the question.Lets see the options now.

E - Incorrect.
This option doesn't explain the fact that 2% of students in the bottom fifth were born in November.Though 25% of the top fifth goes with the option.If 1/5th of babies were born in November then normally 1/5th of both the top performing and bottom performing students will comprise of those born in November.

C - Correct.
This option hits the nail on the head.This basically says the reason November kids do well is because they are the oldest in the class and not because their mothers fasted. Gives an alternate reason.

Hope it's clear...

Thanks a lot.. I got it now...
avatar
DClifelonglearner
Joined: 28 Aug 2018
Last visit: 24 Oct 2019
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 68
Posts: 10
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
arorni
I am still stuck between C and E. Not so sure, why and how we can reject E. Can someone please explain in detail, how we can reject E?

First, try to understand the meaning of both the options C and E.

Next, try finding out which of these 2 options better explain the following fact:
" 25% of top 1/5th scorers AND 2% of bottom 1/5th scorers were born in November".

You'd then understand why E should be eliminated and C is our answer.

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
rakeshtewatia0105
Joined: 28 Jan 2019
Last visit: 29 Jan 2020
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
GMAT 1: 480 Q48 V14
GMAT 1: 480 Q48 V14
Posts: 33
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone please explain how "e" is wrong...

Also I didn't understand the meaning and how to link this with argument...


Thanks in advance

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
MartinTao
Joined: 29 Dec 2018
Last visit: 29 Mar 2020
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 116
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V35
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V35
Posts: 19
Kudos: 229
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rakeshtewatia0105
Can someone please explain how "e" is wrong...

Also I didn't understand the meaning and how to link this with argument...


Thanks in advance

Posted from my mobile device

If E is true, then the percentages of those children born in Nov. who score the top fifth and the bottom fifth will both be around 25%.
User avatar
ravi546
Joined: 11 Jul 2018
Last visit: 27 Jul 2020
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 101
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
Posts: 13
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The Option B directly attacks the validity of the survey. Whereas, Option C makes a huge jump in assumption that older kids have better cognitive abilities. I went with B. Kindly tell on what grounds we can eliminate B.
avatar
DClifelonglearner
Joined: 28 Aug 2018
Last visit: 24 Oct 2019
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 68
Posts: 10
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ravi546
The Option B directly attacks the validity of the survey. Whereas, Option C makes a huge jump in assumption that older kids have better cognitive abilities. I went with B. Kindly tell on what grounds we can eliminate B.

Option B just mentions students who skip the test can't reappear for it.
But it doesn't mention the number of students who skipped. It can be 0, or 5, or 10, or any number. So we can't say for sure whether this fact actually affects conclusion.
Because if 90% of the students of a class skipped then definitely the conclusion comes into question. However, if none of the students, or just 1 student skipped then it doesn't really affect the conclusion.
So option B is very vague.

Hope this helps!!
User avatar
ravi546
Joined: 11 Jul 2018
Last visit: 27 Jul 2020
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 101
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
Posts: 13
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DClifelonglearner
ravi546
The Option B directly attacks the validity of the survey. Whereas, Option C makes a huge jump in assumption that older kids have better cognitive abilities. I went with B. Kindly tell on what grounds we can eliminate B.

Option B just mentions students who skip the test can't reappear for it.
But it doesn't mention the number of students who skipped. It can be 0, or 5, or 10, or any number. So we can't say for sure whether this fact actually affects conclusion.
Because if 90% of the students of a class skipped then definitely the conclusion comes into question. However, if none of the students, or just 1 student skipped then it doesn't really affect the conclusion.
So option B is very vague.

Hope this helps!!
Don't you think that older kids are more intelligent is a huge assumption to make? I feel that attacking the validity of the survey results is better than assuming something.
avatar
DClifelonglearner
Joined: 28 Aug 2018
Last visit: 24 Oct 2019
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 68
Posts: 10
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ravi546
DClifelonglearner
ravi546
The Option B directly attacks the validity of the survey. Whereas, Option C makes a huge jump in assumption that older kids have better cognitive abilities. I went with B. Kindly tell on what grounds we can eliminate B.

Option B just mentions students who skip the test can't reappear for it.
But it doesn't mention the number of students who skipped. It can be 0, or 5, or 10, or any number. So we can't say for sure whether this fact actually affects conclusion.
Because if 90% of the students of a class skipped then definitely the conclusion comes into question. However, if none of the students, or just 1 student skipped then it doesn't really affect the conclusion.
So option B is very vague.

Hope this helps!!
Don't you think that older kids are more intelligent is a huge assumption to make? I feel that attacking the validity of the survey results is better than assuming something.

IMO questions which are not from OG can always be debated. Moreover we don't know the official explanation of why C is the best answer in this case. Verbal experts in this forum have time and again reiterated that we shouldn't really worry too much on questions other than OG ones. So we can always come up with our own interpretations and logic on why an option could be better than the other.

Having said that, I'd like to mention my line of reasoning:
I eliminated E because it didn't mention the specific number of students, if at all any, who would have missed the tests. If there were no students who missed then there would have been no impact at all on the conclusion. However, if majority of students missed then the conclusion is shaken. To mark this option as the correct answer we'd have to assume that majority students missed - to me this was far fetched. Hence I eliminated this option.

When I first solved this question I didn't understand option C at all! I purely marked it because I had eliminated the other 4 options with conviction and guessed that C must be the best answer.

I tried finding Ron Purewel's answer explanation to this question but couldn't find it.
User avatar
MartinTao
Joined: 29 Dec 2018
Last visit: 29 Mar 2020
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 116
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V35
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V35
Posts: 19
Kudos: 229
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi DClifelonglearner,
You can get it in Thursday with Ron —— 20, 02, 2014.
User avatar
thakurarun85
Joined: 10 Jul 2021
Last visit: 21 Sep 2022
Posts: 216
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 216
Kudos: 56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
None of the options give a proper answer. We need an expert comment on this.
User avatar
nahid78
Joined: 12 Mar 2013
Last visit: 30 Apr 2023
Posts: 283
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,062
Products:
Posts: 283
Kudos: 738
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C says November born children are older than others, but how can we relate that older means smarter!! (as nothing such is mentioned in the argument)
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts