Here are some of my takes, please correct me if I am wrong.
Q: The statements above, if true, provide the most support for which of the following conclusions?
-From the passage, we know that Macrophages will fight off bacteria. However, mice without Macrophages will not shown elevate level of nitrate when infected. In short, when Macrophages fight off bacteria the nitrate level will elevate. But we do not know which cause which and what really kills bacteria(i.e. either Macrophages produce nitrate to fight off bacteria OR nitrates can be the wastes after Macrophages fights off bacteria). What we know is the Macrophages is something to do with the level of nitrates and Macrophages fight off bacteria.
A:Mice that are unable either to make macrophages or to make them in sufficient numbers will protect themselves from bacterial infections in some other way.
-Wrong. Out of scope. We are not discussing "some other way" of the immune system.
B:Mice that show elevated levels of nitrates can easily fight off most types of bacterial infections.
-Wrong. From the passage, we only know that Macrophages fight off the bacteria and linked with the level of nitrates. (or maybe nitrates just the wastes after Macrophages fight off bacteria.)
C:In mice, macrophages play a role in the production of nitrates or inhibit a process by which nitrates are broken down or otherwise eliminated.
-Correct Answer. Macrophages linked with level of nitrates. This choice clearly explains that Macrophages plays a role in the production with nitrate.
D:When a healthy mouse becomes infected with an invasive organism, the number of macrophages in the mouse’s body decreases.
-Wrong. Out of scope. Passage does not mention the relationship between total number of Macrophages and bacteria.
E:Injections of nitrates into mice that lack macrophages will not enhance the ability of these animals’ immune systems to fight off infection.
-Wrong. Same as choice B, we do not know the the exact role of nitrates in this defensive mechanism.