hoang221
This is a common misconception about probability. Although we know for sure that she would lose on day 1 and 2 (according to this problem), it actually not the case. We "know" that she will lose on day 1 and 2 because we assumed so. If the problem stated otherwise, we will have different combination of 0.1 and 0.9, but those 2 numbers will stay the same. The overall probability that she will win or lose in a single day will be unchanged
No, I'm with you on that, I was referring to the wording of the question, the probability that
she wins the lottery on each of the first 3 days is 0.1 does not suggest anything about day 4 but semantically with the information, we are provided we are given that "she no longer enters when she wins", so the probability of
her winning on a day following a win is 0 since she doesn't play on those days.
I followed the question, I'm just saying if the question was worded the same except the end said
" what is the probability that she wins on the second day?" instead of
"what is the probability that she wins on the third day?" without changing the wording before it to something like "If the probability of winning" instead of "the probability that she wins".
So what you imply is that the wording can throw us off, because if they ask "what is the probability that she wins on the third day?", the answer can be 0.1, in fact it will be 0.1 no matter what day she won. In this case, we have to rely on the answer choices (clearly there are no 0.1). I think this kind of problem will never happen on GMAT, as we will be required to do at least some calculation in order to reach the answer.