In the figure above, PQRS is a square and AB = AC. Is the area of tria

Question

https://gmatclub.com/forum/download/file.php?id=25390 In the figure above, SQRE is a square and AB = AC. Is the area of triangle ABC greater than the area of square SQRE? (1) The length of RE is less than twice the length of BR. (2) AS = AQ Capture.PNG

KarishmaB · Accepted Answer

Some diagrams will help you figure out the question quickly. First make the most symmetric diagram - A is the centre of SQ and QN = NR (Fig I). Here area of triangle will be equal to area of square. Also, length of BR will be equal to half of length of RE. Ques3.jpg Now if you move B and C away from R and E respectively, the area of triangle will increase (Fig II). On the other hand, if you move B and C toward R and E, the area of triangle will decrease (Fig III). So the relation between BR and RE can tell us whether the area of triangle is less than/equal to/more than area of square. Now we move the triangle of Fig I laterally to get Fig IV. The area of triangle is still equal to area of square but BR is more than half of RE. The relation of BR and RE with the area makes sense only when A is the mid point of SQ. So we need both statements to answer the question. Answer (C)

chetan2u · Answer

ans C...
 1) stat 1 tells us er<2br or er+x=2br...insufficient
 2) stat 2 tells us ce=br... as a is midpoint... insufficient
 combined it tells us
 area of triangle 1/2*bc*rq(ht)=1/2*(ce+er+rb)*rq=1/2*(er+2rb)*rq=1/2*(er+er+x)*rq=1/2*(2er+x)*rq
=(er*rq)+1/2*(x)*rq=area of square+some amount... so sufficient

Bunuel · Answer

Similar question to practice: in-the-figure-above-sqre-is-a-square-ab-ac-and-as-aq-161814.html

viktorija · Answer

Is Area of a Triangle > Area of the Square?
In other words is (RE*CB)/2>RE^2?

We can simplify the equation by dividing both sides by RE (which is always >0) and multiply by 2, we get: Is CB>2*RE?

(1) Insufficient. Tells us that RE<2*BR. If we would know that BR=EC, then we could answer our question, because CB would be equal to 2BR+RE. However, if BR is not equal to CE, then we cannot know the length of CB.

(2) Insufficient. Does not tell us anything about the values that we are looking for. The only information it gives is that CE=RE (note that we know that the triangle is equilateral).

(1)+(2) Sufficient. 2nd statement basically tells us that CB= RE+2*BR. So, our question then looks like that: Is RE+2*BR>2*RE ---> Is 2*BR>RE? And the 1st statement tells us explicitly that RE<2*BR.

Answer C

PathFinder007 · Answer

Hi bunuel,

Could you please provide your comments for statement 2.

basically st2 AS = AQ telling us that CE and RB are symmetric then why this is not sufficient.

Please clarify.

Thanks

AdlaT · Answer

SOLUTION:

Area of triangle ABC= 1/2*ER*BC

Area of Square SQRE= (ER)^2

Area of Traingle:Area of Sqare= 1/2*BC:ER = 1/2*(BR+ER+CE):ER

Statement 1): We are given only RE<2BR , But we know nothing about relation between BR and CE.

Hence, Insufficient.

Statement 2): AS=AQ--->BR=CE, but we don't know anything about relation between ER and any of BR and CE.

Hence, Insufficient.

Statement 1 & Statement 2:
Let ER=1
Area of Traingle: Area of Sqare= 1/2(1+more than 1):1 = More than 1: 1 .

So,YES, Area of traingle ABC is greater than the area of sqare SQRE.

Ans :C

jwam2 · Answer

Bunuel  same question here, but I am re-posting because this question is different than the other question, in my opinion.

I have two quick follow up questions:

(1) How are you able to assume in statement 1 that CE is also 1? It makes sense intuitively, but I'm not seeing that it has to be equal to segment RB.

(2) It is not as clear how to pick smart numbers for statement 1 or 2. Can you provide an explanation for this question?

I found myself guessing the right answer for this question but spending a minute and a half trying to prove why it was correct. Any advice for approaching this problem is helpful.

Gabyms89 · Answer

Why we don't need to know if the triangle is a right triangle? If it was a right triangle then the area=CA*CB/2 instead of CB*(side of the square)/2

KarishmaB · Answer

The triangle cannot be a right triangle, right angled at C. If it were, then AB would be the hypotenuse. The hypotenuse is always larger than both legs so AC = AB would not be possible.

Gabyms89 · Answer

I was thinking that the right angle might be A not C. Why it cannot be a right triangle at A?

warrior1991 · Answer

VeritasKarishma   Bunuel 
 gmatbusters

It is already given that AB=AC and therefore any line drawn from vertex A will act as perpendicular bisector at point P to the line BC.

Now if we take two triangle why cannot we apply RHS rule and further conclude that both are congruent.

The Perpendicular AP will be common to both triangle APC and APB. The hypotenuse AC=AB is given.

So why do we need option B.

With this reasoning I marked A as answer.
Please tell me where am I going wrong.

rever08 · Answer

Hi,

How do you conclude it's right angled at A?

warrior1991 · Answer

VeritasKarishma

Need your inputs here as well.Please see my concern above

Sent from my iPhone using  GMAT Club Forum mobile app

KarishmaB · Answer

You need stmnt 2 because of the way data is given in statement 1.

Note that area of the triangle depends on 2 things - altitude and base. Area = (1/2)*Altitude*Base
Area of the square is the side of the square (which is same an altitude SE/QR). Area = Altitude^2

So depending on what is greater: Base/2 or Altitude, we will know whether the triangle has more area or square.

(1) The length of RE is less than twice the length of BR.

RE (side of square) is the same length as altitude.

RE < 2*BR
Altitude < 2*BR
BR is just a part of the base. We don't know the relation BR has to the rest of the base.

(2) AS = AQ
With this info, now we know the relation of BR with rest of the base.
Base = BR + CE + Altitude = BR + BR + Altitude
Base = 2*BR + Altitude
Since 2*BR is greater than Altitude, Base > 2*Altitude
So Base/2 is greater and hence triangle has more area.

itisSheldon · Answer

MANHATTAN PREP OFFICIAL EXPLANATION To rephrase the question, it is helpful to see what connections exist between the triangle and the square and furthermore how it is possible to relate their areas. Draw a vertical line from point A straight down to the base of the triangle (and label the bottom point of this line Z). This new line, AZ (of length x), is the height of triangle ABC and has the same length as any side of the square. Label the diagram with the rest of the given information: AB = AC, implying that triangle ABC is isosceles and that angle B must equal angle C. Capture.JPG The area of the square can be expressed as x^2 and the area of the triangle as 1/2 (BC)(x) (label all lengths equal to AZ as x) Since BC is comprised of ER + RB + CE, and ER is also a side of the square or x, you can rewrite BC as x + RB + CE. Thus the question becomes “Is 1/2 (x+RB+CE)(x) > x^2 ?" If RB and CE together sum to the length of x, then the left side of the inequality will be identical to the right: 1/2 (x+x)(x) = x^2 For the left side of the inequality to be greater than the right, however, RB and CE must sum to more than x, thus the final rephrase can be stated as “Is RB + CE > x?” (1) NOT SUFFICIENT : The statement can be translated as ER < 2RB x < 2RB .... Again replacing ER with the variable x x/2 < RB To know if RB + CE > x, you would need to know something about CE as well. Can you assume that CE = RB? From the given, triangle ABC is isosceles and thus symmetrical. However, there is no guarantee that is symmetrically placed in the square. If the triangle is symmetrically placed, RB = CE and both are greater than x/2 and would thus sum to greater than x (scenario II below). Scenario III below would also satisfy the question, but scenario I would not necessarily. Capture1.JPG (2) NOT SUFFICIENT : This statement establishes the symmetric placement of triangle ABC within the square SQRE. On its own it does not relate RB and CE to x. (1) AND (2) TOGETHER SUFFICIENT : Given the symmetric placement of triangle ABC within the square SQRE from statement (2) along with the information from statement (1), scenario II above is established and RB + CE > x. The correct answer is (C).

NinetyFour · Answer

I am a bit confused by this question and the OE is not helping. I feel that statement 1 is sufficient because:

Let's call RB = a

If x < 2a, x^2 (area of the square MUST be less then ((x + 2a) * x)/2 if we substitute x in for 2a.

It should not matter whether or not the triangle is centered in the square right? the area will remain constant since it is an isosceles triangle. Would really appreciate an expert's advice. Thank you

bumpbot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

In the figure above, PQRS is a square and AB = AC. Is the area of tria

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Data Sufficiency (DS) Questions

In the figure above, PQRS is a square and AB = AC. Is the area of tria

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards