Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 07:12 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 07:12
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 24 Jan 2026
Posts: 1,135
Own Kudos:
22,610
 [10]
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,882
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Mo2men
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Last visit: 09 May 2023
Posts: 2,426
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Products:
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Posts: 2,426
Kudos: 1,508
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AnthonyRitz
User avatar
Stacy Blackman Consulting Director of Test Prep
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 238
Own Kudos:
432
 [2]
Given Kudos: 169
Affiliations: Stacy Blackman Consulting
Location: United States (DC)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
GPA: 3.11
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 238
Kudos: 432
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
ziyuenlau
Anthony can purchase bagels at \($1.99\) for a specialty bagel and \($15.99\) for a package of one dozen plain bagels. If Anthony can purchase only specialty bagels or packages of plain bagels, did Anthony purchase any plain bagels?

(1) Anthony spent less than \($32.00\)
(2) Anthony spent more than \($31.90\)
Dear ziyuenlau

I'm happy to respond. :-)

Normally, I like Veritas questions, but this is one I don't like. I find the beginning of the second sentence ambiguous-- "Anthony can purchase only specialty bagels or packages of plain bagels." I took this to be simply a clarification of the previous sentence: the only items for sale at this shop are individual specialty bagel and packages of 12 plain bagels, so his purchase can only include those two items. I was interpreting the word "or" as an inclusive "or," because the word "or" is always inclusive in mathematics. This interpretation leads to the answer (E), because with combined statements, the purchase could be either two dozen plain or one dozen plain + 8 specialty bagels.

The only way we can arrive at the answer (C) is if we interpret the "or" as an exclusive "or," in violation of the precedent throughout all mathematics. I suspect this question was written by an American thinking of the conventions of colloquial spoken English, rather than the conventions of mathematics.

I find this question problematic for these reasons. Let me know if anyone has any questions.

Mike :-)

I didn't write this question, but I was involved in its editing and I can verify that the "or" is intended as inclusive. Maybe we should have written "and/or"? You are correct, of course, that the inclusive "or" is standard on the GMAT. Why does this reading lead you to the answer E? Perhaps the question is not well worded in some other way? Note that the question is whether Anthony purchased *any* plain bagels.

P.s. I'm glad to hear that you normally like our questions. We try hard. :)

P.p.s. This question was written by an American who is conversant with both the conventions of colloquial spoken English and the conventions of mathematics (to the best of my knowledge).
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,882
 [2]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,882
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AnthonyRitz
I didn't write this question, but I was involved in its editing and I can verify that the "or" is intended as inclusive. Maybe we should have written "and/or"? You are correct, of course, that the inclusive "or" is standard on the GMAT. Why does this reading lead you to the answer E? Perhaps the question is not well worded in some other way? Note that the question is whether Anthony purchased *any* plain bagels.

P.s. I'm glad to hear that you normally like our questions. We try hard. :)

P.p.s. This question was written by an American who is conversant with both the conventions of colloquial spoken English and the conventions of mathematics (to the best of my knowledge).
Dear AnthonyRitz,

Yes, my friend! Kudos to you! :-) You are correct and I was wrong! Yes, in my concern about the nature of the "or," I misread the end of the prompt. My mistake! :oops:

Absolutely, if the price is between $31.90 and $32.00, it could have been
1) 8 specialty bagels + one dozen plain = 8($2.00 - 1¢) + ($16 - 1¢) = $32.00 - 9¢ = $31.91
or
2) two dozen plain = 2($16 - 1¢) = $32.00 - 2¢ = $31.98
but as you astutely point out, either combination involves at least some plain. If we tried to fill the order with all specialty bagels, we would get,
3) 16 specialty bagels = 16($2.00 - 1¢) = $32.00 - 16¢ = $31.84
Thus, we absolutely need to have at least some plain bagels. This is a brilliantly constructed question, like so many of Veritas', and the answer is unambiguously (C).

Although the question is rigorously correct as is, it may prevent any future possible confusion by stating something such as this: "If the shop only sells these two options, and if Anthony can purchase any combination of individual specialty bagels and packages of plain bagels, then . . ." That's my suggestion: as we both know, the GMAT often over-specifies to ensure clarity and unambiguity.

Overall, Anthony, I apologize for my harsh judgment. Kudos to you and your colleagues at Veritas: you are an impressively bright bunch of folks!

With great respect,
Mike McGarry :-)
User avatar
AnthonyRitz
User avatar
Stacy Blackman Consulting Director of Test Prep
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 169
Affiliations: Stacy Blackman Consulting
Location: United States (DC)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
GPA: 3.11
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 238
Kudos: 432
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mike,

No worries! I appreciate what you do here! We're all going to mess up sooner or later among hundreds or thousands of GMAT questions.

Your wording suggestion makes sense, and I'm happy to pass it along to the question author and see about editing this.

EDIT: "At a certain bagel shop, Anthony can purchase bagels at $1.99 for one specialty bagel and $15.99 for a package of one dozen plain bagels. If the shop only sells these two options, and if Anthony can purchase any combination of individual specialty bagels and packages of plain bagels, then did Anthony purchase any plain bagels?"

I hope that's clearer!

mikemcgarry
AnthonyRitz
I didn't write this question, but I was involved in its editing and I can verify that the "or" is intended as inclusive. Maybe we should have written "and/or"? You are correct, of course, that the inclusive "or" is standard on the GMAT. Why does this reading lead you to the answer E? Perhaps the question is not well worded in some other way? Note that the question is whether Anthony purchased *any* plain bagels.

P.s. I'm glad to hear that you normally like our questions. We try hard. :)

P.p.s. This question was written by an American who is conversant with both the conventions of colloquial spoken English and the conventions of mathematics (to the best of my knowledge).
Dear AnthonyRitz,

Yes, my friend! Kudos to you! :-) You are correct and I was wrong! Yes, in my concern about the nature of the "or," I misread the end of the prompt. My mistake! :oops:

Absolutely, if the price is between $31.90 and $32.00, it could have been
1) 8 specialty bagels + one dozen plain = 8($2.00 - 1¢) + ($16 - 1¢) = $32.00 - 9¢ = $31.91
or
2) two dozen plain = 2($16 - 1¢) = $32.00 - 2¢ = $31.98
but as you astutely point out, either combination involves at least some plain. If we tried to fill the order with all specialty bagels, we would get,
3) 16 specialty bagels = 16($2.00 - 1¢) = $32.00 - 16¢ = $31.84
Thus, we absolutely need to have at least some plain bagels. This is a brilliantly constructed question, like so many of Veritas', and the answer is unambiguously (C).

Although the question is rigorously correct as is, it may prevent any future possible confusion by stating something such as this: "If the shop only sells these two options, and if Anthony can purchase any combination of individual specialty bagels and packages of plain bagels, then . . ." That's my suggestion: as we both know, the GMAT often over-specifies to ensure clarity and unambiguity.

Overall, Anthony, I apologize for my harsh judgment. Kudos to you and your colleagues at Veritas: you are an impressively bright bunch of folks!

With great respect,
Mike McGarry :-)
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,047
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi All,

This question ultimately comes down to 'limited options' and whether they actually exist or not with the given information. In real basic terms, this question can be re-written as "Are there any '15.99s' in the group?" This is a YES/NO question.

1) Anthony spent less than $32.00

There could be one or two 15.99s in the group, in which case the answer would be YES
There might not be a 15.99 in the group, in which case the answer would be NO
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

2) Anthony spent more than $31.90

There could be one or more 15.99s in the group, in which case the answer would be YES
There might not be a 15.99 in the group, in which case the answer would be NO
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, we have a very narrow "window" ($31.90 < TOTAL < $32.00).

IF....there were two $15.99s, then the total would be $31.98 and the answer to the question would be YES
IF....there was one $15.99 and eight $1.99s, then the total would be $31.91 and the answer to the question would be YES
IF... there were NO $15.99s, then we would have just $1.99s; however - with 16 of them we have a total of $31.84 and with 17 of them we have a total of $33.83. Thus, there is NO WAY to get into the given range if we have zero $15.99s, so there isn't a NO answer under these circumstances. Thus, the answer to the question is ALWAYS YES.

Final Answer:
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,972
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,972
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109814 posts
498 posts
212 posts