Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 20:02 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 20:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,733
Own Kudos:
36,451
 [7]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,733
Kudos: 36,451
 [7]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,733
Own Kudos:
36,451
 [2]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,733
Kudos: 36,451
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Mo2men
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Last visit: 09 May 2023
Posts: 2,426
Own Kudos:
1,508
 [1]
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Products:
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Posts: 2,426
Kudos: 1,508
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BrentGMATPrepNow
If j and k are positive integers, what is the value of j?

(1) 4j + 3k = 18
(2) |64k² + 32kj + 4j²| = (-22)²

(1) 4j + 3k = 18

The only positive integers pair (j,k) =(3,2)

Sufficient

(2) |64k² + 32kj + 4j²| = (-22)²

(2) |(8k + 2j)²| = (-22)²

Then only viable is 8k + 2j =22 (because I can't be 8k + 2j =-22 as j & are positive

8k + 2j =22.......Divide by 2

4k + j =11

It is either pair of (j,k) =(3,2) or (7,1)

insufficient

Answer: A

BrentGMATPrepNow

May I ask why you tag this question as Target test prep? should not it you own question and hence tagged with GMATPrep Now??
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,733
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,733
Kudos: 36,451
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mo2men

May I ask why you tag this question as Target test prep? should not it you own question and hence tagged with GMATPrep Now??
Good question.
I originally posted the question in the PS forum by mistake. When the question was moved to the DS forum, it looks like it was accidentally tagged with the wrong source.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,875
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BrentGMATPrepNow
Mo2men

May I ask why you tag this question as Target test prep? should not it you own question and hence tagged with GMATPrep Now??
Good question.
I originally posted the question in the PS forum by mistake. When the question was moved to the DS forum, it looks like it was accidentally tagged with the wrong source.

Edited the source. My mistake. Sorry.
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 5,986
Own Kudos:
5,858
 [1]
Given Kudos: 163
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,986
Kudos: 5,858
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Asked: If j and k are positive integers, what is the value of j?

(1) 4j + 3k = 18
If j=1; k = 14/3; Not feasible since k is an integer
If j=2; k = 10/3; Not feasible since k is an integer
If j=3; k = 2; Feasible
If j=4; k = 2/3; Not feasible since k is an integer
If j=5; k = -2/3; Not feasible since k is a positive integer
For all other values of j; k is negative
j=3; k = 2 is the only solution
SUFFICIENT

(2) |64k² + 32kj + 4j²| = (-22)²
4|16k^2 + 8kj + j^2| = 4* 11^2
|(4k + j)^2| = (4k+j)^2 = 11^2
4k + j = 11
4k + j = - 11; Not feasible since k & j are positive integers
4k + j = 11
If k=1; j=7
But if k=2;j=3
NOT SUFFICIENT

IMO A
User avatar
ashwink
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 15 Mar 2014
Last visit: 20 Nov 2023
Posts: 169
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 4
Posts: 169
Kudos: 169
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(1) 4j + 3k = 18

Even + ? = Even, hence k should also be Even
Only matching pair is j=3 & k=2

Hence, (1) is sufficient. ==> B,C & E is out.

(2) |64k² + 32kj + 4j²| = (-22)²

|(8k + 2j)²| = (-22)²

| (Even + Even)² | would be an even value, hence we take only 22.
Thus, 8k + 2j = 22 , 4k + j = 11

We can have multiple values for this solution: k=1 & j=7, k=2 & j=3

Hence, (2) is not sufficient.


Thus, A should be the answer.
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,733
Own Kudos:
36,451
 [1]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,733
Kudos: 36,451
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BrentGMATPrepNow
If j and k are positive integers, what is the value of j?

(1) 4j + 3k = 18
(2) |64k² + 32kj + 4j²| = (-22)²

I created this question to highlight a common mistake students make.

Target question: What is the value of j?

Given: j and k are positive integers

Statement 1: 4j + 3k = 18
Many students will see this equation with 2 variables and automatically conclude that there are infinitely many solutions, in which case, statement 1 is not sufficient.
Under most conditions, this conclusion would be correct. However, the given information tells us that j and k are positive integers, which severely limits the possible solutions.
In fact, there is only ONE pair of positive integers that satisfy the equation: j = 3 and k = 2.
So, we can be certain that j = 3
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT


Statement 2: |64k² + 32kj + 4j²| = (-22)²
First factor the part inside the absolute value to get: |(8k + 2j)²| = (-22)²
This means that EITHER (8k + 2j)² = (-22)² OR (8k + 2j)² = -(-22)²
We can quickly dismiss the second case, (8k + 2j)² = -(-22)², since (8k + 2j)² must be greater than or equal to zero. So, it could never equal -(-22)²

So, what about (8k + 2j)² = (-22)² ?
This means that either 8k + 2j = 22 or 8k + 2j = -22
If j and k are both positive, we know that 8k + 2j will be positive, which means there are no solutions to the equation 8k + 2j = -22
What about the equation 8k + 2j = 22?
If we take this equation and divide both sides by 2, we get a simpler (yet equivalent) equation: 4k + j = 11
Under the restriction that j and k are POSITIVE INTEGERS, there are two possible solutions.
Case a: k = 1 and j = 7. In this case, the answer to the target question is j = 7
Case b: k = 2 and j = 3. In this case, the answer to the target question is j = 3
Since we can’t answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: A

Cheers,
Brent
Moderators:
Math Expert
109785 posts
498 posts
212 posts