Simply wanted to share some additional data and ask for your views.
I reached out to career management centers (CMC) and students both at Berkeley and UCLA.
I was very disappointed with Berkeley CMC - they simply ignored me even though I am an admitted student with a Berkeley ID.
UCLA CMC exceed all my expectations - I got all the statistics/details requested, without any sugarcoating.
Student response rate over LinkedIn requests was around 50% for both schools.
Two findings were shocking to me (
highlighted in red):
Consulting placements overallUCLA :
only 50% of students looking for consulting (around 90 per year) job get something - UCLA CMC dataBerkeley : pretty much everyone who searches consulting job gets something - Berkeley student data
MBB placementsUCLA: 10-12 students per year (excluding sponsored) - UCLA CMC data
Berkeley : half of students going to consulting get MBB - Berkeley student data
International students placementBoth UCLA and Berkeley place pretty bad international students into consulting, with MBB being hardly attainable for an international
It appears that only one international student from UCLA got MBB consulting in the last few years (even that student lived
in the U.S. and attended U.S. universities)
Students from both schools said that getting MBB jobs at their countries of origin was quite easy
Placements in California overall (not necessarily consulting)UCLA : places very well in Los Angeles but
recruiting for San Francisco becomes already challenging (UCLA student data)
Overall verdict: Even full-ride at UCLA does not justify going there with the consulting career goal UNLESS one plans to return to home country post-MBA. The risk of not getting anything in the US is very high
I would love to hear if someone has other data or can highlight the flaws in this quick analysis (the one flaw I see already - it's not right to fully rely on Berkeley student data)