Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 14:12 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 14:12
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
GMATBusters
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,924
Own Kudos:
6,646
 [11]
Given Kudos: 241
WE:General Management (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,924
Kudos: 6,646
 [11]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATBusters
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,924
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 241
WE:General Management (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,924
Kudos: 6,646
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Gladiator59
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 838
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 260
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Products:
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Posts: 838
Kudos: 2,613
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
lostboy
Joined: 02 Apr 2018
Last visit: 07 Jan 2019
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 48
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B
statment 1 is not sufficient, the number of pepole in each group crosses out
statement 2 is sufficient because it provides information about which average is bigger
User avatar
pk123
Joined: 16 Sep 2011
Last visit: 26 Apr 2020
Posts: 109
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 158
Products:
Posts: 109
Kudos: 119
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avg of both = (N *finance avg. + n* market avg)/(N+n)

Option A: N >n but we do not relation between finance avg and market avg
so not sufficient

Option B: says finance avg < market avg
Not sufficient as well

Combining both
N* (market avg - 10000) + n *market avg /(N+n)

we can't conclusive says its more than sum of avg /2 or not..In some scenarios it is greater but rest it is smaller...

Hence E is the answer
User avatar
u1983
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 24 Aug 2016
Last visit: 06 Jun 2021
Posts: 710
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 97
GMAT 1: 540 Q49 V16
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
Products:
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
Posts: 710
Kudos: 851
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Total avg = xa+yb/a+b ==> when a=b, avg= x+y/2
1) NS
2) NS
1+2) a(y-10000)+ by / a+b ' even if a is less than a , the avg is less than x+y/2........Ans C
User avatar
MsInvBanker
Joined: 23 May 2018
Last visit: 16 Jun 2021
Posts: 658
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
Location: Pakistan
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(1) We know that finance people are less than marketing but we did not know if x was greater than or less than y.

(2) We know x is less than y but nothing about how many are getting x and how many are getting y.

Together, we know that there are more people getting than the people getting x so.

Average of all executives' salaries is > \(\frac{x+y}{2}\) as it will be more tilted towards y.
avatar
Anisha2793
Joined: 20 Aug 2018
Last visit: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E ,not sufficient information to tell the values

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
rever08
Joined: 21 Jul 2017
Last visit: 13 Jan 2020
Posts: 151
Own Kudos:
115
 [1]
Given Kudos: 143
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Leadership
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GPA: 4
WE:Project Management (Education)
Products:
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
Posts: 151
Kudos: 115
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let the total number of finance executives be F and that of marketing be M.

Now, as per question stem the average (arithmetic mean) salary of finance executives is $x and the average (arithmetic mean) salary of marketing executives is $y. Is the average (arithmetic mean)

So average (arithmetic mean) salary of finance executives and marketing executives combined together = (F x $x + M x $y)/(F+M)

We need to find if (F x $x + M x $y)/(F+M) > ( $ (x + y) / 2


From statement 1:

No idea about x or y hence insufficient

From statement 2:
No idea about F and M hence insufficient


Together we know,

F<M and x < y - 10,000

Hence sufficient. Answer C
User avatar
Gladiator59
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 838
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 260
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Products:
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Posts: 838
Kudos: 2,613
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There was an issue with the original question and hence I am revisiting it post finishing the rest of the questions - apologies for the delayed response to Q2 but I feel it is only fair to allow a 10 min extension to it as it had a problem to begin with.

In my opinion Option E is the answer

Please find soln attached in image.

Best,
G
Attachments

Q2.jpeg
Q2.jpeg [ 105.05 KiB | Viewed 3714 times ]

avatar
hargun3045
Joined: 06 Feb 2018
Last visit: 29 Nov 2022
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 16
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey,

Thank you for the questions.

It maybe just me, but I couldn't understand the last part of your question
2(x+y)2(x+y)?
avatar
hargun3045
Joined: 06 Feb 2018
Last visit: 29 Nov 2022
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 16
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks for making the changes.

So,

Imagine this question in terms of weights

Imagine one finance person as average of all finance folks with salary x*

same for marketing person salary y*

St 1 tells us about number of people (more finance than marketing) but we know nothing about the relation between x and y

St 2 tells us about the relation bt x and y, but now we don't know relatively number of people

1 and 2 combine to give us info.

Finance X -------------------(x+y)/2-------------(Actual average)-------------Marketing Y

Actual average has to be closer to marketing side because there are more number of people there taking the overall average above (x+y)/2
User avatar
kylebecker9
Joined: 05 Oct 2018
Last visit: 22 Apr 2019
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 61
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 770 Q49 V47
GPA: 3.95
WE:General Management (Other)
GMAT 1: 770 Q49 V47
Posts: 30
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In a certain company, the average (arithmetic mean) salary of finance executives is $x and the average (arithmetic mean) salary of marketing executives is $y. Is the average (arithmetic mean) salary of finance executives and marketing executives combined greater than $(x+y)/2?
1) The number of the finance executives is less than the number of the marketing executives.
2) x is $10,000 less than y.

Weighted average will be closer to the value with the higher number of executives than to strict (x+y)/2

1) the weight average will be closer to the value of $y but $y could be anything larger or smaller than $x. Insufficient
2) Also insufficient because we don't know anything about the number of executives in each group. If there are the same number of both executives for example, the average salary combined will be equal to $(x+y)/2 (not greater than). If there are 20x more marketing executives, then the average will be greater than.
1+2) There are more marketing executives and they make a higher salary, therefore the average will be greater than (x+y)/2

C
User avatar
T1101
Joined: 07 Aug 2018
Last visit: 18 Nov 2021
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 247
Location: United States (MA)
GMAT 1: 560 Q39 V28
GMAT 2: 670 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 670 Q48 V34
Posts: 85
Kudos: 345
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatbusters
In a certain company, the average (arithmetic mean) salary of finance executives is $x and the average (arithmetic mean) salary of marketing executives is $y. Is the average (arithmetic mean) salary of finance executives and marketing executives combined greater than $\(\frac{(x+y)}{2}\)?

(1) The number of the finance executives is less than the number of the marketing executives.
(2) x is $10,000 less than y.


Weekly Quant Quiz #3 Question No 2


Picking numbers works aswell.

Let the number of finance executives be 0 and the number of marketing executives 1. \(x\) is 0$ and \(y\) is 10,000$.

Therefore the average of \(x\) and \(y\) would be \(\frac{(0*0+1*10000)}{1}=10,000$\) therefore bigger than \(\frac{(0+10000)}{2}=5000$\)

Hence, C
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,586
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,586
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts