Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 05 Nov 2013
Posts: 25
Kudos [?]:
69
[3]
, given: 69

When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the res [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Sep 2014, 06:56
3
This post received KUDOS
24
This post was BOOKMARKED
Question Stats:
51% (02:12) correct
49% (01:21) wrong based on 328 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the result is the twodigit, positive integer N. If M > N, what is the value of M? (1) The integer (M  N) has 12 unique factors. (2) The integer (M  N) is a multiple of 9. Official Explanation: A. A good way to approach this problem is to look at the possible range of (M  N). The largest difference between digits would be 91  19 = 72, and the smallest would be something like 2112 = 9. So you're working with a relatively limited range for the value of (M  N).
That should get you thinking: 12 is a lot of factors. A number has to be relatively large just to have a large number of factors, so with a maximum value of 72 it's unlikely that more than a few number will have that. So start with 72. Its factors include:
1 and 72; 2 and 36; 3 and 24; 4 and 18; 6 and 12; 8 and 9. That's 12 total factors. And if you break it down into primes, it's 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3, a combination of the two lowest prime factors available. For a smaller number to have as many factors, it doesn't have many options other than to turn those 3s into 2s. But try it using 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 3. That's 48, and 48 doesn't have 12 factors:
1 and 48; 2 and 24; 3 and 16; 4 and 12; 6 and 8. That's only 10 factors.
Because you can't find another difference that has 12 factors, M must be 91. And note that you can use the Unique Factors Trick to more quickly do the above:
1) Express the number as the product of prime numbers. (72 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3)
2) Express that product using exponents for each prime base. (72=23∗32)
3) Forget about the bases and concentrate on the exponents (in this case 3 and 2)
4) Add one to each exponent (making them 4 and 3 in this case)
5) Multiply the exponents and you'll have your number of total factors.
If you use that in reverse here, you'll see that to get 12 as the total number of factors, you can have exponents of either 4 and 2 or 5 and 1. And since the smallest use of 5 and 1 would be 25∗31=96, which is out of the possible range, statement 1 must be sufficient.
Statement 2, on the other hand, is not sufficient. Note that you can express (A  B) algebraically using tens and units digits. For the twodigit number xy, for example, in which x and y are each digits (and not numbers to be multiplied), you'd algebraically say that the value is 10x + y, as x is the tens digit and y the units. That makes (A  B) equal to:
10x + y  (10y + x)
That simplifies to:
10x + y  10y  x
Which is 9x  9y, and can be expressed as 9(x  y). Statement 2 then doesn't tell us anything we don't already know; (A  B) MUST BE a multiple of 9, so we don't get any new information.
The correct answer is A.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.

Kudos [?]:
69
[3]
, given: 69


Intern
Joined: 05 Nov 2013
Posts: 25
Kudos [?]:
69
[0], given: 69

Re: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the res [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Sep 2014, 06:56
Did not quite get the hang of the provided OA.
Can a math expert please provide an alternative approach?

Kudos [?]:
69
[0], given: 69


Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2014
Posts: 8
Kudos [?]:
23
[13]
, given: 1

When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the res [#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Oct 2014, 16:11
13
This post received KUDOS
7
This post was BOOKMARKED
I solved the question like this : As per the give info , M = 10a + b ; N =10b + a Also, M>N
Lets analyse statements now: Stmt 1 : The integer (M  N) has 12 unique factors.
M  N = (10a + b)  (10b + a) = 9a  9b so, M  N = 9 (ab) = 3^2 * (ab)
Stmt1 says M  N has 12 factors , this implies that (ab) should be a number with power as 3.
Remember the rule , if prime factorization of the integer ,N = X^p * Y^q * Z^r , then the number of factors of N = (p+1)*(q+1)*(r+1)
So, ab should be a number with power as 3. This implies it should be 8 , which is 2^3.
Hence, (a  b) = 8 , this implies a= 9 and b =1
So, M= 91 and N = 19 , coz given is M>N
Stmt1: Sufficient
Stmt 2 : The integer (M  N) is a multiple of 9.
M  N = (10a + b)  (10b + a) = 9a  9b so, M  N = 9 (ab) . This is already a multiple of 9.
Therefore, (ab) can be any integer. Hence we cannot narrow down the values of a & b to find M.
Stmt2 : Insufficient

Kudos [?]:
23
[13]
, given: 1


Manager
Joined: 22 Jan 2014
Posts: 141
Kudos [?]:
69
[1]
, given: 145
WE: Project Management (Computer Hardware)

Re: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the res [#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Oct 2014, 06:39
1
This post received KUDOS
2
This post was BOOKMARKED
pratikshr wrote: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the result is the twodigit, positive integer N. If M > N, what is the value of M? (1) The integer (M  N) has 12 unique factors. (2) The integer (M  N) is a multiple of 9. Official Explanation: A. A good way to approach this problem is to look at the possible range of (M  N). The largest difference between digits would be 91  19 = 72, and the smallest would be something like 2112 = 9. So you're working with a relatively limited range for the value of (M  N).
That should get you thinking: 12 is a lot of factors. A number has to be relatively large just to have a large number of factors, so with a maximum value of 72 it's unlikely that more than a few number will have that. So start with 72. Its factors include:
1 and 72; 2 and 36; 3 and 24; 4 and 18; 6 and 12; 8 and 9. That's 12 total factors. And if you break it down into primes, it's 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3, a combination of the two lowest prime factors available. For a smaller number to have as many factors, it doesn't have many options other than to turn those 3s into 2s. But try it using 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 3. That's 48, and 48 doesn't have 12 factors:
1 and 48; 2 and 24; 3 and 16; 4 and 12; 6 and 8. That's only 10 factors.
Because you can't find another difference that has 12 factors, M must be 91. And note that you can use the Unique Factors Trick to more quickly do the above:
1) Express the number as the product of prime numbers. (72 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3)
2) Express that product using exponents for each prime base. (72=23∗32)
3) Forget about the bases and concentrate on the exponents (in this case 3 and 2)
4) Add one to each exponent (making them 4 and 3 in this case)
5) Multiply the exponents and you'll have your number of total factors.
If you use that in reverse here, you'll see that to get 12 as the total number of factors, you can have exponents of either 4 and 2 or 5 and 1. And since the smallest use of 5 and 1 would be 25∗31=96, which is out of the possible range, statement 1 must be sufficient.
Statement 2, on the other hand, is not sufficient. Note that you can express (A  B) algebraically using tens and units digits. For the twodigit number xy, for example, in which x and y are each digits (and not numbers to be multiplied), you'd algebraically say that the value is 10x + y, as x is the tens digit and y the units. That makes (A  B) equal to:
10x + y  (10y + x)
That simplifies to:
10x + y  10y  x
Which is 9x  9y, and can be expressed as 9(x  y). Statement 2 then doesn't tell us anything we don't already know; (A  B) MUST BE a multiple of 9, so we don't get any new information.
The correct answer is A. A. Let M = 10a+b so N = 10b+a (1) The integer (M  N) has 12 unique factors MN = 9(ab) = 3^2(ab) 3^2 already has 3 factors. so (ab) has 4 factors. so (ab) is of the form x*y or k^3 (where x, y, and k are prime numbers apart from 3) (i) if (ab) is of the form x*y then x,y can be 2,5,7,... max difference between a and b is 8, which doesn't even satisfy the smallest product of 2*5. so this case is invalid. (ii) if (ab) is of the form k^3 note that (ab) > 1 other wise MN would only have 3 factors. 2^3 = 8 , 3^3 = 27 (not possible) so (ab) = 8 which is possible only for a=9,b=1. hence, A alone is sufficient. (2) The integer (M  N) is a multiple of 9 This is already known. Not useful...hence insufficient.
_________________
Illegitimi non carborundum.

Kudos [?]:
69
[1]
, given: 145


Manager
Joined: 12 Sep 2014
Posts: 168
Kudos [?]:
80
[0], given: 103
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
GPA: 3.94

Re: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the res [#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Oct 2014, 08:59
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
From the premise, we already know that MN is always a multiple of 9, so that immediately rules out statement 2 as insufficient. This is because when a positive 2 digit integer's digits are reverse, the difference between the two numbers is a multiple of 9.
I eventually got statement 1 to be sufficient. However, could someone clarify the rules with prime factorizationI'm still a bit confused.

Kudos [?]:
80
[0], given: 103


Intern
Joined: 25 Jan 2014
Posts: 19
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 75
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: Kellogg '17, Booth '17, Ross '17, Haas '17, Stern '17, Duke '17, Anderson '17, Tepper '17, KenanFlagler '17, Marshall '17, LBS '17, Oxford, ISB '17, Georgia Tech '17, Merage '17, Schulich '17, NUS '17, UrbanaChampaign '17, NTU '17, SPJ GMBA '17

Re: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the res [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Aug 2015, 13:27
pratikshr wrote: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the result is the twodigit, positive integer N. If M > N, what is the value of M? (1) The integer (M  N) has 12 unique factors. (2) The integer (M  N) is a multiple of 9. Official Explanation: A. A good way to approach this problem is to look at the possible range of (M  N). The largest difference between digits would be 91  19 = 72, and the smallest would be something like 2112 = 9. So you're working with a relatively limited range for the value of (M  N).
That should get you thinking: 12 is a lot of factors. A number has to be relatively large just to have a large number of factors, so with a maximum value of 72 it's unlikely that more than a few number will have that. So start with 72. Its factors include:
1 and 72; 2 and 36; 3 and 24; 4 and 18; 6 and 12; 8 and 9. That's 12 total factors. And if you break it down into primes, it's 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3, a combination of the two lowest prime factors available. For a smaller number to have as many factors, it doesn't have many options other than to turn those 3s into 2s. But try it using 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 3. That's 48, and 48 doesn't have 12 factors:
1 and 48; 2 and 24; 3 and 16; 4 and 12; 6 and 8. That's only 10 factors.
Because you can't find another difference that has 12 factors, M must be 91. And note that you can use the Unique Factors Trick to more quickly do the above:
1) Express the number as the product of prime numbers. (72 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3)
2) Express that product using exponents for each prime base. (72=23∗32)
3) Forget about the bases and concentrate on the exponents (in this case 3 and 2)
4) Add one to each exponent (making them 4 and 3 in this case)
5) Multiply the exponents and you'll have your number of total factors.
If you use that in reverse here, you'll see that to get 12 as the total number of factors, you can have exponents of either 4 and 2 or 5 and 1. And since the smallest use of 5 and 1 would be 25∗31=96, which is out of the possible range, statement 1 must be sufficient.
Statement 2, on the other hand, is not sufficient. Note that you can express (A  B) algebraically using tens and units digits. For the twodigit number xy, for example, in which x and y are each digits (and not numbers to be multiplied), you'd algebraically say that the value is 10x + y, as x is the tens digit and y the units. That makes (A  B) equal to:
10x + y  (10y + x)
That simplifies to:
10x + y  10y  x
Which is 9x  9y, and can be expressed as 9(x  y). Statement 2 then doesn't tell us anything we don't already know; (A  B) MUST BE a multiple of 9, so we don't get any new information.
The correct answer is A. Bunuel, Could you explain how is the first point sufficient using a simpler solution. For the second point, 'The integer (M  N) is a multiple of 9' I followed the below logic. two digit multiples of 9 are 18,27,36,45,54,63,72,81,90,99. Out of these 18,27,36,45 and 99 cannot be taken into consideration because it is given that M>N. only possible considerations are 54,63,72,81,90. The only number satisfying the condition where MN should be a multiple of 9 is 54. M=54 and flipping the digits you get N=45. MN= 9 which is the only multiple possible. Am i missing anything here Bunuel. Need your help!!!!

Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 75


Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2679
Kudos [?]:
1628
[0], given: 792
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)

Re: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the res [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Aug 2015, 13:53
arshu27 wrote: pratikshr wrote: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the result is the twodigit, positive integer N. If M > N, what is the value of M? (1) The integer (M  N) has 12 unique factors. (2) The integer (M  N) is a multiple of 9. Official Explanation: A. A good way to approach this problem is to look at the possible range of (M  N). The largest difference between digits would be 91  19 = 72, and the smallest would be something like 2112 = 9. So you're working with a relatively limited range for the value of (M  N).
That should get you thinking: 12 is a lot of factors. A number has to be relatively large just to have a large number of factors, so with a maximum value of 72 it's unlikely that more than a few number will have that. So start with 72. Its factors include:
1 and 72; 2 and 36; 3 and 24; 4 and 18; 6 and 12; 8 and 9. That's 12 total factors. And if you break it down into primes, it's 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3, a combination of the two lowest prime factors available. For a smaller number to have as many factors, it doesn't have many options other than to turn those 3s into 2s. But try it using 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 3. That's 48, and 48 doesn't have 12 factors:
1 and 48; 2 and 24; 3 and 16; 4 and 12; 6 and 8. That's only 10 factors.
Because you can't find another difference that has 12 factors, M must be 91. And note that you can use the Unique Factors Trick to more quickly do the above:
1) Express the number as the product of prime numbers. (72 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3)
2) Express that product using exponents for each prime base. (72=23∗32)
3) Forget about the bases and concentrate on the exponents (in this case 3 and 2)
4) Add one to each exponent (making them 4 and 3 in this case)
5) Multiply the exponents and you'll have your number of total factors.
If you use that in reverse here, you'll see that to get 12 as the total number of factors, you can have exponents of either 4 and 2 or 5 and 1. And since the smallest use of 5 and 1 would be 25∗31=96, which is out of the possible range, statement 1 must be sufficient.
Statement 2, on the other hand, is not sufficient. Note that you can express (A  B) algebraically using tens and units digits. For the twodigit number xy, for example, in which x and y are each digits (and not numbers to be multiplied), you'd algebraically say that the value is 10x + y, as x is the tens digit and y the units. That makes (A  B) equal to:
10x + y  (10y + x)
That simplifies to:
10x + y  10y  x
Which is 9x  9y, and can be expressed as 9(x  y). Statement 2 then doesn't tell us anything we don't already know; (A  B) MUST BE a multiple of 9, so we don't get any new information.
The correct answer is A. Bunuel, Could you explain how is the first point sufficient using a simpler solution. For the second point, 'The integer (M  N) is a multiple of 9' I followed the below logic. two digit multiples of 9 are 18,27,36,45,54,63,72,81,90,99. Out of these 18,27,36,45 and 99 cannot be taken into consideration because it is given that M>N. only possible considerations are 54,63,72,81,90. The only number satisfying the condition where MN should be a multiple of 9 is 54. M=54 and flipping the digits you get N=45. MN= 9 which is the only multiple possible. Am i missing anything here Bunuel. Need your help!!!! Even 63 (&36) follows that MN = multiple of 9. 6336 = 27 = 9*3. Thus you also have 63 as one of the possible answers.
_________________
Thursday with Ron updated list as of July 1st, 2015: http://gmatclub.com/forum/consolidatedthursdaywithronlistforallthesections201006.html#p1544515 Rules for Posting in Quant Forums: http://gmatclub.com/forum/rulesforpostingpleasereadthisbeforeposting133935.html Writing Mathematical Formulae in your posts: http://gmatclub.com/forum/rulesforpostingpleasereadthisbeforeposting133935.html#p1096628 GMATCLUB Math Book: http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmatmathbookindownloadablepdfformat130609.html Everything Related to Inequalities: http://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalitiesmadeeasy206653.html#p1582891 Inequalities tips: http://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalitiestipsandhints175001.html Debrief, 650 to 750: http://gmatclub.com/forum/650to750a10monthjourneytothescore203190.html

Kudos [?]:
1628
[0], given: 792


Intern
Joined: 25 Jan 2014
Posts: 19
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 75
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: Kellogg '17, Booth '17, Ross '17, Haas '17, Stern '17, Duke '17, Anderson '17, Tepper '17, KenanFlagler '17, Marshall '17, LBS '17, Oxford, ISB '17, Georgia Tech '17, Merage '17, Schulich '17, NUS '17, UrbanaChampaign '17, NTU '17, SPJ GMBA '17

Re: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the res [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Aug 2015, 13:58
Engr2012 wrote: arshu27 wrote: pratikshr wrote: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the result is the twodigit, positive integer N. If M > N, what is the value of M? (1) The integer (M  N) has 12 unique factors. (2) The integer (M  N) is a multiple of 9. Official Explanation: A. A good way to approach this problem is to look at the possible range of (M  N). The largest difference between digits would be 91  19 = 72, and the smallest would be something like 2112 = 9. So you're working with a relatively limited range for the value of (M  N).
That should get you thinking: 12 is a lot of factors. A number has to be relatively large just to have a large number of factors, so with a maximum value of 72 it's unlikely that more than a few number will have that. So start with 72. Its factors include:
1 and 72; 2 and 36; 3 and 24; 4 and 18; 6 and 12; 8 and 9. That's 12 total factors. And if you break it down into primes, it's 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3, a combination of the two lowest prime factors available. For a smaller number to have as many factors, it doesn't have many options other than to turn those 3s into 2s. But try it using 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 3. That's 48, and 48 doesn't have 12 factors:
1 and 48; 2 and 24; 3 and 16; 4 and 12; 6 and 8. That's only 10 factors.
Because you can't find another difference that has 12 factors, M must be 91. And note that you can use the Unique Factors Trick to more quickly do the above:
1) Express the number as the product of prime numbers. (72 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3)
2) Express that product using exponents for each prime base. (72=23∗32)
3) Forget about the bases and concentrate on the exponents (in this case 3 and 2)
4) Add one to each exponent (making them 4 and 3 in this case)
5) Multiply the exponents and you'll have your number of total factors.
If you use that in reverse here, you'll see that to get 12 as the total number of factors, you can have exponents of either 4 and 2 or 5 and 1. And since the smallest use of 5 and 1 would be 25∗31=96, which is out of the possible range, statement 1 must be sufficient.
Statement 2, on the other hand, is not sufficient. Note that you can express (A  B) algebraically using tens and units digits. For the twodigit number xy, for example, in which x and y are each digits (and not numbers to be multiplied), you'd algebraically say that the value is 10x + y, as x is the tens digit and y the units. That makes (A  B) equal to:
10x + y  (10y + x)
That simplifies to:
10x + y  10y  x
Which is 9x  9y, and can be expressed as 9(x  y). Statement 2 then doesn't tell us anything we don't already know; (A  B) MUST BE a multiple of 9, so we don't get any new information.
The correct answer is A. Bunuel, Could you explain how is the first point sufficient using a simpler solution. For the second point, 'The integer (M  N) is a multiple of 9' I followed the below logic. two digit multiples of 9 are 18,27,36,45,54,63,72,81,90,99. Out of these 18,27,36,45 and 99 cannot be taken into consideration because it is given that M>N. only possible considerations are 54,63,72,81,90. The only number satisfying the condition where MN should be a multiple of 9 is 54. M=54 and flipping the digits you get N=45. MN= 9 which is the only multiple possible. Am i missing anything here Bunuel. Need your help!!!! Even 63 (&36) follows that MN = multiple of 9. 6336 = 27 = 9*3. Thus you also have 63 as one of the possible answers. Thanks Bunuel.. totally ignored that point. could you explain how the first point is sufficient. I did not understand the earlier solutions at all.

Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 75


Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2015
Posts: 21
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 15

Re: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the res [#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Aug 2015, 19:52
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
A good way to approach this problem is to look at the possible range of (M  N). The largest difference between digits would be 91  19 = 72, and the smallest would be something like 2112 = 9. So you're working with a relatively limited range for the value of (M  N) Express the number 72 as 2x2x2x3x3 = 2^3x3^2 Total number of factors can be found by ignoring base and taking only the exponents i.e 3 and 2. Add 1 to them and multiply. i.e (3+1)x(2+1)= 4x3 = 12 factors available. If you use that in reverse here, you'll see that to get 12 as the total number of factors, you can have exponents of either 4 and 2 or 5 and 1. And since the smallest use of 5 and 1 would be 2^5∗3^1=96, which is out of the possible range, statement 1 must be sufficient. Statement 2,is not sufficient. Note that you can express (A  B) algebraically using tens and units digits. For the twodigit number xy, for example, in which x and y are each digits (and not numbers to be multiplied), you'd algebraically say that the value is 10x + y, as x is the tens digit and y the units. That makes (A  B) equal to: 10x + y  (10y + x) That simplifies to: 10x + y  10y  x Which is 9x  9y, and can be expressed as 9(x  y). Statement 2 then doesn't tell us anything we don't already know; (A  B) MUST BE a multiple of 9, so we don't get any new information.

Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 15


Intern
Joined: 20 Jan 2014
Posts: 34
Kudos [?]:
12
[2]
, given: 4

Re: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the res [#permalink]
Show Tags
21 May 2016, 14:59
2
This post received KUDOS
2
This post was BOOKMARKED
Statement 1:
I would show M as 10t + u and N as 10u + t. Where t is the tens digit of M and u is the units digit.
So 10t + u  10u  t = 9t  9u. We can factor out a 9 here 9(tu) has 12 unique factors.
9 itself has a prime factorization of 3^2 so to find the number of unique factors of 9 we add 1 to the 2 (taken from 3^2) telling us 9 has 3 unique factors.
In order to get 12 unique factors we need a number to the power of 3.
The only number to the power of 3 when two single digits are subtracted from each other is 8, 2^3.
There (MN) is equal to 3^2.2^3. Which as twelve unique factors 3.4 = 12.
Sufficient.
Statement 2:
Doesn't give us any new info.

Kudos [?]:
12
[2]
, given: 4


Intern
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 2
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 37

Re: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the res [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Dec 2016, 08:29
Hi all,
I totally understand the logic, but what about the combination of the integers 8 and 0: 8008=72 which has 12 factors.
It says nothing about nonzero digits...
Thanks in advance!

Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 37


Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 40949
Kudos [?]:
118820
[1]
, given: 12007

Re: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the res [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Dec 2016, 08:34
nachobs wrote: Hi all,
I totally understand the logic, but what about the combination of the integers 8 and 0: 8008=72 which has 12 factors.
It says nothing about nonzero digits...
Thanks in advance! When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the result is the twodigit, positive integer N. 08 is just 8, so it's not a twodigit integer, it's a sing;edigit integer.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Kudos [?]:
118820
[1]
, given: 12007


SVP
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 1743
Kudos [?]:
398
[0], given: 49

Re: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the res [#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Jan 2017, 23:36
[quote="pratikshr"]When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the result is the twodigit, positive integer N. If M > N, what is the value of M?
(1) The integer (M  N) has 12 unique factors.
(2) The integer (M  N) is a multiple of 9.
let m = 10a+b and n = 10b+a , a>b , 2<=a<=9
from 1
9a9b = mn = 9(ab) ,let (ab) = k thus n = 3^2 *k and since mn has 12 unique factors and since 9 has 3 unique factors (1,3,9) then k has 10 factors including 1.
ab = can only yield ( 1 , 2,3,4,5,6,7,8)
number of factors of (3^2)*x^p is 3*(p+1) thus only ab = 8 works since number of factors of 3^2 * 2^3 = 3*4 = 12
and since 2<=a<=9 thus a = 9 and b = 1 and thus m = 91 and N = 19..........suff
from 2
telling us what we already know ... insuff
A

Kudos [?]:
398
[0], given: 49


Director
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 577
Kudos [?]:
24
[0], given: 153

Re: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the res [#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Apr 2017, 16:35
thefibonacci wrote: pratikshr wrote: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the result is the twodigit, positive integer N. If M > N, what is the value of M? (1) The integer (M  N) has 12 unique factors. (2) The integer (M  N) is a multiple of 9. Official Explanation: A. A good way to approach this problem is to look at the possible range of (M  N). The largest difference between digits would be 91  19 = 72, and the smallest would be something like 2112 = 9. So you're working with a relatively limited range for the value of (M  N).
That should get you thinking: 12 is a lot of factors. A number has to be relatively large just to have a large number of factors, so with a maximum value of 72 it's unlikely that more than a few number will have that. So start with 72. Its factors include:
1 and 72; 2 and 36; 3 and 24; 4 and 18; 6 and 12; 8 and 9. That's 12 total factors. And if you break it down into primes, it's 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3, a combination of the two lowest prime factors available. For a smaller number to have as many factors, it doesn't have many options other than to turn those 3s into 2s. But try it using 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 3. That's 48, and 48 doesn't have 12 factors:
1 and 48; 2 and 24; 3 and 16; 4 and 12; 6 and 8. That's only 10 factors.
Because you can't find another difference that has 12 factors, M must be 91. And note that you can use the Unique Factors Trick to more quickly do the above:
1) Express the number as the product of prime numbers. (72 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3)
2) Express that product using exponents for each prime base. (72=23∗32)
3) Forget about the bases and concentrate on the exponents (in this case 3 and 2)
4) Add one to each exponent (making them 4 and 3 in this case)
5) Multiply the exponents and you'll have your number of total factors.
If you use that in reverse here, you'll see that to get 12 as the total number of factors, you can have exponents of either 4 and 2 or 5 and 1. And since the smallest use of 5 and 1 would be 25∗31=96, which is out of the possible range, statement 1 must be sufficient.
Statement 2, on the other hand, is not sufficient. Note that you can express (A  B) algebraically using tens and units digits. For the twodigit number xy, for example, in which x and y are each digits (and not numbers to be multiplied), you'd algebraically say that the value is 10x + y, as x is the tens digit and y the units. That makes (A  B) equal to:
10x + y  (10y + x)
That simplifies to:
10x + y  10y  x
Which is 9x  9y, and can be expressed as 9(x  y). Statement 2 then doesn't tell us anything we don't already know; (A  B) MUST BE a multiple of 9, so we don't get any new information.
The correct answer is A. A. Let M = 10a+b so N = 10b+a (1) The integer (M  N) has 12 unique factors MN = 9(ab) = 3^2(ab) 3^2 already has 3 factors. so (ab) has 4 factors. so (ab) is of the form x*y or k^3 (where x, y, and k are prime numbers apart from 3) (i) if (ab) is of the form x*y then x,y can be 2,5,7,... max difference between a and b is 8, which doesn't even satisfy the smallest product of 2*5. so this case is invalid. (ii) if (ab) is of the form k^3 note that (ab) > 1 other wise MN would only have 3 factors. 2^3 = 8 , 3^3 = 27 (not possible) so (ab) = 8 which is possible only for a=9,b=1. hence, A alone is sufficient. (2) The integer (M  N) is a multiple of 9 This is already known. Not useful...hence insufficient. "max difference between a and b is 8, which doesn't even satisfy the smallest product of 2*5. so this case is invalid. " thank you

Kudos [?]:
24
[0], given: 153


Director
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 577
Kudos [?]:
24
[0], given: 153

Re: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the res [#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Apr 2017, 16:52
Bunuel wrote: nachobs wrote: Hi all,
I totally understand the logic, but what about the combination of the integers 8 and 0: 8008=72 which has 12 factors.
It says nothing about nonzero digits...
Thanks in advance! When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the result is the twodigit, positive integer N. 08 is just 8, so it's not a twodigit integer, it's a sing;edigit integer. @bunuel VeritasPrep gives the following solution; however, I think there is an error where state the possibilities for exponents are 5 and 1 and 4 and 2 wouldn't 4 and 2 be (4+1)(2+1)= 15 which is clearly not 12? A. A good way to approach this problem is to look at the possible range of (M  N). The largest difference between digits would be 91  19 = 72, and the smallest would be something like 2112 = 9. So you're working with a relatively limited range for the value of (M  N). That should get you thinking: 12 is a lot of factors. A number has to be relatively large just to have a large number of factors, so with a maximum value of 72 it's unlikely that more than a few number will have that. So start with 72. Its factors include: 1 and 72; 2 and 36; 3 and 24; 4 and 18; 6 and 12; 8 and 9. That's 12 total factors. And if you break it down into primes, it's 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3, a combination of the two lowest prime factors available. For a smaller number to have as many factors, it doesn't have many options other than to turn those 3s into 2s. But try it using 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 3. That's 48, and 48 doesn't have 12 factors: 1 and 48; 2 and 24; 3 and 16; 4 and 12; 6 and 8. That's only 10 factors. Because you can't find another difference that has 12 factors, M must be 91. And note that you can use the Unique Factors Trick to more quickly do the above: 1) Express the number as the product of prime numbers. (72 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3) 2) Express that product using exponents for each prime base. ( 72=23∗32 ) 3) Forget about the bases and concentrate on the exponents (in this case 3 and 2) 4) Add one to each exponent (making them 4 and 3 in this case) 5) Multiply the exponents and you'll have your number of total factors. If you use that in reverse here, you'll see that to get 12 as the total number of factors, you can have exponents of either 4 and 2 or 5 and 1. And since the smallest use of 5 and 1 would be 25∗31=96 , which is out of the possible range, statement 1 must be sufficient. Statement 2, on the other hand, is not sufficient. Note that you can express (A  B) algebraically using tens and units digits. For the twodigit number xy, for example, in which x and y are each digits (and not numbers to be multiplied), you'd algebraically say that the value is 10x + y, as x is the tens digit and y the units. That makes (A  B) equal to: 10x + y  (10y + x) That simplifies to: 10x + y  10y  x Which is 9x  9y, and can be expressed as 9(x  y). Statement 2 then doesn't tell us anything we don't already know; (A  B) MUST BE a multiple of 9, so we don't get any new information. The correct answer is A.

Kudos [?]:
24
[0], given: 153


Director
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 577
Kudos [?]:
24
[0], given: 153

Re: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the res [#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Apr 2017, 17:03
yezz wrote: pratikshr wrote: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the result is the twodigit, positive integer N. If M > N, what is the value of M?
(1) The integer (M  N) has 12 unique factors.
(2) The integer (M  N) is a multiple of 9.
let m = 10a+b and n = 10b+a , a>b , 2<=a<=9
from 1
9a9b = mn = 9(ab) ,let (ab) = k thus n = 3^2 *k and since mn has 12 unique factors and since 9 has 3 unique factors (1,3,9) then k has 10 factors including 1.
ab = can only yield ( 1 , 2,3,4,5,6,7,8)
number of factors of (3^2)*x^p is 3*(p+1) thus only ab = 8 works since number of factors of 3^2 * 2^3 = 3*4 = 12
and since 2<=a<=9 thus a = 9 and b = 1 and thus m = 91 and N = 19..........suff
from 2
telling us what we already know ... insuff
A But how can "K" have ten factors? If the answer is 3^2 x (ab) then shouldn't k have 4 factors?

Kudos [?]:
24
[0], given: 153



Re: When the digits of twodigit, positive integer M are reversed, the res
[#permalink]
15 Apr 2017, 17:03







