Taxing passage. Got four out of six in 6 mins 39 sec.
Here are my explanations.
Main point question. Need to understand the flow of ideas presented by the author.Q1).Which one of the following best states the main idea of the passage?
(A) The Homeric poems are most fruitfully studied as records of the time and place in which they were written.
Too detailed and opposite of what the author is trying to convey(B) The Homeric poems are the products of a highly developed and complicated tradition of oral poetry.
True but too detailed to be the main point(C) The Homeric poems are currently enjoying a resurgence of critical interest after an age of scholarship largely devoted to the poems’ nonpoetic elements.
BINGO - precisely the main point as can be seen in the last paragraph - Parry Jr. efforts have left to a resurgence of studying Homeric texts in a literary and poetic manner vs. historical & facts based(D) The Homeric poems are currently enjoying a resurgence of scholarly interest after am age during which most studies were authored by nonacademic writers.
TRAP - first few words are what we are looking for but this is not the main point(E) Before Milman Parry published his pioneering work in the early twentieth century, it was difficult to assign a date or an author to the Homeric poems.
BS OptionDetail question - need to locate the two mentioned critics in the first paraQ2). According to the passage, the work of Simone Weil and Erich Auerbach on Homer was primarily concerned with which one of the following?
(A) considerations of why criticism of Homer had moved to peripheral issues
WRONG - this is not true(B) analyses of the poetry itself in terms of its literary qualities
BINGO - the author mentions that only non specialists were looking at Homeric poems the right way ( i.e in a poetic way)(C) studies in the history and nature of oral poetry
Nah! This is not mentioned in first para(D) analyses of the already ancient epic tradition inherited by Homer
Irrelevant to the question(E) critiques of the highly technical analyses of academic critics
BS OptionDetail question but the location of the answer is tricky = refer to the first line of the passage to find it Q3). The passage suggests which one of the following about scholarship on Homer that has appeared since 1970?(A) It has dealt extensively with the Homeric poems as literary art.
BINGO - this is the resurgence that is being talked about in the passage(B) It is more incisive than the work of the Parrys.
Nope - this is not true(C) It has rejected as irrelevant the scholarship produced by specialists between 1935 and 1970.
Too strong verbiage - "Has rejected as irrelevant" needs to be discarded(D) It has ignored the work of Simone Weil and Erich Auerbach.
BS Option - this is not at all the case as those two nonspecialists were doing the right thing before the specialists caught on(E) It has attempted to confirm that the Iliad and the Odyssey were written by Homer.
Never a point of contention , so another BS OptionAnother detail question but the options are tricky!Q4). The author of the passage most probably quotes Alexander Pope (lines 24-26) in order to(A) indicate that the Homeric poems have generally received poor treatment at the hands of English critics
TRAP - this is very close to what we are looking for but I guess the "English critics" ,akes this wrong(B) prove that poets as well as critics have emphasized elements peripheral to the poems
"Prove" is too strong a verbiage, Mr. Pope does no such thing(C) illustrate that the nonpoetical emphasis also existed in an earlier century
BINGO - the crux of why the author quotes Alexander Pope is to show that what was valid in 1715 was valid up until 1970(D) emphasize the problems inherent in rendering classical Greek poetry into modern English
Rendering what? BS Option likely(E) argue that poets and literary critics have seldom agreed the interpretation of poetry
Nope, no such agreement between poets and critics is discussedDetail question - again tricky only because of the options. Found in the final paragraph of the passageQ5). According to the passage, which one of the following is true of Milman Parry’s immediate successors in the field of Homeric studies?(A) They reconciled Homer’s poetry with archaeological and historical concerns.
HOLD Wrong because this is what the latter succesors did but not the immediate ones BIG TRAP(B) They acknowledged the tradition of oral poetry, but focused on the uniqueness of Homer’s poetry within the tradition.
Opposite, this is exactly what they did not do and what they ought to have done(C) They occupied themselves with the question of what qualities made for great poetry.
Opposite - same as above(D) They emphasized the boundaries of oral poetry.
Bingo - this is explicitly mentioned in paragraph two(E) They called for a revival of Homer’s popularity.
BS optionStructure - summary ind of question. An understanding of the main point is essential to answer thisQ6). Which one of the following best describes the organization of the passage?(A) A situation is identified and its origins are examines.
HOLD Why is this correct?
The first line of the passage introduces a situation of resurgence and then the origin of that is discussed. Perfect!(B) A series of hypotheses is reviewed and one is advocated.
No hypothesis is advocated, this is a merely descriptive passage without a conclusion by the author(C) The works of two influential scholars are summarized.
Nah - there are no two focus authors in the passage(D) Several issues contributing to a currently debate are summarized.
Is this a current debate? Don't think so. Wrong.(E) Three possible solutions to a long-standing problem are posed.
BS Option. Three solutions? Discardverdict - GOod passage with some tricks mostly in the options.

Regards,
Gladi