Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 17:52 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 17:52
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,372
 [12]
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
souvonik2k
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 25 Nov 2015
Last visit: 05 Dec 2021
Posts: 953
Own Kudos:
2,210
 [1]
Given Kudos: 751
Status:Preparing for GMAT
Location: India
GPA: 3.64
Products:
Posts: 953
Kudos: 2,210
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sumit411
Joined: 07 Oct 2017
Last visit: 28 Jan 2019
Posts: 214
Own Kudos:
230
 [3]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 214
Kudos: 230
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Imo E
A--> Dangling modifier.
Who will do? No answer
B--> with the aid is supposed to modify the verb be made but it is very far away. We have a much elegant and concise structure available in A.
C--> Who is we ?
D--> suggesting that criminals make cases against themselves. That's a train wreck
E---> this sentence introduces the term litigators . This is not wrong


Kudos appreciated!!


Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
Abhishek009
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 18 Jul 2025
Posts: 5,934
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 463
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 5,934
Kudos: 5,328
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
souvonik2k
Bunuel
With the assistance of informants, cases can often be made against otherwise elusive criminals.


(A) With the assistance of informants, cases can often be made against otherwise elusive criminals.

(B) Cases can often be made against otherwise elusive criminals with the aid of informants.

(C) With the assistance of informants, we can often make cases against otherwise elusive criminals.

(D) Otherwise elusive criminals can often have cases made against them with the assistance of informants.

(E) With the assistance of informants, litigators can often make cases against otherwise elusive criminals.

IMO E.
The initial modifier -With the assistance of informants- correctly connects to litigators.
+1 for (E)
With the assistance of informants, is a modifier modifying litigators.
User avatar
pandeyashwin
Joined: 14 Jun 2018
Last visit: 25 Jan 2019
Posts: 169
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 176
Posts: 169
Kudos: 312
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sumit411
Imo A

B--> with the aid is supposed to modify the verb be made but it is very far away. We have a much elegant and concise structure available in A.
C--> Who is we ?
D--> suggesting that criminals make cases against themselves. That's a train wreck
E---> this sentence introduces the term litigators . This is not wrong but it is different from the original intended meaning. If the original meaning is not nonsense, always try to preserve the meaning of the original sentence.


Kudos appreciated!!


Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
For A , who is going to make the case ?
Litigators in E solves that dangling modifier
User avatar
sumit411
Joined: 07 Oct 2017
Last visit: 28 Jan 2019
Posts: 214
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 214
Kudos: 230
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pandeyashwin
sumit411
Imo A

B--> with the aid is supposed to modify the verb be made but it is very far away. We have a much elegant and concise structure available in A.
C--> Who is we ?
D--> suggesting that criminals make cases against themselves. That's a train wreck
E---> this sentence introduces the term litigators . This is not wrong but it is different from the original intended meaning. If the original meaning is not nonsense, always try to preserve the meaning of the original sentence.


Kudos appreciated!!


Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
For A , who is going to make the case ?
Litigators in E solves that dangling modifier
Yeah, I am in sync with your reasoning.
Edited the post

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
zmzm
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Last visit: 16 Sep 2024
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 33
Kudos: 5
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I may go with C or E. With modifier needs an action-or such as Litigator or We.
avatar
Mankodim
Joined: 19 Aug 2018
Last visit: 26 Apr 2019
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 25
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
With the assistance of informants, cases can often be made against otherwise elusive criminals.


(A) With the assistance of informants, cases can often be made against otherwise elusive criminals.

(B) Cases can often be made against otherwise elusive criminals with the aid of informants.

(C) With the assistance of informants, we can often make cases against otherwise elusive criminals.

(D) Otherwise elusive criminals can often have cases made against them with the assistance of informants.

(E) With the assistance of informants, litigators can often make cases against otherwise elusive criminals.

A) so far, so good - keeping it aside. Although there's no doer of the action, it can be implied at this point of time
B) it kind of sounds like A in passive voice. Ignoring this one
C) who's we here? Can all of us make a case? Nope.
D) i find this to be too wordy
E) looks good. Much better than A

On exam day, I'd have chosen E over A, but then again, I did not do too well in verbal. So I'd wait for the oa or an expert reply.

For me, E is the answer.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
sumit411
Joined: 07 Oct 2017
Last visit: 28 Jan 2019
Posts: 214
Own Kudos:
230
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 214
Kudos: 230
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
zmzm
I may go with C or E. With modifier needs an action-or such as Litigator or We.
We is not correct in this context. You can't attribute an antecedent with we

Kudos appreciated.


Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,372
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,372
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
With the assistance of informants, cases can often be made against otherwise elusive criminals.


(A) With the assistance of informants, cases can often be made against otherwise elusive criminals.

(B) Cases can often be made against otherwise elusive criminals with the aid of informants.

(C) With the assistance of informants, we can often make cases against otherwise elusive criminals.

(D) Otherwise elusive criminals can often have cases made against them with the assistance of informants.

(E) With the assistance of informants, litigators can often make cases against otherwise elusive criminals.

KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



The original phrase, With the assistance of informants, is a modifier. Based on the structure of the original sentence, it appears to modify cases but it doesn't really make sense for a case—an inanimate, abstract thing—to be assisted by people. What is more logical is that the people who are building the case are assisted by the informants. Since those people are not mentioned in the original sentence, the modifier dangles and needs something concrete to modify. Scanning through your options, you'll see that only (C) and (E) give you concrete subjects. (C) is out because we isn't logical; there's no indication that we are making cases. (E) is your best option.

An 800 test taker knows that dangling modifiers create a situation in which, by adding a modifier, she'll have to change the meaning of the sentence in order to make it correct.
avatar
leiluh
Joined: 28 Jun 2021
Last visit: 25 May 2022
Posts: 8
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 8
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I was torn between b and e.

I chose E instead because B is simply the original statement but in a different order. E was more specific as to what type of person can make cases and gave more context.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,830
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,830
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts