Strengths:

Target Test Prep really goes in-depth with Quantitative Reasoning and ensures that every topic is thoroughly covered – even the ones you hardly encounter, like certain geometry concepts. For each type of question, they provide practical tricks to save time and strategies for how to mentally approach problems, so you can work efficiently and confidently. This comprehensive approach means you’re fully prepared for all question types and in a strong position to achieve a high GMAT score.

had an amazing experience with Target Test Prep. Before using TTP, I had already attempted the GMAT Focus three times but struggled to break through the 600 mark. After three months of focused study with TTP, I was able to achieve a 655, surpassing my goal. The course’s structured curriculum and clear, detailed explanations made complex topics much easier to understand. I especially appreciated how TTP covered every Quant topic in depth, even the less common ones like certain geometry concepts. The practical tricks, timing strategies, and mental approaches they teach allowed me to work efficiently and confidently. Their extensive practice materials helped me consistently track my progress, refine my skills, and build the confidence I needed to perform well on test day. I truly feel that TTP was a major factor in my improvement, and I would highly recommend it to anyone preparing for the GMAT.

Read More

Strengths:

Great course, specially helps if you are weak in verbal and gives systematic approach to solve quant and DI questions

Would make the product better:

No chapters on Necessary and sufficient questions, lately such questions are asked in CR, DS, TPA

The Target Test Prep GMAT course is an excellent resource for anyone preparing for the exam, especially if you are looking for a structured and methodical approach. The course is well-organized, breaking down complex concepts into clear, manageable lessons that make learning more efficient. What I really appreciate is the way it systematically builds your foundation in both Quant and Verbal. If you are someone who feels weaker in Verbal or needs a more disciplined path for Quant and Data Insights, this course provides exactly that.

The explanations are thorough, easy to follow, and emphasize not just solving problems but also understanding the underlying logic. This makes a huge difference when tackling more challenging GMAT questions. The course does require time and commitment—at least six months if done properly—but the effort is absolutely worth it.

One area where I felt there could be improvement is the inclusion of dedicated lessons on “necessary and sufficient” concepts, since these appear in CR, DS, and TPA. Still, overall, Target Test Prep provides an outstanding framework for mastering the GMAT.

Read More

Strengths:

Target Test Prep is exceptional for GMAT preparation - I scored a 100 percentile in Quant, all thanks to TTP. It emphasizes fundamental concepts, ensuring a solid understanding. The extensive question bank offers ample practice to boost confidence and accuracy, making it a top choice for focused, strategic preparation.

If you are just beginning your GMAT preparation, I would strongly recommend starting your journey with Target Test Prep (TTP). It is one of the most structured and comprehensive learning platforms available, especially for quantitative preparation, but it also provides guidance across all sections of the exam. What makes TTP particularly effective is its step-by-step methodology, well-explained lessons, and detailed practice problems that build both conceptual clarity and test-taking skills. The platform helps you develop strong fundamentals before moving on to more advanced applications, ensuring that there are no gaps in your understanding. For anyone who feels overwhelmed about how to start, TTP offers a clear study plan, making it an excellent first step in GMAT prep.

Read More

Target Test Prep’s Flexible Plan is a strong option for students seeking high-quality, customizable GMAT prep. Its month-to-month subscription offers freedom without long-term commitment, ideal for self-paced learners. The course excels with detailed lessons, robust analytics, and thousands of practice problems. Its structured yet adaptable format allows users to focus on specific weak areas, improving efficiency. Real-time progress tracking and clear explanations reinforce learning. Though slightly pricier per month, the flexibility justifies the cost for short-term intensive study. Overall, the Flexible Plan provides exceptional value for motivated test-takers who want comprehensive prep materials without locking into a lengthy subscription upfront.

Read More

Strengths:

The course excels in structure, flexibility, and comprehensiveness. Its thoughtfully designed study roadmap allows you to progress at your own pace while targeting specific weaknesses, which is especially valuable for busy professionals. The platform offers a rich variety of exercises that thoroughly cover all sections of the exam, with clear explanations that reinforce understanding. The self-contained nature of the program means you can log in and get straight to work without wasting time deciding what to study next, creating an efficient and low-stress preparation environment.

Would make the product better:

While the course is highly effective, the verbal study sections could be more concise. Many chapters repeat similar concepts but apply them to different question types, which can feel time-consuming. A more efficient structure might include a single, comprehensive chapter covering the transversal strategies and principles, followed by shorter, targeted chapters for each specific question type. This would streamline the learning process without reducing the quality or quantity of practice exercises, allowing students to focus more time on application and less on re-reading overlapping explanations.

I used the GMAT Focus On Demand course from TTP and loved every part of it. I scored a 695 on my GMAT thanks to its well-structured, thoughtfully designed roadmap. The flexibility to advance at my own pace and choose exactly where to focus was invaluable.

The platform offers a huge variety of exercises, covering every aspect of the exam in depth. I especially appreciated how simple it was to log in and get straight to work - no second-guessing if I was spending too much or too little time on a topic. I could just follow the plan and trust the process.

If you want a prep course that is comprehensive, easy to follow, and keeps you focused without the overwhelm, TTP’s GMAT Focus On Demand is an excellent choice.

Read More

Strengths:

An exhaustive Error Tracker.
Ample chapter-wise problems.
Problems always include links to relevant lessons and concepts, making learning and revision easier.
Well-researched, evidence-based advice on the best study, revision, and test day practices.
A robust prep roadmap focused on "doing things the right way. "
Sufficient revision and reinforcement tests at regular intervals within the roadmap ensure that one retains all that has been studied up to that point.

Would make the product better:

Nothing, they know what they are doing!

In January 2024, I walked out of my test centre with a knot in my stomach. My score was 640, a number that, while not disastrous, felt like a poor return on the months of preparation I had invested. I knew I had worked hard, yet I couldn’t see where it had all slipped away. More than disappointment, I felt lost, unsure of what exactly needed fixing.
The months that followed were frustrating. The GMAT format had just shifted from Classic to Focus, and the material I had once spent hours on was slipping from memory. I knew I had to start over, but I didn’t know how. I wanted to power through it just to move on, but not without doing it right this time. That’s when I stumbled onto TTP.
In May 2025, I signed up for their five-day free trial. On the very first day, I took a GMAT Official Practice Exam and scored a 575, which translates to a 610 on the Classic scale. That stung. But it gave me clarity. I didn’t just need to practice more, I needed a better system. I signed up for the monthly plan immediately.
TTP opened with a few pages on how to study well. It wasn’t flashy advice. It was practical and grounded: real progress takes time, shortcuts won’t cut it. Since my mock Quant score was decent, I was placed on the fast-track plan. That meant I could skip full lessons and dive straight into chapter-wise drills. The Easy and Medium questions went fine, but the Hard ones took more time than they should have. I logged every mistake using their Error Tracker and followed the lesson links to relearn the concepts. This helped me zoom in on what actually needed work.
By the end of Quant, I had recorded over 150 mistakes. Some were concept issues, others were careless slip-ups. Looking back at those logs showed me patterns I wouldn’t have caught otherwise, like how I consistently fumbled PEMDAS by ignoring the left-to-right rule. Grouping mistakes by type helped me spot those blind spots and change how I approached similar questions.
Honestly, the Error Tracker was a game-changer. It felt like using a second brain. I could tag mistakes however I wanted, and by the end, I had only a dozen recurring problem types I kept coming back to. TTP clearly built this feature with real student feedback in mind.
Verbal was a similar story. I had trouble with the tougher Critical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension questions. Often, I’d make panicked guesses when the timer ticked down. But using the same system of logging, reviewing, and fixing, I slowly got better. The structure helped, but the discipline it built mattered even more.
With time, I developed something I hadn’t had before: a feel for time. I could glance at a question and instinctively know how long it should take. That awareness hadn’t existed in my first attempt. Now, it was second nature.
When I got to the Data Insights section, I applied what I’d already learned. I approached it with more patience and better pacing. Slowly, I got better at spotting which questions to tackle and which to skip. That one change transformed how I handled the section.
DI used to be the section where I’d run out of time. Now, I was finishing with time to spare and reviewing flagged questions. That feeling of being in control was new to me, and it changed how I viewed the exam.
That said, DI remained my weakest link. I wish I had spent more time on it. My final score reflected that gap. I had drilled Quant and Verbal deeply, but DI didn’t get the same attention. The same refinement didn’t happen there.
Part of the issue was the question pool. At the time, DI was still new and evolving, and the GMAT Focus format was also fresh. TTP’s DI content hadn’t fully caught up. But I can’t blame them. Given how fast they improve things, I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s far better now.
After finishing the course, I turned to official mocks. TTP places a lot of importance on mocks and on pausing between them to analyse what went wrong. That loop of testing, pausing, and adjusting helped me understand not just the content but how I performed under pressure.
One big thing I figured out was section order. I used to think starting with Quant made sense. It felt logical, like easing into the test with the "easier" section. But every time I did that, I found myself mentally checked out by the time I reached Verbal and DI. I’d front-loaded my confidence and was left trying to drag myself through the rest.
Then I read something on TTP's exam tips section that some test-takers perform better when they save their strongest section for last. That clicked. I changed things up and started with Verbal instead.
My mock scores during that stretch were 655, 655, 645, 645, 625, and finally 685. Even as the scores dropped, I didn’t revert to my old order. I trusted the process. I trusted myself. I kept reviewing, kept adjusting.
That 625 told me everything. It wasn’t about knowledge; rather, it was about mindset. I was hesitating, unsure if the new strategy would work. Once I dropped the second-guessing, my silly mistakes stopped. That insight carried me into the final leg.
When I took my last mock, everything came together. I was calm. Focused. Balanced. The nerves were still there, but they had lost their grip on me. I had a rhythm. I knew when to fight for a question and when to move on. That final mock didn’t feel like a test, it felt like closure.
That 685 wasn’t just a number. It was proof that I had done the work. It gave me the confidence to book my official test.
This time, I chose the online version. I knew even small environmental details could mess with my performance. I didn’t want to go back to the same test centre where I’d first fallen apart. Home felt safer. I also reminded myself to keep the test in perspective, something I’d picked up from TTP.
Test day went better than I could have imagined. The tough questions didn’t shake me. I skipped what I needed to, guessed when it made sense, and marked questions with a steady hand. I wasn’t giving myself pep talks anymore. I was simply focused and executing without hesitation. I even finished early and had time to review everything I’d flagged. That hadn’t happened once during mocks.
And then the score came up. 695. That’s roughly equivalent to a 740 on the old GMAT Classic scale, meaning I saw a 100-point jump since my first attempt. I stared at the screen, stunned. I kept waiting for it to be wrong. But a few weeks later, the official score arrived, and it was real.
From walking out of a test centre in January 2024 feeling crushed, to leaning back in my chair at home on January 8, 2025, seeing the number I’d worked for, it’s hard to explain what that meant.
Even then, a part of me wondered if it had really happened, if maybe I had just been lucky that day. That doubt disappeared when I opened the score breakdown and saw it, a perfect 90 in Verbal. I had never achieved that before, not in mocks, not in drills. It was the GMAT itself telling me, in the clearest language it speaks, that the months of steady practice, the control over my nerves, and the rhythm I had worked so hard to build had all clicked at exactly the right moment.
All I’ll say is this: I wish I had found TTP earlier, before I gave my first attempt. It would’ve saved me time, energy, and a whole lot of frustration. Their system works if you let it. I’ve told every GMAT taker I know about them.
If you're still with me, I hope this gives you a clear picture of what this journey was like. I know this review is long. But anything shorter wouldn’t have captured how much this journey taught me, or how much credit TTP deserves. They earned my trust and helped me reach a score I once thought was out of reach. That 100-point improvement didn’t happen by chance. TTP may set the benchmark, but in my case, it was earned slowly through structure, consistency, and trust in the process.

Read More

Strengths:

Well-structured curriculum; bite-sized lessons; practice questions after each lesson

TTP has a well-structured and comprehensive curriculum that really helped me master the topics tested on the GMAT, especially in quant. What I appreciated most was that it didn’t just walk me through the concepts, but also shared practical tips on how to approach problems more efficiently under time pressure. The bite-sized lessons, followed by targeted practice questions and chapter tests, really helped reinforce what I had just learned. I found the platform super easy to follow, and the progression felt very logical. Honestly, I wish I had started studying with TTP earlier, it would’ve saved me a lot of time and frustration.

Read More

Strengths:

Target Test Prep has been fantastic for giving my GMAT prep structure and depth. After using Magoosh and running out of questions, I really appreciated how TTP’s modules are clearly organized and build up skills step by step. The variety and volume of practice problems kept me constantly challenged, and the live support from the TTP team has been outstanding.

Quant has been my biggest weakness so far, but Target Test Prep’s clear, step-by-step lessons give me confidence I’ll improve steadily. Their structured approach is exactly what I need to build strong Quant fundamentals and raise my score. There's focus on repetition till mastery has helped me to build confidence and knowledge in a way other platforms have not.

I recently scored a 655 on the GMAT Focus test and plan to retake it soon. With TTP, I feel equipped with the right tools and support to keep leveling up. I highly recommend Target Test Prep to anyone seeking a comprehensive, well-organized, and effective GMAT prep experience that really helps address weaknesses and build skills.

Read More

Strengths:

Target Test Prep (TTP) is an exceptional GMAT prep platform. Its structured, comprehensive curriculum breaks down complex topics into digestible lessons, reinforced by hundreds of practice questions and analytics that track performance. The interface is user-friendly, and the custom study plans are ideal for disciplined, goal-driven learners. TTP’s emphasis on mastering fundamentals before advancing ensures deep understanding and consistent score improvement.

Would make the product better:

A mobile app would be even easier to use on the go

Its the holy grail. Go for it. As simple as that. Its a bit on the expensive end but completely worth it. Stick to their study plan and follow it religiously. Do not cheat with the tests. Go through each one of them. Everyone speaks about Quant but Verbal is great too. Make it a point to pick up on the common themes they point out in Verbal. These themes will help you spot trends on questions and get to the final answer. I do not even need to talk about Quant. Its super comprehensive. Going through the quant section ensures you know all concepts required for the exam.

Read More

Strengths:

High-quality study material with effective guidance on test-taking strategy to gain a competitive edge

Would make the product better:

The prices might be high, especially for Indians; but I also understand that quality material cannot be offered at cheap prices.

Target Test Prep not only helps but drafts a complete study plan for you, effectively lining up tasks in the order in which it's best to do them. Reading the lessons particularly had a huge difference on my strategy, helping me to score a 705 with a Q90. The error log helps you identify patterns in which you are most prone to making mistakes, and since identifying the problem is a problem half solved, one approaches the certain type of questions more cautiously, preventing such errors in the future. The questions are pretty similar to the actual GMAT, so be assured that you won't be surprised during the actual exam. TTP helps you gain a competitive edge over other test-takers with the several tips and gimmicks given in the reading lessons.

Read More