Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 03:47 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 03:47
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
D3N0
Joined: 21 Jan 2015
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 587
Own Kudos:
572
 [1]
Given Kudos: 132
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V28
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V35
WE:Operations (Retail: E-commerce)
Products:
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V35
Posts: 587
Kudos: 572
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
nousernamefine
Joined: 14 Jan 2024
Last visit: 05 Nov 2025
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
28
 [1]
Given Kudos: 131
Location: India
GPA: 4
Posts: 29
Kudos: 28
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
OmerKor
Joined: 24 Jan 2024
Last visit: 10 Sep 2025
Posts: 129
Own Kudos:
150
 [1]
Given Kudos: 150
Location: Israel
Posts: 129
Kudos: 150
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
pintukr
Joined: 03 Jul 2022
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,590
Own Kudos:
1,089
 [1]
Given Kudos: 22
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Products:
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 1,590
Kudos: 1,089
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Under the zoning laws of Metropolitan City, property developers are allowed to build residential high-rises with no height restrictions, allowing them to maximize the number of units per building. As developers rent individual units, the more units in a building, the more profitable it is. However, due to growing concerns about cityscape aesthetics and sunlight blockage, it seems inevitable that the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity.

Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
Since the existing tall building will still remain, the new buildings' height will be still get restricted. So, not an ideal option.


(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.

Irrelevant, as the costs doesn't impact the height restrictions for futuristic buildings


(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.

Building technologies and associated investments is out of scope wrt the height restrictions for futuristic buildings


(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions.
If several new taller building a rebuilt, that will assist in the manner that the new buildings' height will be allowed to a higher limits when the fixed percentage of the height of existing buildings in the vicinity is calculated


(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.

Lobbying against the imposition of height restrictions --> not relevant to the height restrictions for futuristic buildings



(D) is the CORRECT answer
User avatar
AbhiS101
Joined: 03 Jul 2024
Last visit: 28 Oct 2025
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Location: India
GPA: 68%
Posts: 80
Kudos: 85
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
12 Days of Christmas 2024 - 2025 Competition with $40,000 of Prizes

Under the zoning laws of Metropolitan City, property developers are allowed to build residential high-rises with no height restrictions, allowing them to maximize the number of units per building. As developers rent individual units, the more units in a building, the more profitable it is. However, due to growing concerns about cityscape aesthetics and sunlight blockage, it seems inevitable that the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity.

Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 

Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
This is a reactive strategy that involves significant costs and doesn't guarantee the ability to build taller replacements.
Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
While this can help control costs, it doesn't directly address the core issue of potential height restrictions.
Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
This is the most effective course of action. By building faster, the developer can capitalize on the current unrestricted environment and maximize unit count before potential height restrictions are implemented. This leads to increased profitability and a competitive advantage.
Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions.
This is a proactive approach that maximizes profits and establishes valuable assets before restrictions are imposed. However, it may not be feasible for developers solely focused on the Metropolitan City area.
Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.
Lobbying efforts may or may not be successful and don't guarantee any specific outcome.

IMO C
User avatar
SafSin28
Joined: 16 Aug 2022
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
58
 [1]
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 73
Kudos: 58
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Under the zoning laws of Metropolitan City, property developers are allowed to build residential high-rises with no height restrictions, allowing them to maximize the number of units per building. As developers rent individual units, the more units in a building, the more profitable it is. However, due to growing concerns about cityscape aesthetics and sunlight blockage, it seems inevitable that the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity.

Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.---> Older & shorter buildings in their portfolio do nothing with new ones. OUT
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.----> Longterm contracts? It would be viable if the problem is the changes in the contracts. But it is not. OUT
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.---> Technologies? OUT
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions---> Aha so, the developer can built at his buildings at the height of those taller buildings. Keep it
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.----> This doesn't guarantee the developer's plan to keep the buildings as profitable as they can. OUT

so, D makes a sense
User avatar
andreagonzalez2k
Joined: 15 Feb 2021
Last visit: 26 Jul 2025
Posts: 308
Own Kudos:
497
 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 308
Kudos: 497
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Developer's goal: minimizing the impact on profitability from anticipated height restrictions that will limit the future height of buildings.

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
Demolishing older buildings to make way for taller structures could be an option if the developer wants to ensure that their future buildings can be as tall as possible (since the restrictions will be based on nearby existing buildings). However, demolishing buildings involves significant costs and the developer may not be able to rebuild quickly enough before the restrictions are imposed. INCORRECT

(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
This option would help the developer if construction costs rise in the future. However, it does nothing to address the core issue, which is height restrictions. INCORRECT

(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
Faster construction would allow the developer to potentially finish buildings more quickly, but it doesn't directly address the issue of height restrictions. INCORRECT

(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions
This option is highly strategic. By developing taller buildings now, the developer can establish a benchmark height for those buildings, which will influence the height restrictions in the future. This approach would allow the developer to maximize profits before restrictions are imposed. CORRECT

(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.
While lobbying might seem like a good idea, it does not guarantee success. City councils often prioritize other concerns such as aesthetics, public interest, and environmental factors over the interests of developers. Additionally, lobbying efforts might take time, and the developer cannot be certain that they will succeed in overturning or altering the restrictions. INCORRECT

IMO D
User avatar
BatrickPatemann
Joined: 29 May 2024
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
55
 [1]
Given Kudos: 153
Products:
Posts: 64
Kudos: 55
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect. He is a property developer and wouldn't have capacity to that, time consuming and not efficient.
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor. The outcome of this is uncertain.
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises. This would not really work since it could take long to develop technology and make it marketable, by then, restrictions could already be in place.
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions. This is the most straightforward solution, actionable and sensible. Correct answer.
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions. This is not really profit maximisation at first glance, outcome uncertain.
User avatar
__Poisonivy__
Joined: 24 Feb 2024
Last visit: 08 Apr 2025
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
56
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 53
Kudos: 56
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Removing shorter buildings could make room for taller structures in the future by mitigating potential height restrictions in their vicinity. However, this approach is reactive and depends on the restrictions being implemented, rather than proactively addressing the issue.

(B) While managing costs is important, it does not directly tackle the challenge of height restrictions, which affects the number of rentable units and the developer's ability to optimize profitability.

(C) Accelerating construction can increase the number of projects completed before restrictions are enforced. However, this approach only indirectly addresses future profitability and assumes the restrictions won’t be implemented immediately.

(D) Constructing taller buildings now in areas without height restrictions directly addresses the anticipated issue by ensuring a portfolio of high-capacity structures before the regulations take effect. These buildings can maximize units and profitability and will not be subject to future limitations.

(E) Lobbying could potentially prevent the restrictions altogether, resolving the issue entirely. However, this strategy carries uncertainty as it depends on political and public factors, making it a riskier and less reliable option in the short term.

Ans- (D) opt is most convincing.
User avatar
mpp01
Joined: 13 Dec 2024
Last visit: 08 Jun 2025
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
48
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: Spain
Posts: 49
Kudos: 48
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.

Answer D gives an at the moment solution with a certain outcome, several buildings without restrictions, containing more units and being more profitable maximizing profits. None of the rest of the answers gives a similar at the moment predictable outcome, they are uncertain at most. Select D
User avatar
chloepham
Joined: 17 Nov 2024
Last visit: 09 Jan 2025
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 12
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A): Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings.
  • This is the correct answer because removing shorter buildings increases the allowable height for future developments, minimizing the impact of height restrictions on profitability.
(B): Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs.
  • Irrelevant. Fixed costs do not address the issue of reduced building heights affecting profitability.
(C): Invest in faster construction technologies.
  • Irrelevant. Speed of construction doesn’t mitigate the limitation imposed by height restrictions.
(D): Develop taller buildings in unrestricted areas.
  • Not effective. This only works in areas unaffected by height restrictions, leaving restricted zones unaddressed.
(E): Collaborate with other developers to lobby.
  • Speculative. Lobbying may not succeed and doesn’t guarantee a reduction in the restrictions' impact.


Bunuel
12 Days of Christmas 2024 - 2025 Competition with $40,000 of Prizes

Under the zoning laws of Metropolitan City, property developers are allowed to build residential high-rises with no height restrictions, allowing them to maximize the number of units per building. As developers rent individual units, the more units in a building, the more profitable it is. However, due to growing concerns about cityscape aesthetics and sunlight blockage, it seems inevitable that the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity.

Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 

User avatar
prantorboni
Joined: 28 Nov 2020
Last visit: 03 Nov 2025
Posts: 147
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 221
Products:
Posts: 147
Kudos: 150
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Under the zoning laws of Metropolitan City, property developers are allowed to build residential high-rises with no height restrictions, allowing them to maximize the number of units per building. As developers rent individual units, the more units in a building, the more profitable it is. However, due to growing concerns about cityscape aesthetics and sunlight blockage, it seems inevitable that the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity.

Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?

Presumption: we need to find a way which help the developers to make profit even if height restrictions are imposed in future. Option B perfectly aligns with our presumption.

Answer: (B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,794
Own Kudos:
5,509
 [1]
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,794
Kudos: 5,509
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Under the zoning laws of Metropolitan City, property developers are allowed to build residential high-rises with no height restrictions, allowing them to maximize the number of units per building. As developers rent individual units, the more units in a building, the more profitable it is. However, due to growing concerns about cityscape aesthetics and sunlight blockage, it seems inevitable that the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity.

Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
This is NOT the most effective course of action since it will involve demolition of older, shorter buildings, which will involve additional costs for demolition and reduction in rentals by reduction in the number of units per building.
Incorrect

(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
This may be a good option if a lot of fresh construction is required to reduce materials and labor costs. But exact advantages of long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for material and labor can not be exactly predicted and may lead to losses also. Option D is definitely a better choice
Incorrect

(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
This may save labor costs and time for construction of high-rises but according to new regulations height restrictions will be imposed on new buildings. Therefore, may not be the best option to minimise the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions.
Incorrect

(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions.
Since the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity, property developer will develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions to minimise the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions since height allowed for construction of high-rises as a percentage of height of existing taller buildings in vicinity will increase.
Correct

(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.
Option D is a better choice than other options which will definitely benefit the property developers. Outcome of collaboration with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions is unclear and may not be beneficial.
Incorrect

IMO D
User avatar
nikiki
Joined: 07 May 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
57
 [1]
Given Kudos: 89
Location: India
Posts: 56
Kudos: 57
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A - Demolishing older buildings does not help with the height restrictions, as those buildings are already short. It does not address the developer’s ability to build taller buildings under new regulations. Ineffective
B - While this helps manage future cost inflation, it doesn’t directly counteract the impact of height restrictions, which limit building height, not construction costs. Ineffective
C - Faster construction could speed up projects before the restrictions take effect, but it does not change the fact that the developer will still be limited by height restrictions afterward. Ineffective for addressing height restrictions.
D - This allows the developer to take advantage of current regulations and maximize profitability before restrictions are imposed. It directly addresses the issue. Most effective strategy.
E - Lobbying may or may not succeed and is uncertain. It is not a guaranteed or immediate solution to the problem. Uncertain and less effective than developing buildings immediately.




Bunuel
12 Days of Christmas 2024 - 2025 Competition with $40,000 of Prizes

Under the zoning laws of Metropolitan City, property developers are allowed to build residential high-rises with no height restrictions, allowing them to maximize the number of units per building. As developers rent individual units, the more units in a building, the more profitable it is. However, due to growing concerns about cityscape aesthetics and sunlight blockage, it seems inevitable that the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity.

Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 

User avatar
maddscientistt
Joined: 09 Mar 2023
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
47
 [1]
Given Kudos: 64
Posts: 41
Kudos: 47
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A - Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
This doesn’t solve the problem caused by new restrictions.

B - Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
While locking in construction costs may help control expenses, it doesn't address the issue of reduced building height. Height restrictions will still apply regardless of costs

C - Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
Although speeding up construction can help complete projects before restrictions are in place, it does nothing to bypass the height limits once they are enforced.

D - Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions.
Building taller buildings in areas without current restrictions allows the developer to take advantage of existing rules. This maximizes profits before any future height limits come into effect.

E - Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.
Lobbying may slow down or prevent restrictions, but this is an uncertain and potentially lengthy process. The developer still faces risks if restrictions are eventually enforced.
Bunuel
12 Days of Christmas 2024 - 2025 Competition with $40,000 of Prizes

Under the zoning laws of Metropolitan City, property developers are allowed to build residential high-rises with no height restrictions, allowing them to maximize the number of units per building. As developers rent individual units, the more units in a building, the more profitable it is. However, due to growing concerns about cityscape aesthetics and sunlight blockage, it seems inevitable that the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity.

Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 

User avatar
Shruuuu
Joined: 21 Nov 2023
Last visit: 10 Nov 2025
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
95
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99
Location: India
Schools: ISB '27 (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q83 V86 DI78
Products:
Schools: ISB '27 (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q83 V86 DI78
Posts: 70
Kudos: 95
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A - This would not lead to minimalistic impact on future property as costs might be higher than revenue for the redevelopment - Eliminate
B - Future profitability isn’t promised - Eliminate
C - There is a high chance of loss after the restrictions are passed - Eliminate
D - Ideal scenario as laws are levied as per existing height of buildings and on new buildings - CORRECT
E - Not ethical scenario - Eliminate

IMO D

Bunuel
12 Days of Christmas 2024 - 2025 Competition with $40,000 of Prizes

Under the zoning laws of Metropolitan City, property developers are allowed to build residential high-rises with no height restrictions, allowing them to maximize the number of units per building. As developers rent individual units, the more units in a building, the more profitable it is. However, due to growing concerns about cityscape aesthetics and sunlight blockage, it seems inevitable that the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity.

Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 

User avatar
LastHero
Joined: 15 Dec 2024
Last visit: 11 Nov 2025
Posts: 134
Own Kudos:
147
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 134
Kudos: 147
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
This option would only be useful if the developer can rebuild before restrictions are enacted. While it may help in the future if the developer has the right to build taller structures, this strategy doesn't guarantee the developer can outpace the restrictions.

(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
Securing long-term construction contracts at fixed costs ensures the developer avoids rising construction costs. This action does not directly mitigate the impact of height restrictions.

(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
This option focuses on improving construction speed, which could reduce costs and increase profitability. It helps complete buildings more efficiently but doesn't ensure that these buildings can be as tall as the developer might want, which is the concern here.

(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions CORRECT
This option capitalizes on the current lack of height restrictions in certain areas to maximize the height and number of units in these buildings. If these buildings are completed before height restrictions are imposed, the developer could secure more units and greater profitability. This strategy allows the developer to "lock in" taller buildings before the restrictions take effect, thus minimizing the potential impact of the restrictions once they are imposed.


(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.
Lobbying to prevent height restrictions is a political strategy that could potentially change the course of the city's zoning policies. While this could be an effective long-term solution if the developer is successful, there is no certainty that the lobbying effort will succeed.

Answer D
User avatar
IssacChan
Joined: 25 Sep 2024
Last visit: 21 Mar 2025
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 55
Kudos: 50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
12 Days of Christmas 2024 - 2025 Competition with $40,000 of Prizes

Under the zoning laws of Metropolitan City, property developers are allowed to build residential high-rises with no height restrictions, allowing them to maximize the number of units per building. As developers rent individual units, the more units in a building, the more profitable it is. However, due to growing concerns about cityscape aesthetics and sunlight blockage, it seems inevitable that the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity.

Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 

In this question, we have to minimize the impact future projects' profitability
So we may consider either both revenue and cost impact as profit = revenue - cost

(A) Demolish order may not be sustainable strategy and it is costly to demolish the buildings (x)
(B) Long-term construction contracts at fixed cost will minimize potential cost increase exposure in material and labor (v)
(C) It may maximize the efficiency and productivity, potentially offset the impact of height restriction. Yet, the offset is not guaranteed (x)
(D) It is short-term strategy which may not effective for long term (x)
(E) It may delay the restriction which is not sustainable (x)

Therefore the answer is B
   1   2   3 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts