Bunuel
12 Days of Christmas 2024 - 2025 Competition with $40,000 of PrizesUnder the zoning laws of Metropolitan City, property developers are allowed to build residential high-rises with no height restrictions, allowing them to maximize the number of units per building. As developers rent individual units, the more units in a building, the more profitable it is. However, due to growing concerns about cityscape aesthetics and sunlight blockage, it seems inevitable that the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity.
Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?
(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.
The property developer wants to minimize the impact of future height restrictions on profitability. The developer needs to focus on actions that will allow for maximizing profitability in the event that height restrictions are imposed. Let's evaluate the options:
(A)
Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.This may help to reduce the effect of height restrictions on some properties, but it could incur high costs and may not be effective in maintaining profitability across the developer's portfolio, especially if the restrictions are widespread. Demolishing buildings might not fully address the core issue of new construction.
(B)
Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.This could help control costs in the future, especially if material and labor prices increase. However, it does not directly address the potential impact of height restrictions on profitability. While it might provide some cost stability, it doesn't maximize the number of units in new buildings.
(C)
Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.This could potentially reduce construction time and costs, but it doesn't directly address the issue of height restrictions. While it may help with efficiency, it does not guarantee that the developer will be able to build higher buildings if height restrictions are imposed.
(D)
Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions.This would be a proactive approach, as the developer can maximize profitability by building taller structures in areas that are not yet subject to height restrictions. This could help the developer secure as many units as possible before the restrictions take effect.
(E)
Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.This is a reactive approach, relying on political action to prevent the restrictions altogether. While lobbying could potentially delay or prevent the restrictions, it is uncertain and doesn't guarantee the desired outcome. This approach does not address the possibility of restrictions if they are enacted.
Conclusion: The most effective course of action would be
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions, as it allows the developer to capitalize on current unrestricted conditions before the potential restrictions are imposed. This maximizes profitability in the short term, which is the most direct way to mitigate the future impact of the restrictions.