Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 03:46 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 03:46
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Elite097
Joined: 20 Apr 2022
Last visit: 08 Oct 2025
Posts: 771
Own Kudos:
553
 [1]
Given Kudos: 346
Location: India
GPA: 3.64
Posts: 771
Kudos: 553
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jkkamau
Joined: 25 May 2020
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
107
 [1]
Given Kudos: 122
Location: Kenya
Schools: Haas '25
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V46
GPA: 3.5
Products:
Schools: Haas '25
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V46
Posts: 132
Kudos: 107
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
hr1212
User avatar
GMAT Forum Director
Joined: 18 Apr 2019
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 621
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,483
GMAT Focus 1: 775 Q90 V85 DI90
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 775 Q90 V85 DI90
Posts: 621
Kudos: 924
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
arkadutt
Joined: 25 Sep 2022
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
19
 [1]
Given Kudos: 53
Status:Live in the future and build what seems interesting.
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 8.26
WE:Information Technology (Telecommunications)
Posts: 22
Kudos: 19
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The correct answer is (D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions.

By building taller structures before the height restrictions are imposed, the developer can maximize the number of units per building, thus minimizing the impact of future restrictions on profitability. This course of action allows the developer to take advantage of the current lack of height restrictions and secure a competitive advantage before the regulations change.

Here's my understanding of the other options, let's go through them :-

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings: While this could potentially increase the average height of buildings in the developer's portfolio, it does not directly address the profitability of future projects.

(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs: While controlling costs is important, it does not directly mitigate the impact of height restrictions.

(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction: Faster construction could be beneficial but does not address the issue of height restrictions. The developer would still face limits on building height, regardless of speed.

(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions: This is the most proactive and effective strategy,and makes the most amount of sense. By constructing taller buildings now, the developer can maximize the number of units before height restrictions are imposed, ensuring profitability for future projects.

(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions: While lobbying might delay or prevent the restrictions, it is uncertain and not guaranteed to succeed. This is a less direct and less effective approach compared to building taller structures immediately.
User avatar
missionmba2025
Joined: 07 May 2023
Last visit: 07 Sep 2025
Posts: 341
Own Kudos:
427
 [1]
Given Kudos: 52
Location: India
Posts: 341
Kudos: 427
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
12 Days of Christmas 2024 - 2025 Competition with $40,000 of Prizes

Under the zoning laws of Metropolitan City, property developers are allowed to build residential high-rises with no height restrictions, allowing them to maximize the number of units per building. As developers rent individual units, the more units in a building, the more profitable it is. However, due to growing concerns about cityscape aesthetics and sunlight blockage, it seems inevitable that the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity.

Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 


As per restrictions imposed by the city council, a property developer will be limited to a percentage of the height of existing building. So if the builder buys plots in areas where there are tall buildings, the property developer can construct high building as well.

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.

Will not help. Eliminate A.

(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.

This may reduce construction costs. However the question is around construction of high building. Eliminate B.

(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.

Speed and turn around time is not of concern. Hence, we can eliminate C.

(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions

This seems like a good idea. If the property developer creates several tall buildings, they could leverage their heights later.

(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.

We need to minimize the impact on profitability. Hence, this is not the solution. Eliminate E.

Option D
User avatar
twinkle2311
Joined: 05 Nov 2021
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 150
Own Kudos:
167
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GPA: 9.041
Posts: 150
Kudos: 167
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Goal: Find the most effective course of action for the developer to minimize the impact on his profitability due to the anticipated height restrictions

Let's assess the options:

(A): Demolishing older, shorter buildings will not help, as the restrictions apply only to new buildings. This plan would likely add costs and does not minimize the impact of the upcoming restrictions. Eliminate
(B): Securing long-term construction contracts doesn’t address the core issue of height restrictions, which will limit the height of future buildings. Eliminate
(C): Investing in technologies to speed up construction doesn’t offer an immediate and effective solution to the height restriction problem. Eliminate
(D): This is the most effective course of action because it allows the developer to maximize profitability by building taller structures in areas without restrictions before they take effect. Correct Answer
(E): Lobbying against the restrictions is uncertain and time-consuming; the outcome of lobbying efforts is not guaranteed. Eliminate

Thus, (D) is the best choice
User avatar
crimson_king
Joined: 21 Dec 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
131
 [1]
Given Kudos: 103
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 127
Kudos: 131
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To determine the most effective course of action for the property developer, we need to evaluate the options based on how well they address the anticipated problem of height restrictions and their potential impact on profitability.

Analyzing the options:

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.

This action might increase the average height of buildings in the area, allowing taller new buildings within the height restriction framework. However, demolishing existing buildings is expensive and does not directly address profitability since the restrictions apply to new buildings. Eliminate.


(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.

While this helps manage construction costs, it does not address the impact of height restrictions on profitability. Height restrictions limit the number of rentable units, which is unrelated to material and labor.Eliminate


(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.

Faster construction might help developers complete projects before restrictions take effect, but the restrictions could still render future projects less profitable. This option does not directly minimize the long-term impact of height restrictions. Eliminate.


(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions.

By constructing taller buildings now, the developer can lock in a greater height baseline in areas likely to be affected by future height restrictions. This would maximize future profitability since new buildings could be proportionally taller relative to these pre-existing tall buildings.Keep this option


(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.

This approach could prevent the restrictions entirely, preserving profitability. However, lobbying outcomes are uncertain and depend on political factors outside the developer’s control. This option involves risk and delay compared to taking immediate action. Eliminate.


Conclusion:

The most effective course of action is (D): Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions. This allows the developer to proactively adapt to the anticipated restrictions by establishing a higher baseline, minimizing the impact on future projects.

Correct Answer: (D)
User avatar
jessicaduyenpham
Joined: 22 Jun 2018
Last visit: 12 May 2025
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 8
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
=> Incorrect. Not necessary
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
=> Incorrect. No impact to future height restriction.
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
=> Correct. New potential height restriction only apply to new building.
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions
=> Incorrect. Currently already no height restrictions. This is a concern for future
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.
=> Incorrect in GMAT but biz people do this in real life.
User avatar
Navya442001
Joined: 26 Jan 2024
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
72
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Products:
Posts: 67
Kudos: 72
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
12 Days of Christmas 2024 - 2025 Competition with $40,000 of Prizes

Under the zoning laws of Metropolitan City, property developers are allowed to build residential high-rises with no height restrictions, allowing them to maximize the number of units per building. As developers rent individual units, the more units in a building, the more profitable it is. However, due to growing concerns about cityscape aesthetics and sunlight blockage, it seems inevitable that the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity.

Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
Demolishing older, shorter buildings might help in areas where restrictions are tied to the height of nearby buildings, but this strategy would only take effect after the restrictions are imposed, potentially delaying profitability. It does not preemptively minimize the impact of restrictions.
Eliminate (A).

(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
While controlling costs is important, this action does not directly address the height restrictions or their impact on profitability. It focuses on cost efficiency rather than enabling the construction of taller buildings or mitigating height limitations.
Eliminate (B).

(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
This might allow the developer to build faster and potentially complete projects before restrictions take effect. However, faster construction does not necessarily minimize the impact of height restrictions once they are imposed.
Eliminate (C).

(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions.
This is the most effective option. By constructing taller buildings now in areas without restrictions, the developer maximizes the height of their buildings before any restrictions are implemented. Taller buildings established before restrictions could also set a higher baseline for future projects in the vicinity, reducing the impact of height limitations on profitability.
Correct (D).

(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.
Lobbying could potentially delay or stop the restrictions, but it is speculative and does not guarantee success. The developer cannot rely solely on influencing regulatory outcomes, as height restrictions may still be imposed.
Eliminate (E).
User avatar
gopikamoorthy29
Joined: 09 Dec 2024
Last visit: 27 Jan 2025
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: India
Posts: 15
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option D) is correct
since it allows the developer to maximize profitability before height restrictions are enforced.
other options are not suitable
User avatar
bellsprout24
Joined: 05 Dec 2024
Last visit: 02 Mar 2025
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
83
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 57
Kudos: 83
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer is D.

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect. Incorrect as there is no reason to demolish short buildings.
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor. Incorrect as this would not necessarily minimize the impact on profitability of future projects as fixed costs now could be higher or lower than in the future.
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises. Incorrect as building faster will not necessarily be better when height restrictions are imposed.
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions. Correct as this would maximize profitability now and allow future buildings to be built potentially higher since the limits are a percentage of the height of existing buildings. For example, 50% restriction of a 100 meter building is still better than 50% of a 75 meter building.
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions. Incorrect as lobbying might not materially impact current or future profitability at all.
User avatar
Mantrix
Joined: 13 May 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 163
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 595 Q87 V75 DI77
GMAT Focus 2: 625 Q81 V82 DI80
GPA: 9
GMAT Focus 2: 625 Q81 V82 DI80
Posts: 163
Kudos: 122
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
P1: Under the zoning laws of Metropolitan City, developers are allowed to build high-rises with no height restrictions, allowing them to maximize the number of units per building.

P2: As developers rent individual units, the more units in a building, the more profitable it is.

P3: However, due to growing concerns about cityscape aesthetics and sunlight blockage, it seems inevitable that the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity. (main point to focus on)

Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect. (yes, that's the answer, if shorter building are not there and only the tall buildings there, so the percentage of height of existing buildings will also the increase.) True Contender

(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor. (if they even do so, their profit will decrease) eliminate

(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises. (what if there is restriction on high rise, then technology will be of no use, so faster and slower development doesn't matter.) Eliminate

(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions (Develop several building, but in future more or less there will be decrease in the profit, we can't stop that coz of some building they have developed) eliminate

(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions. (the Law will still be there, Eliminate)
User avatar
Nsp10
Joined: 22 May 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 112
Location: India
Schools: IE Schulich
GPA: 3.0
Products:
Schools: IE Schulich
Posts: 121
Kudos: 87
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
so in this Question we have to minimize the impact of restriction if imposed any in future,
and the restriction could be of height such that if sunlight becomes a problem, then height of the existing building will be considered as one standard parameter.

Okay let us look at the options:

(A) Yes after making suppose 50 new buildings if there will come a restriction which compares the height of new buildings with the existing one then if we demolish the existing such short buildings than from where we will compare the new standard height, this will cause the city council to overall raise the standard height such that the property developers wont have to face much loss because of height difference.
so yes a good choice for an answer.
keep this one
(B) If so than also if the new buildings exceeded the height by a far margin than demolishes the upper floors will cause developers a huge loss beside securing long term construction contracts.
so not a good choice
(C) Faster or slower Construction wont matter if the height exceeds by a far margin, so No
(D) If this construction counts as older construction then it might be profitable for builders as the city council will compare the height difference from older buildings but if this will count as newwe construction then it could result in a huge profit lose as the upper floor beside the standard height would have to demolish.
so no this could not be the answer.
(E) This is indirectly affecting the premise as after lobbying there wont be any restriction so A huge no, as we can not go against the premise.

so A is the best choice here in terms of minimizing the impact on the profitability.

Bunuel
12 Days of Christmas 2024 - 2025 Competition with $40,000 of Prizes

Under the zoning laws of Metropolitan City, property developers are allowed to build residential high-rises with no height restrictions, allowing them to maximize the number of units per building. As developers rent individual units, the more units in a building, the more profitable it is. However, due to growing concerns about cityscape aesthetics and sunlight blockage, it seems inevitable that the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity.

Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 

User avatar
Oppenheimer1945
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 784
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 223
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V76 DI80
GPA: 7.81
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
-compares the with existing buildings and demolish will reduce the comparison height

(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
-securing material cost is irrelevant

(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
- faster construction is not relevant

(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions
- this is out of scope

(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.
-this is against the premise and not relevant

Hence A)
User avatar
Sanjay9822
Joined: 20 Dec 2024
Last visit: 26 Jan 2025
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
19
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 25
Kudos: 19
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
12 Days of Christmas 2024 - 2025 Competition with $40,000 of Prizes

Under the zoning laws of Metropolitan City, property developers are allowed to build residential high-rises with no height restrictions, allowing them to maximize the number of units per building. As developers rent individual units, the more units in a building, the more profitable it is. However, due to growing concerns about cityscape aesthetics and sunlight blockage, it seems inevitable that the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity.

Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 


The property developer wants to minimize the impact of future height restrictions on profitability. The developer needs to focus on actions that will allow for maximizing profitability in the event that height restrictions are imposed. Let's evaluate the options:
(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
This may help to reduce the effect of height restrictions on some properties, but it could incur high costs and may not be effective in maintaining profitability across the developer's portfolio, especially if the restrictions are widespread. Demolishing buildings might not fully address the core issue of new construction.
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
This could help control costs in the future, especially if material and labor prices increase. However, it does not directly address the potential impact of height restrictions on profitability. While it might provide some cost stability, it doesn't maximize the number of units in new buildings.
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
This could potentially reduce construction time and costs, but it doesn't directly address the issue of height restrictions. While it may help with efficiency, it does not guarantee that the developer will be able to build higher buildings if height restrictions are imposed.
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions.
This would be a proactive approach, as the developer can maximize profitability by building taller structures in areas that are not yet subject to height restrictions. This could help the developer secure as many units as possible before the restrictions take effect.
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.
This is a reactive approach, relying on political action to prevent the restrictions altogether. While lobbying could potentially delay or prevent the restrictions, it is uncertain and doesn't guarantee the desired outcome. This approach does not address the possibility of restrictions if they are enacted.
Conclusion: The most effective course of action would be (D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions, as it allows the developer to capitalize on current unrestricted conditions before the potential restrictions are imposed. This maximizes profitability in the short term, which is the most direct way to mitigate the future impact of the restrictions.
User avatar
MinhChau789
Joined: 18 Aug 2023
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
140
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 132
Kudos: 140
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: it seems inevitable that the city council will soon impose height restrictions on new buildings, limiting them to a percentage of the height of existing buildings in their vicinity.

Suppose a property developer in Metropolitan City wishes to minimize the impact on the profitability of future projects due to the anticipated height restrictions. If the developer could do any of the following and wants to select the most effective course of action, which should the developer do now?

(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect.
This action has no positive impact.

(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor.
This may have some limited impact, but probably not the most effective.

(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises.
This may have some limited impact, but probably not the most effective.

(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions
This is the right answer as the action would have an impact on all of the buildings built later.

(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.
If this action is successful, it would have a great impact. But the probability of success, given the provided info, is low.

Answer: D
User avatar
Karanjotsingh
Joined: 18 Feb 2024
Last visit: 03 Oct 2025
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
94
 [1]
Given Kudos: 362
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Posts: 139
Kudos: 94
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation:

The developer wants to stay profitable even when new height limits are set based on existing buildings' heights. To do this, they should:
  • Build Taller Now: By constructing taller buildings before the new rules apply, future height limits will be based on these taller structures. This allows the developer to maximize the number of units and profits under the new restrictions.

Best Answer:
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions.
User avatar
Invincible_147
Joined: 29 Sep 2023
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
64
 [1]
Given Kudos: 164
Products:
Posts: 73
Kudos: 64
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi All,

option analysis

option A) this plan could have worked as the city law will be putting restrictions on percentage of height of the existing buildings and if there is less shorter buildings then there is greater probability of % of restriction will be higher. But here its also mentioned "portfolio" but any one builder doing this wont be affecting much the overall %.

option B) So if there is more profit on the current high rises after the restriction is implemented the profits may not be that much , so the developer may want to lend off some of the contracts but he would be stuck as he has already sighed long term contract.

option C) Why would the developer invest in that tech now when the restrictions are going to take place.

option D)This does provide a way in which the developer can minimise his impact on profitablilty as if he develops in an area where there cannot be restrictions implemented as of now then they could still mainain their profitability.

option E)This could help, but the outcome is not sure , if the protest will work or not

Therefore D is the most suitable answer IMO
User avatar
vijayram24
Joined: 01 Sep 2020
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
37
 [1]
Given Kudos: 209
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Technology
Schools: ISB '26 NUS
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GPA: 8.3
WE:Engineering (Technology)
Products:
Schools: ISB '26 NUS
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
Posts: 38
Kudos: 37
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Argument frames the context where the developer faces a situation in which the new buildings could be confronted
with some height restrictions . But the restrictions are not yet put inforce ,so any option that helps in resolving this condition could be a potential plan for the developer.

1)A talks about demolishing old buildings but the argument mentions that the restrictions are only on new buildings but not on old buildings. So A can be eliminated.
2) B talks about securing long term contracts but it doesnt matter about costs if the restrictions are put into existence , they are going to be demolished. B can be eliminated too
3) C talks about investing in technologies that are helpful in faster construction of high raise buildings .This a close option but even after investing in technology if the restrictions are put into place. The developer cannot implement those construction techniques and use them.

4) D is a potential option because since the new buildings would be restricted not the existing ones, if the developer starts the construction all the buildings which are already under construction could be exempted from the restrictions and hence could not affect the profits.

5) E talks about legal solution where developers can delay the imposition of effect . But in argument it is clear that the factors are clear and no gurantee that legal solution could help in any effect.

So D.
User avatar
AviNFC
Joined: 31 May 2023
Last visit: 13 Nov 2025
Posts: 216
Own Kudos:
288
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 216
Kudos: 288
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Plan to demolish older, shorter buildings in their portfolio if the restrictions take effect. ×while this may help, higher size is further restricted by the size of nearby buildingd
(B) Secure long-term construction contracts at fixed costs for materials and labor. ×Irrelevant
(C) Invest in building technologies that allow for faster construction of high-rises. ×Out of context
(D) Develop several taller buildings in areas currently without height restrictions *Correct. Make high rise so that % of this is also high
(E) Collaborate with other developers to lobby against the imposition of height restrictions.×Out of Context

Answer D
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts