Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
19 Dec 2024, 11:53
Kudos
Bookmarks
Option (A):
"Many agricultural scientists continue to recommend traditional plowing techniques alongside modern machinery to prevent soil compaction and maintain fertility."
[hr]
Option (B):
"Farms that combine no-till practices with traditional tilling methods report the highest levels of soil fertility and overall health."
[hr]
Option (C):
"Farms using no-till farming often require high-tech agricultural machinery to effectively manage crop residue, which is not removed by tilling."
[hr]
Option (D):
"The studies assessing soil health on farms using no-till practices were funded by manufacturers promoting high-tech farming equipment, potentially biasing the results."
[hr]
Option (E):
"The metrics used to assess soil health in the studies are typically those that favor soils which have been recently tilled and chemically treated."
"Many agricultural scientists continue to recommend traditional plowing techniques alongside modern machinery to prevent soil compaction and maintain fertility."
- This provides a general recommendation for plowing techniques but does not directly challenge the studies or evidence that support no-till practices.
- It does not weaken the claim that no-till farming improves soil health.
[hr]
Option (B):
"Farms that combine no-till practices with traditional tilling methods report the highest levels of soil fertility and overall health."
- This weakens the conclusion by suggesting that no-till farming alone might not be sufficient. Instead, a combination of practices yields better results, which challenges the claim that no-till farming alone is sufficient for soil health.
[hr]
Option (C):
"Farms using no-till farming often require high-tech agricultural machinery to effectively manage crop residue, which is not removed by tilling."
- This indicates that high-tech machinery is still required for no-till farming but does not challenge the claim that no-till practices improve soil health.
- The sufficiency of no-till farming for soil health remains unchallenged.
[hr]
Option (D):
"The studies assessing soil health on farms using no-till practices were funded by manufacturers promoting high-tech farming equipment, potentially biasing the results."
- If the studies are biased, the evidence supporting the sufficiency of no-till farming is questionable.
- This weakens the credibility of the evidence cited in support of the conclusion but sufficiency of no-till farming for soil health remains unchallenged .
[hr]
Option (E):
"The metrics used to assess soil health in the studies are typically those that favor soils which have been recently tilled and chemically treated."
- This weakens the evidence by implying that the studies might not accurately reflect the benefits of no-till farming.
- If the metrics are biased, the conclusion drawn from the studies is less reliable and sufficiency of no-till farming for soil health remains unchallenged .
Bunuel
19 Dec 2024, 12:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
The conclusion is that no-till farming alone is enough to maintain soil health
A: Suggests an alternative method but doesn’t challenge the sufficiency of no-till farming.
B: Implies combining no-till with tilling gives better results, but doesn’t question that no-till alone is sufficient. It talks about enhancement, not sufficiency.
C: Shows no-till farming requires high-tech machinery for residue management, implying it’s not enough on its own. -> Correct answer
D: Why are manufacturers even supporting studies that contradict their interests??
E: Doesn’t directly address the strength or validity of the studies supporting no-till farming. It only suggests that the metrics may be biased in favor of tilled soils. But that's not the point
C weakens the claim by showing no-till requires extra machinery, meaning it’s not sufficient by itself.
A: Suggests an alternative method but doesn’t challenge the sufficiency of no-till farming.
B: Implies combining no-till with tilling gives better results, but doesn’t question that no-till alone is sufficient. It talks about enhancement, not sufficiency.
C: Shows no-till farming requires high-tech machinery for residue management, implying it’s not enough on its own. -> Correct answer
D: Why are manufacturers even supporting studies that contradict their interests??
E: Doesn’t directly address the strength or validity of the studies supporting no-till farming. It only suggests that the metrics may be biased in favor of tilled soils. But that's not the point
C weakens the claim by showing no-till requires extra machinery, meaning it’s not sufficient by itself.
BatrickPatemann
Joined: 29 May 2024
Last visit: 15 Apr 2026
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 153
Location: Spain
Schools: HEC (D) ESSEC MiF '26 (S)
GPA: 6.74
19 Dec 2024, 12:56
Kudos
Bookmarks
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the force of the evidence cited?
(A) Many agricultural scientists continue to recommend traditional plowing techniques alongside modern machinery to prevent soil compaction and maintain fertility. Out of scope.
(B) Farms that combine no-till practices with traditional tilling methods report the highest levels of soil fertility and overall health. Not assessing the question.
(C) Farms using no-till farming often require high-tech agricultural machinery to effectively manage crop residue, which is not removed by tilling. Confusing and mixing but not really supporting or weakening anything.
(D) The studies assessing soil health on farms using no-till practices were funded by manufacturers promoting high-tech farming equipment, potentially biasing the results. This one actually supports the evidence, at most.
(E) The metrics used to assess soil health in the studies are typically those that favor soils which have been recently tilled and chemically treated. Weakens the argument by contrasting why the evidence might come favorable for no-till farming.
(A) Many agricultural scientists continue to recommend traditional plowing techniques alongside modern machinery to prevent soil compaction and maintain fertility. Out of scope.
(B) Farms that combine no-till practices with traditional tilling methods report the highest levels of soil fertility and overall health. Not assessing the question.
(C) Farms using no-till farming often require high-tech agricultural machinery to effectively manage crop residue, which is not removed by tilling. Confusing and mixing but not really supporting or weakening anything.
(D) The studies assessing soil health on farms using no-till practices were funded by manufacturers promoting high-tech farming equipment, potentially biasing the results. This one actually supports the evidence, at most.
(E) The metrics used to assess soil health in the studies are typically those that favor soils which have been recently tilled and chemically treated. Weakens the argument by contrasting why the evidence might come favorable for no-till farming.
