Last visit was: 07 May 2024, 02:39 It is currently 07 May 2024, 02:39

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93072
Own Kudos [?]: 621815 [26]
Given Kudos: 81780
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Posts: 3137
Own Kudos [?]: 2774 [7]
Given Kudos: 1510
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Send PM
General Discussion
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11217
Own Kudos [?]: 32325 [2]
Given Kudos: 301
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 26 Jan 2019
Posts: 640
Own Kudos [?]: 441 [0]
Given Kudos: 118
Location: India
Send PM
Re: A certain firm has 28 lawyers in three states. These lawyers have lice [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
A certain firm has 28 lawyers in three states. These lawyers have license either in only one state or all three states. If 10 have license in state X, 11 have license in Y, 13 have license in Z. How many lawyers have license only in state Z ?

A. 3
B. 6
C. 10
D. 11
E. 13


X = 10
Y = 11
Z = 13

X U Y U Z = X + Y + Z - X ∩ Y - Y ∩ Z - Z ∩ X + X ∩ Y ∩ Z

Now no two cities share lawyers, hence X ∩ Y - Y ∩ Z - Z ∩ X = 0

As a result of this scenario, we'll have to tweak the original formula and subtract the 2 * X Y Z as the segments don't overlap between 2 cities hence, we cannot subtract twice the tri-overlap area.

Hence X U Y U Z = X + Y + Z - 0 - 2 * X ∩ Y ∩ Z
=> 28 = 10 + 11+ 13 - 2 * X ∩ Y ∩ Z
=> 6 = 2 * X ∩ Y ∩ Z
=> X ∩ Y ∩ Z = 3

In order to find lawyers working only in City Z, we have to subtract lawyers working in all 3 cities from the total lawyers from City Z

Z - X ∩ Y ∩ Z
=> 13 - 3 = 10

Option C
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Jul 2020
Posts: 107
Own Kudos [?]: 209 [1]
Given Kudos: 239
GMAT Focus 1:
615 Q79 V83 DI79
GMAT 1: 530 Q42 V20
GMAT 2: 640 Q48 V29
Send PM
Re: A certain firm has 28 lawyers in three states. These lawyers have lice [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Bunuel, this is a GMAT Prep Focus mock question, please tag it.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93072
Own Kudos [?]: 621815 [0]
Given Kudos: 81780
Send PM
Re: A certain firm has 28 lawyers in three states. These lawyers have lice [#permalink]
Expert Reply
AnkurGMAT20 wrote:
Bunuel, this is a GMAT Prep Focus mock question, please tag it.

________________________
Added the tag. Thank you!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Dec 2020
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 55
Location: Malaysia
GPA: 3.79
WE:Sales (Health Care)
Send PM
Re: A certain firm has 28 lawyers in three states. These lawyers have lice [#permalink]
Can someone explain why the formula "Total=A+B+C−(AnB+AnC+BnC)+AnBnC+Neither" cannot be used to solve this question?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93072
Own Kudos [?]: 621815 [0]
Given Kudos: 81780
Send PM
Re: A certain firm has 28 lawyers in three states. These lawyers have lice [#permalink]
Expert Reply
 
zaprico wrote:
A certain firm has 28 lawyers in three states. These lawyers have license either in only one state or all three states. If 10 have license in state X, 11 have license in Y, 13 have license in Z. How many lawyers have license only in state Z ?

A. 3
B. 6
C. 10
D. 11
E. 13

Can someone explain why the formula "Total=A+B+C−(AnB+AnC+BnC)+AnBnC+Neither" cannot be used to solve this question?

Because each of AnB, AnC, and BnC also includes AnBnC, and thus the sum of AnB + AnC + BnC won't be 0. You should use the second formula for three overlapping sets:

\(Total = A + B + C - (sum \ of \ EXACTLY \ 2-group \ overlaps) - 2*(all \ three) + Neither\).

28 = 10 + 11 + 13 - 0 - 2*(all three) + 0

(all three) = 3

Only Z = Z - (all three) = 13 - 3 = 10.

Answer: C.

For further insights into the distinctions between these two formulas, check out ADVANCED OVERLAPPING SETS PROBLEMS.

Hope it helps.­
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Jan 2024
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: A certain firm has 28 lawyers in three states. These lawyers have lice [#permalink]
zaprico wrote:
Can someone explain why the formula "Total=A+B+C−(AnB+AnC+BnC)+AnBnC+Neither" cannot be used to solve this question?

­Because it's either 1 or all 3 --> there's no option of 2 which the formula includes
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A certain firm has 28 lawyers in three states. These lawyers have lice [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
93070 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne