I had one doubt and got response to it, posting for community
Statement - \(P(RW)=2*\frac{8}{8+y}*\frac{y}{8+y-1}=2*\frac{8}{8+y}*\frac{y}{7+y}\), multiplying by 2 as RW can occur in two ways RW or WR;
My doubt - Why are we multiplying by 2 when WR and RW is the same thing, there is no distinction of RW means R is 1st position in race and W is 2nd position in race or R is president and W is vice-president and hence there will be 2 cases.
Here whether we take RW or WR, it is one and the same thing thus we should not have.
My mistake / Response
You're mixing up unordered selection with ordered probability calculation.
Method 1: Ordered probability approachSuppose Joan picks marbles
one at a time.For "one red and one white", there are two possible orders:
- RW
- WR
So:
P(RW)=P(R then W)+P(W then R)
=(8/(8+y))·(y/(7+y))+(y/(8+y))·(8/(7+y))
=2·(8/(8+y))·(y/(7+y))
The factor of 2 appears because the event "one of each color" can happen in two different orders.
Method 2: Combination approach
Now forget order.
Number of ways to get 1 red and 1 white:
C(8,1)·C(y,1)=8y
Number of total pairs:
C(8+y,2)
Therefore:
P(1R,1W)=8y/C(8+y,2)
No factor of 2 appears.
Why?
Because combinations already treat RW and WR as the same pair.
Why both methods give the same answer
Take the ordered version:
2·(8/(8+y))·(y/(7+y))
=16y/[(8+y)(7+y)]
Now convert the combination version:
8y/C(8+y,2)
=8y/[(8+y)(7+y)/2]
=16y/[(8+y)(7+y)]
Exactly the same.
GMAT takeaway
When using:
- Sequential probability → count all possible orders (RW and WR), so multiply by 2.
- Combinations → order is already ignored, so do not multiply by 2.
- You must choose one framework and stay consistent.
That's why the solution's statement:
P(RW)=2·(8/(8+y))·(y/(7+y))
is perfectly correct even though the final event is "one red and one white" without regard to order. The multiplication by 2 is compensating for the fact that the calculation is being done using an ordered draw process.
Overall solution
GMAT takeaway: when a probability comparison asks
P(2 red) > P(1 red, 1 white)?
don't calculate full probabilities unless necessary. Compare favorable cases.
Let total marbles = 8 + y.
2 red:
P(RR)=C(8,2)/C(8+y,2)
1 of each:
P(RW)=8C1*yC1/C(8+y,2) = 8*y/ yC1/C(8+y,2)
Same denominator, so compare numerators:
C(8,2)=28
Question becomes:
28 > 8y
y < 3.5
Since y is an integer,
y ≤ 3
So the DS question is really:
"Is y ≤ 3?"
Statement (1)
y ≤ 8
Could be y = 2 → answer YES.
Could be y = 8 → answer NO.
Not sufficient.
Statement (2)
y ≥ 4
Since we need y ≤ 3 for YES, every value satisfying statement (2) gives NO.
Sufficient.
Answer: B
1-minute GMAT pattern:
When comparing probabilities from the same population:
- Write only the favorable-count expressions.
- Cancel common denominators.
- Convert the probability question into an algebra question.
Here:
C(8,2) > 8y
is much faster than computing probabilities.
Bunuel
# of total marbles in the jar equals to \(8+y\), out of which \(R=8\) and \(W=y\)
\(P(RR)=\frac{8}{8+y}*\frac{8-1}{8+y-1}=\frac{8}{8+y}*\frac{7}{7+y}\);
\(P(RW)=2*\frac{8}{8+y}*\frac{y}{8+y-1}=2*\frac{8}{8+y}*\frac{y}{7+y}\), multiplying by 2 as RW can occur in two ways RW or WR;
Question: is \(\frac{8}{8+y}*\frac{7}{7+y}>2\frac{8}{8+y}*\frac{y}{7+y}\)? --> is \(\frac{7}{2}>y\)? --> is \(y<3.5\)? eg 0, 1, 2, 3.
(1) y ≤ 8, not sufficient.
(2) y ≥ 4, sufficient, (\(y\) is not less than 3.5).
Answer: B.