GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Jan 2019, 22:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
  • The winners of the GMAT game show

     January 22, 2019

     January 22, 2019

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    In case you didn’t notice, we recently held the 1st ever GMAT game show and it was awesome! See who won a full GMAT course, and register to the next one.
  • GMAT Club Tests are Free & Open for Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday!

     January 21, 2019

     January 21, 2019

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    Mark your calendars - All GMAT Club Tests are free and open January 21st for celebrate Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday.

A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1584
Location: Dhaka
A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 30 Nov 2018, 04:02
18
90
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (00:54) correct 35% (00:54) wrong based on 2868 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted pedestrians right-of-way.


(A) regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted

(B) regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, granting

(C) regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted

(D) regulating the use of bicycles, mandating a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, requiring of cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granted

(E) regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granted


Source : GMATPrep Default Exam Pack

Originally posted by nakib77 on 14 Oct 2005, 12:29.
Last edited by Bunuel on 30 Nov 2018, 04:02, edited 5 times in total.
Edited the question.
Most Helpful Expert Reply
Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4623
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 13 Mar 2011, 02:40
11
3
Important aspects of list ll ism to decide here are: 1. How many series are there? 2. What is the primary aspect of each series and what are the auxiliary phenomena?

Mind you, they all are not equal elements; here in this case, the regulation is the primacy purpose of the ordinance. The other things are incidental to the primer purpose. The various lists of the primary purpose are required to be parallel within them.

Here in the given case, we can tackle ll ism in three ways.

1. A New York ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycle, mandating a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, requiring of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granting pedestrians right of way. (This choice is not there.


2. A New York ordinance of 1897, regulating the use of bicycle, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granted pedestrians right of way( The OA)

3., Regulating the use of bicycle, a New York ordinance of 1897 mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granted pedestrians right of way( This is also not there)

Amidst these various choices, let’s remember that the –ing - form of regulate i.e. ‘regulating’ in the context is a present participle and not a main verb form of the present progressive. To become present progressive, you do have to use the auxiliary verb ‘is” before the ‘ing’ form. Regulating is neither a gerund here.

The same word manifests different meanings in different contexts and each has its own legitimate purpose.

A is wrong because it treats as if the ordinance had four different but equal purposes.
_________________

you can know a lot about something but not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509


Originally posted by daagh on 16 Dec 2010, 04:46.
Last edited by daagh on 13 Mar 2011, 02:40, edited 1 time in total.
Most Helpful Community Reply
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 748
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2013, 08:31
13
5
AMITAGARWAL2 wrote:
I think it is easy... A

B Use of granting made it a modifier which is incorrect.

C, D and E - A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulating ... , and makes it is a indpendent clause for which there is not verb.


Hi amit,

OA : E

A. regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted
not parallel.
you can't have just "mandated" in parallel to "IT granted".
Finally, "regulated the use of bicycles" SHOULD NOT be parallel to the other elements, because the ideas aren't parallel. (all the other ideas in the list are subsumed under "regulated the use of bicycles".)


B. regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all
times, granting
you can't have a list without "and" in front of the final element.
as in (a), "regulated the use of bicycles" SHOULD NOT be parallel to the other elements, because the ideas aren't parallel. (all the other ideas in the list are subsumed under "regulated the use of bicycles".)


C. regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars
at all times, and it granted
not parallel.
you can't have just "mandated" in parallel to "IT granted"
.


D. regulating the use of bicycles, mandating a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, requiring of cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granted
not a sentence. you can't use "-ing" forms as verbs.
also, "granted" is not parallel to the "-ing" forms anyway.


E. regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all
times, and granted
correct.
note that "regulating the use of bicycles" is NOT parallel to the other items. this is the way the sentence should be written.

HOPE IT HELPS
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...



GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: http://gmatclub.com/forum/vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss

General Discussion
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1584
Location: Dhaka
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Oct 2005, 11:54
OA is E.
it is a meaning and ||ism question.

the law is regulating the use of bicycles mandated X.......required y, and granted Z....

Only E does the job. So E is the OE.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 May 2010
Posts: 23
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 May 2010, 00:00
not that i don't understand the difference between regulating and regulated. Of course i do, but the thing is i am not sure why is regulating being used here since the rest of the sentences in #5 are in past tense " mandated, granted"

thanks
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: what we want to do, do it as soon as possible
Joined: 24 May 2010
Posts: 76
Location: Vietnam
WE 1: 5.0
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 15 Dec 2010, 09:08
2
abcd1 wrote:
not that i don't understand the difference between regulating and regulated. Of course i do, but the thing is i am not sure why is regulating being used here since the rest of the sentences in #5 are in past tense " mandated, granted"

thanks


i think "regulating" here is a modifier of A New York ordinance of 1897, Verb 1 (mandated) + verb 2 (required) + verb 3 (mandated) is perfect paralel structure.
This ordinance is now not effected anymore (that's why main verbs are in the past), however "A New York ordinance of 1897" which is an act that regulates "the use of bicycle" is a fact so using "regulating" here is rational.
Hope it helps :)
_________________

Consider giving me kudos if you find my explanations helpful so i can learn how to express ideas to people more understandable.


Originally posted by MICKEYXITIN on 15 Dec 2010, 08:44.
Last edited by MICKEYXITIN on 15 Dec 2010, 09:08, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Posts: 181
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.95
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2012, 09:21
I fell for C, but after having a look at
http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/sc- ... t7988.html

I realized my mistakes. What the above link says is:

1. 'it gratned' is not in parallel with the rest of the sentence.
2. "Required X do Y" is correct but not "Required X that they do Y"
_________________

-------------------------
-Aravind Chembeti

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2013
Posts: 90
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V28
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
Reviews Badge
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2013, 08:00
I think it is easy... A

B Use of granting made it a modifier which is incorrect.

C, D and E - A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulating ... , and makes it is a indpendent clause for which there is not verb.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Feb 2013
Posts: 154
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Nov 2013, 12:44
1
The only reason E appalled me is the lack of a comma before the "mandated" therefore considered as a running sentence.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Nov 2013
Posts: 16
GMAT Date: 12-26-2013
GPA: 3.6
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2013, 15:10
blueseas wrote:
AMITAGARWAL2 wrote:
I think it is easy... A

B Use of granting made it a modifier which is incorrect.

C, D and E - A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulating ... , and makes it is a indpendent clause for which there is not verb.


Hi amit,

OA : E

A. regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted
not parallel.
you can't have just "mandated" in parallel to "IT granted".
Finally, "regulated the use of bicycles" SHOULD NOT be parallel to the other elements, because the ideas aren't parallel. (all the other ideas in the list are subsumed under "regulated the use of bicycles".)


B. regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all
times, granting
you can't have a list without "and" in front of the final element.
as in (a), "regulated the use of bicycles" SHOULD NOT be parallel to the other elements, because the ideas aren't parallel. (all the other ideas in the list are subsumed under "regulated the use of bicycles".)


C. regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars
at all times, and it granted
not parallel.
you can't have just "mandated" in parallel to "IT granted"
.


D. regulating the use of bicycles, mandating a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, requiring of cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granted
not a sentence. you can't use "-ing" forms as verbs.
also, "granted" is not parallel to the "-ing" forms anyway.


E. regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all
times, and granted
correct.
note that "regulating the use of bicycles" is NOT parallel to the other items. this is the way the sentence should be written.

HOPE IT HELPS



If B was written as below , would it be right ?
regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour and required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, granting

I thought regulated , mandated and required are in a list and should be parallel.
Please help me understand how to understand which ones to consider for list ?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1011
Location: United States
Premium Member
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2013, 20:32
1
A4G wrote:
blueseas wrote:
AMITAGARWAL2 wrote:
I think it is easy... A

B Use of granting made it a modifier which is incorrect.

C, D and E - A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulating ... , and makes it is a indpendent clause for which there is not verb.


Hi amit,

OA : E

A. regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted
not parallel.
you can't have just "mandated" in parallel to "IT granted".
Finally, "regulated the use of bicycles" SHOULD NOT be parallel to the other elements, because the ideas aren't parallel. (all the other ideas in the list are subsumed under "regulated the use of bicycles".)


B. regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all
times, granting
you can't have a list without "and" in front of the final element.
as in (a), "regulated the use of bicycles" SHOULD NOT be parallel to the other elements, because the ideas aren't parallel. (all the other ideas in the list are subsumed under "regulated the use of bicycles".)


C. regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars
at all times, and it granted
not parallel.
you can't have just "mandated" in parallel to "IT granted"
.


D. regulating the use of bicycles, mandating a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, requiring of cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granted
not a sentence. you can't use "-ing" forms as verbs.
also, "granted" is not parallel to the "-ing" forms anyway.


E. regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all
times, and granted
correct.
note that "regulating the use of bicycles" is NOT parallel to the other items. this is the way the sentence should be written.

HOPE IT HELPS



If B was written as below , would it be right ?
regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour and required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, granting

I thought regulated , mandated and required are in a list and should be parallel.
Please help me understand how to understand which ones to consider for list ?


Hi AG
The parallel structure is: mandated || required || granted. <== Results of a new regulation.
In your version of B, the parallel structure can't be hold because:
- "regulated" should not be a main verb, but rather a verb-ing modifier. If "regulated" || mandated || ..... ==> It does not make sense.
- "granting" used as verb-ing modifier is not correct. It should be a main verb rather than a modifier.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2013
Posts: 71
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Finance
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V21
GMAT 2: 530 Q49 V13
GMAT 3: 590 Q49 V21
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Dec 2013, 22:43
2
Correct answer is E.
Meaning: A NY city ordinance of 1897 (about what) regulating the use of bicycle
(what it does) 1)mandated...... ,2) required...., and 3)granted...
3 things are parallel.Now check answer which conveys similar meaning.

A. regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted ...... Not parallel it granted and regulated incorrectly consider as 4 item in the list
B. regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, granting .... Not parallel granting and regulated.
C. regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted... same as A
D. regulating the use of bicycles, mandating a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, requiring of cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granted.... Same as B
E. regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granted ... Corrected regulating as the description of ordinance and 3 items of list in parallel (mandated,required,granted).

E is correct.
Director
Director
User avatar
B
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 848
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Mar 2014, 10:50
2
E. regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour,
required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and
granted

What I can understand is "A New York City ordinance " did the following three things
1) mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour
2) required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times
3) and granted pedestrians right-of-way.

There by regulating the use of bicycles.

I was looking for a option as below:
A New York City ordinance of 1897 mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour,required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times and granted pedestrians right-of-way, regulating the use of bicycles.

or

Regulating the use of bicycles,A New York City ordinance of 1897 mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour,required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times and granted pedestrians right-of-way

So the verb-ing modifier modifies the whole clause.

But with option E) regulating being a verb-ing modifier should modify the preceding noun or noun entity which is "A New York City ordinance of 1897". I was actually looking for a comma separating the modifier from the subject.

Can somebody please clarify the doubt. Somehow I am not comfortable with the sentence structure (I have to, the official answer is E)
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal
My Debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267.html#p1449379
My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961
Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/in/kinjal-das/

Please click on Kudos, if you think the post is helpful

e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2795
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Mar 2014, 12:41
9
2
kinjiGC wrote:
E. regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour,
required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and
granted

What I can understand is "A New York City ordinance " did the following three things
1) mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour
2) required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times
3) and granted pedestrians right-of-way.

There by regulating the use of bicycles.

I was looking for a option as below:
A New York City ordinance of 1897 mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour,required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times and granted pedestrians right-of-way, regulating the use of bicycles.

or

Regulating the use of bicycles,A New York City ordinance of 1897 mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour,required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times and granted pedestrians right-of-way

So the verb-ing modifier modifies the whole clause.

But with option E) regulating being a verb-ing modifier should modify the preceding noun or noun entity which is "A New York City ordinance of 1897". I was actually looking for a comma separating the modifier from the subject.

Can somebody please clarify the doubt. Somehow I am not comfortable with the sentence structure (I have to, the official answer is E)


Dear Kinjal,

Thank you for posting your question here.

Here is the sentence structure of the correct version of this sentence:

• A New York City ordinance of 1897 (subject)
regulating the use of bicycles (verb-ing modifier that gives additional information about the ordinance)
mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, (mandated = verb 1)
required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, (required = verb 2)
• and granted pedestrians right-of-way. (granted = verb 3)


Your understanding of the three parallel items on the list is perfectly fine. As you pointed out, "regulating" as a verb-ing modifier should modify the preceding noun, since there is no comma between the modifier and the noun. "Regulating" correctly modifies "ordinance" in option E. Remember that modifiers can 'jump over' other modifiers. Here, "requiring" can jump over "of 1897" to modify the preceding noun.

If I were to identify the main point of the sentence or to summarize the sentence, I would say that this sentence is about the ordinance. It tells us three things about the ordinance: it (1) mandated something, (2) required something and (3) granted something. Notice that the modifier beginning with "regulating" can be removed from the sentence without affecting the clause in any way. This is what modifiers about nouns do: they give you additional information about the noun.

You may wonder whether the status of "regulating" as a modifier can be identified by doing a meaning analysis of the original sentence. It can if you pay close attention to the intended meaning of the sentence. In the original incorrect version, "regulated" seems to be on par with the verbs "mandated," "required" and "granted". However, this is only a superficial parallel list. This can be identified by focusing on the meaning. "Regulated the use of bicycles" gives us the general information that the ordinance imposed some rules on the use of bicycles. The next three verbs actually give us three specific rules about the use of bicycles that were imposed by the ordinance. So, logically, these three items can't be on par with the general information about what the ordinance was about.

I hope this helps with your doubt!

Regards,
Meghna
_________________








Everything you need to ace the GMAT and more
Basics of the GMAT
GMAT Exam Strategies
GMAT Study Plans
GMAT Verbal Subject Matter
GMAT AWA & IR




| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2598
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Apr 2015, 08:30
nakib77 wrote:
Q23:
A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted pedestrians right-of-way.


A. regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted
here the list is not properly connected. before required and is needed.
ordinance 1) regulated; 2)mandated; and 3)required

B. regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, granting
same mistake as in A.

C. regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and it granted
now the list is changed. regulating modifies the ordinance, and the ordinance now has 2 verbs: mandated and required. again the list is not properly connected.

D. regulating the use of bicycles, mandating a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, requiring of cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granted
changes the 3 verbs into ing modifiers. the ordinance now does not have a verb.

E. regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granted
now regulating modifies the ordinance, which has 3 verbs that are parallel: mandated, required and granted.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2012
Posts: 16
Reviews Badge
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Apr 2016, 02:04
In (E), is a comma between 'bicycles' and 'mandated' required? Per the rules that I have learnt, NOUN + NO COMMA + PAST PARTICIPLE = omitted relative pronoun and verb 'be' e.g. 'which had' or similar. Bicycles didn't mandate anything. Hence, I eliminated (E).

Am I confusing 'mandated' between a past participle with past simple tense?

Thanks
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2911
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Apr 2016, 11:55
2
1
rs1 wrote:
In (E), is a comma between 'bicycles' and 'mandated' required? Per the rules that I have learnt, NOUN + NO COMMA + PAST PARTICIPLE = omitted relative pronoun and verb 'be' e.g. 'which had' or similar. Bicycles didn't mandate anything. Hence, I eliminated (E).

Am I confusing 'mandated' between a past participle with past simple tense?

Thanks


A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulating the use of bicycles mandated...., required......, and granted...........

Subject: A New York City ordinance of 1897
Verb: mandated, required, granted (3 parallel verbs in simple past tense)
Modifier for the subject: regulating the use of bicycles

We do not need a comma before "regulating", since this present participle modifier is an essential (or restrictive) modifier - it defines the ordinance - there could be many City ordinances in 1897; the modifier specifies which of those ordinances is discussed here.
SVP
SVP
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 1877
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2016, 20:27
To solve this, we need to understand the meaning of the sentence first.
the law about regulating the use of bicycles mandated X.......required y, and granted Z.... (we need to make sure that these 3 things are parallel)

Correct Option: E

it is very easy to start looking into the parallelism error without understanding the meaning and mark option A as the correct answer.
Therefore, always make sure that you understand the meaning of the sentence before looking for other errors.
VP
VP
User avatar
P
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 1066
Location: India
GPA: 3.31
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2016, 22:31
prabhakar09 wrote:
But shouldn't it be
1. was regulating
or 2. regulated.

being the whole thing happened in past.

Hi Prabhakar, participles (both present and past participles) don't have tense of their own. They derive their tense from the main verb. For example:

I see a crying bay.
- Present Participle crying; the sentence is in simple present tense (as indicated by the main verb see).

I see a crying bay.
- Present Participle crying; the sentence is in simple past tense (as indicated by the main verb saw).
_________________

Thanks,
Ashish
EducationAisle, Bangalore

Sentence Correction Nirvana available on Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 May 2013
Posts: 66
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2016, 00:18
I have only one concern with e ,why bare form of verb is not been used with required,isnt last part of sentence is subjunctive

Posted from my mobile device
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda &nbs [#permalink] 21 Jun 2016, 00:18

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 25 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, manda

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.