Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 07 May 2012
Posts: 66
Location: United States

A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Oct 2013, 14:42
8
This post received KUDOS
49
This post was BOOKMARKED
Question Stats:
27% (01:46) correct 73% (01:41) wrong based on 1008 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate, can fill a production order in half the time required by two older machines working together at their constant rates. If the three machines are used together, will they require more than 1 hour to fill a production order? (1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours. (2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
Jyothi hosamani



Manager
Joined: 07 May 2012
Posts: 66
Location: United States

Re: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 27 Oct 2013, 08:35
2
This post received KUDOS
Hi Bunuel, Could you please help on the below  This is from Veritas practice test . I got the answer as "A", but as per veritas , the answer is E . Not sure where I went wrong . Appreciate if experts can comment on this. Let A and B , be old machines and C be the new machine .  Rate Tiime Work A x 1/x 1 B y 1/y1 A+B x+y1/(x+y) 1 C 2(x+y)1/2(x+y) 1 combined rate of two old and one new machine is = (x+y)+2(x+y) = 3(x+y) question : is time taken  i.e 1/3(x+y) >1 ? or (x+y) <1/3 ? Statement 1 : (1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours. 1/x <4 and 1/y <4 x>1/4 and y>1/4 hence x+y>1/2 , which answers our question as "No" x+y is not less than 1/3 Sufficient. Statement 2 : (2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour 4(x+y) is the new rate . 1/4(x+y) <1 , hence (x+y) >1/4 . Hence (x+y)<1/3 may or may not be true. Not sufficient. I do not understand , where is it that I am going wrong on this one . Jyothi
_________________
Jyothi hosamani
Originally posted by gmacforjyoab on 26 Oct 2013, 14:43.
Last edited by gmacforjyoab on 27 Oct 2013, 08:35, edited 2 times in total.



Intern
Joined: 05 Oct 2013
Posts: 21

Re: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Oct 2013, 18:04
2
This post received KUDOS
4
This post was BOOKMARKED
Let x, y be the time for 2 old machines to complete the job and z be the time for the newest machine to complete the same job. When 2 old machine working together, they finish the job in \(\frac{1}{\frac{1}{x}+ \frac{1}{y}} = \frac{xy}{x+y}\). So \(z= \frac{xy}{2(x+y)}\). (1) implies that x<8 and y<8. So z<2. If all three machines work together, the time \(\frac{1}{\frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{y} + \frac{1}{z}}\) is less than 4/3. (2) implies that z< 2. Similarly, If all three machines work together, the time is less than 4/3. Answer is E



Intern
Status: NOT READY TO GIVE UP
Joined: 24 Apr 2013
Posts: 26
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT Date: 10302013
WE: Engineering (Other)

Re: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Oct 2013, 05:16
3
This post received KUDOS
gmacforjyoab wrote: Hi Bunuel, Could you please help on the below  This is from Veritas practice test . I got the answer as "A", but as per veritas , the answer is E . Not sure where I went wrong . Appreciate if experts can comment on this. Let A and B , be old machines and C be the new machine .  Rate Tiime Work A x 1/x 1 B y 1/y1 A+B x+y(x+y) 1 C 2(x+y)1/2(x+y) 1 combined rate of two old and one new machine is = (x+y)=2(x+y) = 3(x+y) question : is time taken  i.e 1/3(x+y) >1 ? or (x+y) <1/3 ? Statement 1 : (1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours. 1/x <4 and 1/y <4 x>1/4 and y>1/4 hence x+y>1/2 , which answers our question as "No" x+y is not less than 1/3 Sufficient. Statement 2 : (2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour 4(x+y) is the new rate . 1/4(x+y) <1 , hence (x+y) >1/4 . Hence (x+y)<1/3 may or may not be true. Not sufficient. I do not understand , where is it that I am going wrong on this one . Jyothi the analysis of the argument is wrongly done. If Old m/c takes T time to complete the work, then the newer one will take T/2 so the equation for combined work will look like: 2/T(for new m/c)+ 2/T(for 2 old m/c)=4/T Now the asked ques isweather 4/T>1 or not? which can be answered using both the given statements....



Manager
Joined: 07 May 2012
Posts: 66
Location: United States

Re: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Oct 2013, 08:28
himang wrote: gmacforjyoab wrote: Hi Bunuel, Could you please help on the below  This is from Veritas practice test . I got the answer as "A", but as per veritas , the answer is E . Not sure where I went wrong . Appreciate if experts can comment on this. Let A and B , be old machines and C be the new machine .  Rate Tiime Work A x 1/x 1 B y 1/y1 A+B x+y(x+y) 1 C 2(x+y)1/2(x+y) 1 combined rate of two old and one new machine is = (x+y)=2(x+y) = 3(x+y) question : is time taken  i.e 1/3(x+y) >1 ? or (x+y) <1/3 ? Statement 1 : (1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours. 1/x <4 and 1/y <4 x>1/4 and y>1/4 hence x+y>1/2 , which answers our question as "No" x+y is not less than 1/3 Sufficient. Statement 2 : (2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour 4(x+y) is the new rate . 1/4(x+y) <1 , hence (x+y) >1/4 . Hence (x+y)<1/3 may or may not be true. Not sufficient. I do not understand , where is it that I am going wrong on this one . Jyothi the analysis of the argument is wrongly done. If Old m/c takes T time to complete the work, then the newer one will take T/2 so the equation for combined work will look like: 2/T(for new m/c)+ 2/T(for 2 old m/c)=4/T Now the asked ques isweather 4/T>1 or not? which can be answered using both the given statements.... Couple of issues in what you have explained above. 1. You cannot assume that time required for both the old machines is the same ( which you have assumed to be T). The problem just says , "work at THEIR CONSTANT RATE" . 2. Secondly , you can add the rates of three machines working together , which gives you a combined rate. But you cannot add the time taken by three machines and call that the combined time . for instance  Lets say Machine L takes 2 hrs , M takes 2 hrs and N takes 2 hrs to complete a work independently. If they all work together , then as per your analysis , they take 2+2+2=6 hrs to complete . If they all work together , they would definitely complete it in less than 2 hrs. 3. Also, the answer to the question , from what veritas says , is E and not C/D as you mentioned. Jyothi
_________________
Jyothi hosamani



Intern
Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Posts: 40
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 570 Q46 V23 GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 2.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Oct 2013, 21:23
gmacforjyoab wrote: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate, can fill a production order in half the time required by two older machines working together at their constant rates. If the three machines are used together, will they require more than 1 hour to fill a production order?
(1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours.
(2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour Hi jyothi, I think picking up few nos for each statements is perhaps the fastest way to do this.Before doing this assume x+y is time taken by older machines and z by new machine 1)for 1st statement the older machines can fill the order in less than 4 hours , take for instance the time taken by 2 older machines be 6 hours, so halfthe production order will be in x+y/2=3 hours time taken by new machine is 3 hours, so in 6 hours 1.5 production order is filled => 1 production order in= 6/1.5= 4 hours (so answer to the statement is no) but let us assume time taken by older machines x+y=1/4 hours so half the prod order = 1/4*1/2=1/8 and z takes (1/4*1/2)=1/8 so in 1/4 hours 1.5 orders 1 prod order in 1/4*1/1.5 (which will be less than 1 hour, so answer is yes) clearly therefore statment 1 is insufficient so 2)for the answer to be yes (i,e statement sufficient to state it will take less than 1hour you can pick the same values as in 2 conditio of 1st statement i,e x+y=1/2 hours) for the yes condition pick time taken by z = 10/6 ,, so if rate doubled it will be able to do in 5/6 hours,, so x+y= 20/6 so in 30/6 2 orders are completed, => 1 order in 5/2 hours (so answer is no as order cannot be completed in less than in 1 hour),, you can have the same value (z=10/6) and use it for statemet 1 as well. hence both the values are insufficient.E is correct
_________________
Help with Kudos if I add to your knowledge realm.



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8076
Location: Pune, India

Re: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Nov 2013, 20:55
gmacforjyoab wrote: Hi Bunuel, Could you please help on the below  This is from Veritas practice test . I got the answer as "A", but as per veritas , the answer is E . Not sure where I went wrong . Appreciate if experts can comment on this. Let A and B , be old machines and C be the new machine .  Rate Tiime Work A x 1/x 1 B y 1/y1 A+B x+y1/(x+y) 1 C 2(x+y)1/2(x+y) 1 combined rate of two old and one new machine is = (x+y)+2(x+y) = 3(x+y) question : is time taken  i.e 1/3(x+y) >1 ? or (x+y) <1/3 ? Statement 1 : (1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours. 1/x <4 and 1/y <4 x>1/4 and y>1/4 hence x+y>1/2 , which answers our question as "No" x+y is not less than 1/3 Sufficient. Statement 2 : (2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour 4(x+y) is the new rate . 1/4(x+y) <1 , hence (x+y) >1/4 . Hence (x+y)<1/3 may or may not be true. Not sufficient. I do not understand , where is it that I am going wrong on this one . Jyothi You misread statement (1). (1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours. Each of the older machines cannot fill a production order in less than 4 hrs. They can fill half the production order in less than 4 hrs. The actual time taken by them could be 1 hr, 2 hrs, 3 hrs, 3.9 hrs etc to fill HALF the order. Hence they can fill the complete order is less than 8 hrs. 1/x < 8 1/y < 8 x + y > 1/4 Not sufficient.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep  GMAT Instructor My Blog
Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199
Veritas Prep Reviews



Manager
Joined: 07 May 2012
Posts: 66
Location: United States

Re: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Nov 2013, 06:51
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: gmacforjyoab wrote: Hi Bunuel, Could you please help on the below  This is from Veritas practice test . I got the answer as "A", but as per veritas , the answer is E . Not sure where I went wrong . Appreciate if experts can comment on this. Let A and B , be old machines and C be the new machine .  Rate Tiime Work A x 1/x 1 B y 1/y1 A+B x+y1/(x+y) 1 C 2(x+y)1/2(x+y) 1 combined rate of two old and one new machine is = (x+y)+2(x+y) = 3(x+y) question : is time taken  i.e 1/3(x+y) >1 ? or (x+y) <1/3 ? Statement 1 : (1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours. 1/x <4 and 1/y <4 x>1/4 and y>1/4 hence x+y>1/2 , which answers our question as "No" x+y is not less than 1/3 Sufficient. Statement 2 : (2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour 4(x+y) is the new rate . 1/4(x+y) <1 , hence (x+y) >1/4 . Hence (x+y)<1/3 may or may not be true. Not sufficient. I do not understand , where is it that I am going wrong on this one . Jyothi You misread statement (1). (1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours. Each of the older machines cannot fill a production order in less than 4 hrs. They can fill half the production order in less than 4 hrs. The actual time taken by them could be 1 hr, 2 hrs, 3 hrs, 3.9 hrs etc to fill HALF the order. Hence they can fill the complete order is less than 8 hrs. 1/x < 8 1/y < 8 x + y > 1/4 Not sufficient. Oh right !! Thank you so much for clarifying ! Jyothi
_________________
Jyothi hosamani



Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2014
Posts: 98
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.9
WE: Analyst (Energy and Utilities)

Machines, work/rate problem [#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jan 2015, 14:03
A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate, can fill a production order in half the time required by two older machines working together at their constant rates. If the three machines are used together, will they require more than 1 hour to fill a production order?
(1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours.
(2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 45333

Re: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jan 2015, 04:51



Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2014
Posts: 98
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.9
WE: Analyst (Energy and Utilities)

Re: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jan 2015, 13:19
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
Bunuel wrote: santorasantu wrote: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate, can fill a production order in half the time required by two older machines working together at their constant rates. If the three machines are used together, will they require more than 1 hour to fill a production order?
(1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours.
(2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour Please search before posting and name topics properly (check rule 3: rulesforpostingpleasereadthisbeforeposting133935.html). Thank you. Thanks Bunuel for redirecting and also on rules. Could anybody please give an alternate quick solution for this question?



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8076
Location: Pune, India

Re: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jan 2015, 22:46
8
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
11
This post was BOOKMARKED
gmacforjyoab wrote: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate, can fill a production order in half the time required by two older machines working together at their constant rates. If the three machines are used together, will they require more than 1 hour to fill a production order?
(1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours.
(2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour Here is another solution: New machine takes half the time taken by 2 old machines i.e. rate of new machine is twice the rate of 2 old machines. Say rate of old machine is R. Then rate of 2 old machines is 2R. Then rate of a new machine is 2*2R = 4R. If all 3 machines work together, their combined rate is R + R + 4R = 6R (1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours. This means the old machine takes less than 8 hrs to fill a complete order i.e. its rate is at least 1/8. R is at least 1/8 so 6R is atleast 6/8 = 3/4. So time taken by all 3 machines together to complete 1 lot is maximum 4/3 hrs. Is it actually less than 1 hr, we can't say. Not sufficient. (2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour If rate is 2*4R =8R, time taken is less than 1 hour to complete 1 full production lot. So rate is at least 1/8. This is exactly the same information as obtained in statement 1. This alone will also be insufficient. Both statements give the same information and are insufficient. So together they will be insufficient. Answer (E)
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep  GMAT Instructor My Blog
Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199
Veritas Prep Reviews



Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2014
Posts: 98
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.9
WE: Analyst (Energy and Utilities)

Re: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Jan 2015, 11:37
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: gmacforjyoab wrote: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate, can fill a production order in half the time required by two older machines working together at their constant rates. If the three machines are used together, will they require more than 1 hour to fill a production order?
(1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours.
(2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour Here is another solution: New machine takes half the time taken by 2 old machines i.e. rate of new machine is twice the rate of 2 old machines. Say rate of old machine is R. Then rate of 2 old machines is 2R. Then rate of a new machine is 2*2R = 4R. If all 3 machines work together, their combined rate is R + R + 4R = 6R (1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours. This means the old machine takes less than 8 hrs to fill a complete order i.e. its rate is at least 1/8. R is at least 1/8 so 6R is atleast 6/8 = 3/4. So time taken by all 3 machines together to complete 1 lot is maximum 4/3 hrs. Is it actually less than 1 hr, we can't say. Not sufficient. (2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour If rate is 2*4R =8R, time taken is less than 1 hour to complete 1 full production lot. So rate is at least 1/8. This is exactly the same information as obtained in statement 1. This alone will also be insufficient. Both statements give the same information and are insufficient. So together they will be insufficient. Answer (E) Thanks a lot, Karishma. I find this a bit more easier. +1



Intern
Joined: 27 Apr 2015
Posts: 8

A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
22 May 2015, 20:55
1
This post received KUDOS
gmacforjyoab wrote: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate, can fill a production order in half the time required by two older machines working together at their constant rates. If the three machines are used together, will they require more than 1 hour to fill a production order?
(1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours.
(2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour Let's call the two old machines A and B and new machine C. Q: 1/A + 1/B + 1/C =< 1 (1) 0.5/A =< 0.5/4 or 1/A =< 1/8 0.5/B =< 0.5/4 or 1/B =< 1/8 Hence, 1/A + 1/B =< 1/8 + 1/8 =< 1/4 The Q tells us that C can fill the entire order is 1/2 the combined time of A and B: 1/C =< 2*(1/4) =< 1/2 (This means that C alone could fill the entire order in less than 2 hours) All together, this information is insufficient because it doesn't tell us how less than 2 hours C alone can work or how less than 4 hours A and B can work combined. Therefore, we can't determine if all three together could fill the order in under 1 hour. (2) This tells us 1/2C =< 1... or 1/C =< 1/2 (the same information we had in 1). Still insufficient. Answer: E Hope this helps.



Intern
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 31

A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Jul 2015, 12:11
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: gmacforjyoab wrote: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate, can fill a production order in half the time required by two older machines working together at their constant rates. If the three machines are used together, will they require more than 1 hour to fill a production order?
(1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours.
(2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour Here is another solution: New machine takes half the time taken by 2 old machines i.e. rate of new machine is twice the rate of 2 old machines. Say rate of old machine is R. Then rate of 2 old machines is 2R. Then rate of a new machine is 2*2R = 4R. If all 3 machines work together, their combined rate is R + R + 4R = 6R (1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours. This means the old machine takes less than 8 hrs to fill a complete order i.e. its rate is at least 1/8. R is at least 1/8 so 6R is atleast 6/8 = 3/4. So time taken by all 3 machines together to complete 1 lot is maximum 4/3 hrs. Is it actually less than 1 hr, we can't say. Not sufficient. (2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour If rate is 2*4R =8R, time taken is less than 1 hour to complete 1 full production lot. So rate is at least 1/8. This is exactly the same information as obtained in statement 1. This alone will also be insufficient. Both statements give the same information and are insufficient. So together they will be insufficient. Answer (E) Hi there Karishma, Nice solution, I have a doubt since the statement 1: says each of the old machines completed half the production in less than 4 hours , I took a case where the machines finish their job in a matter of minutes thus the total time for all three will be less than 60 minutes or 1 hr here and an extreme case as you did. Hence I concluded insufficient. Is this correct ?? I took a similar approach for statement 2. Answer :E Thanks



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8076
Location: Pune, India

Re: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Jul 2015, 02:12
anurag356 wrote: VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: gmacforjyoab wrote: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate, can fill a production order in half the time required by two older machines working together at their constant rates. If the three machines are used together, will they require more than 1 hour to fill a production order?
(1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours.
(2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour Here is another solution: New machine takes half the time taken by 2 old machines i.e. rate of new machine is twice the rate of 2 old machines. Say rate of old machine is R. Then rate of 2 old machines is 2R. Then rate of a new machine is 2*2R = 4R. If all 3 machines work together, their combined rate is R + R + 4R = 6R (1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours. This means the old machine takes less than 8 hrs to fill a complete order i.e. its rate is at least 1/8. R is at least 1/8 so 6R is atleast 6/8 = 3/4. So time taken by all 3 machines together to complete 1 lot is maximum 4/3 hrs. Is it actually less than 1 hr, we can't say. Not sufficient. (2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour If rate is 2*4R =8R, time taken is less than 1 hour to complete 1 full production lot. So rate is at least 1/8. This is exactly the same information as obtained in statement 1. This alone will also be insufficient. Both statements give the same information and are insufficient. So together they will be insufficient. Answer (E) Hi there Karishma, Nice solution, I have a doubt since the statement 1: says each of the old machines completed half the production in less than 4 hours , I took a case where the machines finish their job in a matter of minutes thus the total time for all three will be less than 60 minutes or 1 hr here and an extreme case as you did. Hence I concluded insufficient. Is this correct ?? I took a similar approach for statement 2. Answer :E Thanks Yes, less than 4 hours could very well be a few seconds too. That is the extreme "minimum time" scenario. The approach is correct.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep  GMAT Instructor My Blog
Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199
Veritas Prep Reviews



Intern
Joined: 31 Aug 2013
Posts: 10

Re: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Dec 2015, 07:37
1
This post received KUDOS
gmacforjyoab wrote: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate, can fill a production order in half the time required by two older machines working together at their constant rates. If the three machines are used together, will they require more than 1 hour to fill a production order?
(1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours.
(2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour  You may approach this question in efficiency method as well. 1) each can fill half a production in less than 4 hours, hence full production in less then 8 hours. Thus the efficiency of each may be greater than (1/8)*100 = 12.5 %. Say i take the minimum as 12.5% of each machine, thus the newer machine will have a minimum efficiency of 25% , together the three will have minimum efficiency = 75% . Thus they can't complete the work in less than one hour ( note: for less than one hour the summation of those three should be greater than 100%) Hence not sufficient. 2) The new machine if doubles it rates can complete work in less than one hour. Hence the efficiency of new machine should be >50% , and the sum of efficiency of the two older machine should be >25% Taking minimum values of the three, i am getting an efficiency of 75% , which again shows that it may or may not take less than an hour. Hence not sufficient. And even if you combine both i can assume a value in such a way that the efficiency will be >75% but less than 100%. Thus even together they are not sufficient. Ans > E.



Intern
Joined: 20 Nov 2015
Posts: 1

A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Jan 2016, 04:56
2
This post received KUDOS
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
You cannot imagine how much I struggled with these rates pb. So, every time I have a rate question, I proceed like this:
First, I draw a nice and lovely chart:
...................................................Rate.............Time.............Quantity New Machine......................................................t/2..................1 Quant 2 old machines (counted as 1)....................................t..................1 Quant The 2 things working for 1 Quant................................................. 1 Quant
From that, I start to plug the missing parts. The rate for the new machine is 2/t (2/t * t/2 =1 Quant). The rate for the old machines is 1/t. So from this I can guess that the 2 rates combined are 2/t + 1/t = 3/t. So now I have the combined rate. What would be the time, for the combined rate to make 1 Quant ? Only the reversal, T/3
Here is my new chart:
...................................................Rate.............Time.............Quantity New Machine......................................2/t.............t/2.............1 Quant 2 old machines (counted as 1)..................1/t.............t.............1 Quant The 2 things working for 1 Quant.............3/t.............t/3.............1 Quant
The 1st question says: Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours. In other words, if each can do half in less than 4 hours, the 2 combined can achieve in less than 4 hours. So t has to be <4
So the question now is: if t<4, would t/3 (our combined time) be less than 1? The question is much easier ! if t is 3.99, its ok, the combined time is over 1 hour, but if t is 2, then the combined time would be 2/3, which is less than 1.
The 2st question says: If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour. So here again, doubling its current rate means that 2/t (the rate of the new machine) x2, so 4/t. Therefore the time, which is still the reverse of the rate, is t/4. And the stem just says that t/4<1, which means t<4. So this is the same issue as the one stated in the first question. Still no way to know!
Combining both is useless. So E



Manager
Joined: 12 Jan 2015
Posts: 211

Re: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 May 2016, 23:39
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: gmacforjyoab wrote: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate, can fill a production order in half the time required by two older machines working together at their constant rates. If the three machines are used together, will they require more than 1 hour to fill a production order?
(1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours.
(2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour Here is another solution: New machine takes half the time taken by 2 old machines i.e. rate of new machine is twice the rate of 2 old machines. Say rate of old machine is R. Then rate of 2 old machines is 2R. Then rate of a new machine is 2*2R = 4R. If all 3 machines work together, their combined rate is R + R + 4R = 6R (1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours. This means the old machine takes less than 8 hrs to fill a complete order i.e. its rate is at least 1/8. R is at least 1/8 so 6R is atleast 6/8 = 3/4. So time taken by all 3 machines together to complete 1 lot is maximum 4/3 hrs. Is it actually less than 1 hr, we can't say. Not sufficient. (2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour If rate is 2*4R =8R, time taken is less than 1 hour to complete 1 full production lot. So rate is at least 1/8. This is exactly the same information as obtained in statement 1. This alone will also be insufficient. Both statements give the same information and are insufficient. So together they will be insufficient. Answer (E) Hi VeritasPrepKarishma / chetan2u, I am not able to comprehend the following part of your explanation R is at least 1/8 so 6R is atleast 6/8 = 3/4. So time taken by all 3 machines together to complete 1 lot is maximum 4/3 hrsIf R is atleast 3/4, then why the complete 1 lot is ATMOST 4/3..? I thought the complete time must also be ATLEAST 4/3..? Can you please explain with some easy example..? Thanks
_________________
Thanks and Regards, Prakhar



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 5779

A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 May 2016, 23:50
PrakharGMAT wrote: VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: gmacforjyoab wrote: A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate, can fill a production order in half the time required by two older machines working together at their constant rates. If the three machines are used together, will they require more than 1 hour to fill a production order?
(1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours.
(2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour Here is another solution: New machine takes half the time taken by 2 old machines i.e. rate of new machine is twice the rate of 2 old machines. Say rate of old machine is R. Then rate of 2 old machines is 2R. Then rate of a new machine is 2*2R = 4R. If all 3 machines work together, their combined rate is R + R + 4R = 6R (1) Each of the older machines, working alone at its constant rate, can fill half a production order in less than 4 hours. This means the old machine takes less than 8 hrs to fill a complete order i.e. its rate is at least 1/8. R is at least 1/8 so 6R is atleast 6/8 = 3/4. So time taken by all 3 machines together to complete 1 lot is maximum 4/3 hrs. Is it actually less than 1 hr, we can't say. Not sufficient. (2) If the newer machine were to double its rate, it could fill a production order working alone in less than one hour If rate is 2*4R =8R, time taken is less than 1 hour to complete 1 full production lot. So rate is at least 1/8. This is exactly the same information as obtained in statement 1. This alone will also be insufficient. Both statements give the same information and are insufficient. So together they will be insufficient. Answer (E) Hi VeritasPrepKarishma / chetan2u, I am not able to comprehend the following part of your explanation R is at least 1/8 so 6R is atleast 6/8 = 3/4. So time taken by all 3 machines together to complete 1 lot is maximum 4/3 hrsIf R is atleast 3/4, then why the complete 1 lot is ATMOST 4/3..? I thought the complete time must also be ATLEAST 4/3..? Can you please explain with some easy example..? Thanks Hi PrakharGMAT, speed and time are inversely related.. If time taken is more, speed will be less.. If time taken is less, speed will be more... example.. let the distance be 100 and speed be s, so TIME = 100/s... say the least speed = \(\frac{1}{2} *s\).....then MAX TIME \(= 100/\frac{1}{2} *s = \frac{200}{s},\) which is \(100*\frac{2}{s}..\)... as can be seen here... If speed is s/2... time becomes s/2
_________________
Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolutemodulusabetterunderstanding210849.html#p1622372 Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html
GMAT online Tutor




A newer machine, working alone at its constant rate
[#permalink]
19 May 2016, 23:50



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 28 posts ]



