Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 30 Nov 2013
Posts: 19
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Dec 2013, 11:06
Question Stats:
31% (01:03) correct 69% (01:12) wrong based on 521 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams, with each of its L team leaders responsible for D group directors, and each of those D group directors responsible for F fundraisers. If the only three positions on each local team are team leaders, group directors, and fundraisers, and there are more group directors than team leaders, how many team leaders are on the Dallas team? (1) There are 81 total members on the Dallas team (2) There are 5 group directors on the Dallas team
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
Kudos is the best way to say Thank you. Believe in yourself! Practice more and good score in GMAT is for sure




Intern
Joined: 30 Nov 2013
Posts: 19
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Dec 2013, 21:14
Paris75 wrote: I got it wrong since I used the 81 to prove there was only one team leader but:
With statement B alone we can mange to find it:
Since there is L<D, L should be 1 2 3 or 4.
But if L is 2 than the number of D should be divided in 2, meaning ... That we have 2.5 directors. Impossible.
Same logic with 3 and 4...
The only possible answer is 1. Choice C only helps to confirm this answer!
Am I right here? I think you almost got it right with your analysis, but you just missed it. I am sorry. C is incorrect. Please find the answer below: Each of L team leaders has D group directors, making the total number of group directors equal to (L)(D). And each of those group directors has F fundraisers, again requiring multiplication: that total is (L)(D)(F). (You can try this by plugging in small numbers  if each of 2 leaders has 3 directors, you know there would be 6 directors) So while statement 1 is not sufficient (there are multiple combinations that could get you to 81, such as L = 1, D = 2, and F = 39; or L = 1, D = 5, and F = 15), statement 2 guarantees that there is only one team leader. This is because 5 is a prime number, and you know that the number of group directors = LD. The only possible way for LD to equal 5 is if L is 1 and D is 5, or if D is 1 and L is 5. And since the stimulus tells you that there are more directors than leaders, the combination must be 5 directors and 1 leader. Accordingly, statement 2 is sufficient. +1 Kudos if you like and understand.
_________________
Kudos is the best way to say Thank you. Believe in yourself! Practice more and good score in GMAT is for sure




Manager
Status: Student
Joined: 26 Aug 2013
Posts: 221
Location: France
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GPA: 3.44

Re: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Dec 2013, 15:30
I got it wrong since I used the 81 to prove there was only one team leader but: With statement B alone we can mange to find it: Since there is L<D, L should be 1 2 3 or 4. But if L is 2 than the number of D should be divided in 2, meaning ... That we have 2.5 directors. Impossible. Same logic with 3 and 4... The only possible answer is 1. Choice C only helps to confirm this answer! Am I right here?
_________________
Think outside the box



Intern
Joined: 03 Dec 2014
Posts: 2

Re: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Dec 2014, 06:46
Hey... I'm not sure about this one, I feel A is sufficient too. From the question we've got: Total number of people on Dallas team = L + L*D + L*D*F = L * (D + D*F + 1) = L * (D(1+F) + 1) = 81 Given that 81 = 3^4, L must be either 1, 3, 9, 27, or 81. However we also know that L>D, so there's no need to check the combinations where L = 9 or higher. There a bunch of combinations where L=1, as D can then be equal to any factor of 811. However, there are no combinations where L=3 and where L>D, because in that case D must be a factor of 26, i.e. 1, 2, or 13. 3 is larger than 1 or 2, and 13 doesn't work because in that case F = 1, and 13 Directors can't split 1 fundraiser between them! So I find that prompt A is sufficient to determine that L = 1. But VeritasPrep's CAT says I'm wrong, as does this thread, so please explain what I'm missing here!



Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jun 2013
Posts: 277

Re: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Dec 2014, 07:59
li220 wrote: Hey... I'm not sure about this one, I feel A is sufficient too. From the question we've got: Total number of people on Dallas team = L + L*D + L*D*F = L * (D + D*F + 1) = L * (D(1+F) + 1) = 81 Given that 81 = 3^4, L must be either 1, 3, 9, 27, or 81. However we also know that L>D, so there's no need to check the combinations where L = 9 or higher. There a bunch of combinations where L=1, as D can then be equal to any factor of 811. However, there are no combinations where L=3 and where L>D, because in that case D must be a factor of 26, i.e. 1, 2, or 13. 3 is larger than 1 or 2, and 13 doesn't work because in that case F = 1, and 13 Directors can't split 1 fundraiser between them! So I find that prompt A is sufficient to determine that L = 1. But VeritasPrep's CAT says I'm wrong, as does this thread, so please explain what I'm missing here! hi, the highlighted portion is wrong. it's actually the other way around. D>L. now try for L=3, we have D=13 and F=2. i hope it helps.



Intern
Joined: 03 Dec 2014
Posts: 2

Re: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Dec 2014, 08:25
manpreetsingh86 wrote: li220 wrote: Hey... I'm not sure about this one, I feel A is sufficient too. From the question we've got: Total number of people on Dallas team = L + L*D + L*D*F = L * (D + D*F + 1) = L * (D(1+F) + 1) = 81 Given that 81 = 3^4, L must be either 1, 3, 9, 27, or 81. However we also know that L>D, so there's no need to check the combinations where L = 9 or higher. There a bunch of combinations where L=1, as D can then be equal to any factor of 811. However, there are no combinations where L=3 and where L>D, because in that case D must be a factor of 26, i.e. 1, 2, or 13. 3 is larger than 1 or 2, and 13 doesn't work because in that case F = 1, and 13 Directors can't split 1 fundraiser between them! So I find that prompt A is sufficient to determine that L = 1. But VeritasPrep's CAT says I'm wrong, as does this thread, so please explain what I'm missing here! hi, the highlighted portion is wrong. it's actually the other way around. D>L. now try for L=3, we have D=13 and F=2. i hope it helps. Hey thanks Manpreet. You're right, i meant D>L. You've made me realise that actually my mistake was to confuse F and the total number of fundraisers. I assumed that F = 1 means there's only 1 fundraiser total, when actually that means there's 1 fundraiser per Director, which is entirely possible. So i think what you mean is L = 3, D = 13, and F = 1 Thanks for quick response!



Current Student
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2643
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)

Re: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Jul 2015, 06:41
Gmat1008 wrote: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams, with each of its L team leaders responsible for D group directors, and each of those D group directors responsible for F fundraisers. If the only three positions on each local team are team leaders, group directors, and fundraisers, and there are more group directors than team leaders, how many team leaders are on the Dallas team?
(1) There are 81 total members on the Dallas team
(2) There are 5 group directors on the Dallas team
Please provide kudos and help me unlock the GMATclub test 1. Refer to the posts above for a solution to your question. 2. Always search before you post a question.



Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 87
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V38 GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GPA: 3.5

Re: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Mar 2016, 13:03
Engr2012 wrote: Gmat1008 wrote: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams, with each of its L team leaders responsible for D group directors, and each of those D group directors responsible for F fundraisers. If the only three positions on each local team are team leaders, group directors, and fundraisers, and there are more group directors than team leaders, how many team leaders are on the Dallas team?
(1) There are 81 total members on the Dallas team
(2) There are 5 group directors on the Dallas team
Please provide kudos and help me unlock the GMATclub test 1. Refer to the posts above for a solution to your question. 2. Always search before you post a question. Hey is there anyway you can provide a clear solution to this? I am having a hard time interpreting the stimulus Thanks



Current Student
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2643
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)

Re: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Mar 2016, 08:21
GMATDemiGod wrote: Engr2012 wrote: Gmat1008 wrote: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams, with each of its L team leaders responsible for D group directors, and each of those D group directors responsible for F fundraisers. If the only three positions on each local team are team leaders, group directors, and fundraisers, and there are more group directors than team leaders, how many team leaders are on the Dallas team?
(1) There are 81 total members on the Dallas team
(2) There are 5 group directors on the Dallas team
Please provide kudos and help me unlock the GMATclub test 1. Refer to the posts above for a solution to your question. 2. Always search before you post a question. Hey is there anyway you can provide a clear solution to this? I am having a hard time interpreting the stimulus Thanks Sure. Look below. The question tells us that there are L leads, each with D directors and each D has F fundraisers. The question is asking you L=? Now assume some smaller values to make sense of the given information. Lets say there is 1 lead, 2 directors for this 1 lead and in turn each of the 2 directors has 3 fundraisers. Thus the total number of people = 1+2+6 = 9 > Also equal to L+LD+DF (you can try with different combinations). Per statement 1, L + L*D + L*D*F = 81 > L(1+D+DF) = 81 > 81/L MUST be an integer > L = multiple of 3 or 1 As mentioned above, the possible combinations are L = 1, D = 2, and F = 39; or L = 3, D = 13, and F = 1 or L = 1, D = 5, and F = 15 are the only possible cases. Thus you get 2 different values of L. NOT sufficient. Per statement 2, D=5 , this clearly eliminates 2 of the 3 cases we looked at in S1. Thus, this statement is sufficient. B is thus the correct answer. Hope this helps.



Intern
Joined: 10 Sep 2017
Posts: 5

Re: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Sep 2017, 17:09
Where does it say that all teams/organizational units are the same size? Must all "D group directors" have the same number of "F fundraisers"? Or why can't one L team leader have 2 D group directors and another L team leader has 3 D group directors ?
Also how can one team have more than one leader ("how many team leaders are on the Dallas team")?
Is this a culture thing?
Or perhaps I am just getting started with my studies so I'm not familiar with the implied constraints for DS questions. To me, it doesn't look like the question is restricting all L team leaders to have the same number of D group directors.
A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams, with each of its L team leaders responsible for D group directors, and each of those D group directors responsible for F fundraisers. If the only three positions on each local team are team leaders, group directors, and fundraisers, and there are more group directors than team leaders, how many team leaders are on the Dallas team?



Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 484

Re: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Sep 2017, 21:55
Hi One question,
can L Team leaders each can be responsible to same D directors? I am trying to understand this question. If L Team Leaders each will be responsible for different D directors, then statement 2 is sufficient.
Please clarify.



Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 484

Re: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Dec 2017, 11:54
Hi VeritasPrepKarishmaStatement 2 : sufficient as L * D = 5 and D > L => L = 1, D = 5 Statement 1: I have one question given L + L*D + L*D*F = 81 if L =1, D ( 1+F) = 80, we can various D and F, but L = 1 if L =3, D ( 1+F) = 26 => case 1: D = 2 AND F = 12 (this case is not possible, as D > L) => case 2: D = 13 AND F = 1 ( this case is possible, but in the question prompt, we are given F fundraisers (plural), so F cannot be 1, as in one of DS questions, i got tricked into this plurality concept). If we consider F as plural, then F cannot be 1, L cannot be 3 => only L = 1 is possible => proving to be sufficient. So should we take this plurality concept into account? Please clarify thanks



Intern
Joined: 15 Dec 2017
Posts: 15

Re: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 May 2018, 00:02
Kardo wrote: Where does it say that all teams/organizational units are the same size? Must all "D group directors" have the same number of "F fundraisers"? Or why can't one L team leader have 2 D group directors and another L team leader has 3 D group directors ?
Also how can one team have more than one leader ("how many team leaders are on the Dallas team")?
Is this a culture thing?
Or perhaps I am just getting started with my studies so I'm not familiar with the implied constraints for DS questions. To me, it doesn't look like the question is restricting all L team leaders to have the same number of D group directors.
A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams, with each of its L team leaders responsible for D group directors, and each of those D group directors responsible for F fundraisers. If the only three positions on each local team are team leaders, group directors, and fundraisers, and there are more group directors than team leaders, how many team leaders are on the Dallas team? This was my problem with the question as well. I understand mathematically how Statement 2 is sufficient, but I couldn't be sure this was the answer because there was no indication that every team was evenly divided. I think this question is missing that piece of information and everyone is just assuming.



Intern
Joined: 06 Mar 2017
Posts: 46
Location: India
GPA: 3.9

Re: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 May 2018, 06:59
madhavsrinivas wrote: Paris75 wrote: I got it wrong since I used the 81 to prove there was only one team leader but:
With statement B alone we can mange to find it:
Since there is L<D, L should be 1 2 3 or 4.
But if L is 2 than the number of D should be divided in 2, meaning ... That we have 2.5 directors. Impossible.
Same logic with 3 and 4...
The only possible answer is 1. Choice C only helps to confirm this answer!
Am I right here? I think you almost got it right with your analysis, but you just missed it. I am sorry. C is incorrect. Please find the answer below: Each of L team leaders has D group directors, making the total number of group directors equal to (L)(D). And each of those group directors has F fundraisers, again requiring multiplication: that total is (L)(D)(F). (You can try this by plugging in small numbers  if each of 2 leaders has 3 directors, you know there would be 6 directors) So while statement 1 is not sufficient (there are multiple combinations that could get you to 81, such as L = 1, D = 2, and F = 39; or L = 1, D = 5, and F = 15), statement 2 guarantees that there is only one team leader. This is because 5 is a prime number, and you know that the number of group directors = LD. The only possible way for LD to equal 5 is if L is 1 and D is 5, or if D is 1 and L is 5. And since the stimulus tells you that there are more directors than leaders, the combination must be 5 directors and 1 leader. Accordingly, statement 2 is sufficient. +1 Kudos if you like and understand. BunuelPls explain how the colored part is leading to 81?



Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3692

Re: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 May 2018, 07:42
siddreal wrote: Pls explain how the colored part is leading to 81? Hey siddreal , Team Leaders, L = 1 If D = 2, that means total number of Group directors = L * D = 1*2 = 2 (Each Leader with D directors means if we have 5 leaders, we will have 5D directors) Now, if F = 39, the total number of fund raisers = L * D * F = 1* 2 * 39 = 78 (Each Director has F fund raisers. We already know We have LD directors, so fund raisers = LD*F) Total members in the team = Number of (Leaders + Directors + Fundraisers) = 1 + 2 + 78 = 81. Does that make sense?
_________________
My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40 My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub  Importance of an Error Log! Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place  All CR Resources at one place Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog
GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality  View More. New Visa Forum  Ask all your Visa Related Questions  here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club! Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free




Re: A nonprofit group organizes its local fundraisers in teams, &nbs
[#permalink]
30 May 2018, 07:42






