Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 15:44 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 15:44
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
noboru
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Last visit: 15 Jan 2020
Posts: 539
Own Kudos:
9,465
 [54]
Given Kudos: 2
Schools:CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Posts: 539
Kudos: 9,465
 [54]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
48
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
77,001
 [8]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,001
 [8]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
PTK
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Last visit: 06 Oct 2022
Posts: 1,138
Own Kudos:
2,206
 [5]
Given Kudos: 622
Status:mission completed!
GPA: 3.77
Products:
Posts: 1,138
Kudos: 2,206
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
cano
User avatar
BSchool Moderator
Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Last visit: 14 Dec 2015
Posts: 270
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
Posts: 270
Kudos: 559
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. The stem talks about changes is social systems that are influenced by technologies. The social systems that are shielded from tech advancements will not change... they still may change for other reasons.
B. Wrong. According to the stem, only the ones that erase a labor role.
C. Right. If values don't change, it means that technology did not eliminate economic roles, since according to the stem the values tend to change.
D. Makes sense, but still, what level of technological advance we need to make obsolete most economic roles?
E. It could be right, but it's too much of a stretch to conclude this from the stem given.
avatar
vbarrozo
Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Last visit: 31 Jul 2010
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
11
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 9
Kudos: 11
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I went for C.

(C) A social system whose values are not susceptible to change would not be one in which technology can eliminate economic roles. - The double negation can confuse things, but, IMO, that is exactly what question stem states. I think we can rewrite it like this, without the double negation: A social system whose values are susceptible to change would be one in which technology can eliminate economic roles.

(D) A technologically advanced society will place little value on the prestige associated with an economic role. - The stem clearly says that "the introduction of labor-saving technology that makes certain economic roles obsolete". Seems to me that only some roles will lost prestige. Therefore, it is still possible to have some prestigious roles even in a technologically advanced society.
User avatar
lnarayanan
Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Last visit: 21 Aug 2024
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
130
 [2]
Location: chennai
Concentration: general
Posts: 35
Kudos: 130
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
All social systems are based upon a division of economic roles. The values of a social system are embodied in the prestige accorded persons who fill various economic roles. It is therefore unsurprising that, for any social system, the introduction of labor-saving technology that makes certain economic roles obsolete will tend to undermine the values in that social system.

value 1( 100 points )
Value 2( 100 points ) ------- all Social System ( 100 )
Value 3( 100 points )
Value 4( 100 points )
ex:-
value 1( 100 points )
Value 2( 100 points ) ------- all Social System ( 70 )
Value 3( 100 points )
Value 4( 20 points ) ( introducing labor saving tech --- reduce the labor work )

Which one of the following can most reasonably be concluded on the basis of the information above?

(A) Social systems will have unchanging values if they are shielded from technological advancement.
Since,introducing technology is one of the factors & There may be many other factor that affect the labor, we cant say this is true
(B) No type of technology will fail to undermine the values in a social system.
technology do have effect on Social system. It is wrong answer
(C) A social system whose values are not susceptible to change would not be one in which technology can eliminate economic roles.
It is mentioned that " technology may affect the social system". If social system can't be affect by any thing definitely technology can't have any control over Social system.It is correct answer
(D) A technologically advanced society will place little value on the prestige associated with an economic role.
Junk answer
(E) A technological innovation that is implemented in a social system foreign to the one in which it was developed will tend to undermine the foreign social system.Junk Answer
User avatar
TehJay
Joined: 06 Aug 2010
Last visit: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 123
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Boston
Posts: 123
Kudos: 810
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I narrowed this down to C and D before going with C. I think the key thing to remember is that the passage states that "labor-saving technology that makes certain economic roles obsolete" will tend to undermine values - not ALL technology, just that particular subset of technology.

skg
All social systems are based upon a division of economic roles. The values of a social system are embodied in the prestige accorded persons who fill various economic roles. It is therefore unsurprising that, for any social system, the introduction of labor-saving technology that makes certain economic roles obsolete will tend to undermine the values in that social system.
Which one of the following can most reasonably be concluded on the basis of the information above?

(A) Social systems will have unchanging values if they are shielded from technological advancement. Not necessarily true - the passage doesn't state that ONLY technology will change values.

(B) No type of technology will fail to undermine the values in a social system. False - the passage states that labor-saving technology will change values, not ALL technology. So there certainly can be types of technology that don't make economic roles obsolete, thereby undermining the values.

(C) A social system whose values are not susceptible to change would not be one in which technology can eliminate economic roles. Let's reword this to make it a bit more clear: "A social system whose values are not susceptible to change would be one in which technology cannot eliminate economic roles." So, in other words, if a social system's values cannot be changed, then it can't possibly be subject to those kinds of technology that would undermine it's values and thus cause change. This logically follows from the passage.

To put it into logic form, the article states A -> B, where A is "If labor-saving technology that makes certain economic roles obsolete is introduced", and B is "then it will undermine the values of the social system." C then states ~B -> ~A: "If the values of a social system cannot be undermined, then technology that makes certain economic roles obsolete cannot be introduced." This is the logical contrapositive, which is equivalent to the original statement.


(D) A technologically advanced society will place little value on the prestige associated with an economic role. Thought about this one for a while, but once again we're only given the fact that labor-saving technology will undermine the values of economic roles - not ALL technology. A society which has a lot of technology doesn't NECESSARILY have labor-saving technology, so this can't definitively be concluded.

(E) A technological innovation that is implemented in a social system foreign to the one in which it was developed will tend to undermine the foreign social system. Definitely doesn't follow.
User avatar
goforgmat
Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Last visit: 02 Nov 2019
Posts: 246
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 232
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 2.8
Products:
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
Posts: 246
Kudos: 107
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vikasp99
All social systems are based upon a division of economic roles. The values of a social system are embodied in the prestige accorded persons who fill various economic roles. It is therefore unsurprising that, for any social system, the introduction of labor-saving technology that makes certain economic roles obsolete will tend to undermine the values in that social system.

Which one of the following can most reasonably be concluded on the basis of the information above?

(A) Social systems will have unchanging values if they are shielded from technological advancement.

(B) No type of technology will fail to undermine the values in a social system.

(C) A social system whose values are not susceptible to change would not be one in which technology can eliminate economic roles.

(D) A technologically advanced society will place little value on the prestige associated with an economic role.

(E) A technological innovation that is implemented in a social system foreign to the one in which it was developed will tend to undermine the foreign social system.


(A) Social systems will have unchanging values if they are shielded from technological advancement. It cant be inferred.

(B) No type of technology will fail to undermine the values in a social system. We are only concerned with labor saving technology not any kind of technology

(C) A social system whose values are not susceptible to change would not be one in which technology can eliminate economic roles. this is the negated statement of the conclusion.Hence Correct

(D) A technologically advanced society will place little value on the prestige associated with an economic role.We know it places little value in the social system nothing is said about prestige of the role

(E) A technological innovation that is implemented in a social system foreign to the one in which it was developed will tend to undermine the foreign social system.
Out of scope .We dont know how it treats the foreign system
User avatar
ScottWalsh
Joined: 29 Nov 2015
Last visit: 11 Oct 2017
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Status:Aspiring GMAT Assassin
Location: United States (CO)
GPA: 3.3
WE:Law (Military & Defense)
Posts: 8
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tricky one. The prompt describes the place of economic roles in a social system and then says that technology that disturbs those economic roles will underine the social system.

Many of the answer choices mention key words but answer C is correct. If the social system does not change, then the presence of economic role-disrupting technology is not present. If it were present, we know from the prompt that the social system would be undermined.
User avatar
ArtVandaley
Joined: 10 Sep 2013
Last visit: 05 Feb 2022
Posts: 286
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 120
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Posts: 286
Kudos: 423
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I completely understand that C is the correct answer. My concern lies in the leap of faith I had in the logical derivations.

If X, then Y. Then we can also say, if not Y, then not X.


Similarly technology will undermine social values.
So
"Not undermining social values" -> no technology.

A precisely states this.


A) Social systems will have unchanging values if they are shielded from technological advancement.


Can you plug the holes in my reasoning and help me understand the error??

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
rishabh1105
Joined: 25 Mar 2025
Last visit: 20 Jun 2025
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 21
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ArtVandaley
I completely understand that C is the correct answer. My concern lies in the leap of faith I had in the logical derivations.

If X, then Y. Then we can also say, if not Y, then not X.


Similarly technology will undermine social values.
So
"Not undermining social values" -> no technology.

A precisely states this.


A) Social systems will have unchanging values if they are shielded from technological advancement.


Can you plug the holes in my reasoning and help me understand the error??

Posted from my mobile device
"Technological advancements" is not equal to labor saving technologies. Also there might be other factors which could effect social system values, not just technological advancements.
User avatar
rishabh1105
Joined: 25 Mar 2025
Last visit: 20 Jun 2025
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 21
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
All social systems are based upon a division of economic roles. The values of a social system are embodied in the prestige accorded persons who fill various economic roles. It is therefore unsurprising that, for any social system, the introduction of labor-saving technology that makes certain economic roles obsolete will tend to undermine the values in that social system.

Which one of the following can most reasonably be concluded on the basis of the information above?


(A) Social systems will have unchanging values if they are shielded from technological advancement.
We know that introduction of labor saving technologies undermines the social system values but there might other factors too that might change the values. So, saying social system values will not change just by protecting it from tech advancements would be wrong. (Passage nowhere mentions that it is the only way)

(B) No type of technology will fail to undermine the values in a social system.
Saying that all types of technology will undermine the values in a social system. Not sure. We only know about labor saving technologies

(C) A social system whose values are not susceptible to change would not be one in which technology can eliminate economic roles.
Interesting. It says a social system whose values are not susceptible to change would not be one where technology can eliminate roles. Because where technology can eliminate roles we are sure to see changes in social system values.

(D) A technologically advanced society will place little value on the prestige associated with an economic role.
We dont know how will tech advanced society react. We only know social system are based on division of economic roles

(E) A technological innovation that is implemented in a social system foreign to the one in which it was developed will tend to undermine the foreign social system.
We are not sure if this is actually a factor (the effects of where it was developed and the effect on others) So cannot be concluded.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts