All social systems are based upon a division of economic roles. The values of a social system are embodied in the prestige accorded persons who fill various economic roles. It is therefore unsurprising that, for any social system, the introduction of labor-saving technology that makes certain economic roles obsolete will tend to undermine the values in that social system.
Which one of the following can most reasonably be concluded on the basis of the information above?
(A) Social systems will have unchanging values if they are shielded from technological advancement.
We know that introduction of labor saving technologies undermines the social system values but there might other factors too that might change the values. So, saying social system values will not change just by protecting it from tech advancements would be wrong. (Passage nowhere mentions that it is the only way)
(B) No type of technology will fail to undermine the values in a social system.
Saying that all types of technology will undermine the values in a social system. Not sure. We only know about labor saving technologies
(C) A social system whose values are not susceptible to change would not be one in which technology can eliminate economic roles.
Interesting. It says a social system whose values are not susceptible to change would not be one where technology can eliminate roles. Because where technology can eliminate roles we are sure to see changes in social system values.
(D) A technologically advanced society will place little value on the prestige associated with an economic role.
We dont know how will tech advanced society react. We only know social system are based on division of economic roles
(E) A technological innovation that is implemented in a social system foreign to the one in which it was developed will tend to undermine the foreign social system.
We are not sure if this is actually a factor (the effects of where it was developed and the effect on others) So cannot be concluded.