Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 1811:00 AM PST
-12:00 PM PST
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
24 Jul 2023, 22:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take, on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone.
(A) on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power alone
(C) solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided
(D) if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided
(E) while the expansion of executive power should be avoided
The intended meaning: if the reason were only to avoid the expansion of executive power, accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take.
Thus regarding meaning, use "while" will distort the meaning -> E out
To state "reason for sth", we dont use "on the basis of", "solely in that" -> A,C out
(in that is more like "in some aspects")
B and D. B is better.
on the grounds of is unidiomatic. (Also I think "expansion" is better than "expanded" since we are talking about the future, the executive power might already be expanded but we want to avoid the expansion in the future.)
B = if (it were) only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided
Answer: B
(A) on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power alone
(C) solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided
(D) if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided
(E) while the expansion of executive power should be avoided
The intended meaning: if the reason were only to avoid the expansion of executive power, accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take.
Thus regarding meaning, use "while" will distort the meaning -> E out
To state "reason for sth", we dont use "on the basis of", "solely in that" -> A,C out
(in that is more like "in some aspects")
B and D. B is better.
on the grounds of is unidiomatic. (Also I think "expansion" is better than "expanded" since we are talking about the future, the executive power might already be expanded but we want to avoid the expansion in the future.)
B = if (it were) only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided
Answer: B
24 Jul 2023, 22:39
Kudos
Bookmarks
C) solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided
it is given that court took poor decision and its only reason should be something. That meaning is clearly implied by c
it is given that court took poor decision and its only reason should be something. That meaning is clearly implied by c
24 Jul 2023, 22:56
Kudos
Bookmarks
Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take, on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone.
Meaning analysis: Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take. now after this part in the sentence I am expecting that sentence should provide me the why of above thats when though that sentence wants to convey will be complete. the reason that sentence gives for the poor decision is that we should avoid the expansion of execute power.
(A) on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone => on the basis of avoidance of this conveys wrong meaning and construction is also wrong here
(B) on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power alone => here also the meaning conveyed is wrong it says the decision is poor because on the ground of avoiding the expanded the executive power. here power is already expanded so the wrong ans
(C) solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided => here use of in that after soley is wrong in that is used to show something is part of something internally so this is wrong.
(D) if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided => here it correctly conveys the reason why decision is poor and use of if.. because in the sentence properly conveys cause-effect relation. so this is the ans
(E) while the expansion of executive power should be avoided => while conveys wrong context of flow and meaning here so not the ans
so the ans is option D
Meaning analysis: Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take. now after this part in the sentence I am expecting that sentence should provide me the why of above thats when though that sentence wants to convey will be complete. the reason that sentence gives for the poor decision is that we should avoid the expansion of execute power.
(A) on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone => on the basis of avoidance of this conveys wrong meaning and construction is also wrong here
(B) on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power alone => here also the meaning conveyed is wrong it says the decision is poor because on the ground of avoiding the expanded the executive power. here power is already expanded so the wrong ans
(C) solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided => here use of in that after soley is wrong in that is used to show something is part of something internally so this is wrong.
(D) if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided => here it correctly conveys the reason why decision is poor and use of if.. because in the sentence properly conveys cause-effect relation. so this is the ans
(E) while the expansion of executive power should be avoided => while conveys wrong context of flow and meaning here so not the ans
so the ans is option D
