Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 21:14 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 21:14
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Oppenheimer1945
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 784
Own Kudos:
639
 [1]
Given Kudos: 223
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V76 DI80
GPA: 7.81
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
kamalsharmam21
Joined: 22 Mar 2023
Last visit: 09 Jan 2024
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Location: India
Schools: IIMA '25
Schools: IIMA '25
Posts: 59
Kudos: 33
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
poojaarora1818
Joined: 30 Jul 2019
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,543
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3,422
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Economics
GPA: 3
WE:Human Resources (Human Resources)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take, on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power aloneIncorrect
(B) on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power aloneIncorrect
(C) solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoidedIncorrect
(D) if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoidedIncorrect
(E) while the expansion of executive power should be avoidedCorrect
User avatar
$!vakumar.m
Joined: 06 Dec 2021
Last visit: 25 Aug 2025
Posts: 493
Own Kudos:
626
 [1]
Given Kudos: 737
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, International Business
GPA: 4
WE:Human Resources (Telecommunications)
Posts: 493
Kudos: 626
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take, on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone
Incorrect - usage of comma prior to the phrase 'on the basis of avoidance' is incorrect. Also, we see subjunctive mood "would" in the non underlined portion, and therefore we need a condition. But, there is no conditional meaning in this option.
(B) on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power alone
incorrect - for similar reasons as explained for A
(C) solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided
Incorrect - for similar reasons as explained for A. solely in that implies 'solely in the sense that'
(D) if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided
Correct - conditional present in the underlined portion. if only because - is an idiom.
(E) while the expansion of executive power should be avoided
incorrect - 'while' is usually used when two things happen simultaneously whereas we need a condition.
Answer D
User avatar
Lamiya21
Joined: 22 Jan 2022
Last visit: 18 Nov 2023
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
24
 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 28
Kudos: 24
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D is the right answer.

It's best to use 'if' in this sentence, since would is present.
User avatar
Flower_Child
Joined: 28 Dec 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2025
Posts: 105
Own Kudos:
158
 [1]
Given Kudos: 523
Posts: 105
Kudos: 158
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take, on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone.

The sentence adds the verb between the noun subject and its modifier.

For simplicity of understanding we can rewrite the sentence as :
Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take.

would is mainly used for two purpose : 1. hypothetical situation , 2. referring future in the past .
Since the sentence is not in past , this should be a hypothetical sentence .

(A) on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone
Incorrect. Since the sentence is about a prediction about future, use of simple past tense is incorrect.

(B) on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power alone
Incorrect. Since the sentence is about a prediction about future, use of simple past tense is incorrect.

(C) solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided
Incorrect. 'solely' acts as a modifier which can modify ' Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment solely' and later suggesting that 'the expansion of executive power should be avoided' is included withing the action 'Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment' which does not makes sense.

(D) if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided
Correct. This choice correctly specifies why Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take.

(E) while the expansion of executive power should be avoided
Incorrect. The use of 'while' suggests that the two events - 'Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment' and 'avoiding of expansion of executive power' are happening simultaneously. So this choice is incorrect.
User avatar
SS.56
Joined: 18 Jul 2022
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,059
Location: Nepal
Schools: IIMA PGPX'23
GMAT 1: 570 Q45 V24
GMAT 2: 620 Q46 V30
Schools: IIMA PGPX'23
GMAT 2: 620 Q46 V30
Posts: 45
Kudos: 50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take, on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power alone
(C) solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided
(D) if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided
(E) while the expansion of executive power should be avoided


 


This question was provided by Experts Global
for the Around the World in 80 Questions

Win over $20,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 

(A) on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone - avoidance of is correct usage here.
(B) on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power alone - Meaning change
(C) solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided -Meaning change
(D) if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided - Meaning change
(E) while the expansion of executive power should be avoided - Meaning change, while is wrong here

A
User avatar
NoobGmatTaker
Joined: 09 Jul 2023
Last visit: 25 Oct 2025
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Posts: 28
Kudos: 53
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option (A) "on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone" is grammatically correct, but it is less clear and wordier compared to option (B).

Option (B) "on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power alone" is concise and clear. It uses the idiomatic expression "on the grounds of" to indicate the reason for considering the proposed constitutional amendment a poor decision.

Option (C) "solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided" is wordy and awkward. It unnecessarily adds "solely in that" to express the idea, making the sentence less effective.

Option (D) "if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided" is wordy and less direct. It adds "if only because" to express the reason, making the sentence less concise.

Option (E) "while the expansion of executive power should be avoided" changes the meaning of the sentence. It suggests that the expansion of executive power should be avoided, but it doesn't directly connect it to the poor decision of accepting the constitutional amendment. This option is not the most effective in conveying the intended meaning.

So the correct answer is B
User avatar
Rahulbasu007
Joined: 23 Mar 2021
Last visit: 09 Aug 2025
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
62
 [1]
Given Kudos: 748
Status:Trying to push it higher!
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GPA: 3.5
WE:Analyst (Computer Software)
Posts: 57
Kudos: 62
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let's evaluate each option:

(A) "on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone"
Idiomatically, "on the grounds of" is the more common phrase to express a reason or justification, and "avoiding" is simpler and clearer than "avoidance of".
I think this is not the most concise option.
(can be eliminated, but let's keep)

(B) "on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power alone"
The phrase "on the grounds of" is more idiomatic. I think there are no other issues.
(keep this)

(C) "solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided"
The phrase "solely in that" is not idiomatic or coherent in this context. Also this option sounds ungrammatical.
Also, I think, the comma after "in that" is not necessary and disrupts the flow of the sentence. It is creating a break. "In that" is a conjunction that is used to connect two clauses, so there should not be a comma separating the two clauses it is connecting.
(eliminate)


(D) "if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided"
This seems to be grammatically correct and maintains clarity in delivering the reason for the decision being poor.
The phrase "if only because" sets up a conditional clause that provides a reason or justification for the main clause.
(keep this)


(E) "while the expansion of executive power should be avoided"
The conjunction "while" is not used correctly here. It implies a contrast or simultaneous event.
The intended meaning is getting changed.
(eliminate)

On re evaluating, we can eliminate option A as well.

Now, between B and D,
both are grammatically correct.
However in option B, the word "alone" at the end may cause some ambiguity as it could refer either to the Supreme Court's sole reason or to the sole action of avoiding expanded power.

So I will go with D.
User avatar
Genius001
Joined: 08 May 2023
Last visit: 15 Oct 2025
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
Location: Uzbekistan
Posts: 26
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take, on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power alone
(C) solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided
(D) if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided
(E) while the expansion of executive power should be avoided

Let us do it,
Answer C ,D and E , solely in that, while the ,... , they change the meaning of original sentence, Cross out
Answer A and B are correct but if we compare both, A is so wordy, Cross out

Answer:B
User avatar
PK1
Joined: 11 Aug 2018
Last visit: 14 Jun 2025
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 47
Products:
Posts: 96
Kudos: 143
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take, on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone.

Here option choices have expanded executive power vs expansion of execute power

(A) on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone
power is noun and executive is adjective defining kind of power . Expanded here seems to be adjective modifies power but does not fit meaning wise. Nor does it fit as adverb modifying executive . For this reason it is out. Also expanded seems verb+ed as a participle

(B) on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power alone
power is noun and executive is adjective defining kind of power . Expanded here seems to be adjective modifies power but does not fit meaning wise. Nor does it fit as adverb modifying executive . For this reason it is out. Also expanded seems verb+ed as a participle

(C) solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided
Using solely in that it tries to build relationship and not a causal relationship . Hence it seems it is trying to explain that accepting would be poor decision just because expansion of executive power should be avoided

(D) if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided
It sets up cause-effect relationship which is not required here . it wants to say if only because expansion should be avoided, accepting amendment would be a poor decision.

(E) while the expansion of executive power should be avoided
It sets up contrast which is not required here. While expansion should be avoided, accepting proposed amendment would be poor decision for Supreme Court. Not sure what it means to say. contrast works well when while expansion should be avoided, accepting proposed amendment is a good decision not the way it has been framed

C is the answer
User avatar
AviNFC
Joined: 31 May 2023
Last visit: 13 Nov 2025
Posts: 216
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 216
Kudos: 288
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone modifies 'take' , doesn't explain why it is a poor decision
(B) on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power alone modifies 'take' , doesn't explain why it is a poor decision
(C) solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided Correct. explains the reason
(D) if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided Conditional not required
(E) while the expansion of executive power should be avoided No contradiction

IMO Option C
User avatar
cookietar91
Joined: 11 Jul 2023
Last visit: 09 Nov 2023
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
29
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 27
Kudos: 29
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take, on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone.

(A) Incorrect - this structure is very convoluted and doesn't connect well to the previous sentence
(B) Incorrect - this structure is very convoluted and doesn't connect well to the previous sentence
(C) Incorrect - "solely in that," does not provide a suitable structure and interpunction
(D) Correct - creates the most fitting connection to the previous sentence
(E) Incorrect - "while" does not fit the flow of the phrase
User avatar
TargetKellogg2024
User avatar
MBA Section Director
Joined: 25 Apr 2018
Last visit: 13 Nov 2025
Posts: 442
Own Kudos:
732
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: Germany
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V36
GMAT 2: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V37
GRE 1: Q170 V163
Products:
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V37
GRE 1: Q170 V163
Posts: 442
Kudos: 732
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take, on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone.

Here, the sentence structure is V+ing modifier...., X...
This is an inverted sentence for if X, then Y
X = only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided
Y = Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take

Only answer choice D uses if. Also, the presence of "would" in non-underlined portion, coupled with the a reasoning structure, suggests that "if" needs to be present.
Therefore, D is correct.
User avatar
szcz
Joined: 18 Nov 2022
Last visit: 01 Jan 2024
Posts: 131
Own Kudos:
173
 [1]
Given Kudos: 168
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V41
GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V41
Posts: 131
Kudos: 173
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take, on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone
I think should be "basis for". Eliminate option.

(B) on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power alone
should be "on the grounds for". Incorrect option.

(C) solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided
"in that" translates to "in as much as". I dont see the use of these words in this context. Eliminate option.

(D) if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided
Correct option.

(E) while the expansion of executive power should be avoided
The 2nd part of the sentence is a reason for the first. "while" does not help show that. Incorrect option.

Answer option D.
User avatar
Vickiecube
Joined: 11 Aug 2014
Last visit: 08 Oct 2024
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Location: United States (CA)
Posts: 13
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I chose B.


(A) on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone.
avoidance - wordy, awkward.
(B) on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power alone
best answer
(C) solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided
2 sentences are separated by "," unclear use of " solely in that".
(D) if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided
The intent is to explain the reason why accepting amendment is a poor decision. " if only" does not present cause&effect.
(E) while the expansion of executive power should be avoided
"while" represents contrast, not cause&effect
User avatar
NaiX2
Joined: 09 Jun 2023
Last visit: 30 Oct 2023
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 60
Location: Kenya
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
Posts: 24
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. Correct
B. Meaning is unclear
C. Grammar error
D. Illogical error
E. While doesn't show justification

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
LeopardLiu
Joined: 23 Aug 2021
Last visit: 05 Dec 2023
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 74
Posts: 94
Kudos: 145
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer is B
Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take, on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone
of avoidance of expanded is awkward
(B) on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power alone
Clearly conveys the intended meaning, and logically sounds
(C) solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided
the construct of the sentence is wrong. in that, comma is wrong
(D) if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided
distorted the intended meaning, saying that only because of this, the proposal is poor. But this is just one reason
(E) while the expansion of executive power should be avoided
while doesn't fit the logic here.
User avatar
l88
Joined: 04 Mar 2021
Last visit: 26 Jun 2024
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 104
Posts: 26
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Accepting the proposed constitutional amendment would be a poor decision for the Supreme Court to take, on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of expanded executive power alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding expanded executive power alone
(C) solely in that, the expansion of executive power should be avoided
(D) if only because the expansion of executive power should be avoided
(E) while the expansion of executive power should be avoided


 


This question was provided by Experts Global
for the Around the World in 80 Questions

Win over $20,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 

The intended meaning of the sentence is that the amendment would be a poor decision only because the expansion of power should be avoided. We can drop ABE. Between C and D, D is a clear.
D is the answer.
   1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts