Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 19:23 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 19:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
655-705 (Hard)|   Word Problems|                                 
User avatar
mcelroytutoring
Joined: 10 Jul 2015
Last visit: 19 Mar 2026
Posts: 1,206
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 282
Status:Expert GMAT, GRE, and LSAT Tutor / Coach
Affiliations: Harvard University, A.B. with honors in Government, 2002
Location: United States (CO)
Age: 45 (10 years and counting on GMAT Club!)
GMAT 1: 770 Q47 V48
GMAT 2: 730 Q44 V47
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
GMAT 4: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
GRE 1: Q168 V169
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 4: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
GRE 1: Q168 V169
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 1,206
Kudos: 2,675
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Saiganesh999
Joined: 02 Apr 2015
Last visit: 17 Aug 2020
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
16
 [1]
Given Kudos: 95
Location: Singapore
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V24
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GPA: 3.66
WE:Social Work (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
Posts: 25
Kudos: 16
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AaronPond
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 01 Jul 2017
Last visit: 28 Jan 2026
Posts: 89
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Location: United States
Concentration: Leadership, Organizational Behavior
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 89
Kudos: 1,821
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MHIKER
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Last visit: 24 May 2021
Posts: 939
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 690
Status:No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Concentration: Accounting
Posts: 939
Kudos: 5,818
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
macjas
At his regular hourly rate, Don had estimated the labour cost of a repair job as $336 and he was paid that amount. However, the job took 4 hours longer than he had estimated and, consequently, he earned $2 per hour less than his regular hourly rate. What was the time Don had estimated for the job, in hours?

(A) 28
(B) 24
(C) 16
(D) 14
(E) 12

Say the regular hourly rate was \(r\)$ and estimated time was \(t\) hours, then we would have:

\(rt=336\) and \((r-2)(t+4)=336\);

So, \((r-2)(t+4)=rt\) --> \(rt+4r-2t-8=rt\) --> \(t=2r-4\).

Now, plug answer choices for \(t\) and get \(r\). The pair which will give the product of 336 will be the correct answer.

Answer B fits: if \(t=24\) then \(r=14\) --> \(rt=14*24=336\).

Answer: B.

Hope it's clear.

My confusion is: Will not the estimated repair cost be changed?
I solved the question with the tougher way:
(336/T)- (336/T+4) = 2
It needs lots of calculations.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,054
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Baten80,

The first sentence of the prompt tell us that Don estimated the cost as $336 and was PAID that amount. The additional information tells us that Don had to work MORE hours and was thus paid LESS per HOUR overall - meaning that the cost did NOT change.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
mcelroytutoring
Joined: 10 Jul 2015
Last visit: 19 Mar 2026
Posts: 1,206
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 282
Status:Expert GMAT, GRE, and LSAT Tutor / Coach
Affiliations: Harvard University, A.B. with honors in Government, 2002
Location: United States (CO)
Age: 45 (10 years and counting on GMAT Club!)
GMAT 1: 770 Q47 V48
GMAT 2: 730 Q44 V47
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
GMAT 4: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
GRE 1: Q168 V169
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 4: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
GRE 1: Q168 V169
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 1,206
Kudos: 2,675
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The quadratic algebra can get a little complicated here, and the factor tree method I suggested 5 years ago is not always ideal, so I would also suggest straightforward backsolving (trying the answers and adjusting accordingly) as an alternative, easier way to solve this problem.

What is backsolving? Essentially, it involves trying your answers to see whether the rest of the numerical details in the question stem fall into place, then adjusting in the correct direction (higher or lower) when necessary. If you adjust in the correct direction, then you should never have to try more than 2 answers.

Let's start in the middle with Choice C and test. If Don had estimated 16 hours, then he would be making $336/16 = $21/hour. However, the question tells us that he actually worked 4 hours more than the estimate, at $2/less, which in this case would have been 20 hours x $19/hour = $380. That's too much (the actual total was $336), so he must have estimated more hours at a lower rate. Try a higher number for the estimate, then: 24 hours.

If he estimated 24 hours, then he would be making $336/24 = $14/hour. The question tells us that he actually worked 4 hours more than the estimate, at $2/less, which in this case would have been 28 hours x $12/hr = $336.

This is the correct total, so Choice B is correct.

-Brian
User avatar
avigutman
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 30 Sep 2025
Posts: 1,285
Own Kudos:
1,908
 [2]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,285
Kudos: 1,908
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Video solution from Quant Reasoning starts at 0:26:
Subscribe for more: https://www.youtube.com/QuantReasoning? ... irmation=1
User avatar
woohoo921
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2023
Posts: 493
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 623
Posts: 493
Kudos: 150
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avigutman
Video solution from Quant Reasoning starts at 0:26:
Subscribe for more: https://www.youtube.com/QuantReasoning? ... irmation=1

avigutman

This is so helpful, thank you!!!
Initially, I got stuck using this method because I said wait the prime factorization of 28 has an extra 2, so when 24 and 28 are combined, the prime factors of those two numbers added does not exactly equal the prime factors of 336... so that cannot be my answer. Why aren't we looking for an exact match here in prime factors?
Thank you again.
User avatar
avigutman
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 30 Sep 2025
Posts: 1,285
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,285
Kudos: 1,908
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
woohoo921

Initially, I got stuck using this method because I said wait the prime factorization of 28 has an extra 2, so when 24 and 28 are combined, the prime factors of those two numbers added does not exactly equal the prime factors of 336... so that cannot be my answer. Why aren't we looking for an exact match here in prime factors?

woohoo921 if I understood you correctly, you multiplied 24*28 (24 is 2^3 * 3^1, and 28 is 2^2 * 7^1, so their product is 2^5 * 3^1 * 7^1).
Is that what you did? If so, that was your mistake. 24 and 28 independently need to be factors of 336, but not simultaneously.
As an analogy, 6 is a factor of 12 and 4 is a factor of 12, but 6*4=24 is not a factor of 12.
Multiplying 24 by 28 in this problem isn't necessary. Rather, this problem plays on the equivalence of 24*14 and 28*12.
Does that help?
User avatar
woohoo921
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2023
Posts: 493
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 623
Posts: 493
Kudos: 150
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avigutman
woohoo921

Initially, I got stuck using this method because I said wait the prime factorization of 28 has an extra 2, so when 24 and 28 are combined, the prime factors of those two numbers added does not exactly equal the prime factors of 336... so that cannot be my answer. Why aren't we looking for an exact match here in prime factors?

woohoo921 if I understood you correctly, you multiplied 24*28 (24 is 2^3 * 3^1, and 28 is 2^2 * 7^1, so their product is 2^5 * 3^1 * 7^1).
Is that what you did? If so, that was your mistake. 24 and 28 independently need to be factors of 336, but not simultaneously.
As an analogy, 6 is a factor of 12 and 4 is a factor of 12, but 6*4=24 is not a factor of 12.
Multiplying 24 by 28 in this problem isn't necessary. Rather, this problem plays on the equivalence of 24*14 and 28*12.
Does that help?

To clarify, from my understanding your method was that the prime factorization of 336 is= (2^4)(3^1)(7^1). Then, you found the prime factorization of 24 which is (2^3)(3^1). You then said that you are missing (2^2)(2^7) and that the missing primes come from the prime box of 28. The prime box of 28 is then (2^2)(7). Correct? So basically it all evens out?
User avatar
avigutman
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 30 Sep 2025
Posts: 1,285
Own Kudos:
1,908
 [1]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,285
Kudos: 1,908
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
woohoo921
Then, you found the prime factorization of 24 which is (2^3)(3^1). You then said that you are missing (2^2)(2^7) and that the missing primes come from the prime box of 28. The prime box of 28 is then (2^2)(7). Correct? So basically it all evens out?

No, woohoo921, at 8:30 I say that once we've accounted for 24, we still need a (2^1)(7^1) to get to 336. That's 14, not 28.
Then, separately I find the prime box of 28 (2^2)(7^1) and discover that I'd need a (2^2)(3^1) to get to 336. That's 12.
In conclusion, answer choice B has us getting to 336 with 24*14 vs with 28*12, and these two products are a match for the description in the question stem (28 is 4 more than 24, and 12 is 2 less than 14).
User avatar
ThatDudeKnows
Joined: 11 May 2022
Last visit: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 1,070
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 79
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,070
Kudos: 1,030
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
macjas
At his regular hourly rate, Don had estimated the labor cost of a repair job as $336 and he was paid that amount. However, the job took 4 hours longer than he had estimated and, consequently, he earned $2 per hour less than his regular hourly rate. What was the time Don had estimated for the job, in hours?

(A) 28
(B) 24
(C) 16
(D) 14
(E) 12

We can Plug In The Answers (PITA). I like trying B and D.

B: If it had taken the time expected, he'd have made 336/24 = $14 per hour. It took 28 hours, so he made 336/28 = $12 per hour. Is that what we wanted? Yep!

Answer choice B.


ThatDudeKnowsPITA
User avatar
aksh123456123456
Joined: 08 Aug 2022
Last visit: 13 May 2023
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Posts: 14
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone please explain the question? How did he receive the same amount when the hours are increased?
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
13,054
 [1]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,054
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aksh123456123456
Can someone please explain the question? How did he receive the same amount when the hours are increased?

Hi aksh123456123456,

The first sentence of the prompt tell us that Don estimated the cost as $336 and was PAID that amount. However, the additional information tells us that Don had to work MORE hours than he originally estimated the job would take - but since he was paid the estimated cost ($336), he was thus paid LESS per HOUR overall.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich

Contact Rich at: [email protected]
User avatar
SignUp
Joined: 09 Jun 2022
Last visit: 11 Apr 2024
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 46
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is it just me or does this not feel like a 2min question ? Let’s assume you made it to the quadratic and then started substitution of answers , still takes a lot of time .

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,054
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SignUp
Is it just me or does this not feel like a 2min question ? Let’s assume you made it to the quadratic and then started substitution of answers , still takes a lot of time .

Posted from my mobile device

Hi SignUp,

Most GMAT questions are written so that they can be approached in more than one way - and in this prompt, working through a math-heavy approach using Quadratics would likely take you far more than 2 minutes (you can actually see from the 'stats' for this question that lots of people were not able to solve it in 2 minutes - or even close to it). There's actually a much faster way to answer this question that does not require a Quadratic at all - but you still have to do some basic multiplication and division to find the correct answer. As an aside, the 'goal' to answer every Quant question in 2 minutes or less is a terrible idea - and if you are performing at a high level, then you will absolutely see some Quant questions on the Official GMAT that might take you upwards of 3 minutes to solve.

GMAT Assassins aren’t born, they’re made,
Rich

Contact Rich at: [email protected]
User avatar
yalembagrad
Joined: 15 Dec 2022
Last visit: 24 May 2023
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 660 Q43 V38
GMAT 1: 660 Q43 V38
Posts: 39
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
$/hr = $336/hours worked.

Regular hours worked- 336/x

current hours worked - (regular hours worked + 4) -----336/x + 4

$x-2 = 336 / (336/x + 4)

FOIL:
336 + 4X- 672/X - 8 = 336

subtract 336 from both sides and multiply by x

4x^2- 672 - 8x = 0

divide through by 4

x^2 - 2x - 168 = 0

Look through the options for two numbers that add to that multiply to -168 and see if you can manipulate them to also add to -2.

Your two numbers are 14 and 12.

(x-14) (x+12) = 0.

x cant be negative so x =14.

Now the question is for the number of hours. remember that x is dollar per hour.

336/14 = 24 hours worked.
User avatar
aditya_gawhale
Joined: 01 Feb 2024
Last visit: 08 Mar 2026
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q75 V81 DI77
GMAT Focus 2: 665 Q87 V84 DI78
GPA: 7.26
GMAT Focus 2: 665 Q87 V84 DI78
Posts: 22
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
But e) T=12 also satisfies as per your approach. T= 12, T+4 = 16 , both are factors of 336, and R = 23
KarishmaB
macjas
At his regular hourly rate, Don had estimated the labour cost of a repair job as $336 and he was paid that amount. However, the job took 4 hours longer than he had estimated and, consequently, he earned $2 per hour less than his regular hourly rate. What was the time Don had estimated for the job, in hours?

(A) 28
(B) 24
(C) 16
(D) 14
(E) 12

You utilize the answer choices whenever you CAN. Here I would keep an eye on the choices right from the start. I would say
R*T = 336 (his regular hourly rate * time he estimated)
The options give us the value of T which is an integer.

\(336 = 2^4*3*7\)

So R*T = 336
(R-2)*(T + 4) = 336
So T as well as T+4 should be factors of 336.
If T is 28, T+4 is 32 which is not a factor of 336 so ignore it.
If T is 24, T+4 is 28. Both are factors of 336. Keep it. If T is 24, R is 14. So (R - 2) is 12. 12*28 does gives us 336 so T = 24 must be the correct answer.

But note that if you want to reduce your mechanical work, you need to be fast in your calculations. You cannot spend a minute working on every option or making calculation mistakes.
User avatar
DanTheGMATMan
Joined: 02 Oct 2015
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 380
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 380
Kudos: 267
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There is a better way folks:

User avatar
muditbansal
Joined: 06 Dec 2022
Last visit: 12 Mar 2026
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
Posts: 12
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel,

I just have one doubt why did we equate (r-2) * (t+4) = 336. If we are multiplying the new rate and longer time the result would be other than 336 right? It will be the additional amount that Don earned. Please let me know if I am thinking correctly
Bunuel
macjas
At his regular hourly rate, Don had estimated the labour cost of a repair job as $336 and he was paid that amount. However, the job took 4 hours longer than he had estimated and, consequently, he earned $2 per hour less than his regular hourly rate. What was the time Don had estimated for the job, in hours?

(A) 28
(B) 24
(C) 16
(D) 14
(E) 12

Say the regular hourly rate was \(r\)$ and estimated time was \(t\) hours, then we would have:

(i) \(rt=336\).

(ii) \((r-2)(t+4)=336\) (we are told that the job took 4 hours longer than he had estimated and, consequently, he earned $2 per hour less than his regular hourly rate, thus \((r-2)(t+4)=336\));

So, \((r-2)(t+4)=rt\);

\(rt+4r-2t-8=rt\);

\(t=2r-4\).

Now, plug answer choices for \(t\) and get \(r\). Finally, since we know that \(rt=336\), then the pair which will give the product of 336 will be the correct answer.

Answer B fits: if \(t=24\) then \(r=14\) and \(rt=14*24=336\).

Answer: B.

Hope it's clear.
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
Math Expert
109910 posts
Tuck School Moderator
852 posts