Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:13 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:13
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2   3   4   5   6   
555-605 Level|   Idioms/Diction/Redundancy|   Parallelism|   Verb Tense/Form|                        
User avatar
Pankaj0901
User avatar
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Last visit: 17 Dec 2022
Posts: 419
Own Kudos:
51
Given Kudos: 737
Location: India
WE:Account Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Posts: 419
Kudos: 51
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 05 Nov 2020, 03:23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks GMATNinja, your explanations are very helpful. However, the "Odds and Even Strategy" chapter of Manhattan states this:
Do not use comma before "AND" to separate two verbs that have the same subject. Either eliminate the comma or add a subject to the second verb, creating a second main clause. Examples:
1. Earl walked to school, and later ate his lunch. (WRONG- "comma" should not be placed before AND)
2. Earl walked to school and later ate his lunch. (RIGHT)
3. Earl walked to school, and he later ate his lunch. (RIGHT)

This theory surely does contradict your statement that a comma can be applied for a pause. The application of comma in example number 1 above makes the statement wrong, as per Manhattan.
Could you please help understand what I am missing here. Thanks in advance.


GMATNinja
pankaj94GMAT
why ", and that" has been used instead of "and that" in D an E.
The comma just helps organize this lengthy sentence, making it easier for the reader to understand (the GMAT is pretty lenient when it comes to this sort of comma usage -- here's another example).

If a sentence is missing a comma where one is NEEDED (i.e. joining two independent clauses with a conjunction), then the sentence is probably wrong. But if it's just an "extra" comma that helps improve the clarity and that doesn't cause any meaning issues, you should look for other decision points.

Much more on punctuation in this video.

I hope that helps!
Show more
avatar
PelumiOgunlana
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2020
Last visit: 07 Dec 2022
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
6
Given Kudos: 15
Location: United States (IL)
Schools: Imperial '22 (WD) WBS (A) Bayes (M) Cambridge '22 (D) Said '22 (D)
GMAT 1: 590 Q39 V31
GMAT 2: 660 Q44 V38
GMAT 3: 670 Q46 V37
GPA: 3.38
Schools: Imperial '22 (WD) WBS (A) Bayes (M) Cambridge '22 (D) Said '22 (D)
GMAT 3: 670 Q46 V37
Posts: 30
Kudos: 6
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 05 Nov 2020, 18:03
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Although I expected the second that for the question to be parallel doesn't the presence of ", and" mean that what follows must be an independent sentence? I don't understand how E is correct if that grammatical rule is correct.
User avatar
EducationAisle
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 05 Nov 2020, 21:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PelumiOgunlana
Although I expected the second that for the question to be parallel doesn't the presence of ", and" mean that what follows must be an independent sentence? I don't understand how E is correct if that grammatical rule is correct.
Show more
Would agree @PelumiOgunlana; one way to look at it is that since there is no independent sentence after and, the presence or absence of a comma (before and) would not really matter.

In other words, if there is an independent sentence after and, in that case the presence/absence of a comma does make a difference in meaning interpretation.

Jack said that Peter studies hard and Michael does not.
- The absence of a comma before and seems to suggest that the above sentence is equivalent to: Jack said that Peter studies hard and that Michael does not.

Jack said that Peter studies hard, and Michael does not.
- The presence of a comma before and seems to suggest that the above sentence is giving us two different pieces of information:
i) Jack said that Peter studies hard
ii) Michael does not.

Would also be interesting to see what others have to say about this.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [4]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [4]
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 12 Jan 2021, 13:51
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Thanks GMATNinja, your explanations are very helpful. However, the "Odds and Even Strategy" chapter of Manhattan states this:
Do not use comma before "AND" to separate two verbs that have the same subject. Either eliminate the comma or add a subject to the second verb, creating a second main clause. Examples:
1. Earl walked to school, and later ate his lunch. (WRONG- "comma" should not be placed before AND)
2. Earl walked to school and later ate his lunch. (RIGHT)
3. Earl walked to school, and he later ate his lunch. (RIGHT)

This theory surely does contradict your statement that a comma can be applied for a pause. The application of comma in example number 1 above makes the statement wrong, as per Manhattan.
Could you please help understand what I am missing here. Thanks in advance.
Show more
When it comes to comma usage, there are common conventions, but very few rules, so you want to be careful about being too rigid in your analysis. (And ideally, you wouldn't rely on faulty comma usage at all when looking for reasons to eliminate an answer. If you'd like a full hour on GMAT punctuation, you could suffer through this video.)

So the Manhattan guide is certainly correct about the convention. You wouldn't want to use a comma to separate two actions performed by the subject, unless you had a good reason. If a comma makes the meaning clearer, you'd want to use one. Clarity is always good!

Consider two examples:

    On Tuesdays Tim cooks for his children and then stays home with his bedridden kids the next day.

Here, Tim performs two actions, and because the sentence is fairly simple and doesn't introduce a new subject, there's no reason to use a comma here. Would it be a concrete error to use one? It would be suspect usage, and I'd be very surprised if you saw such a construction in a correct answer on the GMAT, but I'd hesitate to say it's a strict grammatical error.

But now consider a second, slightly more complicated example:

    Tom cooks for his children on Tuesdays and Wednesdays, and stays home with his bedridden kids on Thursdays.

This time, I'd argue that it's fair game to use a comma after "Wednesdays." While you don't need it, the comma helps the reader see that an idea is complete -- for example, we're not about to see something like "Tuesdays and Wednesdays and alternate Saturdays," but rather, a new action is about to be introduced. Of course, another writer might argue that the comma is superfluous. It's really a matter of taste.

The point is that none of this is ironclad. That's what makes language so complicated and SC so maddening.

So rather than internalizing a list of scenarios for when a comma is allowed, just be in the habit of asking yourself about clarity and meaning in general. If the comma confuses you, and another option eliminates a comma in a way that creates a logical sentence, this could certainly qualify as a valid decision point. But if the comma doesn't confuse you, and you find yourself agonizing about whether the comma is acceptable in a given construction, look for other issues.

In other words: when it comes to comma usage, there's simply too much gray to be able to rely strictly on a list of conventions.

i hope that helps!
User avatar
zoezhuyan
User avatar
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Last visit: 11 Nov 2024
Posts: 418
Own Kudos:
94
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 418
Kudos: 94
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 16 Apr 2021, 00:36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dear AndrewN
I picked up D because I thought the verb "expect" implies something will happen in the future, or just something will come in the future, in D "internet will become more widely available" can logically match the "increase" in the future. considering what the representatives said is in the past, so we need "expected" and "would", I thought D cannot eliminate because of "would".

I think there must be some reasoning bug, but I have no idea.

also, I don't have an efficient way to pick up between "expect the increase of piracy" and "expect piracy to increase". DmitryFarber points out "the", honestly speaking, "the" is tough for me, and some experts say GMAT won't test "the", so Andrew, I am curious how you pick up between these two, not considering the use of "the".

appreciate for your help.
User avatar
zoezhuyan
User avatar
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Last visit: 11 Nov 2024
Posts: 418
Own Kudos:
94
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 418
Kudos: 94
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 17 Apr 2021, 02:17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN
zoezhuyan
dear AndrewN
I picked up D because I thought the verb "expect" implies something will happen in the future, or just something will come in the future, in D "internet will become more widely available" can logically match the "increase" in the future. considering what the representatives said is in the past, so we need "expected" and "would", I thought D cannot eliminate because of "would".

I think there must be some reasoning bug, but I have no idea.

also, I don't have an efficient way to pick up between "expect the increase of piracy" and "expect piracy to increase". DmitryFarber points out "the", honestly speaking, "the" is tough for me, and some experts say GMAT won't test "the", so Andrew, I am curious how you pick up between these two, not considering the use of "the".

appreciate for your help.
Hello, zoezhuyan. You have to remember not to get too attached to the idea that something that could be true must be true. How about we look at (D) and (E) in the context of the sentence to tease out some talking points?

Quote:
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that there were about a million copies of Hollywood movies available online and expected piracy to increase with high-speed Internet connections that become more widely available.

(D) online, and that they expected the increase of piracy as high-speed Internet connections would become more widely available

(E) online, and that they expected piracy to increase as high-speed Internet connections became more widely available
When I look at the first split, (E) wins, hands down. (D) does not deliver on the setup of what was expected until the object of the preposition, leaving us, the poor readers, in suspense. To be sure, expected an increase in something could work in a different sentence, but expected the increase is more restrictive, as though we have already read about such an increase. Just because a million copies of [pirated] movies gets mentioned, we cannot label the activity an increase: we simply have no benchmark for comparison. So yes, the is a problem, even if I do not believe its presence should overshadow the larger issue of delaying key information. Notice how (E) tells us exactly what was expected, right where we would expect to see such information: they expected piracy. Okay, that is much easier to follow than (D). And what is expected to happen, concerning piracy? It is going to increase. Between the infinitive, expected to, and the noun phrase, expected + [noun] + of, we should definitely favor the former, which is to say the infinitive form.


- Andrew
Show more

dear AndrewN, can I say it's better to prefer expect + object + verb when I encounter expect + object + verb and expect + noun + of ?
or some other verbs except expect ?
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 17 Apr 2021, 11:23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
zoezhuyan
dear AndrewN, can I say it's better to prefer expect + object + verb when I encounter expect + object + verb and expect + noun + of ?
or some other verbs except expect ?
Show more
In general, a verb form in such a context is preferred over a prepositional form to express a similar idea. I would suggest you take note of any exceptions you may encounter along the course of your studies, but by and large, a verb clearly conveys the action that a subject took, while a prepositional phrase hides that same action within more words than are necessary to use.

- Andrew
avatar
ghost07gems
avatar
Joined: 04 Feb 2021
Last visit: 09 Jun 2022
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
1
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 10 May 2021, 12:23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun

I got the intuition that they expect ..... as the high-speed Internet connections will become more widely available
But my intuition is wrong since E don't have would so can you please tell where am I missing
Show more
This sentence tells us what the representatives expected (past) as something happened (also past). For example:

They expect piracy to increase as high-speed Internet connections become more widely available.
We should look at this as a process.

If we take the sentence above and shift it into the past, we get:
They expected piracy to increase as high-speed Internet connections became more widely available.[/quote]

Is this sentence correct?

They expect piracy to increase as high-speed Internet connections will become more widely available.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [1]
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 10 May 2021, 13:55
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ghost07gems

Is this sentence correct?

They expect piracy to increase as high-speed Internet connections will become more widely available.
Show more
Hello, ghost07gems. I saw your query in the chatroom as well, but I thought I would answer here, since my writing style lends itself to this format a little better. I saw that nightblade354 had advised against the use of will in the above sentence. That advice was correct. The reason is that an expectation is understood to project into the future, without employing the future tense:

1) I expect it to rain today.

2) He expects her to marry him.

Moreover, notice that in the original sentence, the one about piracy, as is serving to denote a concurrent action, and the first action is increase, not will increase—piracy is expected to increase as high-speed connections become more commonplace. Even if the future tense were acceptable, it would not be preferred within such a projection (i.e. the expectation), since will adds nothing in the way of vital meaning that the infinitive does not already convey.

I hope that helps clarify the matter. Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
avatar
filmpaniti
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2021
Last visit: 05 Feb 2022
Posts: 2
Location: Thailand
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 13 Dec 2021, 08:49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

I rejected choice E simply because 'and that they expected' is preceded by the comma, and I thought that when you have to parallel lists with and comma is not required. Can someone help clarify why 'said that...., and that....' is acceptable.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [2]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [2]
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 13 Dec 2021, 23:33
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
filmpaniti
Hi,

I rejected choice E simply because 'and that they expected' is preceded by the comma, and I thought that when you have to parallel lists with and comma is not required. Can someone help clarify why 'said that...., and that....' is acceptable.
Show more
Hi filmpaniti,

Generally speaking, although there are some things that the GMAT does test, like comma splices, it is actually quite risky to use most comma "rules" to eliminate options in GMAT SC questions. I'm not sure which rule you were trying to apply here, but you should not use it going forward.
User avatar
VIGHNESHKAMATH
User avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2021
Last visit: 21 Nov 2022
Posts: 151
Own Kudos:
53
Given Kudos: 259
Posts: 151
Kudos: 53
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 14 Dec 2021, 00:45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
Hello Everyone!

This is a great example of a GMAT question that focuses on consistent verb tense! Let's start by looking at the question carefully, and identify any major differences between the options by highlighting them in orange:

At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that there were about a million copies of Hollywood movies available online and expected piracy to increase with high-speed Internet connections that become more widely available.

(A) online and expected piracy to increase with high-speed Internet connections that become more widely available
(B) online and expect the increase of piracy with the wider availability of high-speed Internet connections
(C) online, and they expect more piracy to increase with the wider availability of high-speed Internet connections
(D) online, and that they expected the increase of piracy as high-speed Internet connections would become more widely available
(E) online, and that they expected piracy to increase as high-speed Internet connections became more widely available

Since we know that this question focuses mainly on verb consistency, here are a couple places we can focus on:

1. expected / expect
2. became available / become available / the wider availability of

To begin, we need to determine when these events take place: in the past, present, or future? Let's look at the entire sentence for clues:

At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that there were about a million copies of Hollywood movies available online and expected piracy to increase with high-speed Internet connections that become more widely available.

This takes place in 2001, which is clearly in the past! So, let's make sure all the verbs in each option reflect that:

(A) online and expected piracy to increase with high-speed Internet connections that become more widely available

This is INCORRECT because it uses the present tense "become" instead of the past tense "became." Since this all takes place in the past, it's best to keep all the verbs in some form of past tense!

(B) online and expect the increase of piracy with the wider availability of high-speed Internet connections

This is INCORRECT because it uses the present tense "expect" for an event that took place in 2001, which is clearly in the past and requires past tense verbs to match!

(C) online, and they expect more piracy to increase with the wider availability of high-speed Internet connections

Again, this is INCORRECT because it uses the present tense "expect" to describe a past event!

(D) online, and that they expected the increase of piracy as high-speed Internet connections would become more widely available

This is INCORRECT because it uses the present tense "become" to describe a past event.

(E) online, and that they expected piracy to increase as high-speed Internet connections became more widely available

This is CORRECT! It uses past tense verbs consistently throughout the sentence to indicate that everything in the sentence occurred in the past!


There you have it - option E is the best choice because it uses consistent verb tenses!


Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
Show more


I understand that below question is related in past, so ''expected'' and ''became'' is correct. Alternatively would below sentence be also correct?

"At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that there were about a million copies of Hollywood movies available online and that they expect piracy to increase as high-speed Internet connections become more widely available."

Can above sentence work , it projects into future by stating that high speed internet connection usage would increase in future, piracy would further increase. Will this work?
User avatar
jabhatta2
User avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,294
Own Kudos:
317
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,294
Kudos: 317
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 14 Dec 2021, 07:04
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hollywood Movies



(A) Parallelism (X and Y); Meaning

(B) Parallelism (X and Y); Meaning

(C) Meaning

(D) Verb / Meaning

(E) CORRECT



First glance

The clue here is very subtle. Each answer begins with the same two words (online and) but some choices place a comma between the two and some don’t. Something is going on with the structure of the sentence, which could be overall Sentence Structure or something more specific such as Parallelism or Modifiers. The word and indicates that the issue might be with Sentence Structure or Parallelism.



Issues

(1) Parallelism: X and Y

The original sentence contains this X and Y construction: there were a million copies … and expected piracy to increase.

The Y portion begins with a verb (expected), so the subject needs to come from the X portion. The X portion is an inverted sentence (the subject is placed after the verb), so the subject is a million copies—but it’s illogical to say that the copies expected piracy to increase. Logically, the representatives expected this. But representatives can’t be the subject for the Y portion; the structure of the sentence prohibits this:

Representatives said that there were a million copies … and expected piracy to increase.

This structure is Subject Verb THAT Subject Verb and Verb. In this construction, the first subject-verb pairing, before the word that, is essentially blocked off as its own structure. The and Verb parallelism cannot jump over the word that to go back to the first subject and verb. Answer (B) also has this same construction, so eliminate (A) and (B) for faulty parallelism.

The remaining choices all introduce an appropriate subject for the Y portion: the pronoun they, referring back to the representatives. The parallelism is now correct: representatives said X and Y, where X and Y are complete sentences. Look for another difference among the answers.

(2) Meaning / Verb

You may have noticed another issue in the original sentence. The final portion of the sentence is a bit unclear.

expected piracy to increase with high-speed Internet connections that become more widely available

The logical meaning is that, as high-speed Internet becomes more available, people will find it easier to download stolen content and, therefore, piracy will increase. In other words, one event causes the other.

The original sentence, however, does not actually state any kind of cause-effect relationship. It just says that both things are expected to happen at the same time. You’ve already eliminated choice (A), but check the remaining choices for this same issue.

(C) they expect more piracy to increase with the wider availability …

(D) they expected the increase of piracy as high-speed connections would become more widely available

(E) they expected piracy to increase as high-speed connections became more widely available

Answer (C) does have a meaning problem: more and increase mean the same thing, so it is redundant to use both words. It also uses the same with language as (A) and (B)—in other words, it doesn’t establish a cause-effect relationship. Eliminate (C) for faulty meaning.

Answers (D) and (E) both use as to indicate a cause-effect relationship. There are some other differences, though. First, examine expected the increase of piracy vs. expected piracy to increase. What’s the difference in meaning between She expected the increase of her salary and She expected her salary to increase?

In the first case, her salary already increased in the past (as she expected it to). In the second case, at some point in the past, she thought that her salary was going to increase in the future.

If the expected increase already occurred, as choice (D) says, then it’s not appropriate to say that high-speed connections would become more widely available. They must have already become more widely available in order for the increase in piracy to have occurred. Eliminate choice (D) for illogical meaning.

The Correct Answer

Correct answer (E) employs a parallel structure (representatives said X and Y). It also conveys a clear and logical meaning. The reps expected piracy to increase at some time in the future, after the reps made that statement, and this would occur because (as) high-speed Internet became more widely available.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,193
Own Kudos:
4,759
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,193
Kudos: 4,759
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 17 Dec 2021, 07:30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VIGHNESHKAMATH
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
Hello Everyone!

This is a great example of a GMAT question that focuses on consistent verb tense! Let's start by looking at the question carefully, and identify any major differences between the options by highlighting them in orange:

At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that there were about a million copies of Hollywood movies available online and expected piracy to increase with high-speed Internet connections that become more widely available.

(A) online and expected piracy to increase with high-speed Internet connections that become more widely available
(B) online and expect the increase of piracy with the wider availability of high-speed Internet connections
(C) online, and they expect more piracy to increase with the wider availability of high-speed Internet connections
(D) online, and that they expected the increase of piracy as high-speed Internet connections would become more widely available
(E) online, and that they expected piracy to increase as high-speed Internet connections became more widely available

Since we know that this question focuses mainly on verb consistency, here are a couple places we can focus on:

1. expected / expect
2. became available / become available / the wider availability of

To begin, we need to determine when these events take place: in the past, present, or future? Let's look at the entire sentence for clues:

At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that there were about a million copies of Hollywood movies available online and expected piracy to increase with high-speed Internet connections that become more widely available.

This takes place in 2001, which is clearly in the past! So, let's make sure all the verbs in each option reflect that:

(A) online and expected piracy to increase with high-speed Internet connections that become more widely available

This is INCORRECT because it uses the present tense "become" instead of the past tense "became." Since this all takes place in the past, it's best to keep all the verbs in some form of past tense!

(B) online and expect the increase of piracy with the wider availability of high-speed Internet connections

This is INCORRECT because it uses the present tense "expect" for an event that took place in 2001, which is clearly in the past and requires past tense verbs to match!

(C) online, and they expect more piracy to increase with the wider availability of high-speed Internet connections

Again, this is INCORRECT because it uses the present tense "expect" to describe a past event!

(D) online, and that they expected the increase of piracy as high-speed Internet connections would become more widely available

This is INCORRECT because it uses the present tense "become" to describe a past event.

(E) online, and that they expected piracy to increase as high-speed Internet connections became more widely available

This is CORRECT! It uses past tense verbs consistently throughout the sentence to indicate that everything in the sentence occurred in the past!


There you have it - option E is the best choice because it uses consistent verb tenses!


Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.


I understand that below question is related in past, so ''expected'' and ''became'' is correct. Alternatively would below sentence be also correct?

"At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that there were about a million copies of Hollywood movies available online and that they expect piracy to increase as high-speed Internet connections become more widely available."

Can above sentence work , it projects into future by stating that high speed internet connection usage would increase in future, piracy would further increase. Will this work?
Show more

Hello VIGHNESHKAMATH,

We hope this finds you well.

The sentence provided by you is still not correct, as it uses the simple past tense verb phrase "that there were", establishing that the representatives' statement refers to events that concluded in the past. Moreover, the use of the modifier "At the end of 2001" also establishes that the sentence refers ot past events; it would not make much sense to say that "At the end of 2001, representatives said that there are about a million copies of Hollywood movies available online."

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [1]
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 18 Dec 2021, 09:02
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
filmpaniti
Hi,

I rejected choice E simply because 'and that they expected' is preceded by the comma, and I thought that when you have to parallel lists with and comma is not required. Can someone help clarify why 'said that...., and that....' is acceptable.
Show more
We see questions like this all the time, and 100% agree with @AjiteshArun's response.

As we wrote earlier this week on another thread: in some cases, you absolutely NEED a comma. But in other cases, a comma might be used just to break up a long, confusing sentence. In those cases, it's best to be conservative and look for other decision points.

Check out the link above for other examples in which the correct answer uses "extra" commas for clarity.

I hope that helps a bit!
User avatar
Vaishali2004
User avatar
Joined: 29 Sep 2021
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 83
Own Kudos:
22
Given Kudos: 85
Schools: ISB '27 (WL)
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT 2: 640 Q46 V31
GMAT 3: 640 Q48 V31
GMAT 4: 700 Q45 V40
Schools: ISB '27 (WL)
GMAT 4: 700 Q45 V40
Posts: 83
Kudos: 22
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 03 Jan 2022, 06:28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone please explain how the usage of would is incorrect in option D?
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [3]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [3]
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 04 Jan 2022, 00:38
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vaishali2004
Can someone please explain how the usage of would is incorrect in option D?
Show more
Hi Vaishali2004,

This sentence tells us what the representatives expected (past) as something happened (also past). We don't need would as the past of will here. For example:

They expect piracy to increase as high-speed Internet connections become more widely available.
We should look at this as a process.

If we take the sentence above and shift it into the past, we get:
They expected piracy to increase as high-speed Internet connections became more widely available.
User avatar
EducationAisle
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 04 Jan 2022, 01:50
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vaishali2004
Can someone please explain how the usage of would is incorrect in option D?
Show more
There is an implicit cause and effect depicted in the usage of "as" here; incidentally, the effect ("they expected..") is mentioned before the cause ("high-speed Internet connections became more widely available...").

In such cases, "would/will" is almost never used in the "cause" part (this is also true for "conditional statements", primarily those that use "if").

For example:

As the pandemic spreads, people will get more cautious.
- Notice that this sentence is actually talking about "future", but still, does not use "will/would" in the "cause" part.

So, following would not be a great construct:

As the pandemic will spread, people will get more cautious.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [3]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [3]
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 29 Jan 2022, 09:23
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vaishali2004
Can someone please explain how the usage of would is incorrect in option D?
Show more
It's hard to talk about the use of "would" without looking at the rest of the sentence. First, check out this subtle difference between (D) and (E):

  • (E) "[motion picture industry representatives said] that they expected piracy to increase" - The representatives were expecting something to happen. But that something (an increase in piracy) hadn't happened yet when the action of "expecting" took place -- the representatives weren't sure whether piracy would actually increase.
  • (D) "[motion picture industry representatives said] that they expected the increase of piracy" - There's something funky about, "they expected THE increase." This makes the reader think, "wait, did this increase already happen, as the representatives expected it to? Or is the meaning the same as in choice (E)?" The intended meaning is now less clear, and that gives us one vote against (D).

The "would" makes this issue even worse. It implies that the high-speed Internet connections have not yet become more widely available (and that they WOULD become more widely available in the future). So if the "becoming more widely available" part hasn't happened yet, does that mean that the "increase of piracy" part hasn't happened yet either? Or, as described above, are we talking about THE increase that already happened?

Because "would" creates a meaning that's certainly confusing and arguably illogical, we can kill (D).

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Dinesh654
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2021
Last visit: 11 Aug 2024
Posts: 155
Own Kudos:
9
Given Kudos: 217
Status:In learning mode...
Location: India
GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27
Posts: 155
Kudos: 9
At the end of 2001, motion picture industry representatives said that 11 Apr 2022, 18:55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi experts, MartyTargetTestPrep mgmat GMATNinja egmat
In A, Is "that become" is correct?
because we are talking in past and become represents present- isn't it a tense mismatch?

In D, many people are saying "would become" is wrong?
How? beacuse it could be a case that representatives were thinking of a hypothetical case? makes sense to me!
we use would in past timeline to indicate a hypothetical case
How would is wrong here?
   1   2   3   4   5   6   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
miag
188 posts