Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Posts: 23
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.82
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)

Re: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been [#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Sep 2015, 22:57
B is the OE.
Premise: 20% students failed, 80% students passed. Premise: the NUMBER of students decreased by 10% from previous year.
CASE 1: in 1997, total number of students: 100 80 passed, 20 failed. No. of total students remain same in 1998 : So 0.1 of 80 = 8 decrease > 72 students passed. so % passed = 72 Hence no. of senior decreased.
CASE 2: in 1997, total number of students: 100 80 passed, 20 failed. No. of students increased : So again, 0.1 of 80 = 8 decrease > 72 students passed. Assuming there are 110 students now, % of students passed < 72 and AGAIN, no. of seniors decreased.
CASE 3: in 1997, total number of students: 100 80 passed, 20 failed. No. of students decreased : So again, 0.1 of 80 = 8 decrease > 72 students passed. Assuming there are 110 students now, % of students passed > 72 and AGAIN, no. of seniors decreased.
So under all circumstances, no. of seniors decrease or increase is NOT A SURE SHOT consideration.
B States otherwise. and hence B = OA



Manager
Joined: 07 Jun 2015
Posts: 85
WE: Design (Aerospace and Defense)

#Top150 CR: Beginning in 1997 high school seniors in State Q [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jan 2016, 09:33
This is a messed up question.
Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been required to pass a comprehensive proficiency exam before they are allowed to graduate.( it is some fact and let us move on)
The exam requirement was intended to ensure that a minimum level of academic quality will be achieved by the students in the state. ( it is some fact and let us move on)
In 1997, 20 percent of the seniors did not pass the exam and were, therefore, not allowed to graduate. (ok game begins.it says in 1997 20% were not allowed to graduate)
In 1998, the number of seniors who passed the exam decreased by 10% from the previous year.
(So in 1998 NUMBER of seniors decreased by 10%. Suppose there were total 100 seniors in 1997,80 were passed. So 808=72 passed in 1998.
Some facts 1.We dont know what % of seniors passed in 1998. 2.We don't know what is the number of seniors who did not pass in 1998. 3.We don't know total number of seniors in 1998
The argument above, if true, LEAST supports which of the following statement.
A. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam increased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors decreased during that time period.[color=#0000ff][/color]
It says IF % of students passed in 98 >% of students passed in 97,then total number of students in 98 is < total number of students in 97.
total students in 97=100 students passed in 97=80
Students passed in 98=808=72 total students in 98=X 72 is more than 80% of X. There fore X<100 So A is supported by argument and a is not the answer.
B. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam decreased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors increased during that time period.
It says IF % of students passed in 98 < % of students passed in 97,then total number of students in 98 is >total number of students in 97.
let us say
total students in 97=100 Students passed in 97=80 Students passed in 98=808=72 total students in 98=X If 72 is less than 80% of X which means
X should be > 90
If X is between 90 and 100,X need not increase.
So the part of the argument 'then total number of students in 98 is >total number of students in 97.' is wrong.
So B can be the answer.
C. Unless the number of high school seniors was lower in 1998 than in 1997, the number of seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was lower than 80 percent.
unless(this is a strong condition) total students in 98 (let us say X) is less than that in 97( 100),number of seniors who passed in 98 (72) should be less than 80% (These numbers are from calculation shown in B)
which means unless X < 100 then 72 should be less than 80% of X Actually this need not be correct.
If we take values of X from 99 91, then still 72 is less than 80% of X .
C can also can be the answer
D. If the number of high school seniors who did not pass the exam decreased by more than 10 percent from 1997 to 1998, the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was greater than 80 percent. Let us break the D
If the number of high school seniors who did not pass the exam decreased by more than 10 percent from 1997 to 1998,
passed in 97=80 Total in 98=X
did not pass decreased by 10%=passed increased by 10%
Passed in 98= 88
then the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was greater than 80 percent.
Which means 88 should be more than 80% of X. But we don know the value of X
this is not supported. Either
D can also be the answer
E. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was less than 70 percent, the number of high school seniors in 1997 was higher than the number in 1998.
total in 98=X
Students passed in 98=808=72
Those who passed in 98=less than 70% of X
Then minimum value of X=103
so “the number of high school seniors in 1997 was higher than the number in 1998”
E is supported so E is not the answer



Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2013
Posts: 110

Re: #Top150 CR: Beginning in 1997 high school seniors in State Q [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Feb 2016, 22:05
pkm9995109794 did a great job of breaking down each answer choice, but unfortunately he made a couple errors which led to not being able to answer the question. I do agree however, that this is a messed up question. I'll go through it in the same way and use the same numbers so we can all see where the differences are. Quote: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been required to pass a comprehensive proficiency exam before they are allowed to graduate. The exam requirement was intended to ensure that a minimum level of academic quality will be achieved by the students in the state. In 1997, 20 percent of the seniors did not pass the exam and were, therefore, not allowed to graduate. In 1998, the number of seniors who passed the exam decreased by 10% from the previous year. Firstly, let's pick a few numbers to make our lives easy. Let the total number of high school seniors in 1997 = 100 Then the number of high school seniors who passed in 1997 = 80 (given) Then the number of high school seniors who passed in 1998 = 72 (given, decrease of 10%) Let the total number of high school seniors in 1998 = x It needs to be noted here that the question is tricky in that it refers to the percentage of students who passed, and also to a percentage decrease in the number of students who passed. These are two different things. One previous poster incorrectly assumed that this meant that the percentage of students who passed in 1998 was 70%. That is not true. In fact we don't know what percentage of students passed in 1998. What we DO know is that the percentage of students who passed in 1997 = \(\frac{80}{100} = 80\%\) and that the percentage of students who passed in 1998 was \(\frac{72}{x}\). It will also be helpful to note that if x=90, then the percentage of students who passed in 1998 = \(\frac{72}{90} = 80\%\) This will be used as a reference when we evaluate the answer choices. Ok, the question: The argument above, if true, LEAST supports which of the following statements.A. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam increased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors decreased during that time period.This is saying that if \(\frac{72}{x}>80\%\), then x<100. Is this true based on the argument? \(\frac{72}{x}>80\%\) means \(x<\frac{72}{0.8}\) which means \(x< 90\). So x<100, the statement is supported by the argument above. DISCARDB. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam decreased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors increased during that time period.This is saying that if \(\frac{72}{x}<80\%\), then x>100. Is this true? Using the same logic as in A. we can see that here x>90. That means it MIGHT be greater than 100, but is not definitive. POSSIBLE ANSWER. C. Unless the number of high school seniors was lower in 1998 than in 1997, the number of seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was lower than 80 percent.This is a tricky one. The word "unless" is basically the opposite of "if", or can be read as "if not". So "unless A happens, B happens" should be read as "If not A, then B". Applied to the statement, it can be read as " If the number of high school seniors was NOT lower in 1998 than in 1997, then the number of seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was lower than 80 percent. Using our numbers, it looks like this: if \(x>100\), then \(\frac{72}{x}<80\%\) We know if x=90, then 72/x = 80%, so if x>100, then 72/x must be < 80%. Statement is supported by the argument above. DISCARDD. If the number of high school seniors who did not pass the exam decreased by more than 10 percent from 1997 to 1998, the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was greater than 80 percent.Number of students who did not pass the exam in 1997 = 20. If this number decreased by more than 10% then the number of students who did not pass the exam in 1998 < 18. (2010%=18) Therefore the number of students who did not pass the exam in 1998 = x72 < 18. Meaning x<90 And the percentage of students who passed the exam in 1998 was greater that 80%. \(\frac{72}{x}>80\%\), and x<90. This is true, supported by the argument above. DISCARDE. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was less than 70 percent, the number of high school seniors in 1997 was higher than the number in 1998.If \(\frac{72}{x}<70\%\), then 100>x If \(x>\frac{72}{0.7}\), then x<100 If \(x>102\), then \(x<100\). Obviously false. This statement cannot be true based on the argument above.But now we have a problem. Answer choice B is only partially supported by the argument, and answer choice E is contradicted by the argument. The way the question is phrased, "The argument above, if true, LEAST supports which of the following statements." could be interpreted as "Which of the following statement IS supported by the argument above, but supported the least". That way one could argue that B is the answer. But I don't think that is the correct interpretation of the question, and I'm not sure you can support less than by contradicting, which would suggest to me that the correct answer should be E, not B. There could also possibly be a typo in answer choice E, swapping 1997 and 1998 in the second half of the statement. That would result in the statement being fully supported by the argument and the answer would then be a unanimous B. Can anyone find an error in my analysis? By the way, to do this in under 2 minutes would take some serious powers of time manipulation... Cheers
_________________
Dave de Koos GMAT aficionado



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 6218

Re: #Top150 CR: Beginning in 1997 high school seniors in State Q [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Feb 2016, 23:17
Hi, davedekoos wrote: pkm9995109794 did a great job of breaking down each answer choice, but unfortunately he made a couple errors which led to not being able to answer the question. I do agree however, that this is a messed up question. Q argument may not be messed up but, the OA is actually messed up..Quote: But now we have a problem. Answer choice B is only partially supported by the argument, and answer choice E is contradicted by the argument. The way the question is phrased, "The argument above, if true, LEAST supports which of the following statements." could be interpreted as "Which of the following statement IS supported by the argument above, but supported the least". That way one could argue that B is the answer. But I don't think that is the correct interpretation of the question, and I'm not sure you can support less than by contradicting, which would suggest to me that the correct answer should be E, not B. The Requirement "The argument above, if true, LEAST supports which of the following statements." does convey that the choice is likely to be supported in whatever little way. So, B comes close to that requirement. But E is totally incorrect, overtaking B as the most appropriate choice but may not exactly fit into the requirement. So my take would be that E was not intended by the source as it has turned out to be and, errorneously, 1997 has been mentioned as 1998 and viceversa.
_________________
1) Absolute modulus : http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolutemodulusabetterunderstanding210849.html#p1622372 2)Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html 3) effects of arithmetic operations : https://gmatclub.com/forum/effectsofarithmeticoperationsonfractions269413.html
GMAT online Tutor



Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1289

Re: #Top150 CR: Beginning in 1997 high school seniors in State Q [#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Feb 2016, 03:07
This question definitely needs fixing. As others have suggested, switching the years in E would easily make B the answer. If E is really the intended answer, then the question would need to clearly ask for an answer that "MUST BE FALSE." This is not something we'd usually see on the GMAT. In any case, when we're asked for an answer that is "least supported," there should really be four supported answers and one unsupported answer. The relative language "least" is just used to protect the testwriters in case we think of some slight exception or odd interpretation that might make two answers seem valid.
_________________
Dmitry Farber  Manhattan GMAT Instructor  New York
Manhattan GMAT Discount  Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews  View Instructor Profile  Manhattan GMAT Reviews



Intern
Joined: 15 Nov 2015
Posts: 45

Re: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been [#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Apr 2016, 06:44
you can think of a least possible scenario as an except scenario. courtesy of powerscore CR guide. So Question rephrased : all choices support except one doesn't follow from the argument. Year Pass Fail Total 97 80 20 100 98 72 ? ? A. %HSS who passed increased from 97 to 98 > total number of HSS decreased from 97 to 98 we know number of HSS who passed decreased from 80 to 72. Only way % can increase is the total decrease! B. %HSS who passed decreased from 97 to 98 > total number of HSS increased from 97 to 98 if you think of it this is the inverse logic of A. So this should not be supported. the total number need not decrease for the %HSS to decrease. It can stay the same and still decrease. from our example with total as 100 in 1998 as well. % of HSS who passed is 72%. Decreased but total stays the same. C. if total number of seniors who passed in 1998 was greater than or equal to 80%> number of seniors was lower in 1998 than in 1997. Only way for % of seniors who passed be greater than 72% in 1998 is if the total number of people decrease. Similar logic to A. D. if number of HSS who failed decreased by more than 10% from 1997 to 1998 > % of HSS who passed in 1998 was greater than 80%. So number of people who failed in 1998 decreased by more than 2 from our premise. So the number decreased to 17,16,15...etc.. So total is 72+17=89, or 88 , or 87....(72/90 =80%) so in all the scenario the percentage of people who passed will be greater than 80%. E. % of people who passed was less than 70% in 1998> number of seniors was higher in 97 than in 98. How can % be less than 70% in 1998? only if total number increase. if total decreased % will only increase! So option is definitely not supported. E for me....



Intern
Joined: 02 Mar 2016
Posts: 12

Re: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been [#permalink]
Show Tags
20 May 2016, 23:43
sanjuro9 wrote: adhiraj wrote: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been required to pass a comprehensive proficiency exam before they are allowed to graduate. The exam requirement was intended to ensure that a minimum level of academic quality will be achieved by the students in the state. In 1997, 20 percent of the seniors did not pass the exam and were, therefore, not allowed to graduate. In 1998, the number of seniors who passed the exam decreased by 10% from the previous year. The argument above, if true, LEAST supports which of the following statement. A. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam increased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors decreased during that time period. B. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam decreased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors increased during that time period. C. Unless the number of high school seniors was lower in 1998 than in 1997, the number of seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was lower than 80 percent. D. If the number of high school seniors who did not pass the exam decreased by more than 10 percent from 1997 to 1998, the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was greater than 80 percent. E. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was less than 70 percent, the number of high school seniors in 1997 was higher than the number in 1998. Please provide an explanation with actual numbers. OA:1997 80% passed, 20% failed 1998 number who passed decreased by 10% from number who passed in 1997 Both in 1997 and 1998 we don't know what was the number of students. Lets start by taking a number for 1997, say 100 students appeared and 80 passed, 20 failed. In 1998, we 'll have 10% fewer passing than 1997, so 72 passed the exam. Now, lets look at the choices. A  If the percentage of students who passed increased in 1998... so 72 is > 80% of x (x being number of students in 1998. 72 > 0.8x or x<90 so Choice A is valid. Note that the question stem asks for LEAST possible conclusion. B  %passing decreased. so, 72/x*100 < 80 or 72/x < 0.8 or x>90. x could be 91 or 120. Don't know. C  Not necessarily true. Number of students can remain the same, say 100 and the number of students passing is less than 80%, ie. 72%. D  We know that the number of students passing the exam decreased by 10%, lets not evaluate this. E  The percentage of passing students in 1998 would be less than 70% is when number of students in 1998 is greater than number of students in 1997. >102 to be precise. Answer would (E) As in case of B, the conclusion may or may not be true depending upon how much the percentage has decreased. In case of E the number of students in 1997 can not be greater than that in 1998. This analysis would take more than 510 minutes. What's the source and are you sure the OA is B? What's the explanation at the source? for answer option E), if 72 is less than 70%, then total number must be greater than 100. So, E is valid. Answer B is correct.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 6218

Re: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2016, 08:19
adhiraj wrote: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been required to pass a comprehensive proficiency exam before they are allowed to graduate. The exam requirement was intended to ensure that a minimum level of academic quality will be achieved by the students in the state. In 1997, 20 percent of the seniors did not pass the exam and were, therefore, not allowed to graduate. In 1998, the number of seniors who passed the exam decreased by 10% from the previous year. The argument above, if true, LEAST supports which of the following statement. A. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam increased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors decreased during that time period. B. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam decreased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors increased during that time period. C. Unless the number of high school seniors was lower in 1998 than in 1997, the number of seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was lower than 80 percent. D. If the number of high school seniors who did not pass the exam decreased by more than 10 percent from 1997 to 1998, the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was greater than 80 percent. E. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was less than 70 percent, the number of high school seniors in 1997 was higher than the number in 1998. Please provide an explanation with actual numbers. OA:Hi, Responding to a PM... Lets take a friendly number to check on choices.. Total seniors in 1997 = 100... 80 passed and 20 failed.. 1998  Total = T... Passed = 90% of 80 = 72 and failed = F... lets check the statements  A. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam increased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors decreased during that time period.% in 1997 = 80%, and % in \(1998 = \frac{72}{T}\).... \(\frac{72}{T}\) > 80%.... \(\frac{72}{T}> \frac{80}{100} ..... T < 72*\frac{100}{80}.... T<90\)... so YES the number of high schools seniors decreased from 100 to LESS than 90 during that time period B. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam decreased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors increased during that time period.% in 1997 = 80%, and % in 1998 = 72/T.... \(\frac{72}{T} < 80\)%....\(\frac{72}{T}< \frac{80}{100} ..... T > 72*\frac{100}{80}.... T>90...\) so YES if the number of high schools seniors was 91 and NO if it was 101 or 110 etc.. So this may not be TRUE everytime.... C. Unless the number of high school seniors was lower in 1998 than in 1997, the number of seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was lower than 80 percent.let T< 100..... so 72/T <80/100..... T>90..... so if T is between 90 and 100... ans is NO...% <80... if T is <90... ans is YES > 80% again Can be TRUE of FALSE.. D. If the number of high school seniors who did not pass the exam decreased by more than 10 percent from 1997 to 1998, the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was greater than 80 percent.% in 1997 = 80%, and % in \(1998 = \frac{72}{T}\).... so # failed in 1997 = 20, and in 1998 #<18, say 17, so T = 72+17 = 89<90.. \(\frac{72}{(<90)}=x\) .... so x> 80%. so YES the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was greater than 80 percent. E. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was less than 70 percent, the number of high school seniors in 1997 was higher than the number in 1998.so \(\frac{72}{T}<\frac{70}{100}..............T> 72*\frac{100}{70}.......... T> 102...\) so clearly ans is NO in every case.. Now we have B and C, which may be TRUE or FALSE, and E, which will always be FALSE.. so cleraly E is least supported...OA given is B and many have found B to be correct.. But answer should be E, unless we mean LEAST supported means that the choice should be supported a bit but not completely.. And I do not think that should be the meaning
_________________
1) Absolute modulus : http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolutemodulusabetterunderstanding210849.html#p1622372 2)Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html 3) effects of arithmetic operations : https://gmatclub.com/forum/effectsofarithmeticoperationsonfractions269413.html
GMAT online Tutor



Director
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 607

Re: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2016, 09:44
Thank you for replying to my private message Chetan This is exactly what my answer was appearing.. No matter what numbers I used I was getting option E as the least supported one. I don't know why B is the OA. Anyway I will go stick to my answer and your mathematical proof and mark Option E as correct. Thanks again chetan2u wrote: adhiraj wrote: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been required to pass a comprehensive proficiency exam before they are allowed to graduate. The exam requirement was intended to ensure that a minimum level of academic quality will be achieved by the students in the state. In 1997, 20 percent of the seniors did not pass the exam and were, therefore, not allowed to graduate. In 1998, the number of seniors who passed the exam decreased by 10% from the previous year. The argument above, if true, LEAST supports which of the following statement. A. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam increased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors decreased during that time period. B. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam decreased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors increased during that time period. C. Unless the number of high school seniors was lower in 1998 than in 1997, the number of seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was lower than 80 percent. D. If the number of high school seniors who did not pass the exam decreased by more than 10 percent from 1997 to 1998, the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was greater than 80 percent. E. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was less than 70 percent, the number of high school seniors in 1997 was higher than the number in 1998. Please provide an explanation with actual numbers. OA:Hi, Responding to a PM... Lets take a friendly number to check on choices.. Total seniors in 1997 = 100... 80 passed and 20 failed.. 1998  Total = T... Passed = 90% of 80 = 72 and failed = F... lets check the statements  A. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam increased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors decreased during that time period.% in 1997 = 80%, and % in \(1998 = \frac{72}{T}\).... \(\frac{72}{T}\) > 80%.... \(\frac{72}{T}> \frac{80}{100} ..... T < 72*\frac{100}{80}.... T<90\)... so YES the number of high schools seniors decreased from 100 to LESS than 90 during that time period B. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam decreased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors increased during that time period.% in 1997 = 80%, and % in 1998 = 72/T.... \(\frac{72}{T} < 80\)%....\(\frac{72}{T}< \frac{80}{100} ..... T > 72*\frac{100}{80}.... T>90...\) so YES if the number of high schools seniors was 91 and NO if it was 101 or 110 etc.. So this may not be TRUE everytime.... C. Unless the number of high school seniors was lower in 1998 than in 1997, the number of seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was lower than 80 percent.let T< 100..... so 72/T <80/100..... T>90..... so if T is between 90 and 100... ans is NO...% <80... if T is <90... ans is YES > 80% again Can be TRUE of FALSE.. D. If the number of high school seniors who did not pass the exam decreased by more than 10 percent from 1997 to 1998, the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was greater than 80 percent.% in 1997 = 80%, and % in \(1998 = \frac{72}{T}\).... so # failed in 1997 = 20, and in 1998 #<18, say 17, so T = 72+17 = 89<90.. \(\frac{72}{(<90)}=x\) .... so x> 80%. so YES the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was greater than 80 percent. E. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was less than 70 percent, the number of high school seniors in 1997 was higher than the number in 1998.so \(\frac{72}{T}<\frac{70}{100}..............T> 72*\frac{100}{70}.......... T> 102...\) so clearly ans is NO in every case.. Now we have B and C, which may be TRUE or FALSE, and E, which will always be FALSE.. so cleraly E is least supported...OA given is B and many have found B to be correct.. But answer should be E, unless we mean LEAST supported means that the choice should be supported a bit but not completely.. And I do not think that should be the meaning
_________________
Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly. FINAL GOODBYE : 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017  I am back but for all purposes please consider me semiretired.



Intern
Joined: 19 Oct 2014
Posts: 44
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25 GMAT 2: 670 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.26
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)

Re: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Oct 2016, 08:45
"E. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was less than 70 percent, the number of high school seniors in 1997 was higher than the number in 1998. If the % of students who passed the exam in 1998 was less than 70% i.e. the total number of students would be more more than 100 because 72 is 72% of 100. For the % to be less than 70, the total number of students should be more than 100. True. Answer (B)" Karishma madam, Can you explain this If the % of students who passed the exam in 1998 was less than 70% i.e. the total number of students would be more more than 100 because 72 is 72% of 100. For the % to be less than 70, the total number of students should be more than 100.The text marked in red refers to the number of students in 1998 or 1997 ? It me it looks it should refer to the number in 1998.
_________________
"Don't be satisfied with stories, how things have gone with others. Unfold your own myth."Rumi
Consider hitting on kudos button for a sec, if this post helps you.



Intern
Joined: 18 Jul 2016
Posts: 1

Re: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Oct 2016, 09:24
Capricorn369 wrote: This is a tough one but i'll share my 2 cents.
1997  80% pass/ 20% fail. 1998  72% pass/ 28% fail. (becasue the number of seniors who passed the exam decreased by 10% from 1997)
After reading options we can observe that only option (B) talks inline with the facts  If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam decreased from 1997 to 1998. Rest all talks weird/inconsistent number or percentage.
Let me know your thoughts. Cheers! Hey dude. The question is which of the following is least supported by the argument, meaning option B is least consistent with the question, the rest can be correctly inferred from the argument. Go home and read the question first.



Intern
Joined: 26 Jun 2016
Posts: 23
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.25

Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been [#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Feb 2017, 08:55
To simplify the argument, let assume total number of seniors in 1997 is 100:
In 1997, 20% seniors did not pass the exam > 80% pass > it is 80 pass against 100 in total In 1998, number of passed senior decreased 10% (of 80) > it is 72 pass against "X" in total => If ratio of passed senior in 1998 equals to that in 1997, then X = 72/80% = 90 If X > 90, then 1998's ratio <80% If X <90, then 1998's ratio > 80%
We have to eliminate all the answer choices which the above results support or partially support toward:
A/ If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam increased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors decreased during that time period. If 72/X > 80%, then X<100 <=> If X<90, then X<100 (yes, it is always true) SUPPORT
B/ If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam decreased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors increased during that time period. If 72/X <80%, then X>100 <=> If X>90, then X >100 (Yes, It is true in many cases, but if 100>X>90 it is false) PARTIALLY SUPPORT
C/ Unless the number of high school seniors was lower in 1998 than in 1997, the number of seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was lower than 80 percent. It means if X>=100, then 72/X <80% <=> If X>=100, then X>90 (yes, it is always true) SUPPORT
D/ If the number of high school seniors who did not pass the exam decreased by more than 10 percent from 1997 to 1998, the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was greater than 80 percent. It means if the number of nopassed senior (say "n") <18, then (Xn)/X >80% (opp! with variety value of "X" and "n" we know that it can be true or false) PARTIALLY SUPPORT
E/If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was less than 70 percent, the number of high school seniors in 1997 was higher than the number in 1998. If 72/X <70%, 100 > X <=> If X >102.8, then 100> X (wow! it is totally false) CORRECT ANSWER
It is such the time killer, all about math and easy to be confused, so I wont take time to resolve this kind of question in real test.



Manager
Joined: 04 Dec 2016
Posts: 57
Location: India
GPA: 3.8
WE: Operations (Other)

Re: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been [#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Feb 2017, 11:28
+1 E.
Guessed right. :D
Nice explanations!



Intern
Joined: 25 Feb 2017
Posts: 6

Re: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been [#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Mar 2017, 11:03
Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been required to pass a comprehensive proficiency exam before they are allowed to graduate. The exam requirement was intended to ensure that a minimum level of academic quality will be achieved by the students in the state. In 1997, 20 percent of the seniors did not pass the exam and were, therefore, not allowed to graduate. In 1998, the number of seniors who passed the exam decreased by 10% from the previous year.
The argument above, if true, LEAST supports which of the following statement.
A. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam increased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors decreased during that time period. B. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam decreased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors increased during that time period. C. Unless the number of high school seniors was lower in 1998 than in 1997, the number of seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was lower than 80 percent. D. If the number of high school seniors who did not pass the exam decreased by more than 10 percent from 1997 to 1998, the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was greater than 80 percent. E. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was less than 70 percent, the number of high school seniors in 1997 was higher than the number in 1998.
How can the answer be E? Please help



Intern
Joined: 25 Feb 2017
Posts: 6

Re: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been [#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Mar 2017, 11:06
Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been required to pass a comprehensive proficiency exam before they are allowed to graduate. The exam requirement was intended to ensure that a minimum level of academic quality will be achieved by the students in the state. In 1997, 20 percent of the seniors did not pass the exam and were, therefore, not allowed to graduate. In 1998, the number of seniors who passed the exam decreased by 10% from the previous year.
The argument above, if true, LEAST supports which of the following statement.
A. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam increased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors decreased during that time period. B. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam decreased from 1997 to 1998 , the number of high schools seniors increased during that time period. C. Unless the number of high school seniors was lower in 1998 than in 1997, the number of seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was lower than 80 percent. D. If the number of high school seniors who did not pass the exam decreased by more than 10 percent from 1997 to 1998, the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was greater than 80 percent. E. If the percentage of high school seniors who passed the exam in 1998 was less than 70 percent, the number of high school seniors in 1997 was higher than the number in 1998.
How can the answer be E? Please explain approach



Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 669

Re: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been [#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Mar 2017, 21:54
Merging topics. Please, search questions before creating a discussion.
_________________
Please Read: Verbal Posting Rules



Intern
Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 16

Re: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been [#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Mar 2017, 12:05
Hi experts,
kindly help us with the above question



GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1824
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46 GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51

Re: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Apr 2017, 14:08
Aketa, please see the above explanations if you haven't already  and I particularly agree with DmitryFarber.
_________________
GMAT Club Verbal Expert  GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!)  GMAT blog  Food blog  Notoriously bad at PMs
Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal Reading Comprehension  Critical Reasoning  Sentence Correction
YouTube LIVE verbal webinars Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR  Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset
SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations All QOTDs  Subscribe via email  RSS
Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button  and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
Sentence Correction articles & resources How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC  That "ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb  That "ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either  NoBS Guide to GMAT Idioms  "Being" is not the enemy  WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?
Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club  Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC 7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores  How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99  Time management on verbal



Director
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 674
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33 GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)

Re: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been [#permalink]
Show Tags
02 May 2017, 07:36
took 4 min 45 seconds but got correct answer Answer should be E. . My go : Passed / fail 1997 : 80/20  suppose 100 people are there. 1998 : 72/ ?  Don't know how many people are there but we know only 72 people passed. A B C D  can be true in some cases . but E can never be true . Answer E.




Re: Beginning in 1997, high school seniors in State Q have been
[#permalink]
02 May 2017, 07:36



Go to page
Previous
1 2 3
Next
[ 50 posts ]



